KURUMSAL YÖNETİM & VERGİDEN KAÇINMA İLİŞKİSİ: BİST İŞLETMELERİ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Bu çalışmanın amacı işletmelerin farklı kurumsal yönetim uygulamalarıyla vergiden kaçınma oranları arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda; 2010-2015 yılları arasında BİST TÜM endeksine kote olan işletmelerin kurumsal yönetim değişkenlerinin (kurumsal sahiplik oranı, yönetim kurulu üye sayısı, yönetim kurulu bağımsız üye sayısı, yönetim kurulundaki kadın üye sayısı, bağımsız denetim görüşü, denetim şirketi ve aile işletmesi olma), “düzeltilmiş ticari kâr – mali kâr farkı” yöntemiyle ölçülen vergiden kaçınmayla ilişkileri, verilerin yapısına uygun olan panel veri analizi yöntemlerinden “genelleştirilmiş tahmin eşitliği” yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analizler sonucunda literatürdeki mevcut çalışmalarla benzer şekilde, genel olarak etkin kurumsal yönetimin varlığında vergiden kaçınmanın arttığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE & TAX AVOIDANCE: AN INVESTIGATION ON BIST FIRMS

The aim of this study is to reveal the relationship between different corporate governance practices of businesses and tax avoidance. For his purpose; the relationship between corporate governance variables (the number of board members, the number of independent members of the board of directors, the number of female members in the board of directors, the independent audit opinion, the corporate ownership rate) and tax avoidance measured by adjusted book- tax gap method were analyzed using “the generalizedestimation equation method,” which is appropriate for the structure of the data of the companies quoted on the BIST ALL index during the period of 2010- 2015. As a result of the analyzes, similar to the current studies in the literatüre, it has been concluded that tax avoidance increased in the presence of effective corporate governance mechanisims.

