Psikoterapideki tabu: Olumsuz etkilere dair sistematik bir gözden geçirme

Psikolojik tedaviler ne kadar iyi niyetli şekilde planlanıp uygulansa da danışanlara olumsuz etki etme veya beklenmedik şekilde sonlanma ihtimaline sahiptir. Bu olumsuz/negatif etkiler, alanyazında çok farklı terimler ile temsil edilmektedir. Öte yandan, olumsuz etkilerin nasıl tanımlanacağı, nasıl değerlendirileceği veya onlarla karşılaşıldığında neler yapılması gerektiği açık değildir. Bu sistematik derlemenin amacı, alanyazında psikoterapinin olumsuz etkileri ile ilgili yapılmış çalışmaları bir araya getirmek ve bu kavramın nasıl ele alındığını ve terapist ve danışanların gözünden bu etkilerin neler olabileceğini incelemektir. Sistematik alanyazın taraması sonucunda bu konuda toplam 58 çalışmaya ulaşılmış, tarama kriterlerine uyan 14 makale ayrıntılı olarak incelenmiştir. Bulgulara göre, bu olgu için kullanılan terimler arasında olumsuz etkiler, olumsuz göstergeler, yan etkiler, semptomların bozulması-kötüye gitmesi ve istenmeyen etki yer almaktadır. Farklı bozukluklardan mustarip farklı sayıdaki katılımcı ve çeşitli yöntemlerle yapılan bu çalışmalarda belirtilen olumsuz etkiler ise özetle teknik problemler, terapötik ilişki ile ilgili problemler, belirtilerin artması/ kötüleşmesi, danışanın ve terapistin psikoterapiden beklentilerinin karşılanamaması olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Nihayetinde bu konuda doğru bir çıkarım yapmak için daha fazla sayıda seçkisiz kontrollü araştırmaya ihtiyaç olduğu düşünülmüştür. Terapilerdeki olumsuz etkilerle ilgili yapılan bu tür araştırmaların yaygınlaşmasının ruh sağlığı çalışmalarını geliştireceği, tabu gibi görünen bu kavrama odaklanarak terapistlere farkındalık kazandıracağı, danışanlara daha faydalı olma ve psikoterapilerin daha işlevsel olması yönünde etkileri olacağı düşünülmektedir.

The taboo in psychotherapy: A systematic review of negative effects

No matter how well-intentioned psychological treatments are planned and implemented, they have the potential to affect clients negatively or to end unexpectedly. These negative effects are represented by very different terms in the literature. It is not clear how to define negative effects, how they will be evaluated, or what to do when encountered with them. The purpose of this systematic review was to bring together the studies on the negative effects of psychotherapy and to examine how this concept is handled and what these effects can be from the perspective of therapists and clients. As a result of the systematic literature review, 58 studies on this subject were reached, and 14 articles meeting the screening criteria were examined in detail. According to the findings, the terms used for this phenomenon include negative effects, negative indicators, side effects, deterioration- worsening of symptoms and undesirable effect. The negative effects stated in these studies with different numbers of participants suffering from different disorders and various methods are defined as technical problems, problems with the therapeutic relationship, increase or worsening of symptoms, failure to meet the expectations of the client and therapist from psychotherapy. It was thought that more randomized controlled trials were needed to make a clear conclusion on this issue. It is thought that the widespread use of such research will improve mental health studies, bring awareness to therapists by focusing on this concept that seems taboo, will have effects on being more beneficial to clients and making psychotherapies more functional.

