Yetişkin Popülasyonda Semental Ayrılma Prevalansının Retrospektif Analizi

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'nin Orta Karadeniz Bölgesi'nde üniversite diş hastanesine başvuran yetişkin popülasyonda görülen semental ayrılma prevalansının belirlenmesi ile semental ayrılmanın hasta yaşı, cinsiyeti ve diş tipi ile ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bin dört yüz elli bir yetişkin hastanın 4629 daimi dişine ait periapikal radyografiler incelenerek semental ayrılma saptanan örnekler kaydedildi. Hastaların sistemde kayıtlı olan kişisel bilgileri ile dental tedavi kayıtları (yaş, cinsiyet ve uygulanan tedaviler) incelendi. Semental ayrılma ile hasta yaşı, cinsiyeti, diş tipi, dişlerin ait oldukları çeneler, kök kanal tedavisi varlığı ve periapikal lezyon varlığı ilişkileri değerlendirildi. Elde edilen verilerin istatistiksel analizi için Pearson ki-kare testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: İncelenen hastaların 13'ünün periapikal radyografilerinde semental ayrılma saptandı (%0,89). Semental ayrılma prevalansının hasta yaşı, cinsiyeti ve diş tipi ile anlamlı ilişki göstermediği saptandı (p>0,05). Maksiller dişlerin mandibular dişlere göre daha fazla semental ayrılma gösterdikleri (p

A Retrospective Study of the Prevalence of Cemental Tear in a Sample of the Adult Population Applied Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Dentistry

Objective: The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of cemental tears and evaluate its relation with patient gender, age and tooth type in a population of adult dental patients applied to the university hospital in the center Black Sea Region of Turkey.MaterialsandMethods: Periapical radiographs of 4629 permanent teeth of 1451 adult patients were examined and teeth with cemental tears were recorded. The patients' biographic data and dental history (age, gender and treatment history) from the patient database were also recorded. Possible relationships with the patient age, patient gender, tooth type, tooth region, presence of previous root canal treatment and the presence of apical periodontitis lesions were evaluated. Pearson chi-square test was used to analyze data statistically.Results: Cemental tears were detected in the periapical radiographs of 13 patients (0.89%) of the total 1451 patients. The prevalence of the cemental tears showed no significant relation with the age and gender of the patients or tooth type (p>0.05). Maxillary teeth showed more cemental tears than the mandibular teeth did (p<0.05) and significantly more frequent cemental tears were detected in teeth showing periapical lesions (p<0.05). Conclusion: The presence of cemental tears is a rare entity in dental clinics. However clinicians should consider the presence of cemental tears especially in the examination and treatment planning of teeth with periodontal or periapical involvement.

PDF

___

1. Leknes KN, Lie T, Selvig KA. Cemental tear: a risk factor in periodontal attachment loss. J Periodontol 1996; 67: 583-8.
2. Tulkki MJ, Baisden MK, McClanahan SB. Cemental tear: a case report of a rare root fracture. J Endod 2006; 32: 1005-7.
3. Tai TF, Chiang CP, Lin CP, Lin CC, Jeng JH. Persistent endodontic lesion due to complex cementodentinal tears in a maxillary central incisor: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 55-60.
4. Lin HJ, Chan CP, Yang CY, Wu CT, Tsai YL, Huang CC, et al. Cemental tear: clinical characteristics and its predisposing factors. J Endod 2011; 37: 611-8.
5. Leknes KN. The influence of anatomic and iatrogenic root surface characteristics on bacterial colonization and periodontal destruction: a review. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 507-16.
6. Lin HJ, Chang SH, Chang MC, Tsai YL, Chiang CP, Chan CP, et al. Clinical fracture site, morphologic and histopathologic characteristics of cemental tear: role in endodontic lesions. J Endod 2012; 38: 1058-62.
7. Lin HJ, Chang MC, Chang SH, Wu CT, Tsai YL, Huang CC, et al. Treatment outcome of the teeth with cemental tears. J Endod 2014; 40: 1315-20.
8. Chou J, Rawal YB, O'Neil JR, Tatakis DN. Cementodentinal tear: a case report with 7-year follow-up. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 1708- 13.
9. Ishikawa I, Oda S, Hayashi J, Arakawa S. Cervical cemental tears in older patients with adult periodontitis. Case reports. J Periodontol 1996; 67: 15-20.
10. Stewart ML, McClanahan SB. Cemental tear: a case report. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 81-6.
11. Marquam BJ. Atypical localized deep pocket due to a cemental tear: case report. J Contempt Dent Pract 2003; 4: 52-64.
12. Keskin C, Uzun I, Kalyoncuoğlu E, Güler B, Özyürek T. Koronal restorasyon ve kök kanal dolgularının kalitesi ile tedavi sonrası apikal periodontitis ilişkisinin retrospektif incelenmesi. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ Dis Hekim Fak Derg 2012; 13: 15-21.
13. Weiger R, Hitzler S, Hermle G, Löst C. Periapical status, quality of root canal fillings and estimated endodontic treatment needs in an urban German population. Dent Traumatol 1997; 13: 69-74.
14. Dugas NN, Lawrence HP, Teplitsky PE, Pharoah MJ, Friedman S. Periapical health and treatment quality assessment of root-filled teeth in two Canadian populations. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 181-92.
15. Boucher Y, Matossian L, Rilliard F, Machtou P. Radiographic evaluation of the prevalence and technical quality of root canal treatment in a French subpopulation. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 229- 38.
16. Rohlin M, Kullendorff B, Ahlqwist M, Henrikson CO, Hollender L, Stenström B. Comparison between panoramic and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of periapical bone lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1989; 18: 151-5.
17. Molander B, Ahlqwist M, Gröndahl HG. Panoramic and restrictive intraoral radiography in comprehensive oral radiographic diagnosis. Eur J Oral Sci 1995; 103: 191-8.