Türkiye’de Optimal Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynağının COPRAS Yöntemiyle Tespiti ve Yenilenebilir Enerji Yatırımlarının İstihdam Artırıcı Etkisi

Bu çalışma Türkiye'nin elektrik üretiminde yenilenebilir enerji payının %100 olması halinde sektöre yapılacak ilave yatırımların istihdamda sağlayacağı artışı tahmin etmektedir. İlave yatırımlarda hangi yenilenebilir kaynağa ne kadar pay ayrılacağı COPRAS çok kriterli karar verme yöntemiyle belirlenmiştir. COPRAS'a göre belirlenen yenilenebilir enerji yatırım büyüklüklerinin ülkedeki istihdama yapacağı katkı Ulusal Enerji Laboratuvarı (NREL) tarafından geliştirilen İstihdam ve Ekonomik Kalkınma Modeline (JEDI) göre tahmin edilmiştir. Model sonuçlarına göre fosil yakıtlı santraller yerine kurulacak 56.694 MW büyüklüğündeki yenilenebilir enerji santrallerinin kurulumu ve işletilmesiyle ülkede 576.664 kişiye doğrudan, 322.852 kişiye dolaylı ve 233.030 kişiye uyarılmış olmak üzere toplamda 1.132.545 kişiye ilave istihdam sağlanacağı tahmin edilmektedir

Determination of Renewable Energy Source in Turkey by COPRAS and Analysis of the Employment-Enhancing Effect of Renewable Energy Investments

The present study estimates the increase in the number of jobs resulting from the additional investments in energy sector if Turkey’s renewable energy percentage in the electricity generation is 100%. The share to be allocated to each renewable energy source within additional investment value is determined according to COPRAS-based multi-criteria decision making method. The contribution of renewable energy investment value which is determined through COPRAS to employment in the country has been estimated according to Jobs and Economic Development Impact (JEDI) Model which was developed by National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). According to results of the model, it is estimated that a total of 1.132.545 additional jobs will be created with following breakdown through the installation and operation of 56.694 MW renewable energy plants instead of fossil fuel power stations: to 576.664 people directly, to 322.852 people indirectly and to 233.030 people through stimulated employment

___

Altuntepe, N. ve Güner, T. (2013), “Türkiye’de østihdam-Büyüme øliúkisinin Analizi (1988-2011)”, Uluslararas Alanya øúletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 73-84.

Ataman, B.C. (2006), “Türkiye’de 2000-2005 Dönemi øúsizlik Üzerine Tartúmalar”, øktisat øsletme ve Finans, 21(239), 93-107.

Banaitiene, N., Banaitis, A., Kaklauskas, A. ve Zavadskas, E.K. (2008), “Evaluating the Life Cycle of Building: a Multivariant and Multiple Criteria Approach”, Omega, 36(3), 429-441.

Barúk, S., Çevik, E.ø. ve Çevik, N.K. (2010), “Türkiye’de Okun Yasas, Asimetri øliúkisi ve østihdam Yaratmayan Büyüme: Markov-Switching Yaklaúm”, Maliye Dergisi Yaynlar, 159.

Benayoun, R., Roy, B. ve Sussman, B. (1966), “ELECTRE: Une Méthode Pour Guider le Choix en Présence de Points de Vue Multiples”, Note de Travail, 49, SEMA-METRA International, Direction Scientifique.

Brauers, W.K.M. ve Zavadskas, E.K. (2006), “The MOORA Method and Its Application to Privatization in a Transition Economy”, Control and Cybernetics, 35(2), 445.

Ceylan, S. ve ùahin, B.Y. (2010), “øúsizlik ve Ekonomik Büyüme øliúkisinde Asimetri”, Do÷uú Üniversitesi Dergisi, 11(2), 157-165.

Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M. ve Chakraborty, S. (2011), “Materials Selection Using Complex Proportional Assessment and Evaluation of Mixed Data Methods”, Materials and Design, 32, 851-860.

Chatterjee, N. ve Bose, G. (2013), “A COPRAS-F Base Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Approach for Site Selection of Wind Farm”, Decision Science Letters, 2(1), 1-10.

Churchman, C.W. ve Ackoff, R.L. (1954), “An Approximate Measure of Value”, Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 2(2), 172-187

EøA (2016), “Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2016”, US Energy Information Administration, http://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/electricity _generation.pdf (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

ETKB (2016), “østatistikler, Denge Tablolar, Enerji øúleri Genel Müdürlü÷ü”, Ankara, http://www.eigm.gov.tr/tr-TR/Denge-Tablolari/ Denge-Tablolari (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

Görez, T. ve Alkan, A. (2005), “Türkiye’nin Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklar ve Hidroelektrik Enerji Potansiyeli”, III. Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklar Sempozyumu, Mersin, 19-21.

Hwang, C.L. ve Yoon, K. (1981), “Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications”, New York: Springer.

IPCC (2014), “IPCC Working Group III-Mitigation of Climate Change, Annex III: Technology-Specific Cost and Performance Parameters”, https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_annex -iii.pdf (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

IRENA (2016), “Renewable Energy and Jobs Annual Review 2016”, International Renewable Energy Agency, http://www.irena.org/ DocumentDownloads/Publications/IRENA_RE_Jobs_Annual_Review_2 016.pdf (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E.K.. Raslanas, S., Ginevicius, R., Komka, A. ve Malinauskas, P. (2006), “Selection of Low-e Window in Retrofit of Public Buildings by Applying Multiple Criteria Method COPRAS: A Lithuanian Case”, Energy and Buildings, 38, 454-462.

