Erkan ÇALIŞKAN, Salih BARDAKCI, Necmettin TEKER

Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında algılanan sosyalleşme ölçeğinin bilgisayar destekli ortaklaşa öğrenme ortamlarına yönelik yapı geçerliği

Bu araştırmanın amacı Kreijns, Kirshner, Jochems ve VanBuuren (2007) tarafından geliştirilen ve Bardakcı (2010) tarafından Türk kültürü ve çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarına yönelik olarak uyarlanan Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Ortamlarında Algılanan Sosyalleşme Ölçeği’nin (ÇASÖ) yapı geçerliğinin bilgisayar destekli ortaklaşa öğrenme (BDDÖ) ortamında sınanmasıdır. ÇASÖ tek faktör altında toplanan ve tamamı toplam puana olumlu yönde katkı sağlayan beşli Likert tipinde 10 maddeden oluşmaktadır. Araştırma verileri Ankara, Gazi, Marmara ve Van Yüzüncü Yıl üniversitelerine devam etmekte olan ve 2008-2009 öğretim yılında ortak bir BDOÖ uygulamasına katılan 158 lisans öğrencisinden elde edilmiştir. Veriler üzerinde doğrulayıcı faktör analizi çalışmaları gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre ÇASÖ BDOÖ ortamında da Kreijns ve arkadaşları (2007) ve Bardakcı (2010) tarafından ortaya konulan yapıyı aynen korumaktadır. Araştırmada ÇASÖ maddelerine ilişkin olarak hem Cronbach Alfa iç tutarlık hem de Sperman-Brown iki yarı test güvenirlik katsayıları .92 düzeyinde bulunmuştur.

Construch validity of the scale of the perceived sociability of online learning environment in computer supported collaborative learning environments

Abstract The main aim of the study is to test construct validity of “The Scale of The Perceived Sociability of Online Learning Environment (SPSO)”, developed by Kreijns, Kirshner, Jochems and VanBuuren (2007) and adapted to Turkish culture for online learning environments by Bardakci (2010) in computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments. The scale consists of ten five-point-Likert type items under a single factor, and all of the items positively contribute to the total score. The research data is collected from 158 undergraduates from Ankara University, Gazi University, Marmara University and Van Yuzuncu Yil University, participating in a CSCL environment application in the 2008-2009 academic year. Confirmatory factor analysis is applied to the obtained data. According to results SPSO exactly maintains the construct shown by Kreijns and et al. (2007) and Bardakci (2010) in CSCL environments. In the research, both The Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient and The Sperman-Brown split- half coefficient of the scale items are found as .92.

