Tunus Medina Çarşılarının Mimari Mekanlarının Resistatif Özellikleri Üzerine Bir İrdeleme

Geleneksel kentlerin ayrılmaz bir parçası olan çarşılar, kent yapılaşmasının çeşitli zaman dilimlerindeki mimari özelliklerini yansıtan, aynı zamanda ticaret aktivitelerinin yanısıra kent içi iletişimin gerçekleştiği mekanlar bütünüdür. Çeşitli mekansal deneyimler aracılığıyla kent belleğinin kazındığı geleneksel çarşıların kültürel süreklilikleri, günümüzde kentlerin hızlı mekansal değişimleri karşısında tehdit altındadır. Bu çalışma, Dünya Kültür Mirası olan Tunus Medina çarşılarının küreselleşme karşısındaki direnişlerinin önemini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Kimlik, miras ve kolektif belleğin üçlü ilişkisinden ortaya çıkan kavramsal bir kültürel süreklilik modeli ortaya konmuş ve bu modeli desteklemek üzere bir alan çalışması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçta, Tunus Medina geleneksel çarşıları, kapitalist ticaret karşısında, kültürel sürekliliğini korumasına yardımcı olan çeşitli resistatif özelliklerini halen devam ettirebilmektedir.

Resistive Traits of the Tunisian Medina Bazaars’ Architectural Spaces in the Globalized World

In ancient times, bazaars were an integral part of the city life; bifurcating from the city structure and reflecting each period of time’sarchitectural characteristics. It is also said that they are the source of 20 communications and trade activities. However, due to the quickchanges in the cities’ spatial configurations that we are living in, these traditional spaces started to run a risk of possible cultural continuityalteration. But, despite the disturbing contradiction which is affecting their traditional allure, they still reflect an undying identity. They arestill talking about the engraved cultural memory thro ugh several architectural traits and spatial experiences. This paper aims to highlightthe significance of the 25 Medina of Tunis bazaars’ resistance against globalization. The present study case analysis lead to a conceptualframing of cultural continuity’s model being a tripartite relation between identity, heritage and collective memory. Through this research,it had been concluded that several resistance traits witness that the Medina of Tunis is still showing a cultural continuity able to counterthe market capitalization.

___

  • Abdelkafi, J, (1989). La Medina de Tunis Espace historique, CNRS press.
  • Ardalan, N, (1980). “Places of public gathering”, proceedings of seminar five in the series, Architectural transformation in the Islamic world, Jordan.
  • Augé, M, (2010). «Retour sur les « non-lieux ». In: Communications, 87, pp. 171-178, URL: http://www.persee.fr/doc/ comm_0588-8018_2010_num_87_1_2631, put online on 03/06/2016, p 2, [accessed 02 September 2016].
  • Augé, M, (2010). «Retour sur les « non-lieux ». In: Communications, 87, pp. 171-178, URL: http://www.persee.fr/doc/ comm_0588-8018_2010_num_87_1_2631, put online on 03/06/2016, p 2, [accessed 02 September 2016].
  • Eldemery Mostafa, I, (2009). “Globalization challenges in architecture”, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, Vol. 26, No. 4,Theme Issue: Work Beyond Boundaries (Winter, 2009), pp. 343-354, Locke Science Publishing Company, Inc, URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43030883, [accessed: 27 October 2016], p. 5.
  • Erll, A, (2011). Memory in culture, Palgrave Macmillon, US, p, 18.
  • Escher, A. and Schepers, M., (2007). Revitalizing the Medina of Tunis as a national symbol, (CRISSMA) Centro di Ricerche sul Sistema Sud e il Mediterraneo Allargato, working paper N°12.
  • Jan, A, (2008). “Communicative and cultural memory”, (Ansgar Nünning (Hg.), Cultural Memory Studies. An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook, Berlin, New York, 109-118.
  • Khalfoune, T, (2005). « Le Habous, le domaine public et le trust ». In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 57 N°2, 441-470. URL: , [accessed on 05 Juin 2016].
  • Koca K. S. (2010). “Tunus’un Medinaları’nda Mekansal bir deneyim: Dokular, Renkler, İzler”, Mimarlık Tasarım Kültür Sanat, Ocak 2010.
  • Mouhli, Z. Bejaoui, F. and Gazzah, A. Tunis patrimoine vivant conservation et créativité, ASM (association of safegarding of the Medina) 1980-2012.
  • Mouhli, Z., (2014). Industries créatives et régénération urbaine dans la Médina de Tunis, MEDNETA project, (ASM) Association for Safeguarding of the Medina of Tunis.
  • Nooraddin, H, (2012). “Architectural Identity in an Era of Change”, Developing Country Studies Journal, Vol.2, N°10, p. 2.
  • Pellegrin, A, (1952). Le vieux Tunis, les noms de rues de la ville arabe, Espace Diwan, 38-47.
  • Saadaoui, A, (2010). Tunis ville Ottomane trois siècles d’urbanisme et d’architecture, Centre de publication universitaire, Tunis, p. 67.
  • Santelli, S., (1995). La ville le creuset méditerranéen Tunis, Demi- Cercle Edition, CNRS.
  • Santelli, S., (1995). La ville le creuset méditerranéen Tunis, Demi- Cercle Edition, CNRS.
  • Santelli, S., Medinas Traditional architecture of Tunisia, Dar Ashraf Editions, Tunis.
  • Temple, N, “Cultivating architecture”, (2012). Emmons, P, Hendrix, J and Lomholt, J, The cultural Role of Architecture contemporary and historical perspectives, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, London and New York.
  • Tomlinson, J, (2003). “Globalization and cultural identity”, p. 3.
  • Tomlinson, J, (2003). “Globalization and cultural identity”, URL: , [accessed on 2nd of November 2016], p. 1.