TÜRK BANKACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDEKİ HİZMET YENİLİĞİ PERFORMANSININ METİN MADENCİLİĞİ VE BULANIK ÇOK KRİTERLİ KARAR VERME YÖNTEMLERİ İLE ANALİZİ

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türk bankacılık sektöründeki yeni hizmet geliştirme kabiliyetlerine etki eden faktörleri incelemek ve BIST'de işlem gören bankaların performansını, hizmet yeniliğine göre değerlendirmektir. Çalışmanın yeniliği, veri madenciliği ve hibrit çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerini birlikte dikkate alan iki aşamalı bir analiz kullanmasıdır. Literatür tabanlı hizmet geliştirme kriterleri için veri madenciliği yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Buna göre, ölçütlerin ağırlıklandırılması için bulanık AHP, bankaların hizmet yeniliği performansına göre sıralanması için ise bulanık TOPSIS yöntemlerinden faydalanılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, müşterilerin en önemli boyut olduğu belirlenmiştir. Buna karşın, çalışanların ise daha düşük önem ağırlığına sahip olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ek olarak, herhangi bir banka türünün diğerlerine kıyasla bariz bir üstünlüğü bulunmadığı görülmüştür. Diğer bir ifadeyle, her banka türü içerisinde hem iyi hem de kötü performans sonuçlarına sahip olan bankalar bulunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, en son sıralarda yabancı ve özel bankaların yer aldığı belirlenmiştir. Bu bağlamda, rekabetçi avantaj elde edebilmek için performansı düşük olan bu bankaların müşteri beklentilerini dikkate alan yeni hizmetler geliştirmeleri yerinde olacaktır.

ANALYSIS OF SERVICE INNOVATION PERFORMANCE IN TURKISH BANKING SECTOR USING A COMBINING METHOD OF FUZZY MCDM AND TEXT MINING

The purpose of the study is to examine the effecting factors for new service development capabilitiesin Turkish banking sector and to evaluate the performance of the banks in listed BIST based on theservice innovation performance. The novelty of the study is to employ a two-step analysisconsidering the data mining and the hybrid MCDM respectively. The method is applied by using thedata mining for extracting the literature based-criteria of service innovation. Accordingly, the fuzzyAHP is computed for weighting the criteria and the fuzzy TOPSIS is considered to rank the banksbased on the service innovation performance. The results demonstrate that the service conditions forthe customers are the most important factor in the service innovation performance while theemployees are weakly considered to evaluate the new service development. In addition, it is seen thatno bank type has a clear advantage over others. In other words, there are banks with both good andbad performance outcomes within each type of banking group. However, it is determined thatforeign banks and private banks took place in the worst order. In this context, in order to achieve acompetitive advantage, these low performing banks should focus on new services that take intoaccount the customer expectations

___

  • Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2006). Modeling the metrics of lean, leagile and agile supply chain: An ANP-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(1), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.005
  • Aghdaie, M. H., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2013). Decision Making in Machine Tool Selection: An Integrated Approach with SWARA and COPRAS-G Methods. Inzinerine EkonomikaEngineering Economics, 24(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.24.1.2822
  • Albadvi, A., Chaharsooghi, S. K., & Esfahanipour, A. (2007). Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(2), 673–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.022
  • Alimardani, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Aghdaie, M. H., & Tamosaitiene, J. (2013). A Novel Hybrid Swara and Vikor Methodology for Supplier Selection in an Agile Environment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(3), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.814606
  • Amiri, M. P. (2010). Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6218–6224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.103
  • Anand, A., Rufuss, D. D. W., Rajkumar, V., & Suganthi, L. (2017). Evaluation of Sustainability Indicators in Smart Cities for India Using MCDM Approach. Energy Procedia, 141, 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.094
  • Asakereh, A., Soleymani, M., & Sheikhdavoodi, M. J. (2017). A GIS-based Fuzzy-AHP method for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in Khuzestan province, Iran. Solar Energy, 155, 342– 353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.05.075
  • Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., & Gold, S. (2018). Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.013
  • Aydogan, E. K. (2011). Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3992–3998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.060
  • Baek, S.-C., & Hong, W.-H. (2017). Exploring convergence research trends of spatial information based on UAV using text mining technique. Spatial Information Research, 25(2), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0095-5
  • Beccali, M., Cellura, M., & Mistretta, M. (2003). Decision-making in energy planning. Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology. Renewable Energy, 28(13), 2063–2087. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(03)00102-2
  • Behzadian, M., Kazemadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021
  • Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051–13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
  • Bozbura, F. Tunc, B., & Kahraman, C. (2007). Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 1100–1112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.006
  • Brans, J., & Vincke, P. (1985). A Preference Ranking Organization Method - (the Promethee Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making). Management Science, 31(6), 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647
  • Brans, J., Vincke, P., & Mareschal, B. (1986). How to Select and How to Rank Projects - the Promethee Method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377- 2217(86)90044-5
  • Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2006). The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control and Cybernetics, 35(2), 445–469.
