We investigated the reliability of multi-vessel off-pump coronary artery by-pass surgery in patients who have low risk profile. This study included 53 patients who undergone off-pump coronary artery by-pass surgery. Patients have been allocated two groups in terms of graft count. 1 and 2 vessel patients were defined as Group A and 3,4,5 vessel patients as Group B. Baseline and serial post-operative CK-MB values were obtained. Ejection fraction (LVEF), mitral-myocardial systolic velocities (lateral S’ and septal S’), mean E’, left ventricle filling pressure index (E/E’ ratio) and tricuspid-S’ were calculated at pre and postoperative period. Intensive care unit stay time was moderately correlated with pre mean E’ (r = -0.32, p=0.020) and pre E/E’ ratio (r = 0.34, p=0.013). ∆ CK-MB values were similar between two groups (p=0.263). There are no differences between groups in terms of ∆ LVEF, ∆ mean E’, ∆ lateral S’ and ∆ tricuspid S’. ∆ E/ E’ ratio was mildly in favour of group A patients (-2.31 ± 2.70 vs. -0.29 ± 2.89, p=0.007). Furthermore, ∆ septal S’ was slightly in favour of group A patients (0.71 ± 2.39 cm/s vs. -0.66 ± 1.73 cm/s, p=0.017). Multi-vessel off-pump coronary artery by-pass surgery seems as safe as 1 and 2 vessels despite small differences in terms of cardiac function alterations in patients who have low risk profile.
___
Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, et al. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in beating heart against cardioplegic arrest studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): A pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2002;359:1194-9.
Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Contini M, et al. Myocardial revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in multivessel disease: Impact of the strategy on early outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 72:456-62.
Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia (MCSPI) Research Group. Effects of acadesine on the incidence of myocardial infarction and adverse cardiac outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:658-73.
Alwan K, Falcoz PE, Alwan J, et al. Beating versus arrested heart coronary revascularization: evaluation by cardiac troponin I release. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:2051-5.
World Health Organization. Diabetes Mellitus: A Report of a WHO Study Group (WHO publication no. 727). World Health Organization, Geneva, 1985.
Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Gomes WJ, et al. Beating versus arrested heart revascularization: Evaluation of myocardial function in a prospective randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:685-90.
Gerritsen WB, van Boven WJ, Driessen AH, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Oxidative stress and renal function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:923-9.
Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: A prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:797-808.
Cartier R, Brann S, Dagenais F, et al. Systematic off-pump coronary artery revascularization in multivessel disease: Experience of three hundred cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:221-9.
Guyton RA, Thourani VH, Puskas JD, et al. Perfusion-assisted direct coronary artery bypass: Selective graft perfusion in off-pump cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:171-5.
Ascione R, Caputo M, Angelini GD. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: not a flash in the pan. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:306-13.
Rose EA. Off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:379-80.
Pegg TJ, Selvanayagam JB, Karamitsos TD, et al. Effects of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on early and late right ventricular function. Circulation. 2008; 117:2202-10.
Hedman A, Alam M, Zuber E, et al. Decreased right ventricular function after coronary artery bypass grafting and its relation to exercise capacity: a tricuspid annular motion-based study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17:12631.
Roshanali F, Yousefnia MA, Mandegar MH, et al. Decreased right ventricular function after coronary artery bypass grafting. Tex Heart Inst J. 2008; 35:250-5.
Khani M, Hosseintash M, Foroughi M, et al. Assessment of the effect of offpump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery on right ventricle function using strain and strain rate imaging. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016;6:138-43.
Møller CH, Penninga L, Wetterslev J, et al. Clinical outcomes in randomized trials of off- vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29:2601-16.
Mathew JP, Parks R, Savino JS, et al. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass surgery: predictors, outcomes and resource utilization: multicenter study of perioperative ischemia research group. JAMA. 1996;276:300–6.
Hakala T, Pitka¨nen O, Hippelainen M. Feasibility of predicting the risk of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery with logistic regression model. Scand J Surg. 2002;91:339–44.
2Gardin JM, Arnold AM, Bild DE, et al. Left ventricular diastolic filling in the elderly: the cardiovascular health study. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:345–51.
Schulman S, Lakatta EG, Fleg JL, et al. Age-related decline in left ventricular filling at rest and exercise. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:1932–8.
Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, et al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: A comparative simultaneous Dopplercatheterization study. Circulation. 2000;102:1788 –94.
Lee EH, Yun SC, Chin JH, et al. Prognostic implications of preoperative E/e’ ratio in patients with off-pump coronary artery surgery. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:362-71.
Jun NH, Shim JK, Kim JC, et al. Prognostic value of a tissue Doppler-derived index of left ventricular filling pressure on composite morbidity after offpumpcoronary artery bypass surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:519-24.