CONTESTING THE RESOLUTIONS OF SHAREHOLDERS BEFORE A COURT OF LAW IN POLAND

Bu makale, Polonyada şirket hissedarlarının kararlarını hukuki olarak gözden geçirme sistemini genel hatlarıyla ele almaktadır. Belli bir kararın hatalı olduğu durumlarda hukuk mahkemesinde açılabilecek iki tür davayı ele almaktadır. Bu bağlamda, kanun hükümlerinin yol açtığı, uygulamadaki sorunların önemine gereğinden fazla değer vermek zordur. Buna en iyi örnek, Polonya Ticarî Şirketler Kanununda yer alan yalnızca birkaç hükme dayalı olarak ortaya çıkan büyük miktarda içtihat hukukudur. Bu konu, Polonya içtihadında da büyük yankı uyandırmıştır. Ancak, bu makale sadece birkaç konuya değinmektedir ve bunlardan en önemlisi hissedarların kararıyla işinden uzaklaştırılan bir şirket yöneticisinin bu karara itiraz edip edemeyeceğidir. Ayrıca, makale Ticarî Şirketler Kanununda açık bir şekilde ele alınmayan, hissedar kararlarına itiraz etme biçimleri ve denetim kurullarının kararlarına itiraz konularını da içermektedir.

Polonyada Şirket Hissedarlarının Kararlarına Hukuk Mahkemelerinde Yapılan İtiraz

This article outlines the system of judicial revision of shareholders resolutions in Poland. It deals with two actions that may be brought before a court of law in the situation where a particular resolution is defective. The significance of practical problems caused by statutory provisions in this respect is difficult to overestimate. The best example is a large amount of case law which arose on the ground of just a few provisions of the Polish Code of Commercial Companies. This topic aroused much interest in the Polish jurisprudence as well. However, the article discusses just a few issues, the most important being that whether a company director removed from office by shareholders resolution has the right to contest that resolution. Also, the topics covered by the article include the ways of contesting shareholders resolutions that are not expressly dealt with in the Code of Commercial Companies and contesting the resolutions of supervisory boards.

___

K. Bilewska, Sankcja sprzeczności uchwały walnego zgromadzenia z normami dyspozytywnymi polemika [Resolutions of General Meetings Contrary to Non-Absolutely Binding Legal Norms the Polemic], Przegląd Prawa Handlowego, 2011, no: 6;

D. Kulgawczuk, Uchwały nieistniejące ujęcie systemowe (część 1) [Non existing resolution systemie approach (part 1)], Prawo Spółek, 2009, no: 9;

D. Kulgawczuk,, Uchwały nieistniejące ujęcie systemowe (część 2) [Non existing resolutions systemic approach (part 2)], Prawo Spółek, 2009, no: 10;

R.L. Kwaśnicki, M. Romatowska, Zaskarżenie uchwał rad nadzorczych spółek kapitałowych glosa do wyroku SN z 18.2.2010 r., II CSK 449/09 [Contesting the resolutions of company supervisory boards gloss to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 18 February 2010; in Polish only] , Glosa, 2010, no: 4;

K. Osajda, Prawo odwołanego członka organu spółki do zaskarżenia jej uchwał - najnowsze orzecznictwo Sądu Najwyższego [The Right of a Director Removed from Office to Contest Company Resolutions an Overview of the Latest Supreme Court Decisions], Glosa, 2005, no: 3;

A. Radwan, Ł. Gorywoda, Zaskarżanie uchwał walnego zgromadzenia akcjonariuszy. Reforma w Europie i wnioski dla polskiego ustawodawcy [Contesting the Resolutions of General Meetings. The Reform in Europe and Conclusions for Polish Law-Makers], Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego, 2009, no: 2;

M. Romanowski, Czy uchwała zgromadzenia udziałowców spółki kapitałowej sprzeczna z normą dyspozytywną jest sprzeczna z prawem? [Is a shareholders resolution that is contrary to a non-absolutely binding legal norm contrary to statutory law?], Przegląd Prawa Handlowego, 2011, no: 4;

S. Sołtysiński, Czy istnieją uchwały nieistniejące zgromadzeń spółek kapitałowych i spółdzielni?[Do non-existing resolutions of shareholders and co-operatives exist?], Przegląd Prawa Handlowego, 2006 , no: 2;

S. Sołtysiński, Glosa do wyroku SN z dnia 13 lutego 2004 r., II CK 438/02 [The Gloss to the Judgment of the Supreme Court of 13 February 2004, II CK 438/02], Orzecznictwo Sądów Polskich, 2006, no: 5;

S. Sołtysiński, Skutki naruszenia norm względnie wiążących polemicznie [The Consequences of not Complying with Non-Absolutely Binding Legal Norms the Polemic], Przegląd Prawa Handlowego, 2011, no: 6;

S. Sołtysiński, System prawa prywatnego. Tom 17 B. Prawo spółek kapitałowych, Warsaw 2010;

A. Szumański, System prawa prywatnego. Tom 17 A. Prawo spółek kapitałowych, ed. S. Sołtysiński, CH Beck, Warsaw 2010.