  • Brauers, W. K. M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Vilutiene, T. (2008). Multi-Objective Contractor’s Ranking by Applying the Moora Method. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.245-255
  • Brauers, W. K., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2009). Robustness of the Multi-Objective Moora Method with a Test for the Facilities Sector. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 15(2), 352–375. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.352-375
  • Briggs, T., Kunsch, P., & Mareschal, B. (1990). Nuclear Waste Management - an Application of the Multicriteria Promethee Methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 44(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90308-X
  • Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 17, pp. 233-247 Analysis of Service Innovation Performance in Turkish Banking
  • Buyukozkan, G., & Cifci, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000–3011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162
  • Buyukozkan, G., & Cifci, G. (2012a). A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2341–2354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.061
  • Buyukozkan, G., & Cifci, G. (2012b). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000–3011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162
  • Chakraborty, S. (2011). Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(9–12), 1155–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2972-0
  • Chakraborty, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Applications of WASPAS Method in Manufacturing Decision Making. Informatica, 25(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2014.01
  • Chakraborty, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2015). Applications of Waspas Method as a MultiCriteria Decision-Making Tool. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 49(1), 5–22.
  • Chang, D.-Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655.
  • Chen, C.T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1.
  • Chen, M. F., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40(13), 1473–1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2005.01.006
  • Chu, T. C. (2002a). Facility location selection using fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisions. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10(6), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488502001739
  • Chu, T. C., & Lin, Y. C. (2003). A fuzzy TOPSIS method for robot selection. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001700300033
  • Clifton, C., & Cooley, R. (1999). TopCat: Data mining for topic identification in a text corpus. In J. M. Zytkow & J. Rauch (Eds.), Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (Vol. 1704, pp. 174–183). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
  • Correia, A., & Goncalves, A. (2017). Topics Discovery in Text Mining. In A. Rocha, A. M. Correia, H. Adeli, L. P. Reis, & S. Costanzo (Eds.), Recent Advances in Information Systems and Technologies, Vol 1 (Vol. 569, pp. 251–256). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
  • Csutora, R. & Buckley, J. J. (2001). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: The Lambda-Max method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 120, pp. 181-195
  • Cui, A. S., & Wu, F. (2017). The impact of customer involvement on new product development: Contingent and substitutive effects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(1), 60-80.
  • Dadelo, S., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., & Dadeliene, R. (2012). Multiple Criteria Assessment of Elite Security Personal on the Basis of Aras and Expert Methods. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 46(4), 65–87.
  • Dagdeviren, M. (2008). Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(4), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845- 008-0091-7
  • Dagdeviren, M., Yavuz, S., & Kilinc, N. (2009). Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8143–8151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016
  • de Almeida, A. T. (2007). Multicriteria decision model for outsourcing contracts selection based on utility function and ELECTRE method. Computers & Operations Research, 34(12), 3569–3574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.003
  • Delen, D., & Crossland, M. D. (2008). Seeding the survey and analysis of research literature with text mining. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1707–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.035
  • Delmonte, R., & Pallotta, V. (2011). Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis Need Text Understanding. In V.
