Error Correction: An Indication of Consciousness Raising
Bu çalışmanın amacı yapı odaklı öğretimin ve dönüt türünün öğrenme üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemektir. Deney grubundaki öğrencilere hatalarına dair düzeltici dönütler verilmiştir. Bu dönütler; yönlendiriciler, ifadelerin daha netleştirilmesinin istenilmesi, tekrarlatmalar, öğrenciden cevabın alınması ve dilötesi ipuçları şeklinde sağlanmıştır. Ancak, kontrol grubuna aynı eğitim verilmesine rağmen, bu geribildirimlerin hiçbiri sağlanmamıştır. 15 oturumluk (30 saat) uygulama süresince, katılımcılara hedeflenen dil yapılarını kullanmaları için farklı sınıf içi görevler verilmiştir. Korelasyon katsayısı ve t-test aracılığı ile yapılan veri analizi sonuçları, deney grubundaki katılımcıların kontrol grubundakilere oranla daha başarılı olduğunu göstermektedir.
The aim of this study was to explore the effects of form-focused instruction and feedback type on learning. The learners in treatment group received corrective feedback in the form of prompts, including clarification requests, repetitions, elicitations, and meta-linguistic clues while the learners in the control group received the same instruction as the experimental group without any kind of feedback. The participants were assigned different tasks in order to use the aimed structures during the 15 treatment sessions (30 hours). The analysis of the data done through correlation coefficient and t-test indicated the outperformance of the participants in experimental group over the performance of the participants in control group.
___
Andrews, S. (2007). Teacher language awareness. Cambridge: CUP.Askew, S., & Lodge, C.(2000). Gifts, ping-pong and loops-linking feedback and learning. In S. Askew (Ed.) (pp. 1-17). Feedback for learning. London: Routledge / Falmer.
Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinning of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language acquisition (pp. 206-257). Cambridge: CUP.
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143– 188.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: OUP.
Ellis, R. (2001). Investigating form-focused instruction. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Form-focused instruction and second language learning (pp.1-46). New York:
Blackwell. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fowler, W. S., & Coe, N. (1976). Nelson English language tests. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons LTD.
Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldmann, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55 (4), 575-611.
Kim, J. H. (no date). Issues of corrective feedback in SLA. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 4 (2), 1-24.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Second language acquisition and second language learning. New York: Prentice Hall.
Levine, G. S. (2003). Student and instructor beliefs and attitudes about target language use, first language use, and anxiety: Report of a questionnaire study. Modern Language Journal, 87, 343–364.
Lightbown, P. M. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-195). Cambridge: CUP.
Lightbown, P. M. (2003). SLA research in the classroom/SLA research for \the classroom. Language Learning 28, 4-13.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned. Oxford: OUP.
Loewen, S. (2007). Error correction in second language acquisition. Clear News, 11 (2), 1-7.
Loewen, S. (2004). Uptake in incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Language Learning, 54 (1), 153-188.
Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. R. & T. J. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468).
San Diego : Academic Press. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on forms: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-42). Cambridge: CUP.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 19 (1), 399-432.
Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing, and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27 (3). 405-430.
Nassaji, H. (2007). Elicitation and reformulation and their relationship with learner repair in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 57 (4), 511-548.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Form-focused instruction and second language learning (pp. 157-213). New York:
Blackwell. Rutherford, W. (1984). Language universals and second language acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Rutherford, W., & SharWood Smith, M. (1985). Consciousness-raising and universal grammar. Applied Linguistics, 6 (3), 274-282.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17-46.
Scutt, V. M., & Fueute, M. J. (2008). What’s the problem? L2 learners’ use of the L1 during consciousness-raising, form-focused tasks. The Modern language journal, 92 (1), 100-113.
Sheen, Y. H. (2004). Classrooms across instructional settings: Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative. Language Teaching Research. 8 (3), 263-300.
Toth, P.D. (2006). Processing instruction and a role for output in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 56 (2), 319-385.
Trofimovich, P., & Gatbonton, E. (2006). Repetition and focus on form in processing L2 Spanish words: Implications for pronunciation instruction. The Modern Language Learning, 90 (4), 519-535.
Truscott, J. (1998). Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review. Second Language Research, 14 (2), 103-135.
Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London: Longman.
Walter, T. (2004). Teaching English language learners. London: Longman.
- ISSN: 1307-4733
- Yayın Aralığı: Yıllık
- Başlangıç: 2007
- Yayıncı: -
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler
Classroom Interaction Mediated by Gender and Technology: The Language Laboratory Course
Nematullah SHOMOOSSI, Mohammad AMOUZADEH, Saeed KETABI
The Effect of the Relationship between Learning and Teaching Strategies on Academic Achievement
ARİF SARIÇOBAN, Aysel SARICAOĞLU
Metaphorical Conceptualizations of an Adult EFL Learner: Where Old Concepts are Impregnable
The Role of L1 in L2 Acquisition: Attitudes of Iranian University Students