___

  • Berk, M. ve Parker, G. (2009). The elephant on the couch: Side-effects of psychotherapy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(9), 787-794.
  • Boettcher, J., Rozental, A., Andersson, G. ve Carlbring, P. (2014). Side effects in internet-based interventions for social anxiety disorder. Internet Interventions, 1(1), 3-11.
  • Boisvert, C. M. (2002). Iatrogenic symptoms in psychotherapy: A theoretical exploration of the potential impact of labels, language, and belief systems. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 56(2), 244-259.
  • Boisvert, C. M. (2010). Negative treatment effects: Is it time for black box warning? American Psychologist, 65(7), 680-681.
  • Bystedt, S., Rozental, A., Andersson, G., Boettcher, J. ve Carlbring, P. (2014). Clinicians’ perspectives on negative effects of psychological treatments. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 43(4), 319–331.
  • Crawford, M. J., Thana, L., Farquharson, L., Palmer, L., Hancock, E., Bassett, P., Clarke, J. ve Parry, G. D. (2016). Patient experience of negative effects of psychological treatment: Results of a national survey. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 208(3), 260-265.
  • Dimidjian, S. ve Hollon, S. D. (2010). How would we know if psychotherapy were harmful?. The American Psychologist, 65(1), 21–33.
  • Eaton, T., Abeles, N. ve Gutfreund, M. (1993). Negative indicators, therapeutic alliance, and therapy outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 3(2), 115-123.
  • Foulkes, P. (2010). The therapist as a vital factor in side-effects of psychotherapy. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 44(2), 189.
  • Gullickson, K. M., Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., Dear, F. B. ve Titov, N. (2019). Negative effects associated with internet- delivered cognitive behaviour therapy: An analysis of client emails. Internet Interventions, 18, 1-7.
  • Heins, M. J., Knoop, H., Prins, J. B., Stulemeijer, M., van der Meer, J. W. M. ve Bleijenberg, G. (2010). Possible detrimental effects of cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 79(4), 249-256.
  • Hofmann, S. G. ve Suvak, M. (2006). Treatment attrition during group therapy for social phobia. Anxiety Disorders, 20(7), 961-972.
  • Klingberg, S., Herrlich, J., Wiedemann, G., Wölwer, W., Meisner, C., Engel, C., Jakobi-Malterre, U. E., Buchkremer, G. ve Wittorf, A. (2012). Adverse effects of cognitive behavioral therapy and cognitive remedition in schizophrenia: Results of the treatment of negative symptoms study. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200(7), 569-576.
  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007). Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 53- 70.
  • Linden, M. (2013). How to define, find and classify side effects in psychotherapy: From unwanted events to adverse treatment reactions. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20(4), 286-296.
  • Linden, M. ve Schermuly-Haupt, M. L. (2014). Definition, assessment and rate of psychotherapy side effects. World Psychiatry, 13(3), 306-309.
  • Older, J. (1977). Four taboos that may limit the success of psychotherapy. Psychiatry, 40(3), 197-204.
  • Parker, G., Fletcher, K., Berk, M. ve Paterson, A. (2013). Development of a measure quantifying psychotherapeutic ingredients: The experiences of therapy questionnaire (ETQ). Psychiatry Research, 206(2-3), 293-301.
  • Parry, G. D., Crawford, M. J. ve Duggan, C. (2016). Iatrogenic harm from psychological therapies-time to move on. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 208(3), 210-212.
  • Peterson, A. L., Roache, J. D., Raj, J. ve Young-McCaughan, S. (2013). The need for expanded monitoring of adverse events in behavioral health clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 34(1), 152-154.
  • Pope, K. S., Sonne, J. L. ve Greene, B. (2006). What therapist’s don’t talk about and why: Understanding taboos that hurt us and our clients. American Psychological Association.
  • Roback, H. B. (2000). Adverse outcomes in group psychotherapy: Risk factors, prevention and directions. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 9(3), 113-122.
  • Roth, A. ve Fonagy, P. (1996). What works for whom. Guilford Press.
  • Rozental, A., Andersson, G., Boettcher, J., Ebert, D. D., Cuijpers, P., Knaevelsrud, C., Ljótsson, B., Kaldo, V., Titov, N. ve Carlbring, P. (2014). Consensus statement on defining and measuring negative effects of internet interventions. Internet Interventions, 1(1), 12-19.
  • Rozental, A., Boettcher, J., Andersson, G., Schmidt, B. ve Carlbring, P. (2015). Negative effects of internet interventions: A qualitative content analysis of patients' experiences with treatments delivered online. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 44(3), 223-236.
  • Rozental, A., Kottorp, A., Boettcher, J., Andersson, G. ve Carlbring, P. (2016). Negative effects of psychological treatments: An exploratory factor analysis of the negative effects questionnaire for monitoring and reporting adverse and unwanted events. PloS One, 11(6), e0157503.
  • Rozental, A., Kottorp, A., Forsström, D., Manssın, K., Boettcher, J., Andersson, G., Furmark, T. ve Carlbring, P. (2019). The negative effects questionnaire: Psychometric properties of an instrument for assessing negative effects in psychological treatments. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 47(5), 559-572.
  • Sachs, J. S. (1983). Negative factors in brief psychotherapy: An empirical assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(4), 557-564.
  • Safran, J. D. ve Muran, J. C. (2000). Resolving therapeutic alliance ruptures: Diversity and integration. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(2), 233-243.
  • Smith, T. W. (1992). Hostility and health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychology, 11(3), 139-150.
  • Suh, C. S., Strupp, H. H. ve O’Malley, S. S. (1986). The Vanderbilt process measures: The psychotherapy process scale (VPPS) and the negative indicators scale (VNIS). L. S. Greenberg ve W. M. Pinsof (Ed.), Guilford clinical psychology and psychotherapy series. The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook içinde (s. 285-323). Guilford Press.
  • Von der Lippe, A. L., Monsen, J. T., Ronnestad, M. H. ve Eilertsen, D. E. (2008). Treatment failure in psychotherapy: The pull of hostility. Psychotherapy Research, 18(4), 420-432.
Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2602-4438
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2017
  • Yayıncı: Klinik Psikoloji Araştırmaları Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Çevrimiçi psikoterapi yöntemlerinin farklı gruplar (yetişkin, çocuk, ergen ve aile) temelinde incelenmesi