___

  • Amiram, D., Bauer, A. M. ve Frank, M. M. (2013). Corporate Tax Avoidance and Managerial Incentives Generated by Shareholder Dividend Tax Policy Erişim Adresi: http://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty-research/ sites/facultyresearch/files/accounting/AMIRAM.BURTON.2013.pdf
  • Annuar, H. A., Salihu, I. A., Obid, S. N. S., (2014). “Corporate Ownership, Governance and Tax Avoidance: An Interactive Effects”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, ss. 150 – 160, International Conference on Accounting Studies 2014, ICAS 2014, 18-19 August 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Armstrong, C.S., Blouin, J. L. and Larcker, D.F. (2012). The Incentives for Tax Planning, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53 (1-2), 391-411.
  • Armstrong, C.S., Blouin, J.L., Jagolinzer, A.D. and Larcker, D.F. (2015). Corporate Governance, Incentives and Tax Avoidance, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60 (1), 1-17.
  • Baltagi, B.H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data. 3. bs. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Baltagi, B.H. and Wu, P.X. (1999). Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15, 814-823.
  • Bauer, A. (2011). Internal Control Quality as an Explanatory Factor of Tax Avoidance, (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) School of Accounting & Finance University of Waterloo
  • Bauer, A. (2014). Tax Avoidance and the Implications of Weak Internal Controls, Contemporary Accounting Research, 33 (2), 449 – 486.
  • Boussaidi, A. and Hamed, M. S. (2015). The Impact of Governance Mechanisms on Tax Aggressiveness: Empirical Evidence From Tunisian Context, Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 5, (1), 1-12.
  • Brown, M. and Forsythe, A. (1974), Robust test for the equality of variances, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 364-367.
  • Chen, K. P. and Chu, C. Y. C. (2005). Internal Control vs. External Manipulation: A Model of Corporate Income Tax Evasion, RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 151 – 164.
  • Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q. And Shevlin, T. (2010). Are Family Firms More Tax Aggressive Than Non-Family Firms?, Journal of Financial”Economics, 95, 41-61.
  • Desai, M. and Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate Tax Avoidance and Highpowered Incentives, Journal of Financial Economics, 79, (1), 145–179.
  • Desai, M. ve Dharmapala, D. (2009). Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, (3), 537-546.
  • Donohoe, M. P. ve Knechel, W. B. (2014). Does Corporate Tax Aggressiveness Influence Audit Pricing?, Contemperory Accounting Research, 31, (1), 284– 308.
  • Dyreng, S., Hanlon, M., and Maydew, E. (2008). Long-Run Corporate Tax Avoidance, The Accounting Review, 83, (1), 61-82.
  • Edgar, T. (2007). Designing and Implementing a Target-Effective General Anti- Avoidance Rule, Tax Avoidance in Canada After Canada Trustco and Mathew, (ed.) D Duff and H Erlichman, ss. 221 – 226.
  • Egger, P., Eggert, W. and Winner, H. (2010).Saving Taxes Through Foreign Plant Ownership, Journal of International Economics, 81, 99 – 108.
  • Gaertner, F. B. (2014). CEO After-Tax Compensation Incentives and Corporate Tax Avoidance, Contemporary Accounting Research, 31, (4), 1077
  • – 1102. Graham, L. and Bedard, J. C. (2015) Internal Control Deficiencies in Tax Reporting: A Detailed View, Accounting Horizons, 29, (4), 917 – 942.
  • Hanlon, M. and Heitzman, S. (2010). A Review of Tax Research, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, (2-3), 127–178.
  • Hausman, J.A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics, Econometrica, 46,(6), 1251-1271.
  • Hoi, C.K., Wu, Q. and Zhang, H. (2013). Is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Associated with Tax Avoidance? Evidence from Irresponsible CSR Activities, The Accounting Review, 88, (6), 2025-2059.
  • Kay, J.A. (1980), The Anatomy of Tax Avoidance, Income Distribution: The Limits to Redistribution; Proceedings of the 31st Symposium of the Colston Research Society, University of Bristol (John Wright), ss. 135-148.
  • Klassen, K.J., Lisowsky, P. and Mescall, D. (2016). The Role of Auditors, Non- Auditors, and Internal Tax Departments in Corporate Tax Aggressiveness, The Accounting Review, 91, (1), 179 – 205.
  • Landry, S., Deslandes, M. ve Fortin, A. (2013). Tax Aggressiveness, Corporate Social Responsibility and Ownership Structure, Journal of Accounting, Ethics & Public Policy, 14, (3), 611 – 645.
  • Lanis, R. and Richardson, G. (2015). Is Corporate Social Responsibility Performance Associated with Tax Avoidance?, Journal of Business Ethics, 127,(2), 439- 457.
  • Levene, H. (1960), Robust tests for equality of variances, Contributions to Probability and Statistics, (I. Olkin), 278-292. Palo Alto, CA: Standford University Press.
  • Mahenthiran, S. and Kasipillai, J. (2012). Influence of Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance on Effective Tax Rates and Tax Planning: Malaysian Evidence, Australian Tax Forum, 27, (4), 941 – 969.
  • Martinez, A.L. and Lessa, R.C. (2014). The Effect of Tax Aggressiveness and Corporate Governance on Audit Fees: Evidences from Brazil, Journal of Management Research, 6, (1), 95 – 108.
  • Martinez, A.L., Ribeiro, A.C. and Funchal, B. (2015). The Sarbanes Oxley Act and Taxation: A Study of the Effects on the Tax Aggressiveness of Brazilian Firms, Xv Congresso USP Controladoria e Contabilidade - 2015, At São Paulo – SP.
  • McGuire, S.T., Omer, T.C. and Wang, D. (2012). Tax Avoidance: Does Tax-Specific Industry Expertise Make a Difference?, The Accounting Review, 87,(3), 975-1003.
  • Minnick, K., and Noga, T. (2010). Do Corporate Governance Characteristic Influencing Tax Management?, Journal of Corporate Finance, 16, 703 – 718.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). Glossary of Tax Terms Erişim Adresi: http://www.oecd.org/ctp/ glossaryoftaxterms.htm
  • Pesaran, M.H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESIFO Working Paper, NO. 1229.
  • Phillips, J.D. (2003). Corporate Tax-Planning Effectiveness: The Role of Compensation-Based Incentives, The Accounting Review, 78, (3), 847 – 874.
  • Rego, S.O. and Wilsom, R. (2012), Equity Risk Incentives and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 50, 775 – 810.
  • Richardson, G., Taylor, G., Lanis, R. (2013). The Impact of Board of Director Oversight Characteristics on Corporate Tax Aggressiveness: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32, (3), 68 – 88.
  • Richardson, G., Wang, B. and Zhang, X. (2016). Ownership Structure and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Publicly Listed Private Firms in China, Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 12, (2), 141- 158.
  • Scheffer, D. (2013). The Ethical Imperative of Curbing Corporate Tax Avoidance, Ethics & International Affairs (Cambridge University Press), 27, (4), 361 – 369.
  • Shafer, W.E. and Simmons, R.E. (2008). Social Responsibility, Machiavellianism and Tax Avoidance: A study of Hong Kong Tax Professionals, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21 (5), 695 – 720.
  • Steijvers, T. ve Niskanen, M. (2014). Tax Aggressiveness In Private Family Firms: An Agency Perspective, Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5, 347- 357.
  • The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wale Erişim Adresi: https://www.icaew.com/technical/corporate-governance/principles/ principles-articles/does-corporate-governance-matter
  • Tresch, R. (2002). Public Finance, A Normative Theory. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Watson, L. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility, Tax Avoidance, and Earnings Performance, The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 37, (2), 1-21.
  • Weisbach, A.D. (2003). Corporate Tax Avoidance. Proceedings from National Tax Association ninety sixth annual conference. Chicago: Illinois.
  • Zemzem, A. and Ftouhi, K. (2013). The Effects of Board of Directors’ Characteristics on Tax Aggressiveness, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4, (4), 140-147.
  • Zhang, H-X. Ve Han, M-F. (2008). Tax Planning Analysis Based on Listed Company With Different Ownership Structure - The Empirical Evidence From State- Owned Listed Company And Private Listed Company in China. China Soft Science, 9, 122 – 131.