Effects of CDA Instruction on EFL Analytical Reading Practices

Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce okumasına yönelik söylem tabanlı yaklaşımlar, öğrencilerin pasif rollerini 'metinlere karşı dayanıklı' hale getirmektedir. Bu makale, Najran Üniversitesi Hazılık Sınıfı erkek öğrencilerinde Eleştirel Söylem Analizinin Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce analitik okuma uygulamalarını ne derecede geliştirdiğini incelemektedir. Bu çalışma, bir Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce sınıfında Eleştirel Söylem Analizi analiz düzeylerini (metin analizi, söylem analizi ve eleştirel söylem analizi) kullanmaktadır. Bu yarı deneysel calışma tasarımında, bir okuma sınıfından veri toplamak için uygulama öncesinde ve sonrasında bir anket ve bir test kullanılmıştır. Uygulama öncesinde, sınıfta okuma geleneksel yöntemlerle öğretilirken, uygulama sırasında sınıfta Eleştirel Söylem Analizi talimatları kullanılmıştır. Hem anket hem de testten toplanan veriler eşleştirilmiş örnek t-testi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar her analitik uygulamada, yani metin analizinde (tanımlama), söylem analizinde (yorumlama) ve eleştirel söylem analizinde (açıklama), istatistiksel anlamlıklık göstermektedir. Ön ve son testlerin ve anketlerin korelasyon analizi eleştirel söylem analizinde istatiksel olarak anlamlıklık göstermektedir (.019). Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce okuma sınıflarında eleştirel kültürlerarası farkındalığı geliştirmek için Eleştirel Söylem Analizinin rolü hakkında daha fazla araştırma yapılması önerilmektedir

Eleştirel Söylem Analizi Talimatlarının Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce Analitik Okuma Uygulamaları Üzerine Etkileri

Discourse-based approaches to EFL reading have shifted the students` passive role to become ‘text resistant’. This paper examines the extent to which Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) enhances analytical reading practices in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) reading context among Preparatory Year students at Najran University. The paper operationalizes CDA levels of analysis (namely, text analysis, discourse analysis, and critical discourse analysis) in an EFL reading classroom. In this quasi-experimental design, a questionnaire and a test were used to collect data from a reading class before and after the interventional program. Prior to the treatment, the class was taught reading through traditional methods, whereas in the treatment stage, the class was conducted using CDA instruction. The data collected from both the questionnaire and the test were analyzed using the paired sample t-test. The results showed statistical significance in each analytical practice: text analysis (description), discourse analysis (interpretation), and critical discourse analysis (explanation). The correlation analysis of the pre- and post- tests and questionnaires showed a statistical significance in the critical discourse analysis (.019). Further research on the role of CDA in fostering critical intercultural awareness in an EFL reading classroom is suggested

