Diyarbakır İlinde Yetişen Badem Ağaçlarından Endofit ve Epifit Bakteri Türlerinin İzolasyonu ve Bitki Gelişimini Teşvik Eden Mekanizmalarının Karakterizasyonu

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sağlıklı badem ağaçlarından izole edilen bitkigelişimini teşvik eden endofit ve epifit bakteri (PGPB) türlerintanılanması ve bitki gelişimini teşvik eden mekanizmalarınınbelirlemektir. MALDI-TOF tanılama analizleri sonucu, 19 izolatGram-negatif Serratia, Pseudomonas, Ochrobactrum ve Enterobacter,26 izolat ise Gram-pozitif Bacillus ve Arthrobacter cinsine dahil türlerolarak teşhis edilmiştir. Test edilen izolatlardan, 46 izolat siderofor,45 izolat amonyak üretiminde pozitif, 35 izolat ise fosforu değişenoranlarda çözebilme yeteneğinde olurken, bakterilerin tamamı 5.48-127.81 µg/ml konsantrasyon aralığında IAA üretmişlerdir.Pseudomonas spp and Enterobacter cloacae izolatları siderofor,Serratia marcescens izolatları fosforu çözme, Enterobacter cloacaeizolatları IAA üretme, Bacillus spp ise amonyak üretme etkinliğininyüksek düzeylerde olduğu görülmüştür. Aynı türe bağlı endofitbakteri izolatları epifit bakteri izolatlarına kıyasla bu mekanizmalarıdaha düşük düzeyde teşvik ettiği belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlaryüksek düzeyde siderofor, amonyak, IAA üretimi ile fosfor çözme gibibitki gelişimini teşvik edici özellikleri sahip PGPB izolatlarınınekonomik öneme sahip kültür bitkilerin yetiştiriciliğinde biyolojikgübre olarak kullanılmada potansiyeline sahip olduğunugöstermiştir.

Prevalence and Characterization of Plant Growth Promoting Mechanisms of Endophytic and Epiphytic Bacterial Species Isolated from Almond Trees Growing in Diyarbakır Province of Turkey

The aims of this study were to identify endophytic and epiphytic plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) from healthy almond trees and to characterize plant growth promoting mechanisms. By using MALDITOF analyses, 19 Gram-negative isolates, belonging to Serratia, Pseudomonas, Ochrobactrum and Enterobacter genus and 26 Grampositive isolates, belonging to Bacillus and Arthrobacter genus were identified. Among the tested bacterial isolates, 46 isolates were positive for siderophore production, 45 isolates for ammonium production, 35 isolates solubilized phosphorus varying ratios, and all isolates produced IAA between 5.48-127.81 µg/ml concentrations. Isolates of Pseudomonas spp and Enterobacter cloacae were found highly effective for siderophore production, S. marcescens for solubilisation of phosphorus, E. cloacae for IAA production, Bacillus spp for ammonia production. Bacterial isolates tested showed significant differences in siderophore, ammonia and IAA production and phosphorus solubilisation efficiency. It was found that the efficacies of endophytic bacterial isolates were lower compared to the same species of epiphytic bacterial isolates. Overall results suggest that use of the most efficient PGPB isolates have an excellent potential to be used as biofertilizer for cultivation of economically important crops.

