KÜRESEL İKLİM DEĞİŞİKLİĞİNİN İNTERNET HABERLERİNDE ÇERÇEVELENMESİ

Bu araştırmanın amacı internette okunan haberlerde küresel iklim değişikliğine yönelik haberlerin nasıl çerçevelendiğini inceleyip bunun kamuoyundaki risk algısı ile ilişkisinin nasıl olabileceğini tartışmaktır. Bu amaçla 20-27 Mart 2018 tarihleri arasında Google News sitesinde “küresel ısınma “ ve “iklim değişikliği” kodlarıyla aratılan 41 haber incelenmiştir. MAXQDA 18 programı kullanılarak çerçeve ve içerik analizi yapılmıştır. Bunun sonucunda haberlerin felaket beklentisi odaklı olduğu ve daha çok bireysel çözümler ortaya koyduğu gözlenmiştir. Bu da haberlerin tutarsız algılanmasına yol açıyor olabilir, bu sebepten daha geniş ölçekte ve kapsamlı bir çerçeve kurulabilir.  

FRAMING CLIMATE CHANGE NEWS ON INTERNET MEDIA

This study aims to identify how online news frame climate change and argue the relations between these frames and risk perception of public. In order to collect data, “climate change” and “global warming” phrases were searched on Google news website between 20-27th of March 2018. 41 news from different websites were identified. The news were analysed by using MAXQDA 18. Results showed that the news use catasthropic future expectations and indiviual responsobility frame more than the other frames. This situation might lead to confusion, because if the future is that in darkness, how only individual level action prompts as the main solution. Therefore, broader frames can be more helpful to raise public awareness.

___

  • Boykoff, M. T. (2007). From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(4), 477–489.
  • Carvalho, A., & Burgess, J. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1457–1469.
  • Cılızoğlu, G. Y., & Sayımer, İ. (2009). Yazılı Basında Risk Algısının Oluşturulma Süreci: Küresel Isınma Örneği. Marmara İleşim Dergisi, 15, 7–21.
  • Demircan, M., Turan, N., Arabacı, H., Coşkun, M., Türkoğlu, N., & Çiçek, İ. (2016). Gündem Belirleme Modeline Göre Yazılı Basındaki İklim Değişikliği Haber Ve Köşe Yazılarının Analizi.
  • Dickson, R. G., Kays, S., Law, S., & Eiteman, M. (1992). Abatement of ethylene by ozone treatments in controlled atmosphere storage of fruits and vegetables. Presented at the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Meeting (USA).
  • Driedger, S. M. (2007). Risk and the media: A comparison of print and televised news stories of a Canadian drinking water risk event. Risk Analysis, 27(3), 775–786.
  • Edwards, D., & Henderson, C. (2000). Can we trust the media on the environment? Ecologist, 30(4), 22–25.
  • Hannigan, J. A. (1995). Environmental sociology: A social constructionist perspective. Taylor & Francis US.
  • Joffe, H. (1999). Risk and’the Other’. Cambridge University Press.
  • Liberatore, A. (1997). The integration of sustainable development objectives into EU policy-making. The Politics of Sustainable Development, Baker S, Kousis M, Richardson D, Young S (Eds). Routledge: London, 107–126.
  • Marisa Dispensa, J., & Brulle, R. J. (2003). Media’s social construction of environmental issues: focus on global warming–a comparative study. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 23(10), 74–105.
  • Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23.
  • Sampei, Y., & Aoyagi-Usui, M. (2009). Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan’s national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environmental Change, 19(2), 203–212.
  • Schudson, M. (2002). The news media as political institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), 249–269.
  • Schwarz, M., & Thompson, M. (1990). Divided we stand: re-defining politics, technology and social choice. University of Pennsylvania Press.