The effects of different agents preferred for general anesthesia on lactate and liver enzymes in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The effects of different agents preferred for general anesthesia on lactate and liver enzymes in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of different agents used for anesthesia maintenance on liver enzymes and lactate changes in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using CO2 pneumoperitoneum with constant pressure. Seventy-five patients planned to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation have been randomly divided into 3 groups. Liver function tests have been evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively in the 24th hour. Arterial blood samples for lactate level determination were obtained: (T_1) immediately before pneumoperitoneum, (T_2) 10 min after pneumoperitoneum, (T_3) 30 min after pneumoperitoneum, (T_4) 60 min after desufflation of CO2. Patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation. The possible effects of different agents used for anesthesia maintenance on liver enzymes and lactate changes in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In comparison of lactate values, there were no differences between the three groups in T_1, T_2 and T_4 measurements (P=0.059, P=0.108, P=0.225). However, in the T_3 measurements, lactate values are lower in the Group P, compared to Group S and D (P=0.001, P=0.001). Postoperative AST and ALT values are lower in the Group P, compared to Group S and D (P

___

  • 1. Himal HS. Minimally invasive ( laparoscopic ) surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;8:265-70.
  • 2. Lal P, Agarwal PN, Malik VK, et al. A difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy that requires conversion to open procedure can be predicted by preoperative ultrasonography. JSLS. 2002;6:59-63.
  • 3. Meftahuzzaman SM, Islam MM, Chowdhury KK, et al. Haemodynamic and end tidal CO2 changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia. Mymensingh Med J. 2013; 22:473-477.
  • 4. Alijani A, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Abdominal wall lift versus positive pressure capnoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2004;239:388-94.
  • 5. Henny CP, Hofland J. Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum. Surg. Endosc. 2005;19:1163-71.
  • 6. Saber AA, Laraja RD, Nalbandian HI, et al. Changes in liver function tests after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: not so rare, not always ominous. Am Surg. 2000;66:699-702.
  • 7. Morino M, Giraudo G, Festa V. Alterations in hepatic function during laparoscopic surgery. An experimental clinical study. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:968-72.
  • 8. Sakorafas G, Anagnostopoulos G, Stafyla V, et al. Elevation of serum liver enzymes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. N Z Med J. 2005;118:U1317.
  • 9. Hasukic S, Kosuta D, Muminhodzic K. Comparison of postoperative hepatic function between laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Med Princ Pract. 2005;14:147-50.
  • 10. Schilling MK, Redaelli C, Krähenbühl L, et al. Splanchnic microcirculatory changes during CO2 laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184:378-82.
  • 11. Diebel L, Wilson R, Dulchavsky S, et al. Effect of increased intra-abdominal pressure on hepatic arterial, portal venous and hepatic microcirculatory blood flow. J Trauma. 1992;33:279-82.
  • 12. Hasukic S. Postoperative changes in liver function tests: randomized comparison of low and high-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1451-5.
  • 13. Giraudo G, Brachet Contul R, Caccetta M, et al. Gasless laparoscopy could avoid alterations in hepatic function. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:741-6.
  • 14. Guven HE, Oral S. Liver enzyme alterations after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007;16:391-4
  • 15. Halevy A, Gold-Deutch R, Negri M, et al. Are elevated liver enzymes and bilirubin levels significant after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the absence of bile duct injury? Ann Surg. 1994;219:362-4.
  • 16. Tan M, Xu FF, Peng JS, et al. Changes in the level of serum liver enzymes after laparoscopic surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:364-7.
  • 17. Jakimowicz J, Stultiens G, Smulders F. Laparoscopic insufflation of the abdomen reduces portal venous flow. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:129-32.
  • 18. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, et al. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1121-243.
  • 19. Singal R, Singal RP, Sandhu K, et al. Evaluation and comparison of postoperative levels of serum bilirubin, serum transaminases and alkaline phosphatase in laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;6:479-86.
  • 20. Bickel A, Weiar A, Eitan A. Evaluation of liver enzymes following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are they really elevated? J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1418-21.
  • 21. Ibraheim OA, Samarkandi AH, Alshehry H, et al. Lactate and acid base changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2006;18:757-68.
  • 22. Ortiz-Oshiro E, Mayol J, Aparicio Medrano JC, et al. Lactate metabolism during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison between CO2 pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall retraction. World J Surg. 2001;25:980-4.
  • 23. Meierhenrich R, Gauss A, Mühling B, et al. The effect of propofol and desflurane anaesthesia on human hepatic blood flow: a pilot study. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:1085-93.
  • 24. Zhu T, Pang Q, McCluskey SA, et al. Effect of propofol on hepatic blood flow and oxygen balance in rabbits. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55:364-70.
Medicine Science-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0634
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Effect Publishing Agency ( EPA )
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Does MiRNA gene expression predict gastric cancer stage and localization?

ÖNDER ÖZCAN, Ahmet Korkut BELLİ, SELAMİ ILGAZ KAYILIOĞLU, ÖZGÜR İLHAN ÇELİK, MEHMET KAPLAN, Murat KARA, Murat POLAT

The evaluation of two different surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty according to the patient satisfaction, plantar pressure distribution and trendelenburg sign

Ahmet YILDIRIM, Tacettin AYANAOĞLU, MUSTAFA ÖZER, Erdinç ESEN, Ulunay KANATLI, Selçuk BÖLÜKBAŞI

Smoking patterns and cessation counseling practices among physicians in Turkey

Çiğdem TEKİN, GÜLSEN GÜNEŞ, Erkay NACAR, Burak METE, Ertan UNVER

Synthesis and the effect of a novel benzoxazole compound on breast cancer cell line

FUNDA KOSOVA, Özlem TEMİZ ARPACI, ERCÜMENT ÖLMEZ, MEHMET İBRAHİM TUĞLU

Risk of adenomyosis according to the type of previous uterine surgery

Gamze YILMAZ, EMRE ERDEM TAŞ, AYŞE FİLİZ YAVUZ

The risks and benefits of non-predictive splenectomy: The necessity of splenectomy and early postoperative outcomes

YUSUF GÜNAY, İLHAN TAŞDÖVEN

Evaluation of the association between gross motor function classification system levels and implementation of home programs in children with cerebral palsy

Filiz Çiledağ ÖZDEMİR

The impact of anatomical, prosthetic features, and implant location on quality of life among locator-retained mandibular overdenture wearers

GÜLER YILDIRIM AVCU

Can bevacizumab administered together with beta radiation in treatment of pterygium play a role in additive effect and/or treatment of the side effects?

Yasemin BENDERLİ CİHAN, Fatma BAĞCI

Analysis of the dermatoglyphics of patients with obstructive sleep apnea

MUSTAFA CANBOLAT, HİLAL ERMİŞ, FURKAN ÇEVİRGEN, DENİZ ŞENOL, TURGAY KARATAŞ, Evren KÖSE, DAVUT ÖZBAĞ