Okul Öncesi Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimsel Kavramların İçselleştirmesinde Grafikleri Zihin Aracı Olarak Kullanmaları

Bu çalışma okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının topladıkları verileri anlamada bir zihin aracı olarak grafikleri nasıl kullandıklarını ve grafik kullanımının öğretmen adaylarının bilimsel kavramları içselleştirmesini nasıl kolaylaştırdığını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yirmi altı okul öncesi öğretmen adayı çalışmaya katılmıştır. Araştırma verileri katılımcı gözlem tekniği ile toplanmıştır. Gözlemler ve gözlem esnasında sınıfta öğrenciler arasında meydana gelen konuşmalar alan notları biçiminde kaydedilmiştir. Bu çalışma verilerin analizi ve yorumlanmasında Vygotsky’nin sosyo-kültürel kuramını temel almıştır. Sonuçlar grafik kullanımının bilişsel yükü azaltarak ve örüntü tanılama ve örüntüden sonuç çıkarma gibi yüksek düzey zihinsel fonksiyonların işlemesini sağlayarak okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının hedeflenen bilimsel kavramları anlamalarını kolaylaştırdığını göstermiştir.

Preservice Early Childhood Teachers Use of Graphs as Mental Tools in Internalizing Scientific Concepts

The purpose of this study was to examine how preservice early childhood teachers used graphs as a mental tool in a science methods course to make sense of their data and how graph use facilitated preservice teachers’ internalization of scientific concepts. Twenty-six preservice early childhood teachers participated in the study. Data were collected through participant observation technique. Field notes were kept to record observations and discourse taking place during the classroom observations. The current study utilized a Vygotskian framework in the analysis and the interpretation of the study data. The results demonstrated that using the graph as a mediating tool facilitated preservice teachers’ understanding of the targeted science concepts by organizing their data in a way that could reduce the burden of cognitive load to process information, which made it possible for higher psychological functions, such as seeing patterns and deriving conclusions from the pattern, to operate more efficiently. 

___

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn and Bacon MA:Boston.
  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
  • Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York: Longman.
  • Hewson, P., W. (2004). Resources for science learning: Tools, tasks, and environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 201-225.
  • Hobson, S. M., Trundle, K. C., & Saçkes, M. (2010). Using a planetarium software program to promote conceptual change with young children. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 165-176.
  • Jones, M. G., Rua, M. J., & Carter, G. (1998). Science teachers’ conceptual growth within Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 967-985.
  • Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2001). Preschool teachers’ content knowledge in science: Their understanding of elementary science concepts and of issues raised by children’s questions. International Journals of Early Years Education, 9(3), 165-179.
  • Lemke, J., L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296-316.
  • Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359-377.
  • Macbeth, D. (2000). On an actual apparatus for conceptual change. Science Education, 84(2), 228-264.
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
  • Renshaw, P., & Brown, R. A. J. (2007). Formats of classroom talk for integrating everyday and scientific discourse: Replacement, interweaving, contextual privileging and pastiche. Language and Education, 21(6), 531-549.
  • Roald, I., & Mikalsen, O. (2001) Configuration and dynamics of the Earth-Sun-Moon system: An investigation into conceptions of deaf and hearing pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 423-440.
  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford Univeristy Press.
  • Roth, W., & Bowen, G. M. (1999). Of cannibals, missionaries, and coverts: Graphing competencies from grade 8 to professional science inside (classrooms) and outside (field/laboratory). Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24(2), 179-212.
  • Schoultz, J., Saljo, R., & Wyndhamn, J. (2001). Heavenly talk: Discourse, artifacts, and children’s understanding of elementary astronomy. Human Development, 44, 103-118.
  • Trundle, K. C., Saçkes, M., Smith, M. M., & Miller, H. L. (2012, September). Preschoolers’ ideas about day and night and objects in the sky. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Congress on Early Childhood Education. Adana, Turkey, September 12-15.
  • Wells, G., & Claxton, G. (2002). Introduction: Sociocultural perspective on the future of education. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.). Learning or life in the 21st century (pp.1-18). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Vygotsky, L. V. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychologicalprocess. (edited by, M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman).Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Za’rour, G. I. (1976). Interpretation of natural phenomena by Lebanese school children. Science Education, 60(2), 277-287.