KAPSAMLI GELİRİN DEĞER İLİŞKİSİNE YÖNELİK ULUSLARARASI LİTERATÜR TARAMASI

Bu literatür taramasında Web of Science veri tabanında yer alan ve kapsamlı gelirin değer ilişkisini analiz eden 25 sayısal makale incelenerek ve bu makalelere ilişkin genel özellikler, modeller, değişkenler, değişken varyans ve dışlanmış değişken yanlılığı sorununa yönelik kullanılan yöntemler irdelenmektedir. Kapsamlı gelirin değer ilişkisi perspektifinden analizi konusunun akademik literatürdeki yerinin özellikle 2015 ve sonrasında daha belirgin bir hale geldiği anlaşılmaktadır. Ayrıca, yalnızca bir makalenin birden fazla ülkeye ait veri setini kullanarak bulgular sunması, literatürün bu alandaki boşluğuna ve potansiyeline işaret etmektedir. Bu literatür taraması çalışması, analiz konusu makalelerin ağırlıklı olarak Getiri Modeli perspektifinden konuya yaklaştığını, piyasa verisine ilişkin ölçüm fiyatı olarak finansal yıl sonu kapanış fiyatını kullandığını ve değişken varyans ile dışlanmış değişken yanlılığı sorunlarına yönelik çekinceler sunmadığını ortaya koyarak gelecek araştırmalar için ışık tutmaktadır

A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

In this literature review study, 25 quantitative articles studying the value relevance of comprehensive income are analysed by considering their general traits, models and variables employed, and methods to deal with heteroscedasticity and endogeneity. The number of studies analysing the value relevance of comprehensive income becomes very apparent beginning from 2015. Furthermore, since there is only one article presenting outcomes by employing a dataset belonging to several countries, there is a huge gap andpotential of the literature on studies presenting international evidence. This literature review study also reports that the literature extensively i) employs the Return Model, ii) measures the market price at the end of the fiscal year end, and iii) does not point out concerns regarding heteroscedasticity and endogeneity. This study aims to shed light on the current picture of the literature for the future research.

