İlliberal Liberteryenler: Neden Liberteryenizm Liberal Bir Görüş Değildir ve Bu İyi Bir Şeydir; Samuel Freeman’e Cevap

Samuel Freeman’in liberal düşünce dünyasında epeyce ilgi çeken yazısını daha önce çevirmiş ve Liberal Düşünce Dergisi’nde (2011’de) yayınlamıştım: “İlliberal Lİberteryenler: Liberteryenizm Niçin Liberal Bir görüş Değildir?” (Liberal Düşünce, Yıl 2011, Cilt , Sayı 64, ss. 5-39 https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/ pub/liberal/issue/48185/609813 ). Dergi’nin yazının yayınlandığı sayısında benim bu yazıya yönelik bir eleştirim de yer almıştı: “Amerikan Liberalizmi Ne Kadar Liberal?” (Liberal Düşünce, Yıl 2011, Cilt , Sayı 64, ss. 41-68 https:// dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/liberal/issue/48185/609816) . Daha sonra bu yazılar başka birkaç yazıyla birlikte bir kitapta derlendi: Hangi Liberalizm (Liberte Yayınları, 2013, (https://www.liberte.com.tr/hangi-liberalizm). Aslında Freeman’e sadece benim gibi klasik liberaller değil anarko-kapitalistler de cevap vermişti.

___

  • -Anderson, Martin. 1989. The Christian Science Monitor, 4 January, p. 19, reprinted in Block, Walter, ed. Economics and the Environment: A Reconciliation, Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.
  • -Anderson, William, Walter Block, Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Ilana Mercer, Leon Snyman, and Christopher Westley. 2001. “The Microsoft Corporation in Collision with Antitrust Law,” The Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, Winter, s. 287–302.
  • -Armentano, Dominick T. 1972. The Myths of Antitrust, New Rochelle, N.Y.: Arlington House.
  • ——. 1982. Antitrust and Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy Failure, New York, Wiley.
  • ——. 1991. Antitrust Policy: The Case for Repeal, Washington, D.C.: The Cato Institute.
  • -Armstrong, Donald. 1982. Competition versus Monopoly: Combines Policy in Perspective, Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.
  • -Barnett, Randy, 1977, “Whither anarchy? Has Robert Nozick justified the state?,” The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, Winter, s. 15–22.
  • -Barnett, William and Walter Block. Unpublished. “Coase and Van Zandt on Lighthouses”
  • -Benson, Bruce L. 1989a. “Enforcement of Private Property Rights in Primitive Societies: Law Without Government,” The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. IX, No. 1, Winter, s. 1–26.
  • ——. 1989b. “The Spontaneous Evolution of Commercial Law,” Southern Economic Journal, 55: 644–661.
  • ——. 1990. The Enterprise of Law: Justice Without the State, San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy.
  • ——. 1993. “The Impetus for Recognizing Private Property and Adopting Ethical Behavior in a Market Economy: Natural Law, Government Law, or Evolving Self-Interest,” 6 Rev. Austrian Econ. 43.
  • -Block, Walter. 1969. “Voluntary Slavery.” The Libertarian Connection, Vol. I, No. 3, April 13, s. 9–11.
  • ——. 1983. “Public Goods and Externalities: The Case of Roads,” The Journal of Libertarian Studies: An Interdisciplinary Review, Vol. VII, No. 1, Spring, s. 1–34; http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/7_1/7_1_1.pdf
  • ——. 1990. “Earning Happiness Through Homesteading Unowned Land: a comment on ‘Buying Misery with Federal Land’ by Richard Stroup,” Journal of Social Political and Economic Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, Summer, s. 237–253.
  • ——.. 1991. “Book review of Michael Levin, Feminism and Freedom, “ The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. X, No. 1, s. 97–106; http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/10_1/10_1_6.pdf
  • ——. 1991 [1976]. Defending the Undefendable, New York: Fox and Wilkes.
  • ——. 1994. “Total Repeal of Anti-trust Legislation: A Critique of Bork, Brozen and Posner,” Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 8, No. 1, s. 35–70.
  • ——. 1996. “Hayek’s Road to Serfdom,” Journal of Libertarian Studies: An Interdisciplinary Review, Vol. 12, No. 2, Fall, s. 327–350, http://www.mises.org/journals/jls/12_2/12_2_6.pdf
  • ——. 1998. “Compromising the Uncompromisable: Discrimination,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 57, No. 2, April, s. 223–237. http://www.babson.edu/ajes/issues/past.htm