Kayakutlu, G. ve Ercan, S. (2015), “Regional Energy Portfolio Construction: Case Studies in Turkey. In Sustainable Future Energy Technology and Supply Chains”, Springer International Publishing, 107-126.

Kenny, R., Law, C. ve Pearce, J.M. (2010), “Towards Real Energy Economics: Energy Policy Driven by Life-Cycle Carbon Emission”, Energy Policy, 38(4), 1969-1978.

Kesici, M.R. (2010), “Türkiye Ekonomisinin Yüksek Büyüme Evresinde østihdam ve øúsizlik”, “øú, Güç” Endüstri øliúkileri ve ønsan Kaynaklar Dergisi, Temmuz, 12(3), 07-26.

MacCrimmon, K.R. (1968), “Decision Making Among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach”, RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA.

Murato÷lu, Y. (2011), “Büyüme ve østihdam Arasndaki øliúki: Türkiye Örne÷i”, International Conference on Eurasian Economies, Conference Paper, http://avekon.org/papers/335.pdf (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

NETL (2013), “Power Generation Technology Comparison from a Life Cycle Perspective”, National Energy Technology Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,https://www.netl.doe.gov/ File%20Library/Research/Energy%20Analysis/Life%20Cycle%20Analysis/Technology-Assessment-Compilation-Report.pdf (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

OECD (2015), “OECD Employment Outlook 2015”, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/els/oecd-employment-outlook-19991266.htm (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

Özcan, E., Ünlüsoy, S., ve Eren, T. (2017), “ANP VE TOPSIS Yöntemleriyle Türkiye’de Yenilenebilir Eneri Yatrm Alternatiflerinin De÷erlendirilmesi”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi, Science and Technology, 5(2), 204-219.

REN21 (2015), “Renewables 2015 Global Status Report”, Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century, http://www.ren21.net/wpcontent/uploads/2015/07/GSR2015_KeyFindings_lowres.pdf (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

Roy, B. (1985), “Méthodologie Multicritère d" aide à la Décision”, Economica.

Roy, B. (1991), “The Outranking Approach and the Foundations of ELECTRE Methods”, Theory and Decision, 31(1), 49-73.

Rutovitz, J. (2010), “South African Energy Sector Jobs to 2030”, Greenpeace Africa by the Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology, Sydney, Greenpeace Africa, Johannesburg.

Rutovitz, J. ve Harris, S. (2012), “Calculating Global Energy Sector Jobs: 2012 Methodology”, Prepared for Greenpeace International by the Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology, Sydney.

Srinivasan, V. ve Shocker, A.D. (1973), “Linear Programming Techniques for Multidimensional Analysis of Preferences”, Psychometrika, 38(3), 337-369.

Stein, E.W. (2013), “A Comprehensive Multi-Criteria Model to Rank Electric Energy Production Technologies”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 640-654. https://e3garden.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2013/10/RSER2418_Stein.pdf (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

Taban, S. (2011), “Küresel Finans Krizi Öncesi ve Sonras Dönemde Türkiye’de Ekonomik Büyümenin Dinamikleri”, SETA Analiz, 37, 1-33.

Tar, R. ve Abasz, T. (2010), “Asimetrik Etkiler Altnda Okun Yasas’nn Eúik Hata Düzeltme Modeli ile Snanmas: Türkiye Örne÷i”, øktisat øúletme ve Finans, 25(291), 53-77.

TCMB (2016), “Elektronik Veri Da÷tm Sistemi”, Genel østatistikler, http://evds.tcmb.gov.tr/ (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

TEøAù (2016), “Türkiye 2015 Yl Elektrik Üretim-øletim østatistikleri”, Türkiye Elektrik øletim A.ù. Genel Müdürlü÷ü Planlama ve Stratejik Yönetim Dairesi Baúkanl÷ Üretim Planlama ve østatistik Müdürlü÷ü, Ankara, http://www.teias.gov.tr/T%C3%BCrkiyeElektrik%C4%B0 statistikleri/istatistik2015/istatistik2015.htm (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

UNFCCC (2015), “GHG Data: GHG Total Including LULUCF”, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change http://unfccc.int/ ghg_data/ghg_data_unfccc/time_series_annex_i/items/3842.php (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

US Energy Information Administration (2015), “Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook”, http://www.eia.gov/outlooks/archive/aeo15/pdf/ electricity_generation_2015.pdf (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

Uysal, D. ve Alptekin, V. (2009), “Türkiye Ekonomisinde Büyüme-øúsizlik øliúkisinin Var Modeli Yardmyla Snanmas (1980-2007)”, Dumlupnar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Aralk, 25, 69-78.

World Bank (2015), “World Development Indicators: Energy Dependency, Efficiency and Carbon Dioxide Emissions”, http://wdi.worldbank.org/ table/3.8 (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

World Bank (2016), “World DataBank, World Development Indicators”, http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-develop ment-indicators (Eriúim Tarihi: 15.05.2017)

Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Fouladgar, M.M., Zavadskas, E.K. ve Moini, S.H.H. (2013), “Selecting the Optimal Renewable Energy Using Multi Criteria Decision Making”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(5), 957-978.

Ylmaz Eser, B. ve Terzi, H. (2008), “Türkiye’de øúsizlik Sorunu ve Avrupa østihdam Stratejisi”, Erciyes Üniversitesi øktisadi ve ødari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 229-250.

Zavadskas, E.K. ve Kaklauskas, A. (1996), “Pastatǐ Sistemotechninis Ʋvertinimas [eng. Systemic-technical Assessment of Buildings]”, Vilnius: Technika.

Zavadskas, E.K. ve Turskis, Z. (2010), “A New Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Method in Multicriteria DecisionǦMaking”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 159-172.