___

  • Ahemad M, Kibret M 2014. Mechanisms and Applications of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: Current Perspective. Journal of King Saud University-Science, 26: 1-20.
  • Anoymous, 2017. FAOSTAT, World Production Quantities of Crops http://www.fao.org (Erişim tarihi: 16.12.2019).
  • Araujo FF, Henning AA, Hungria M 2005. Phytohormones and Antibiotics Produced by Bacillus subtilis and Their Effects on Seed Pathogenic Fungi and on Soybean Root Development. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 21(8-9): 1639-1645.
  • Arora NK, Tewari S, Singh S, Lal N, Maheshwari DK 2012. PGPR for Protection of Plant Health Under Saline Conditions. In: Maheshwari DK (ed.) Bacteria in Agrobiology: Stress management, pp. 239-258.
  • Bernal G, Illanes A, Ciampi L 2002. Isolation and Partial Purification of a Metabolite from a Mutant Strain of Bacillus sp. with Antibiotic Activity Against Plant Pathogenic Agents. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, (on line), 15 April 2002, 5 (1). Available from http://www.ejbiotechnology.info/ content/vol5/issue1/full/4/
  • Bhardwaj D, Ansari MW, Sahoo RK, Tuteja N 2014. Biofertilizers Function as Key Player in Sustainable Agriculture by Improving Soil Fertility, Plant Tolerance and Crop Productivity. Microb Cell Fact, 13: 66.
  • Cappuccino JC, Sherman N 1992. In Microbiology: A laboratory Manual, Third ed. Benjamin Cummings Pub. Co, New York, pp. 125-179.
  • Duman K, Soylu S 2019. Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Traits and Antagonistic Potentials of Endophytic Bacteria from Bean Plants Against Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola. Bitki Koruma Bülteni, 59 (3) : 59-69.
  • Fravel DR 1988. Role of Antibiosis in the Biocontrol of Plant Disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 26: 75-91.
  • Glickman E, Dessaux Y 1995. A Critical Evaluation of the Specificity of Salkowski Reagent for Indole Compounds Produced by Phytopathogenic Bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61: 793– 796.
  • Gupta G, Parihar SS, Ahirwar NK, Snehi SK, Singh V 2015. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): Current and Future Prospects for Development of Sustainable Agriculture. Journal of Microbial and Biochemical Technology, 7: 096-102.
  • Hallmann J, Quadt-Hallmann A, Mahaffee WF, Kloepper JW 1997. Bacterial Endophytes in Agricultural Crops. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 43(10): 895-914.
  • Kara M, Uysal A, Sönmez E, Soylu EM, Kurt Ş, Soylu,S 2017a. Employment of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for identification of antagonist and plant growth promoting bacterial isolates. 3rd International Symposium for Agriculture and Food – ISAF 2017, 18-20 October 2017, Ohrid/Republic of Macedonia. p. 338.
  • Kara M, Atay M, Kaya A, Soylu EM, Kurt Ş, Soylu, S 2017b. Biocontrol potential and mode of action of Serratia marcescens against soil-borne fungal pathogens of cypress trees. 3rd International Symposium for Agriculture and Food – ISAF 2017, 18-20 October 2017, Ohrid/Republic of Macedonia. p.339.
  • Kumar P, Dubey RC, Maheshwari DK 2012. Bacillus strains Isolated from Rhizosphere Showed Plant Growth Promoting and Antagonistic Activity against Phytopathogens. Microbiological Research, 167: 493–499.
  • Krebs B, Junge H, Ockhardt A, Hoding B, Heubner D, Erben, U 1993. Bacillus subtilis: An effective Biocontrol Agent. Pesticide Science, 37: 427429.
  • Lelliot RA, Stead DE 1987. Methods for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Diseases of Plants. (T.F. Preece, Editor). In: Methods in Plant Pathology, Vol 2, Blackwell Scientific Publications. pp. 176-177, Oxford.
  • Leong J 1986. Siderophores: Their Biochemistry and Possible Role in the Biocontrol of Plant Pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 24: 187-209.
  • Loper JE, Schroth MN 1986. Influence of Bacterial Sources of Indole-3-Acetic Acid on Root Elongation of Sugar Beet. Phytopathology, 76(4): 386–389.
  • Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F 2009. Plant-GrowthPromoting Rhizobacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology 63: 541-556.
  • Marquez-Santacruz HA, Hernandez-Leon R, OrozcoMosqueda MC, Velazquez-Sepulveda I, Santoyo G 2010. Diversity of Bacterial Endophytes in Roots of Mexican Husk Tomato Plants (Physalis ixocarpa) and Their Detection in the Rhizosphere. Genetics and Molecular Research, 9(4): 2372-2380.
  • Mehta PS, Negi KS, Ojha SN 2010. Native Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Foods of Uttarakhand Himalaya for Sustainable Food Security and Livelihood. Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources, 1 (1): 89–96.
  • Nega A 2014. Review on Concepts in Biological Control of Plant Pathogens. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 4(27): 33-54.
  • Patten CL, Glick BR 2002. Role of Pseudomonas putida Indole Acetic Acid in Development of the Host Plant Root System. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(8): 3795-3801.
