___

Albe, V. (2008). Students' positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue. Science & Education, 17(8-9), 805-827.

Bal, Ş., Samancı, N. K. & Bozkurt, O. (2007). University students' knowledge and attitude about genetic engineering. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 119-126.

Boerwinkel, D.J., Knippels, M.J., & Waarlo, A.J. (2011). Raising awareness of presymptomatic genetic testing. Journal of Biological Education, 45(4), 213-221

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. (1st edition). California: Sage Publications Inc.

Clarkeburn, H., Downie, J.R., & Matthew, B. (2002). Impact of an ethics programme in a life sciences curriculum, Teaching in Higher Education, 7(1), 65-79.

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press

Dawson, V.M. (2011). A case study of the impact of introducing socio-scientific issues into a reproduction unit in a Catholic Girls' school. T. D. Sadler (Ed.). Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom (313-345). New York: Springer Dordect.

Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in education. (6th edition). Boston: McGraw-Hill

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M.R. (2008). Structural equation modeling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 6(1), 53-60.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

Ishiyama, I., Tanzawa, T., Watanabe, M., Maeda T, Muto, K., Tamakoshi, A., & et al. (2011). Public attitudes to the promotion of genomic crop studies in Japan: Correlations between genomic literacy, trust, and favorable attitude. Public Understanding of Science, 21(4), 495-512

Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with SIMPLIS command language. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International Inc,

Karasar, N. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. (19. Baskı), Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.

Keefer, M. (2003). Moral Reasoning and case based approaches to ethical instruction in science. D.L. Zeidler (Ed.). The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education (241-260). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Kelchtermans, G. (2007). Who I am in how I teach is the message: self-understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 257-272

Kelloway, E.K. (1998). Using lisrel for structural equation modeling: a researcher's guide. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principal and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Pres.

Klop, T., & Severiens, S. (2007). An exploration of attitudes towards modern biotechnology: a study among Dutch secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 663-679

Kolsto, S.D. (2001). 'To trust or not to trust,...'- pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 877-901.

Kolsto, S.D. (2006). Patterns in students' argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1689- 1716.

Lazarowitz, R., & Bloch, I. (2005). Awareness of societal issues among high school biology teachers teaching genetics, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(5-6), 437-457

Mels, G. (2006). LISREL for Windows: Getting Started Guide Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc.

Nielsen, J.A. (2012a). Arguing from Nature: The role of 'nature' in students' argumentations on a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 723-744.

Nielsen, J.A. (2012b). Science in Discussions: An analysis of the use of science content in socio-scientific discussions. Science Education 96(3), 428-456.

Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M.M. (2004): Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 411-423.

Qin, W. & Brown, J.L. (2007). Public reactions to information about genetically engineered foods: Effects of information formats and male/female differences. Public Understanding of Science 16(4), 471-488.

Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (3rd edition). Sydney: Ligare Book Printer.

Puig, B., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2011). Different music to the same score: Teaching about genes, environment and human performances. T.D. Sadler (Ed.).

Socioscientific Issues in the Classroom (201-238). New York: Springer Dordect. Reis, P., & Galvão, C. (2004). Socioscientific controversies and students' conceptions about scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1621-1633

Sadler, T.D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. T.D. Sadler (Ed.). Socioscientific Issues in the Classroom (1-10). New York: Springer Dordect.

Sadler, T.D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 513-536.

Sadler, T.D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 353-376.

Sadler, T.D., & Zeidler, D.L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88, 4-27.

Simonneaux, L. (2011). Students' reasoning on socioscientific issues and socially acute questions. D.J. Boerwinkel, & A.J. Waarlo, (Eds.). Genomics Education for Decision making (73-82) FISME series on Research in Science Education. Utrecht: CD-? Press,

Sturgis, P., Cooper, H., & Fife-Schaw, C. (2005). Attitudes to biotechnology: Estimating the opinions of a better informed public. New Genetics and Society, 24(1), 31-55.

Tan, E.K., Lee, J., Hunter, C., Shinawi, L., Fook-Chong, S., & Jankovic J. (2007). Comparing knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing in Parkinson's disease in an American and Asian population. Journal of Neurological Science, 252(2), 113-120.

Topçu M.S. (2010). Development of attitudes towards socioscientific issues scale for undergraduate students. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(1), 51-67

van der Zande, P.A.M. (2009). Health-related genomics in classroom practice. D. J. Boerwinkel, ve A. J. Waarlo (Eds.). Rethinking Science Curricula in the Genomics Era (82-89). FISME series on Research in Science Education No. 62. Utrecht: CD-? Press.

van der Zande, P.A.M. (2011). Empowering teachers to teach socioscientific issues: the role of teacher identity in teaching. D. J. Boerwinkel, and A. J. Waarlo, (Eds.). Genomics Education for Decision making (117-124). FISME series on Research in Science Education No. 67. Utrecht: CD-? Press.

van der Zande, P.A.M., Warloo, A.J., Brekelmans, M., Akkerman, S.F. ve Vermunt, J.D. (2011). A knowledge base for teaching biology situated in the context of genetic testing. International Journal of Science Education, 33(15). 2307-2067.

Walker, K., & Zeidler, D.L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387-1410.

YÖK (2007). Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitim Fakülteleri (1982-2007). Ankara: Meteksan A.Ş.

Yüce, Z., ve Yalçın, N. (2012). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının biyoteknoloji konusundaki bilgi düzeyleri. X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi. http://kongre.nigde.edu.tr/xufbmek/dosyalar/tam_metin/pdf/2261-16_05_2012- 10_53_15.pdf adresinden 19.09.2012 tarihinde edinilmiştir.