___

  • Amir, E., Harris, T. S. and Venuti, E. K. (1993). A comparison of the valuerelevance of U.S. versus Non-U.S. GAAP accounting measures using Form 20-F reconciliations. Journal of Accounting Research 31, 230–264.
  • Amri-Asrami, M., Aghaei, M.A., Azar, A. and Sepasi, S. (2017). Value relevance of information in transaction-based accounting vs. fair value accounting for equity valuation. Revista QUID (Special Issue), 54–64.
  • Anandarajan, A., Hasan, I., Isik, I. and McCarthy, C. (2006). The Role of Earnings and Book Values in Pricing Stocks: Evidence from Turkey. Advances in International Accounting 19, 59–89.
  • Ball, R. ve Brown, P. (1968). An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6(2), 159–178.
  • Banks, L., Hodgson, A. ve Russell, M. (2018). The location of comprehensive income reporting – does it pass the financial analyst revision test? Accounting Research Journal 31(4), 531–550.
  • Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H. ve Landsman, W. R. (2001). The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31(1–3), 77–104.
  • Bartolucci, F., Belotti, F. ve Peracchi, F. (2015). Linear models for panel data Testing for time-invariant unobserved heterogeneity in generalized linear models for panel data. Journal of Econometrics 184(1), 111–123.
  • Barton, J., Hansen, T. B. ve Pownall, G. (2010). Which performance measures do investors around the world value the most-and why? Accounting Review 85(3), 753–789.
  • Beaver, W. H. (1968). The Information Content of Annual Announcements Earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 6(3), 67–92.
  • Beaver, W. H. (2002). Perspectives on Recent Capital Market Research. Accounting Review 77(2), 453–474.
  • Bhat, G. and Ryan, S. G. (2015). The impact of risk modeling on the market perception of banks’ estimated fair value gains and losses for financial instruments. Accounting, Organizations and Society 46, 81–95.
  • Bischof, J. and Daske, H. (2016). Interpreting the European Union’s IFRS Endorsement Criteria: The Case of IFRS 9. Accounting in Europe 13(2), 129– 168.
  • Brushwood, J. D., Johnston, D. and Kutcher, L. (2017). The Market Valuation of the Permanent Book-to-Tax Differences Generated by StockBased Compensation Awards. Journal of The Americal Taxation Association 39(2), 1–20.
  • Campbell, J. L. (2015). The fair value of cash flow hedges, future profitability, and stock returns. Contemporary Accounting Research 32(1), 243–279.
  • Chambers, D., Linsmeier, T. J., Shakespeare, C. ve Sougiannis, T. (2007). An evaluation of SFAS No. 130 comprehensive income disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies 12, 557–593.
  • Clout, V. J. and Willett, R. J. (2016). Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics Earnings in firm valuation and their value relevance. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 12(3), 223–240.
  • De George, E. T., Li, X.and Shivakumar, L. (2016). A review of the IFRS adoption literature. Review of Accounting Studies 21(3), 898–1004.
  • Demir, V., Bahadir, O. ve Oncel, A. G. (2013). What is the Best Measure of Financial Performance? Comprehensive Income versus Net Income: Evidence from Turkey. İktisat, İşletme ve Finans 28, 73–96.
  • Demir, V., Ertugrul, M. ve Gür, E. (2016). Değer ilişkisi üzerine uluslararası yayınlar. Mali Çözüm 136, 13–31.
  • Dhaliwal, D., Subramanyam, K. R. and Trezevant, R. (1999). Is comprehensive income superior to net income as a measure of firm performance? Journal of Accounting and Economics 26(1), 43–67.
  • Dong, M., Ryan, S. and Zhang, X.-J. (2014). Preserving amortized costs within a fair-value-accounting framework: reclassification of gains and losses on available-for-sale securities upon realization. Review of Accounting Studies 19, 242–280.
  • Easton, P. D. and Sommers, G. A. (2003). Scale and the Scale Effect in Market-based Accounting Research. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 30(1–2), 25–55.Ertugrul, M. (2018). Muhasebe Verilerinin Değer İlişkisi 1. Bs. Ankara: Nobel Bilimsel Eserler.
  • Ertugrul, M. ve Demir, V. (2018). How Does Unobserved Heterogeneity Affect Value Relevance? Australian Accounting Review 28(2), 288–301.
  • Francis, J. and Schipper, K. (1999). Have Financial Statements Lost Their Relevance? Journal of Accounting Research 37(2), 319–352.
  • Frendy, H. U. D. S. (2017). Does recycling improve information usefulness of income? The case of Japan. Asian Review of Accounting 25(3), 376–403.
  • Gaio, C. (2010). The Relative Importance of Firm and Country Characteristics for Earnings Quality around the World. European Accounting Review 19(4), 693–738.
  • Gaio, C. and Raposo, C. (2011). Earnings quality and firm valuation: International evidence. Accounting and Finance 51(2), 467–499.
  • Gigler, F., Kanodia, C. and Venugopalan, R. (2007). Assessing the Information Content of Mark-to-Market Accounting with Mixed Attributes : The Case of Cash Flow Hedges. Journal of Accounting Research 45(2), 257– 276.
  • Gow, I. D., Ormazabal, G. and Taylor, D. J. (2010). Correcting for Cross‐ Sectional and Time‐Series Dependence in Accounting Research. Accounting Review 85(2), 483–512.
  • Gregory, A., Saleh, W. and Tucker, J. (2005). A UK test of an inflationadjusted Ohlson model. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 32(3–4), 487–534.
  • He, H. and Lin, Z. (2015). Analyst Following, Information Environment and Value Relevance of Comprehensive Income: Evidence from China. AsiaPacific Journal of Financial Studies 44(5), 688–720.