  • Pallotta, A. Soro, & E. Vargiu (Eds.), Advances in Distributed Agent-Based Retrieval Tools (Vol. 361, pp. 81-+). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
  • Dinçer, H., Yuksel, S., & Adalı, Z. (2018). Relationship Between Non-Performing Loans, Industry, and Economic Growth of the African Economies and Policy Recommendations for Global Growth. In Globalization and Trade Integration in Developing Countries (pp. 203-228). IGI Global.
  • Dong, Y., Zhang, G., Hong, W.-C., & Xu, Y. (2010). Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decision Support Systems, 49(3), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.03.003
  • Dožić, S., Lutovac, T., & Kalić, M. (2018). Fuzzy AHP approach to passenger aircraft type selection. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.08.003
  • Ecer, F. (2014). A hybrid banking websites quality evaluation model using AHP and COPRAS-G: a Turkey case. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(4), 758–782. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.915596
  • Ersin, İ., & Duran, S. (2017). Faizsiz Finans Döngüsünü Oluşturma Açısından Adil Ekonomik Düzen Söyleminin Kredileşme İlkeleri ve Uygulanabilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(8), 109-132.
  • Ertugrul, I., & Karakasoglu, N. (2009). Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 702–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.014
  • Ertugrul, I., & Karakasoglu, N. (2009). Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 702–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.014
  • Eti, S., & İnel, M. N. (2016). A Research on Comparison of Regression Models Explaining the Profitability Base on Financial Data. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(10), 470-475.
  • Fadafan, F. K., Danehkar, A., & Pourebrahim, S. (2018). Developing a non-compensatory approach to identify suitable zones for intensive tourism in an environmentally sensitive landscape. Ecological Indicators, 87, 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.066
  • Fung, G. P. C., Yu, J. X., & Lam, W. (2003). Stock prediction: Integrating text mining approach using real-time news. New York: Ieee.
  • Garten, Y., & Altman, R. B. (2009). Pharmspresso: a text mining tool for extraction of pharmacogenomic concepts and relationships from full text. Bmc Bioinformatics, 10, S6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471- 2105-10-S2-S6
  • Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Estimating the Helpfulness and Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics. Ieee Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(10), 1498–1512. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2010.188
  • Girgin, G. K. (2018). Tüketicilerin Ramazan Ayinda Televizyonlardaki Yiyecek-İçecek Reklamlarina Yönelik Görüşlerinin Belirlenmesi. Kırgızistan-Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi, 7(2), 621-635.
  • Gumus, A. T. (2009). Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 4067–4074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.03.013
  • Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Bahrami, M. (2014). Investment prioritizing in high tech industries based on SWARA-COPRAS approach. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(3), 534–553. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.881435
  • Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Bahrami, M. (2014). Investment prioritizing in high tech industries based on SWARA-COPRAS approach. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(3), 534–553. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.881435
  • Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Saparauskas, J. (2013). New Application of SWARA Method in Prioritizing Sustainability Assessment Indicators of Energy System. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 24(5), 408–414. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.24.5.4526
  • Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2013). Design of Products with Both International and Local Perspectives Based. Ekonomska Istrazivanja-Economic Research, 26(2), 153–166.
