___

• Alvesson, M., ve Willmott, H. (1992). Critical Management Studies. London: Sage.
• Baldridge, J. V. ve Deal, T. E. (1975). Managing Change in Educational Organizations. Berkeley: McCutchan.
• Barley, Stephan R. (1983). Semiotics and the Study of Occupational and Organizational Cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 393-413.
• Berg, Per Olof. (1985). Organizational Change as a Symbolic Transformati Process. Peter Frost ve diğerleri (Derleyenler), Organizational Culture, Beverly Hills: Sage, 281-299.
• Blumer, H. (1969) Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
• Bolman, L. G., ve Deal, T. E. (1991). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Bredeson, Paul W. (1989). An Analysis of Metaphorical Perspectives of School Principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(l),s. 29-50.
• Broms, Henri and Henrik Gahmberg. (1983). Communication to Self in Organizations and Cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 482-495.
• Cooley, C. H. (1961). False Separation of Individual and Society. G. Manis ve B. N. Meltzer (Ed.). Symbolic Interaction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Cossette, P. (1988). The Study of Language in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Stance. Human Relations, 41,1988.
• Dance, F. E. (1970). The Concept of Communication. The Journal ofCommunication, 20 (2), s. 201-210.
• Dandridge, Thomas C. (1983). Symbols'Function and Use, L. R. Pondy ce Diğerleri., (Derleyenler),' Organizational Symbolism. London: Jai Press, s. 63-79.
• Deal, Terrence.E. (1990). Reframing Reform. Educational Leadership, 47(8), s. 6-12.
• Deal, Terrence E. And Kent D. Peterson. (1990). The Principal's Role in Shaping School Culture. Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Washington, DC.
• Edelman, M. J. (1977). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
• Freud, S. (1952). On Dreams. NY: Norton.
• Gahmberg, Henrik. (1990). Metaphor Management: on the Semiotics of Strategic Management. B. A. Turner (editör), Organizational Symbolism. Berlin DeGruyter, s. 151-157.
• Gordon, Davis. (1992). The Symbolic Dimension of Administration for Effective Schools. The American Educational Research Association (San Francisco: CA, April 20-24, 1992), s. 25.
• Kelly, Bridget E. And Paul V. Bredeson. (1991). Measures of Meaning in a Public and in a Parochial School: Principals as Symbol Managers. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(3), s. 6-22.
• March, J. G. ve Olsen, J. (1976). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetforlaget.
• Mead, G. H. Mind (1934). Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Charles W. Morris (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Meltzer, B. N., Petras, J. W., ve Reynolds, L. T. (1975). Symbolic Interactionism: Genesis, Varieties and Criticism. London: Routledgeve Kegan Paul.
• Mintzberg, H. (1973) The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper and Row.
• Ortner, S. (1973). "On Key Symbols. American Anthropologist. 75, 1338-1346.
• Sakin, A. (2000). Okul Yöneticisinin Sembolik Liderlik Davranışları. Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eskişehir.
• Schall, M. S. (1983). A Communication-rules Approach to Organizational Culture. Administrative Science Quarterly. 28, s. 557-581.
• Turan, S. , ve Sny, C. (2001). An Exploration of Transformational Leadership And its Role In Strategic Planning: A Conceptual Framework.. Educational Planning, 13(1), 3-19.
• Wilkins, Alan L. (1983). Organizational Stories as Symbols Which-Control the Organization, L.R. Pondy ve diğerleri (editörler), Organizational Symbolism. Greenwich: CT, Jai Press, s. 81-92.