  • Pavlovic M, Konrad R, Iwobi AN, Sing A, Busch U, Huber I 2012. A Dual Approach Employing MALDITOF MS and Real-Time PCR for Fast Species Identification Within the Enterobacter cloacae Complex. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 328: 46–53.
  • Rani MU, Reddy G 2011. Bacillus cereus and Enterobacter cancerogenus Screened for Their Efficient Plant Growth Promoting Traits Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Antagonistic Traits Among Sixteen Bacterial Isolates from Rhizospheric Soils of Pigeon Pea. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 5(15): 2090-2094.
  • Romero FM, Marina M, Pieckenstain FL 2014. The Communities of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Leaf Endophytic Bacteria, Analyzed by 16Sribosomal RNA Gene Pyrosequencing. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 351(2): 187-194.
  • Rosenbluet M, Martinez-Romero E 2006. Bacterial Endophytes and Their Interactions with Hosts. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 19: 827–837. Santoyo G, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Carmen OrozcoMosquedac M, Glick BR 2016. Plant GrowthPromoting Bacterial Endophytes. Microbiological Research, 183: 92–99.
  • Saranraj P, Sivasakthivelan P, Sakthi SS 2013. Prevalence and Production of Plant Growth Promoting Substance by Pseudomonas fluorescens Isolated from Paddy Rhizosphere Soil of Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu, India, African Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(2): 95-101.
  • Schwyn B, Neilands JB 1987. Universal Chemical Assay for Detection and Determination of Siderophores. Analytical Biochemistry, 160: 47-56.
  • Shi Y, Yang H, Zhang T, Sun J, Lou K 2014. IlluminaBased Analysis of Endophytic Bacterial Diversity and Space-Time Dynamics in Sugar Beet on The North Slope of Tianshan Mountain. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98(14): 6375-6385.
  • Singh N, Pandey P, Dubey RC, Maheshwari DK 2008. Biological Control of Root Rot Fungus Macrophomina phaseolina and Growth Enhancement of Pinus roxburghii (Sarg.) by Rhizosphere Competent Bacillus subtilis BN1. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24: 1669-1679
  • Soylu S, Kara M, Üremiş İ, Kurt Ş, Soylu EM, Uysal A 2018. Determination of Plant Growth Promoting Traits of Bacterial Endophytes Isolated and Identified from Invasive Plant Water Hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes in Orontes River of Turkey. 1. International Mediterranean Symposium, 01-03 November 2018, Mersin/Turkey. Volume 4: 65-78.
  • Soylu EM, Soylu S, Kara M, Kurt Ş 2020. Sebzelerde Sorun Olan Önemli Bitki Fungal Hastalık Etmenlerine Karşı Vermikomposttan İzole Edilen Mikrobiyomların in vitro Antagonistik Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi, 23 (1): 7- 18.
  • Sturz AV, Christie BR, Nowak J 2000. Bacterial Endophytes: Potential Role in Developing Sustainable Systems Of Crop Production. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 19(1): 1-30.
  • Sujatha N, Ammani K 2013. Siderophore Production by the Isolates of Fluorescent Pseudomonads. International Journal of Current Research and Review, 5(20): 01-07.
  • Sülü SM, Bozkurt İA, Soylu S 2016. Bitki Büyüme Düzenleyici ve Biyolojik Mücadele Etmeni Olarak Bakteriyel Endofitler. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 21: 103-111.
  • Tariq M, Hameed S, Yasmeen T, Zahid M 2014. Molecular Characterization and Identification of Plant Growth Promoting Endophytic Bacteria Isolated from the Root Nodules of Pea (Pisum sativum L.). World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 30: 719-725.
  • Tjamos EC, Tjamos SE, Antoniou PP 2010. Biological Management of Plant Diseases: Highlights on Research and Application. Journal of Plant Pathology, 92: S17-S21.
  • Ullah A, Mushtaq H, Fahad S, Shah A, Chaudhary HJ 2017. Plant Growth Promoting Potential of Bacterial Endophytes in Novel Association with Olea ferruginea and Withania coagulans. Microbiology, 86(1): 119-127.
  • Vazquez P, Holguin G, Puente ME, Lopez-Cortes A, Bashan Y, 2000. Phosphate-Solubilizing Microorganisms Associated with The Rhizosphere of Mangroves in a Semiarid Coastal Lagoon. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 30: 460–468.
  • Wang Y, Zeng Q, Zhang Z 2010. Antagonistic Bioactivity of an Endophytic Bacterium H6. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(37): 6140-6145.
  • Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S 1996. Induced Systemic Resistance to Cucumber Diseases and Increased Plant Growth by Plant-Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Under Field Conditions. Phytopathology, 86: 221–224.
  • Weller DM 1988. Biological Control of Soil Borne Plant Pathogens In The Rhizosphere with Bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 26: 379-407.
KSÜ Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2619-9149
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2018
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Fatty Acid Composition, Vitamin A, and Vitamin E Content of Sphaerophysa kotschyana