PDF

___

Abedin, B. (2011). Investigating the trend of non-task social interactions in online collaborative learning environments. 44th Hawaii International Conference on System, Hawaii, USA Kongresinde sunulmuş bildiri.
Abedin, B., Daneshgar, F. ve D’Ambra, J. (2011). Students’ communicative behavior adaptability in CSCL environments. Education and Information Technologies, 16, 227–244.
Barab, S., MaKinster, J.G., Moore, J.A., Cunningham D.J. ve The ILF Design Team. (2001). Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49 (4), 71–96.
Baran, B. (2007). A case study of online communities of practice for teacher education: motivators, barriers and outcomes. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Ensititüsü, Ankara.
Bardakcı, S. (2010). Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamında algılanan sosyalleşme ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 43 (1), 17-40.
Barkhi, R., Jacob, V. S. ve Pirkul, H. (1999). An experimental analysis of face-to-face versus computer mediated communication channels. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 325–347.
Bentler, P. M. ve Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32, 47–83.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. istatistik, araştırma deseni spss uygulamaları ve yorum (6. baskı). Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Crook, C. (1998). Children as computer users: The case of collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 30, 237-247.
Çalışkan, E. (2005). Bilgisayar destekli ortaklaşa öğrenmede grup yapısının öğrencilerin görev başarısı üzerindeki etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve Lisrell uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Dennis, A. R., Hilmer, K. M. ve Taylor, N. J. (1997). Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision-making: Effects of minority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 61–88.
Dewiyanti, S., Brand-Gruwel, S., Jochems, W. ve Broers, N.J. (2007). Students experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 496–514.
Fjermestad, J. (2004). An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research.Decision Support Systems, 37 , 239–263.
Hair, F. H; Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R.E. ve Tahtam, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th edition). New jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tahtam, R. L. ve Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th Edition). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Hassanein, K. ve Head, M. (2004). Instilling social presence trough the web interface. Third Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS, Washington D.C, USA Kongresine Sunulmuş Bildiri.
Hobaugh, C. F. (1997). Interactive strategies for collaborative learning. The Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning: Competition Connection- Collaboration (pp. 121–125) University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA Kongresinde sunulmuş bildiri.
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P.A. ve Kanselaar, G. (2010). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition Learning,SpringerLink doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9061-5.
Jarvela, S., Hakkinen, P., Arvaja, M. ve Leinonen, P. (2004). Instructional support in CSCL. Editör J.W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner ve R. L. Martens, What we know about CSCL (pp. 115-139). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Johnson, D. L. (1997). The effect of task difficulty on accounting-based decisions in face-to-face versus computer-mediated group settings: An experimental investigation. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University,Texas.
Jöreskog, K. G. ve Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications.Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. ve Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. Editör D. Gilbert, S.Fiske ve G. Lindzey, Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233-265). New York:McGraw-Hill.
Kirschner, P. A., Martens, R. L. ve Strijbos, J. W. (2004). CSCL in higher education? Editör J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner ve R. L. Martens, What we know about CSCL (pp. 3-30). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kirschner, P.A. ve Kreijns, K. (2005). Enhancing sociability of computer supported collaborative learning environments. Editör R. Bromme, F.W. Hesse ve H. Spada, Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication (pp. 169-191). New York, NY: Springer.
Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge.
Kline, P. (2000). The handbook of psychological testing (Second edition). London and Newyork: Routledge.
Kreijns, K. (2004). Sociable CSCL environments social affordances, sociability, and social presence. Maastricht: Datawyse boek-en Grafische Producties.
Kreijns, K. ve Kirschner, P.A. (2004). Designing sociable CSCL environments. Editör J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner ve R. L. Martens, What we know about CSCL (pp. 221-243). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A. ve Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 5 (1), 8-22.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A. ve Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335–353.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W. ve VanBuuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer- supported colloborative learning environments.Computers & Education 49, 176–192.
Lee, J. ve Lee, H. (2010). The computer-mediated communication network: Exploring the linkage between the online community and social capital. New Media &Society, 12 (5), 711–727.
Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K. ve Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and orientations of CSCL. Editör J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner ve R. L. Martens, What we know about CSCL (pp. 221-243). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P.C. ve d’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449-521.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R. ve McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103,391-410.
Peters, S. (2007). Online collaborative learning for high school students: Using a blended approach for the promotion of self-monitoring skills. National Educational Computing Conference, Atlanta, USA Kongresine Sunulmuş Bildiri.
Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability: Twenty years of chatting online. Behavior and Information Technology Journal, 20 (5), 347-356.
Rovai, A. P. (2001). Classroom community at a distance: A comparative analysis of two ALN-based university programs. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 105–118.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C. ve Lamon, M. (1994). The CSILE Project: Trying to bring the classroom into World 3. Editör K. McGilley, Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Strijbos, J.W. (2011). Assessment of (computer-supported) collaborative Learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4 (1), 59-73.
Suter, V. (2011). I am here–are you there? Sense of presence and implications for virtual world design. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pepperdine University Graduate School of Education and Psychology, California.
Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: temel kavramlar ve örnek uyugulamalar.Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74.
Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik modellemesine giriş temel ilkeler ve LISRELL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinox.
Tabachnick, B. C. ve Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th edition).Needha Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Tu, C. H. (2000). On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. Journal of Network and Computer Application, 23(1), 27-37.
Yamada, G. ve Pandey, S. (1995). Effect of sample size on goodness-of-fit indices in structural equation models. Journal of Social Service Research, 20(3/4), 49-70.