Seda OKTAY, Ezgi Didem MERDAN YILDIZ, Pelin KARACA DİNÇ, Gülsen ERDEN

Psikopatolojilerde gen-çevre etkileşimi: Stresle ilgili genetik ve epigenetik süreçler

Esra ZIVRALI YARAR

Investigating alexithymia, emotional expression, childhood trauma, and attachment in self-reported disordered eating behaviour

İlayda ÖZDEMİR, Şermin TÜKEL

COVID-19 pandemisi sürecinde sigara ve alkol kullanan bireylerde travma sonrası stres bozukluğu semptomlarının incelenmesi

Sevda ACAR, Hadiye Bostancı DEMİRCİ, Derya ŞAŞMAN KAYLI, Görkem YARARBAŞ

The investigation of the mediating role of impostor phenomenon in the relationship between maladaptive perfectionism and depression among residents

Elif Elvan MİREL, Hale ÖGEL-BALABAN

Psikoterapideki tabu: Olumsuz etkilere dair sistematik bir gözden geçirme

Esra ALTIN GÖK, Orçun YORULMAZ

Çocuk kaybı sonrası ebeveynlerin ilişkileri

Serkan ÖZGÜN, Belgin DERYALAR, İlke Sine EĞECİ, Bülent AYKUTOĞLU, Asuman BÜYÜKCAN TETİK, Gökçen BULUT

Investigating the symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in individuals who use alcohol and cigarette during the COVID-19 pandemic

Sevda ACAR, Hadiye Bostancı DEMİRCİ, Derya ŞAŞMAN KAYLI, Görkem YARARBAŞ

Yale-Brown Obsesyon Kompulsiyon Ölçeği-Türkçe Öz Bildirim Formu: Güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması

Filiz KOÇOĞLU, Başak BAHTİYAR