Abdussamat GÜZEL, MAHFUZ ELMASTAŞ

Bazı Pestisitler ve Odun Sirkesinin Buğday Agro-Ekosistemindeki Toprak Nematodlarına Etkileri

İbrahim KOÇ, Erdal Necip YARDIM, Şenol YILDIZ

Nutritional Enrichment of Apple Pomace by Fungal Fermentations

RAMAZAN TOSUN, Sulhattin YASAR

Hıyar (Cucumis sativus L.) Genotiplerinde Genetik Çeşitliliğin Morfolojik Karakterler ve AFLP Analizi Kullanılarak Değerlendirilmesi

Damla GÜVERCİN, Yaşar KARAKURT, Sercan ÖNDER, Özgür İŞLER

Bazı Kavuzsuz Arpaların (Hordeum vulgare L. var. nudum Hook. f.) Verim ve Bazı Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Soner YÜKSEL, Saime İKİNCİKARAKAYA ÜNVER

Bazı Soya Fasulyesi [Glycine Max (L.) Merr.] Genotipleri Arasında Agronomik Özelliklerin ve ISSR Yönteminin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Emine ARSLAN, Elif GÜLBAHÇE MUTLU, Ömer DURSUN, Ahmet BAĞCI

Yağışa Dayalı Koşullarda Bazı Ekmeklik Buğday Çeşitlerinin (Triticum aestivum L.) Verim ve Bazı Kalite Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Seydi AYDOĞAN, mehmet ŞAHİN, Aysun GÖÇMEN AKÇACIK, Berat DEMİR, Telat YILDIRIM, Sümeyra HAMZAOĞLU

Bursa-Gemlik Ekolojik Koşullarında Farklı Fosfor Dozlarının Azkan Nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) Çeşidinin Verim ve Verim Öğeleri Üzerine Etkisi

Numan BİLDİRİCİ, Okan KULAÇ

Asma Anacı Çeliklerinde Kök Oluşum Yoğunluğu Yerlerinin Saptanması

Fatime CAN, İSMAİL YENİLMEZ, Salih ÇELİK

Kahramanmaraş’ta Bağcılığın Mevcut Durumu, Potansiyeli ve Geliştirilmesi

İsmail GÜVENÇ