  • Hatami-Marbini, A., & Tavana, M. (2011). An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 39(4), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.09.001
  • Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Verdegay, J. L. (1996). Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00162-X
  • Hu, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-L., & Chou, H.-L. (2017). Opinion mining from online hotel reviews - A text summarization approach. Information Processing & Management, 53(2), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2016.12.002
  • Hung, J.-L., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003-2008: a categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9044-9
  • Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Ilbahar, E., Karaşan, A., Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2018). A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Safety Science, 103, 124– 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.025
  • Jayawickrama, H. M. M. M., Kulatunga, A. K., & Mathavan, S. (2017). Fuzzy AHP based Plant Sustainability Evaluation Method. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 571–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.073
  • Jharkharia, S., & Shankar, R. (2007). Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 35(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.06.005
  • Jibao, L., Huiqiang, W., & Liang, Z. (2006). Study of network security situation awareness model based on simple additive weight and grey theory. (Y. M. Cheung, Y. Wang, & H. Lium, Eds.). New York: Ieee.
  • Kalibatas, D., & Turskis, Z. (2008). Multicriteria evaluation of inner climate by using MOORA method. Information Technology and Control, 37(1), 79–83.
  • Kaliszewski, I., & Podkopaev, D. (2016). Simple additive weighting-A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 54, 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.042
  • Kannan, D., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., & Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(2), 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.07.023
  • Kannan, G., Pokharel, S., & Kumar, P. S. (2009). A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 54(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.06.004
  • Kanuganti, S., Agarwala, R., Dutta, B., Bhanegaonkar, P. N., Singh, A. P., & Sarkar, A. K. (2017). Road safety analysis using multi criteria approach: A case study in India. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4649–4661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.299
  • Karabasevic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Stanujkic, D. (2016). The Framework for the Selection of Personnel Based on the SWARA and ARAS Methods Under Uncertainties. Informatica, 27(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2016.76
  • Karande, P., & Chakraborty, S. (2012). Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Materials & Design, 37, 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.013
  • Karatzoglou, A., & Feinerer, I. (2010). Kernel-based machine learning for fast text mining in R. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 54(2), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2009.09.023
  • Kartal, M. T. (2017). Türk Bankacılık Sektöründe Müşteri Şikâyetleri Yönetimi Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme İktisadı Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28(83), 85-108.
  • Kartal, M. T., Depren, S. K., & Depren, Ö. (2018). Türkiye’de Döviz Kurlarini Etkileyen Makroekonomik Göstergelerin Belirlenmesi: Mars Yöntemi İle Bir İnceleme. Kırgızistan-Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi, 7(1), 209-229.
  • Kavaliauskas, M., Deltuvas, R., & Cinga, G. (2011). Simple Additive Weighting Approach to Score the State Forest Enterprises in Lithuania. In Rural Development in Global Changes, Vol 5, Book 2 (Vol. 5, pp. 34–40). Akademija: Aleksandras Stulginskis University.
  • Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2010). Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul. Energy, 35(6), 2517–2527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.051
  • Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2010). Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul. Energy, 35(6), 2517–2527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.051
  • Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2011). Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 6577–6585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.081
  • Kersuliene, V., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of Rational Dispute Resolution Method by Applying New Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (swara). Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.12
  • Khan, K., Baharudin, B., Khan, A., & Ullah, A. (2014). Mining opinion components from unstructured reviews: A review. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 26(3), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2014.03.009
  • Kroha, P., Baeza-Yates, R., & Krellner, B. (2006). Text mining of business news for forecasting. In Seventeenth International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Proceedings (pp. 171-+). Los Alamitos: Ieee Computer Soc.