___

  • Abbasian, G. R., & Malaee, N. (2016). The Effect of Critical Discourse Analysis Instruction on Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension and Orientation. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(17), 1-20.
  • Al-Homoud, F., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Extensive reading in a challenging environment: A comparison of extensive and intensive reading approaches in Saudi Arabia. Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 383-401.
  • Al-Musallam, E. I. (2009). College instructors’ and learners’ attitudes to authentic EFL reading materials in Saudi Arabia.Unpublished PhD dissertation. King Saud University.
  • Al Ghazali, F. (2007). Critical discourse analysis: How can awareness of CDA influence teaching techniques? TESOL Arabia.
  • Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge language assessment series: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Alshumaimeri, Y. (2011). The effects of reading method on the comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 185.
  • Amari, F. Z. (2015). The role of critical discourse analysis in EFL teaching/learning. Frontiers of Language and Teaching, 6, 87-93.
  • Azman, H., Bhooth, A. M., & Ismail, K. (2013). Readers reading practices of EFL Yemeni students: recommendations for the 21st century. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies, 13(3), 63-78.
  • Bredl, S., Winker, P., & Kötschau, K. (2012). A statistical approach to detect interviewer falsification of survey data. Survey methodology, 38(1), 1-10.
  • Carrell, P. L. (1988). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference in ESL reading. Interactive approaches to second language reading, 101-113.
  • Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching: A guide for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Cots, J. M. (2006). Teaching ‘with an attitude’: Critical Discourse Analysis in EFL teaching. ELT Journal, 60(4), 336-345.
  • Dar, Z. K., Shams, M. R., & Rahimi, A. (2010). Teaching reading with a critical attitude: Using critical discourse analysis (CDA) to raise EFL university students’ critical language awareness (CLA). International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 3(2).
  • Dellinger, B. (1995). Finnish views of CNN television news: a critical cross-cultural analysis of the American commercial discourse style. Wasaensis: Universitas Wasaensis.
  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London and New York: Longman.
  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London Edward Arnold.
  • Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406
  • Hammond, K. (2006). More than a game: A critical discourse analysis of a racial inequality exercise in Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 545-571.
  • Hashemi, M. R., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2012). Critical discourse analysis and critical thinking: An experimental study in an EFL context. System, 40(1), 37-47.
  • Huckin, T. N. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. Miller (Ed.), Functional approaches to written text: Classroom Applications.Washington: United States Information Agency.
  • Janks, H. (1997). Critical discourse analysis as a research tool. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 18(3), 329-342.
  • Jdetawy, L. F. A. (2011). Problems Encountered by Arab EFL Learners. Language in India, 11(3).
  • Kang, H. (2007). A Case study: Comparing reading strategies of advanced CFL learners on different genres and media of text. Retrieved 21/1/2017, from Education: 1st Place (The Ohio State University Edward F. Hayes Graduate Research Forum http://hdl.handle.net/1811/31925
  • Kashkuli, F. R., Ghanbari, N., & Abbasi, A. (2016). The effect of Van Dijk discourse strategies on Iranian EFL learners' writing proficiency. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(4), 819.
  • Khabiri, M., & Pakzad, M. (2012). The effect of teaching critical reading strategies on EFL learners’ vocabulary retention. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 31(1), 73-106.
  • Kirn, & Hartmann. (2012). Reading Interactions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Ko, M.-y. (2013). A critical discourse analysis of EFL learners’ post-reading reflections in a critical literacy-based class. English Linguistics Research, 2(2), 1-14.
  • Macknish, C. J. (2011). Understanding critical reading in an ESL class in Singapore. TESOL Journal, 2(4), 444-472.
  • Nezami, S. R. A. (2012). A critical study of comprehension strategies and general problems in reading skill faced by Arab EFL learners with special reference to Najran University in Saudi Arabia. International Journal Social Science and Education, 2(3), 306-316.
  • Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 329-348.
  • Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Lawerance Erlbaum: Mahwah.
  • Rahimi, E., & Sharififar, M. (2015). Critical discourse analysis and its implication in English language teaching: A case study of political text. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(3), 504.
  • Rahimi, S. (2013). Promoting the Reading Comprehension of High-School Students through Critical Discourse Analysis. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 3(4), 56.
  • Rajabi, P. (2009). Cultural orientation and reading comprehension models: the case of Iranian rural and urban students. Novitas-Royal, 3(1), 75-82
  • Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice: Cambridge university press.
  • Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & Joseph, G. O. G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of educational research, 75(3), 365-416.
  • ur Rahman, M. M., & Alhaisoni, E. (2013). Teaching English in Saudi Arabia: prospects and challenges. Academic Research International, 4(1), 112.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 1-37). London: Sage.
  • Wallace, C. (1992). Critical literacy awareness in the EFL classroom. Critical language awareness, 59-92.
  • Winch, G., Johnston, R. R., March, P., Ljungdahl, L., & Holliday, M. (2006). Literacy: Reading, Writing and Children's Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Yu-hui, L., Li-rong, Z., & Yue, N. (2010). Application of Schema Theory in Teaching College English Reading. Canadian Social Science, 6(1), 59.