  • Hellström, K. (2006). The Value Relevance of Financial Accounting Information in a Transition Economy: The Case of the Czech Republic. European Accounting Review 15(3), 325–349.
  • Hodder, L. D., Hopkins, P. E. and Wahlen, J. M. (2006). Risk-Relevance of Fair-Value Income Measures for Commercial Banks. Accounting Review 81(2), 337–375.
  • Hodgson, A. and Russell, M. (2014). Comprehending Comprehensive Income. Australian Accounting Review 24(2), 100–110.
  • Jones, D. A. and Smith, K. J. (2011). Comparing the value relevance, predictive value, and persistence of other comprehensive income and special items. Accounting Review 86(6), 2047–2073.
  • Kajüter, P. and Nienhaus, M. (2017). The Impact of IFRS 8 Adoption on the Usefulness of Segment Reports. Abacus 53(1), 28–58.
  • Kamu Gözetimi Kurumu (2018). Kavramsal Çerçeve.
  • Kanagaretnam, K., Mathieu, R. and Shehata, M. (2009). Usefulness of comprehensive income reporting in Canada. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 28(4), 349–365.
  • Khan, S. and Bradbury, M. E. (2016). The volatility of comprehensive income and its association with market risk. Accounting and Finance 56, 727–748.
  • Khan, S., Bradbury, M. E. and Courtenay, S. (2018). Value Relevance of Comprehensive Income. Australian Accounting Review 28(2), 279–287.
  • Kothari, S. P. (2001). Capital Markets Research in Accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31, 105–231.
  • Kothari, S. P. and Warner, J. B. (2004). Econometrics of Event Studies. available at https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.608601
  • Kothari, S. P. and Zimmerman, J. L. (1995). Price and return models. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20(2), 155–192.
  • Kubota, K., Suda, K. and Takehara, H. (2011). Information Content of Other Comprehensive Income and Net Income: Evidence for Japanese Firms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 18(2), 145–168.
  • Landsman, W. R., Miller, B. L., Peasnell, K. and Yeh, S. (2011). Do Investors Understand Really Dirty Surplus? Accounting Review 86(1), 237– 258.
  • Lin, S., Martinez, D., Wang, C. and Yang, Y. (2018). Is Other Comprehensive Income Reported in the Income Statement More Value Relevant? The Role of Financial Statement Presentation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 33(4), 624–646.
  • Makar, S., Wang, L. and Alam, P. (2013). The mixed attribute model in SFAS 133 cash flow hedge accounting: implications for market pricing. Review of Accounting Studies 18, 66–94.
  • Manganaris, P., Spathis, C. and Dasilas, A. (2016). How institutional factors and IFRS affect the value relevance of conservative and non-conservative banks. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 17(2), 211–236.
  • Mechelli, A. and Cimini, R. (2014). Is Comprehensive Income Value Relevant and Does Location Matter? A European Study. Accounting in Europe 11(1), 59–87.
  • Mestelman, S., Mohammad, E. and Shehata, M. (2015). The Convergence of IFRS and U.S. GAAP: Evidence from the SEC’s Removal of Form 20-F Reconciliations. Accounting Perspectives 14(3), 190–211.
  • Miller, M. H. and Modigliani, F. (1966). Some Estimates of the Cost of Capital to the Electric Utility Industry, 1954-1957. American Economic Review 56(3), 333–391.
  • Mulenga, M. J. (2016). International Financial Reporting Standards’ Adoption and Value Relevance of Accounting Information: a Brief Literature Review. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management 4(6), 814–827.
  • Nguyen, T. and Molinari, P. (2013). Accounting for “insurance contracts” according to IASB exposure draft - Is the information useful. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice 38(2), 376–398.
  • O’Hanlon, J. F. and Pope, P. F. (1999). The value-relevance of UK dirty surplus accounting flows. British Accounting Review 31(4), 459–482.
  • Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2), 661–687.
  • Onali, E., Ginesti, G. and Vasilakis, C. (2017). How should we estimate value-relevance models? Insights from European data. British Accounting Review 49(5), 460–473.
  • Ota, K. (2003). The Impact of Price and Return Models on Value Relevance Studies: A Review of Theory and Evidence. Accounting Research Journal 16(1), 6–20.
  • Park, H. (2018). Market Reaction to Other Comprehensive Income. Sustainability 10(6), 1–13.
  • Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies 22(1), 435–480.
  • Schaberl, P. D. and Victoravich, L. M. (2015). Reporting location and the value relevance of accounting information: The case of other comprehensive income. Advances in Accounting 31(2), 239–246.
  • Ulusan, H. (2013). Kapsamlı kâr (zarar): Raporlama yöntemi tercihleri ve finansal performansın raporlanmasına etkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 14(2), 45–72.
  • Walker, M. (1997). Clean Surplus Accounting Models and Market-based Accounting Research: A Review. Accounting and Business Research 27(4), 341–355.
  • Walker, M. (2010). Accounting for varieties of capitalism: The case against a single set of global accounting standards. British Accounting Review 42(3), 137–152.
  • Yousefinejad, M., Ahmad, A. ve Embong, Z. (2017). Value Relevance of Other Comprehensive Income and Its Available-For-Sale Financial Instruments (AFS) and Revaluation Surplus of Property , Plant and Equipment (REV) Components. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance 8(Special Issue), 133–143.