  • Kutlu, A. C., & Ekmekcioglu, M. (2012). Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSISbased fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044
  • Lai, Y., Liu, T., & Hwang, C. (1994). Topsis for Modm. European Journal of Operational Research, 76(3), 486– 500. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8
  • Lee, S. (2010). Using fuzzy AHP to develop intellectual capital evaluation model for assessing their performance contribution in a university. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 4941–4947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.020
  • Li, G., Dai, J. S., Park, E.-M., & Park, S.-T. (2017). A study on the service and trend of Fintech security based on text-mining: focused on the data of Korean online news. Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques, 13(4), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11416-016-0288-9
  • Liao, C.-N., & Kao, H.-P. (2011). An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP approach to supplier selection in supply chain management. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 10803–10811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.031
  • Lin, M.-C., Wang, C.-C., Chen, M.-S., & Chang, C. A. (2008). Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process. Computers in Industry, 59(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2007.05.013
  • Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., & Verbeke, A. (2004). PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377- 2217(03)00153-X
  • Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., & Verbeke, A. (2004). PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377- 2217(03)00153-X
  • Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(8), 4126– 4148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003
  • Mikhailov, L. (2003). Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 134, pp. 365-385
  • Ming, F., Wong, F., Liu, Z., & Chiang, M. (2014). Stock Market Prediction from WSJ: Text Mining via Sparse Matrix Factorization (pp. 430–439). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2014.116
  • Modak, M., Pathak, K., & Ghosh, K. K. (2017). Performance evaluation of outsourcing decision using a BSC and Fuzzy AHP approach: A case of the Indian coal mining organization. Resources Policy, 52, 181– 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.03.002
  • Moro, S., Rita, P., & Cortez, P. (2017). A text mining approach to analyzing Annals literature. Annals of Tourism Research, 66, 208–210.
  • Mostafa, M. M. (2013). More than words: Social networks’ text mining for consumer brand sentiments. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 4241–4251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.019
  • Mousseau, V., & Slowinski, R. (1998). Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples. Journal of Global Optimization, 12(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008210427517
  • Mukhtarov, S., Yüksel, S., & Mammadov, E. (2018). Factors that increase credit risks of Azerbaijani banks. Journal of International Studies Vol, 11(2), 63-75.
  • Nădăban, S., Dzitac, S., & Dzitac, I. (2016). Fuzzy TOPSIS: A General View. Procedia Computer Science, 91, 823–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.088
  • Nagar, A., & Hahsler, M. (2012). Using Text and Data Mining Techniques to extract Stock Market Sentiment from Live News Streams. In 2012 International Conference on Computer Technology and Science (Vol. 47, pp. 91–95).
  • Nassirtoussi, A. K., Aghabozorgi, S., Teh, Y. W., & Ngo, D. C. L. (2015). Text mining of news-headlines for FOREX market prediction: A Multi-layer Dimension Reduction Algorithm with semantics and sentiment. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(1), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.004
  • Natarajan, J., Berrar, D., Dubitzky, W., Hack, C., Zhang, Y., DeSesa, C., … Bremer, E. G. (2006). Text mining of full-text journal articles combined with gene expression analysis reveals a relationship between sphingosine-I-phosphate and invasiveness of a glioblastoma cell line. Bmc Bioinformatics, 7, 373. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-373
  • Nazari, S., Fallah, M., Kazemipoor, H., & Salehipour, A. (2018). A fuzzy inference- fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based clinical decision support system for diagnosis of heart diseases. Expert Systems with Applications, 95, 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.11.001
  • Neokosmidis, I., Rokkas, T., Parker, M. C., Koczian, G., Walker, S. D., Siddiqui, M. S., & Escalona, E. (2017). Assessment of socio-techno-economic factors affecting the market adoption and evolution of 5G networks: Evidence from the 5G-PPP CHARISMA project. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 572– 589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.11.007
  • Oenuet, S., & Soner, S. (2008). Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Management, 28(9), 1552–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019
  • Oktar, S., & Yüksel, S. (2016). Bankalarin Türev Ürün Kullanimini Etkileyen Faktörler: Mars Yöntemi ile Bir Inceleme/Determinants of the Use Derivatives in Banking: An Analysis with MARS Model. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 53(620), 31-46.
  • Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1
  • Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004a). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1
  • Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004b). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1
  • Opricovic, Serafim, & Tzeng, G.-H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020
  • Özdağoğlu, A., & Özdağoğlu, G. (2007). Comparison of AHP And Fuzzy AHP For The Multi-Criteria Decision Making Processes With Linguistic Evaluations. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, (11), 65–85.
