Kişilerarası Duygu Düzenleme Anketi: Birlikte Kara Kara Düşünme ve Birlikte Yeniden Değerlendirme’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması

Duygu düzenleme süreçleri yaşam boyu devam eden ve değişebilen bir yapıya sahip olduğu için bu süreçlerin kişilerarası ilişkilerden etkilenmesi kaçınılmazdır. Kişilerarası ilişkilere eş ilişkileri de dahil olmakta ve bu ilişkiler duygu düzenleme süreçleri üzerinde etkili olabilmektedir. Bu bağlamda, çalışmanın amacı, Kişilerarası Duygu Düzenleme Anketi: Birlikte Kara Kara Düşünme ve Birlikte Yeniden Değerlendirme formunun Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarını gerçekleştirmektir. Faktör yükü dağılımının anketin özgün formuyla tutarlılığını kontrol etmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilen açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda maddelerin faktör yüklerinin .66 ile .87 arasında değiştiği görülmüştür. Açımlayıcı faktör analizinin ardından gerçekleştirilen doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda modelin gerekli olan uyum değerlerini sağladığı bulunmuştur. Birlikte yeniden değerlendirme alt faktörü orijinal formda olduğu gibi dört maddeye sahipken; birlikte kara kara düşünme alt faktörünün içerisinde yer alan bir madde modelin uyumunu bozduğu gerekçesiyle anketten çıkartılmıştır. Böylece, anket toplamda dokuz madde ve iki alt faktörle son halini almıştır. Anketin alt faktörleri olan birlikte yeniden değerlendirme ve birlikte kara kara düşünmeye ilişkin Cronbach alfa güvenirlik katsayıları sırasıyla .88 ve .76 olarak bulunmuştur. Anketin ölçüt bağıntılı geçerliğini sınamak amacıyla Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeği, Depresyon-Anksiyete-Stres 21 ve Çiftlerin Uyumu Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular ölçüt bağıntılı geçerliğin kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğunu göstermiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçları Kişilerarası Duygu Düzenleme Anketi: Birlikte Kara Kara Düşünme ve Birlikte Yeniden Değerlendirme’nin Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermiştir.

The Turkish adaptation of the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Co-Brooding and Co-Reappraisal

Since emotion regulation processes have a lifelong and changeable structure, it is inevitable that these processes will be affected by interpersonal relationships. These interpersonal relationships include spousal relationships and can affect emotion regulation processes. In this context, the study aimed to carry out the validity and reliability studies of the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Co-Brooding and Co-Reappraisal. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis conducted to check the consistency of the factor load distribution with the original form of the questionnaire, it was observed that the factor loads of the items varied between .66 and .87. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis performed after the exploratory factor analysis, it was found that the model provided the necessary fit indices. While the co-reappraisal subscale has four items as in the original form, an item included in the co-brooding subscale was removed from the questionnaire because it disrupted the fit of the model. Thus, the questionnaire took its final form with a total of nine items and two subscales. The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficients of the subscales of the questionnaire, the co-reappraisal and co-brooding, were respectively .88 and .76. In order to test the criterion-related validity of the questionnaire, Emotion Regulation Scale, Depression-Anxiety-Stress 21, and Dyadic Adjustment Scale were used. The findings showed that criterion-related validity is acceptable. The results of the study showed that the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Turkish form of Co-Brooding and Co-Reappraisal with Spouse is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

PDF

___

Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W. ve Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10(2), 176- 181.
Atasözleri ve Deyimler Sözlüğü. (b.t.). Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlükleri. www.sozluk.gov.tr
Ben-Naim, S., Hirschberger, G., Ein-Dor, T. ve Mikulincer, M. (2013). An experimental study of emotion regulation during relationship conflict interactions: The moderating role of attachment orientations. Emotion, 13(3), 1-14.
Brackett, M. A., Bertoli, M., Elbertson, N., Bausseron, E., Castillo Gualda, R. ve Salovey, P. (2013). Emotional intelligence: Reconceptualizing the cognition–emotion link. M. Robinson, E. