Root Canal Treatment for Deciduous

Süt dişlerinin erken kaybı fizyolojik, fonksiyonel ve estetik açıdan birçok olumsuzluğa yol açmaktadır. Süt dişlerinin yapısı, çürüğün çok daha kolay ve kısa sürede ilerlemesine sebep olmakta ve bu dişlerin ağızda tutulmaları için sıklıkla pulpa tedavilerine ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Süt dişi kök kanal tedavilerinin başarısını arttıracak yeni materyallerin araştırılmasına devam edilmektedir. Çalışmamızda süt dişi kök kanal tedavilerinde son dönemde öne çıkan güncel yaklaşımların derlenmesi amaçlanmıştır.

Süt Dişlerinde Kök Kanal Tedavisi: Derleme

The early loss of deciduous teeth leads to many negations in terms of physiological, functional and aesthetic. The structure of the deciduous teeth causes decay to progress much easier and less time and this is the need for frequent dental pulp treatment to be kept in the mouth. The new materials that will increase the success of deciduous teeth root canal treatment are continuing to investigate. In this study, it is aimed that recently prominent current approaches are to be compiled in root canal treatment of deciduous teeth.

PDF

___

1. Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent dentitions. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 571-96.
2. Rock WP; British Society of Paediatric Dentistry. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry. Extraction of deciduous teeth - balance and compensation. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002; 12: 151-3.
3. Carotte P. Endodontic treatment for children. Brit Dent J 2005; 198: 9-15.
4. Topaloglu-Ak A, Eden E, Frencken JE. Managing dental caries in children in Turkey -a discussion paper. BMC Oral Health 2009; 9: 32.
5. Doğan BG, Gökalp S. Türkiye'de diş çürüğü durumu ve tedavi gereksinimi, 2004. Hacetttepe Diş Hekimliği Dergisi 2008; 32: 45-57.
6. Gökalp S, Güçiz-Doğan B, Tekçiçek M, Berberoğlu A, Ünlüer Ş. Beş, On İki ve On Beş Yaş Çocukların Ağız Diş Sağlığı Profili, Türkiye-2004. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2007; 31: 3-10.
7. Zeren AE, Sarı Ş. Süt dişlerinde kanal çalışma boyu ölçümünde kullanılan güncel yöntemler: dijital radyografi ve elektronik apeks bulucular. Acta Odontol Turc 2014; 31:49-53.
8. Mello-Moura AC, Moura-Netto C, Araki AT, Guedes-Pinto AC, Mendes FM. Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in deciduous anterior teeth. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 142-7.
9. Santos-Pinto L, Cordeiro Rde C, Zuanon AC, Basso MD, Gonçalves MA. Primary tooth length determination in direct digital radiography: an in vivo study. Pediatr Dent 2007; 29: 470-4.
10. Kim E, Lee SJ. Electronic apex locator. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48: 35-54.
11. Sivadas G, Sudha P, Shenoy R, Rao A, Suprabha BS. Accuracy of apex locator for root canal length determination of deciduous molars compared to conventional radiograph. J Interdiscip Dentistry 2013; 3: 163-6.
12. Krishnan IS, Sreedharan S. A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in deciduous teeth: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent 2012; 3: 416-20.
13. Soruri M, Moeini M, Rekabi S, Bahrololumi Z, Moeini M, Zsre Reza M. A clinical comparison of the accuracy of an electronic apex locator and radiography in determination of root canal length in deciduous molars. American Journal of Research Communication 2013; 1: 119-27.
14. Oznurhan F, Ünal M, Kapdan A, Ozturk C, Aksoy S. Clinical evaluation of apex locator and radiography in primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2015; 25: 199-203.
15. Kim E, Marmo M, Lee CY, Oh NS, Kim IK. An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 79-83.
16. Nagaratna PJ, Shashikiran ND, Subbareddy VV. In vitro comparison of NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel hand instruments in root canal preparations of primary and permanent molar. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2006; 24: 186-91.
17. Guelzow A, Stamm O, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 743-52.
18. Özen B, ÖM Akgün. A Comparison of Ni-Ti Rotary and Hand Files Instrumentation in Primary Molars. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research 2013; 6: 6-8.
19. Kummer TR, Calvo MC, Cordeiro MM, de Sousa Vieira R, de Carvalho Rocha MJ. Ex vivo study of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques in human primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 84-92.
20. Makarem A, Ravandeh N, Ebrahimi M. Radiographic assessment and chair time of rotary instruments in the pulpectomy of primary second molar teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2014; 8: 84-9.
21. Ramezanali F, Afkhami F, Soleimani A, Kharrazifard MJ, Rafiee F. Comparison of Cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time for Deciduous Molars: Mtwo Rotary Instruments vs. Hand K-Files. Iran Endod J 2015; 10: 240-3.
22. Katge F, Patil D, Poojari M, Pimpale J, Shitoot A, Rusawat B. Comparison of instrumentation time and cleaning efficacy of manual instrumentation, rotary systems and reciprocating systems in primary teeth: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014; 32: 311-6.
23. Nazari Moghaddam K, Mehran M, Farajian Zadeh H. Root Canal Cleaning Efficacy of Rotary and Hand Files Instrumentation in Primary Molars. Iran Endod J 2009; 4: 53-7.
24. Balto H, Salama F, Al-Mofareh S, Al-Yahya F. Evaluation of different irrigating solutions on smear layer removal of deciduous root dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16: 187-91.
25. Jafari A, Kiani M, Nikkhah M, Bakhtiari R, Nakhjavani YB, Heidari AR. Comparative evaluation of antiseptic effects of sodium hypochlorite, thyme essence and normal salins in root canal irrigation of deciduous teeth. JDM 2014; 27: 161-7.
26. Göztas Z, Onat H, Tosun G, Sener Y, Hadimli HH. Antimicrobial effect of ozonated water, sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in primary molar root canals. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 469- 74.
27. Götze Gda R, Cunha CB, Primo LS, Maia LC. Effect of the sodium hypochlorite and citric acid association on smear layer removal of primary molars. Braz Oral Res 2005; 19: 261-6.
28. Kapdan A, Kustarci A, Tunc T, Sumer Z, Arslan S. Which is the most effective disinfection method in primary root canals: Conventional or newly developed ones? Niger J Clin Pract 2015; 18: 538-43.
29. Ximenes M, Triches TC, Beltrame AP, Hilgert LA, Cardoso M. Effect of endodontic irrigation with 1% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA on primary teeth: a scanning electron microscope analysis. Gen Dent 2013; 61: 24-7.
30. Kim M, Kim j, Lim S. Accidental Extrusion of Sodium Hypochlorite during Endodontic Treatment in a Primary Tooth. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2015: 42.
31. Chaugule VB, Panse AM, Gawali PN. Adverse Reaction of Sodium Hypochlorite during Endodontic Treatment of Primary Teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 8: 153-6.
32. Onçağ O, Hoşgör M, Hilmioğlu S, Zekioğlu O, Eronat C, Burhanoğlu D. Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 423-32.
33. Ximenes M, Triches TC, Beltrame AP, Hilgert LA, Cardoso M. Effect of endodontic irrigation with 1% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA on primary teeth: a scanning electron microscope analysis. Gen Dent 2013; 61: 24-7.
34. Botton G, Pires CW, Cadoná FC, Machado AK, Azzolin VF, Cruz IB, Sagrillo MR, Praetzel JR. Toxicity of irrigating solutions and pharmacological associations used in pulpectomy of primary teeth. Int Endod J 2016; 49: 746-54.
35. Tulsani SG, Chikkanarasaiah N, Bethur S. An in vivo comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and Biopure MTAD(TM) against enterococcus faecalis in primary teeth: A qPCR study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014; 39: 30-4.
36. Farhin K, Viral PM, Thejokrishna P, Sajjad M. Reduction in Bacterial Loading Using MTAD as an Irrigant in Pulpectomized primary Teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015; 39: 100-4.
37. Verma MK, Pandey RK, Khanna R, Agarwal J. The antimicrobial effectiveness of 25% propolis extract in root canal irrigation of primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014; 32: 120-4.
38. Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2004; 14: 417-24.
39. Ahmed HMA. Pulpectomy procedures in primary molar teeth. Eur J Gen Dent 2014; 3: 3-10.
40. Walia T. Pulpectomy in hyperemic pulp and accelerated root resorption in primary teeth: a review with associated case report. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014; 32: 255-61.
41. Arıkan V. Öz Odası Tabanına Yerleştirilen Mta'nın Furkasyon Lezyonlu Süt Dişlerine Uygulanan Kanal Tedavisinin Başarısına Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi. Doktora Tezi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Pedodonti A.D, 2011.
42. Lin B, Zhao Y, Yang J, Wang W, Ge LH. Effects of zinc oxide-eugenol and calcium hydroxide/ iodoform on delaying root resorption in deciduous molars without successors. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 471-5.
43. Estrela C, Estrela CR, Hollanda AC, Decurcio Dde A, Pecora JD. Influence of iodoform on antimicrobial potential of calcium hydroxide. J Appl Oral Sci 2006; 14: 33-7.
44. Harini Priya M, Bhat SS, Sundeep Hegde K. Comparative evaluation of bactericidal potential of four root canal filling materials against microflora of infected non-vital primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010; 35: 23-9.
45. Nakornchai S, Banditsing P, Visetratana N. Clinical evaluation of 3Mix and Vitapex as treatment options for pulpally involve deciduous molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2010; 20: 214-21.
46. Ozalp N, Saroğlu I, Sönmez H. Evaluation of various root canal filling materials in primary molar pulpectomies: an in vivo study. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 347-50.
47. Howley B, Seale NS, McWhorter AG, Kerins C, Boozer KB, Lindsey D. Pulpotomy versus pulpectomy for carious vital primary incisors: randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent 2012; 34: 112- 9.
48. Subramaniam P, Gilhotra K. Endoflas, zinc oxide eugenol and metapex as root canal filling materials in primary molars--a comparative clinical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011; 35: 365-9.
49. Gupta S, Das G. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of zinc oxide eugenol and metapex in root canal treatment of primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011; 29: 222-8.
50. Fuks AB, Eidelman E, Pauker N. Root fillings with Endoflas in primary teeth: a retrospective study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002; 27: 41-5.
51. Moskovitz M, Sammara E, Holan G. Success rate of root canal treatment in primary molars. J Dent 2005; 33: 41-7.
52. Moskovitz M, Yahav D, Tickotsky N, Holan G. Long-term follow up of root canal treated primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2010; 20: 207-13.
53. Rewal N, Thakur AS, Sachdev V, Mahajan N. Comparison of Endoflas and Zinc oxide Eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary dentition. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014; 32: 317-21.