  • Paksoy, T., Pehlivan, N. Y., & Özceylan, E. (2013). Bulanık Küme Teorisi / Bulanık Matematiksel Programlamaya Giriş. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık
  • Park, B., Oh, K.-Y., Lee, J.-H., Yoon, J.-H., Kuk, L. S., & Lee, M.-J. (2017). A Study on Environmental research Trends by Information and Communications Technologies using Text-mining Technology. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 33(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2017.33.2.7
  • Podvezko, V. (2011). The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 22(2), 134–146.
  • Ravi, V., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2005). Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 48(2), 327– 356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2005.01.017
  • Romano, M., Del Giudice, M., & Bresciani, S. (2017). Open innovation and customer-based development of new products. Mercati e competitività, 3(3), 15-20.
  • Roy, B. (1991). The Outranking Approach and the Foundations of Electre Methods. Theory and Decision, 31(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134132
  • Rufuss, D. D. W., Kumar, V. R., Suganthi, L., Iniyan, S., & Davies, P. A. (2018). Techno-economic analysis of solar stills using integrated fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis. Solar Energy, 159, 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.050
  • Ruzgys, A., Volvaciovas, R., Ignatavicius, C., & Turskis, Z. (2014). Integrated Evaluation of External Wall Insulation in Residential Buildings Using Swara-Todim Mcdm Method. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.843585
  • Saaty, T. (1990). How to Make a Decision - the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  • Saaty, T. L. (1986). Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 32(7), 841– 855.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1994). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces, 24(6), 19–43.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1999). Fundamentals of the analytic network process. In Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process (pp. 12–14).
  • Saaty, T. L. (2004). Fundamentals of the analytic network process—Dependence and feedback in decisionmaking with a single network. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(2), 129–157.
  • Saaty, T. L. (2005). Making and validating complex decisions with the AHP/ANP. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 14(1), 1–36.
  • Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
  • Saaty, T. L., Peniwati, K., & Shang, J. S. (2007). The analytic hierarchy process and human resource allocation: Half the story. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7–8), 1041–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.010
  • Saaty, T., & Vargas, L. (1987). Uncertainty and Rank Order in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 32(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90275-X
  • Salih, Y. K., See, O. H., Ibrahim, R. W., Yussof, S., & Iqbal, A. (2015). A novel noncooperative game competing model using generalized simple additive weighting method to perform network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 28(6), 1112–1125. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.2747
  • San Cristobal, J. R. (2011). Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The Vikor method. Renewable Energy, 36(2), 498–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.031
  • Scherf, M., Epple, A., & Werner, T. (2005). The next generation of literature analysis: Integration of genomic analysis into text mining. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 6(3), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/6.3.287
  • Schneider, N., Fechner, N., Landrum, G. A., & Stiefl, N. (2017). Chemical Topic Modeling: Exploring Molecular Data Sets Using a Common Text-Mining Approach. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 57(8), 1816–1831. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00249
  • Secme, N. Y., Bayrakdaroglu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2009). Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish Banking Sector using Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699– 11709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.013
  • Sevkli, M. (2010). An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Research, 48(12), 3393–3405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540902814355
  • Seyedmohammadi, J., Sarmadian, F., Jafarzadeh, A. A., Ghorbani, M. A., & Shahbazi, F. (2018). Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models in cultivation priority planning for maize, rapeseed and soybean crops. Geoderma, 310, 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.012
  • Shakouri, H. G., Nabaee, M., & Aliakbarisani, S. (2014). A quantitative discussion on the assessment of power supply technologies: DEA (data envelopment analysis) and SAW (simple additive weighting) as complementary methods for the “Grammar.” Energy, 64, 640–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.022
  • Shieh, J.-I., Wu, H.-H., & Huang, K.-K. (2010). A DEMATEL method in identifying key success factors of hospital service quality. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(3), 277–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.01.013
  • Sirisawat, P., & Kiatcharoenpol, T. (2018). Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approaches to prioritizing solutions for reverse logistics barriers. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 117, 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.015
  • Smalheiser, N. R. (2001). Predicting emerging technologies with the aid of text-based data mining: the micro approach. Technovation, 21(10), 689–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00048-7
  • Stanujkic, D., Magdalinovic, N., Jovanovic, R., & Stojanovic, S. (2012). An Objective Multi-Criteria Approach to Optimization Using Moora Method and Interval Grey Numbers. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(2), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.676996
  • Stefano, N. M., Casarotto Filho, N., Vergara, L. G. L., & Rocha, R. U. G. (2015). COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment): State of the Art Research and its Applications. Ieee Latin America Transactions, 13(12), 3899–3906.
  • Sun, C.-C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 7745–7754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066
  • Tam, M. C. Y., & Tummala, V. M. R. (2001). An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 29(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00039-6
  • Taylan, O., Bafail, A. O., Abdulaal, R. M. S., & Kabli, M. R. (2014). Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Applied Soft Computing, 17, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003
  • Terzioğlu, M. K. (2018). The Nexus Among Fiscal Policies, Fiscal Decentralization, And Economic Performance: Joint Effect Of Globalization And Institutional Quality. Kırgızistan-Türkiye Manas Üniversitesi, 7(2), 155-172.
  • Thorleuchter, D. (2008). Finding new technological ideas and inventions with text mining and technique philosophy. In C. Preisach, H. Burkhardt, L. SchmidtThieme, & R. Decker (Eds.), Data Analysis, Machine Learning and Applications (pp. 413–420). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
  • Torra, V. (1997). The weighted OWA operator. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 12(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-111X(199702)12:2<153::AID-INT3>3.0.CO;2-P
  • Tsai, W.-H., & Chou, W.-C. (2009). Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1444–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.058
  • Tseng, M.-L. (2009). A causal and effect decision making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7738–7748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.011
  • Tunay, K. B., & Yüksel, S. (2017). The relationship between corporate governance and foreign ownership of the banks in developing countries. Contaduría y Administración, 62(5), 1627-1642.
  • Tyagi, S., Agrawal, S., Yang, K., & Ying, H. (2017). An extended Fuzzy-AHP approach to rank the influences of socialization-externalization-combination-internalization modes on the development phase. Applied Soft Computing, 52, 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.10.017
  • Tzeng, G.-H., Chiang, C.-H., & Li, C.-W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004
  • Urosevic, S., Karabasevic, D., Stanujkic, D., & Maksimovic, M. (2017). An Approach to Personnel Selection in the Tourism Industry Based on the Swara and the Waspas Methods. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 51(1), 75–88.
  • Van Laarhoven, P. J. M. & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 11, pp. 229-241
  • Van Wijk, B. L. G., Klungel, O. H., Heerdink, E. R., & De Boer, A. (2006). A comparison of two multiple characteristics decision making techniques for the comparison of antihypertensive drugs: Simple additive weighting and technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 15, S224–S224.
  • Wang, B., Huang, H., & Wang, X. (2012). A novel text mining approach to financial time series forecasting. Neurocomputing, 83, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2011.12.013
  • Wang, J.-W., Cheng, C.-H., & Kun-Cheng, H. (2009). Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 9(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2008.04.014
  • Wang, X., & Triantaphyllou, E. (2008). Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 36(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.12.003
  • Wei, C. C., Chien, C. F., & Wang, M. J. J. (2005). An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.03.004
  • Westergaard, D., Stærfeldt, H.-H., Tønsberg, C., Jensen, L. J., & Brunak, S. (2018). A comprehensive and quantitative comparison of text-mining in 15 million full-text articles versus their corresponding abstracts. PLOS Computational Biology, 14(2), e1005962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005962
  • Wong, F. M. F., Liu, Z., & Chiang, M. (2014). Stock Market Prediction from WSJ: Text Mining via Sparse Matrix Factorization. In R. Kumar, H. Toivonen, J. Pei, J. Z. Huang, & X. Wu (Eds.), 2014 Ieee International Conference on Data Mining (icdm) (pp. 430–439). New York: Ieee.
  • Wu, W.-W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.07.025
  • Wu, W.-W. (2008). Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.07.025
  • Wu, W.-W., & Lee, Y.-T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005
  • Xu, R. (2000). Fuzzy least-squares priority method in the analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 112, pp. 359-404
  • Xu, Z. S. (2005). An overview of methods for determining OWA weights. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 20(8), 843–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20097
  • Yadegaridehkordi, E., Nasir, M. H. N. B. M., Noor, N. F. B. M., Shuib, L., & Badie, N. (2018). Predicting the adoption of cloud-based technology using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and structural equation modelling approaches. Applied Soft Computing, 66, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.12.051
  • Yager, R. (1992). Applications and Extensions of Owa Aggregations. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 37(1), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(92)90093-Z
  • Yager, R. (1993). Families of Owa Operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 59(2), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(93)90194-M
  • Yager, R. R. (1996). Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 11(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-111X(199601)11:1<49::AIDINT3>3.3.CO;2-L
  • Yao, L., Zhang, Y., Chen, Q., Qian, H., Wei, B., & Hu, Z. (2017). Mining coherent topics in documents using word embeddings and large-scale text data. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 64, 432– 439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.06.024
  • Yong, D. (2006). Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28(7–8), 839–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2436-5
  • Yu, D., Xu, Z., Pedrycz, W., & Wang, W. (2017). Information sciences 1968-2016: A retrospective analysis with text mining and bibliometric. Information Sciences, 418, 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.031
  • Yuksel, I., & Dagdeviren, M. (2007). Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis - A case study for a textile firm. Information Sciences, 177(16), 3364–3382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.01.001
  • Yüksel, S. (2017). The impacts of research and development expenses on export and economic growth. International Business and Accounting Research Journal, 1(1), 1-8.
  • Yüksel, S. (2016). Bankaların Takipteki Krediler Oranını Belirleyen Faktörler: Türkiye İçin Bir Model Önerisi. Bankacılar Dergisi, 98, 41-56.
  • Yüksel, S., & Özsarı, M. (2017). Türkiye’nin Kredi Notunu Etkileyen Faktörlerin MARS Yöntemi İle Belirlenmesi. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 1(2), 16-31.
  • Yüksel, S., Mukhtarov, S., & Mammadov, E. (2016). Comparing the efficiency of Turkish and Azerbaijani banks: An application with data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3), 1059-1067.
  • Yüksel, S., & Zengin, S. (2016). Leading Indicators of 2008 Global Crisis: An Analysis with Logit and Mars Methods. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 8(15), 495-518.
  • Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Emir, Ş. (2017). Comparing the performance of Turkish deposit banks by using DEMATEL, Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and MOORA approaches. World Journal of Applied Economics, 3(2), 26-47.
  • Zadeh, L., A fuzzy-algorithmic approach to the definition of complex or imprecise concepts. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 1976, 8, 249–291
  • Zadeh, L., Information and Control, 1965, 8, 338–358. Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2010). A New Additive Ratio Assessment (aras) Method in Multicriteria Decision-Making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Peldschus, F., & Turskis, Z. (2007). Multi-attribute assessment of road design solutions by using the COPRAS method. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 2(4), 195– 203.
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Kalibatas, D., & Kalibatiene, D. (2016). A multi-attribute assessment using WASPAS for choosing an optimal indoor environment. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 16(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2015.10.002
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Vilutiene, T. (2010). Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 10(3), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60141-1
  • Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras, Antucheviciene, J., Saparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2013). Mcdm Methods Waspas and Multimoora: Verification of Robustness of Methods When Assessing Alternative Solutions. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 47(2), 5–20.
Manas Journal of Social Studies-Cover
  • ISSN: 1694-7215
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2001
  • Yayıncı: KIRGIZİSTAN-TÜRKİYE MANAS ÜNİVERSİTESİ