The aim of this study was to compare the measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) using the CT-1P tonopachymetry and AL-Scan optical biometry with those obtained with ultrasound (US) pachymetry. In this prospective study, CCTs were measured in 100 eyes of healthy subjects with the CT-1P tonopachymetry, AL-Scan optical biometry and US pachymetry, and the results were compared. The mean CCT taken with the CT-1P, AL-Scan optical biometry and US pachymetry were 514.1±34.96 µm, 540.00±29.57 µm and 542.53±31.2 µm, respectively. There were high correlations between CCT readings using US pachymetry and AL-Scan optical biometry (r=0.949, p= 0.001), between US pachymetry and CT-1P tonopachymetry (r=0.851, p< 0.001) and between AL-Scan optical biometry and CT-1P tonopachymetry (r=0.859, p< 0.001). Both AL-Scan optical biometry and CT-1P tonopachymetry are quick, non-contact devices that are easy to use and are reliable alternatives to US pachymetry for measuring CCTs
___
1. Mishima S. Corneal thickness. Surv Ophthalmol. 1968;13(2):57-96.
2. Whıtacre MM, Steın RA, Hassaneın, K. The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115(5):592-96.
3. Herndon LW, Choudhri SA, Cox T, Damji KF, Shields MB, Allingham RR. Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115(9):1137-41.
4. Argus WA. Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(12):1810-2.
5. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperlıng S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta ophthalmol. 1975;53(4): 652-9.
6. Fujioka M, Nakamura M, Tatsumi Y, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, Negi A. Comparison of Pentacam Scheimpflug camera with ultrasound pachymetry and noncontact specular microscopy in measuring central corneal thickness. Curr Eye Res. 2007;32(2):89-94
7. Myrowitz EH, Ren S, Chuck RS. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by four different pachymeters. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33(3):156-60.
8. Módis L, Langenbucher A, Seitz B. Corneal thickness measurements with contact and noncontact specular microscopic and ultrasonic pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132(4):517-21.
9. Bechmann M, Thiel MJ, Neubauer AS, Ullrich S, Ludwig K, Kenyon KR, Ulbig MW. Central corneal thickness measurement with a retinal optical coherence tomography device versus standard ultrasonic pachymetry. Cornea. 2001;20(1):50-4.
10. Murphy GE, Murphy CG. Comparison of efficacy of longest, average, and shortest axial length measurements with a solid-tip ultrasound probe in predicting intraocular lens power. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(5): 644-5.
11. Ou TH, Lai IC, Teng MC. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasonic pachymetry, Orbscan II, and SP3000P in eyes with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect. Chang Gung Med J. 2012;35(3):255-62.
12. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) Group. Central corneal thickness in the ocular hypertension treatment study (OHTS). Ophthalmology. 2001;108(10):1779-88.
13. European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) Group. Predictive factors for open-angle glaucoma among patients with ocular hypertension in the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(1):3-9.
14. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Corneal thickness measurements and visual function abnormalities in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(2):131-7.
15. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Dong L, Yang Z; EMGT Group. Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(11):1965-72.
16. Ozcura F, Aydin S, Uzgören N. Effects of central corneal thickness, central corneal power, and axial length on intraocular pressure measurement assessed with goldmann applanation tonometry. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2008;52(5):353-6.
17. Lomoriello DS, Lombardo M, Tranchina L, Oddone F, Serrao S, Ducoli P. Repeatability of intra-ocular pressure and central corneal thickness measurements provided by a non-contact method of tonometry and pachymetry. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(3):429-34.
18. Garcia-Resua C, Blanco A, Miñones M, Yebra-Pimentel E, Giraldez MJ. Accuracy and repeatability of a new tono-pachymeter for measuring central corneal thickness. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38(3):158-63.
19. Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, Funovıcs MA, Skorpik C. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82(10):892-9.
20. Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U, Schwartz S, Ken-Dror G, Avni I, Zadok D. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(9):1729-35.
21. Chen S, Huang J, Wen D, Chen W, Huang D, Wang Q. Measurement of central corneal thickness by high‐resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier‐domain optical Coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90(5):449-55.
22. Uçakhan ÖÖ, Özkan M, Kanpolat A. Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(6):970- 7.
23. Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Amro SA, Kangave D, Sadaawy A, Wehaib TA, Al-Obeidan S. Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry. Int ophthalmol. 2008;28(5):333-8.
24. Rainer G, Findl O, Petternel V, Kiss B, Drexler W, Skorpik C, Georgopoulos M, Schmetterer L. Central corneal thickness measurements with partial coherence interferometry, ultrasound, and the Orbscan system. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(5), 875-9.
25. Nemeth G, Tsorbatzoglou A, Kertesz K, Vajas A, Berta A, Modis L. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurement with a new optical device and a standard ultrasonicpachymeter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:460-3
26. Huang J, Savini G, Li J, Lu W, Wu F, Wang J, Li Y, Feng Y, Wang Q. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurement of ocular component and its comprasion with IOLMaster. Br J Ophtalmol. 2014;98:1277-81
27. Nam SM, Lee HK, Kim EK, Seo KY. Comparison of corneal thickness after the instillation of topical anesthetic: proparacaine versus oxybuprocaine. Cornea. 2006;25:51-4
28. Nissen J, Hjortdal J, Ehlers N, Frost‐Larsen K, Sörensen TA. Clinical comparison of optical and ultrasonic pachometry. Acta Ophthalmolo. 1991;69(5):659-63.
29. Ou TH, Lai IC, Teng MC. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasonic pachymetry, Orbscan II, and SP3000P in eyes with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect. Chang Gung Med J. 2012;35(3), 255-62.