Fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotiplerinin moleküler karakterizasyonu

Fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Leguminosae familyası içerisinde yer almakta ve Dünyada yaygın olarak yetiştirilmektedir. Ülkemizde baklagil grubu sebzeler içerisinde önemli türlerden biridir. Bu çalışmada; Burdur sınırları içerisinde biri standart çeşit olmak üzere toplam 12 fasulye genotipinin moleküler açıdan karakterizasyonlarının yapılması amaçlanmıştır. Genotipler yerel fasulye yetiştiren çiftçilerden kış döneminde toplanmıştır. Yüksek polimorfizm üretebilen Amplified Fragment Lenght Polymorphism (AFLP) markörleri ve bireysel bitkilerden alınan DNA örnekleri kullanılarak yerel genotipler arasındaki genetik farklılıklar ortaya konulmuştur. AFLP’den elde edilen amplifikasyon ürünleri skorlanmış, ve tum genotipler için benzerlik matriksi Dice coeficient metodu kullanılarak Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariete Analysis System (NTSYS-pc) programı yardımıyla hesaplanmıştır. Bulunan benzerlik katsayıları 0.178-0.713 arasında değişim göstermiştir. Bu koefficient değerlerine göre yapılan gruplandırmada iki ana grup oluşmuştur. Sonuçlar toplanan fasulye genotiplerinin Phaseolus vulgaris’in genel genetik varyabilitesini gösterdiklerini ve bu materyallerin çoklu orijinlere sahip olduklarını ve bu yüzden ıslah programlarında varyasyon kaynağı olarak önemli bir potansiyele sahip olduklarını göstermektedir

Molecular characterization of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes

Received 13 May 2013 Received in revised form 1 July 2013 Accepted 10 July 2013 Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), a member of Leguminosae family, is widely cultivated in the world. It is one of the most important legume species in Turkey. This study was conducted to characterize 11 common bean genotypes and a standard cultivar commonly cultivated in Burdur province. Genotypes were collected from local bean growing farmers. Highly polimorphic Amplified Fragment Lenght Polymorphism (AFLP) markers were used to determine the genetic differences among the genotypes using DNA extracted from the leaves of each genotype. The amplification products from AFLP reactions were scored and the similarity matrix for all genotypes was obtained with Dice coefficient method using NTSYSpc program. The similarity coefficients ranged from 0.178 to 0.713. Based on these coefficient values, two main clusters were obtained. The results suggest that the collected bean genotypes truly represent the overall genetic variability of Phaseolus vulgaris, confirming the multiple origins of these materials, and their potential as a source of variation for breeding programs.

___

  • Balkaya A (1999) Karadeniz Bölgesindeki Taze Fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Gen Kaynaklarının Toplanması, Fenolojik ve Morfolojik Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi ve Taze Tüketime Uygun Tiplerin Teksel Seleksiyon Yöntemi ile Seçimi Üzerinde Araştırmalar. Doktora Tezi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsüi, Samsun.
  • Broughton WJ, Hernández G, Blair M, Beebe S, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J (2003) Beans (Phaseolus spp.) - Model food legumes. Plant Soil 252: 55-128.
  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13-15.
  • Fabio LM, Sergio E, Lee TSG, Flipe GG (2003) Genetic relationships and diversity among Brazilian cultivars and land races of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) revealed by AFLP markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50: 887–893.
  • Gepts P (1998) Origin and evolution of common bean: Past events and recent trends. HortScience 33:1124-1130.
  • Gepts P, Beavis WD, Brummer EC, Shoemaker RC, Stalker HT, Weeden NF, Young ND (2005) Legumes as a model plant family. Genomics for food and feed report of the cross-legume advances through genomics conference. Plant Physiology 137: 1228 – 1235. Koinange EMK, Singh SP, Gepts P (1996) Genetic control of the domestication syndrome in common-bean. Crop Science 36:103710
  • Kumar V, Sharma S, Kero S, Sharma S, Sharma AK, Kumar M, Bhat KV (2008) Assessment of genetic diversity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Scientia Horticulturae 116: 138–143.
  • Lioi L, Piergiovanni AR, Pignone D, Pugliesi S, Santantonio M, Sonnante G (2005) Genetic diversity of some surviving on-farm Italian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces. Plant Breeding 124: 576–581.
  • Maciel FL, Echeverrigaray S, Gerald LTS, Grazziotin FG (2003) Genetic relationships and diversity among Brazilian cultivars and landraces of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) revealed by AFLP markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50: 887– 8
  • Mantel (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209–220. Maras
  • M, Šuštar-Vozlic J, Javornik B, Meglic V (2008) The efficiency of AFLP and SSR markers in genetic diversity estimation and gene pool classification of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Acta Agriculturae Slovenia 91:87-96.
  • Piergiovanni AR, Taronto G, Lasavio PF, Pignone D (2004) Commonbean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces from Abruzzo and Lazio regions (Central Italy). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 00: 1-10.
  • Pillen K, Binder A, Kreuzkam B, Ramsay L, Waugh R, Förster J, Leon J (2000) Mapping new EMBL-derived barley microsatellites and their use in differentiating German Barley cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 652-660.
  • Rohlf FJ (2000) NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 2.1. Exeter Software, Setauket, New York..
  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman and Co., San Francisco
  • Svetleva D, Pereira G, Carlier J, Cabrata L, Leitao J, Genchev D (2006) Molecular characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes included in Bulgarian collection by ISSR and AFLP TM analyses. Scientia Horticulture 109:198–200
  • Tan A, Açıkgöz N (2002) In situ and on-farm conservation of legume landraces in Turkey. In Report of a Working Group on Grain Legumes. Third Meeting, 5-7 July 2001, Krakow, Poland (L. Maggioni, M. Ambrose, R. Schachl, G. Duc and E. Lipman, compilers). pp. 117-120, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.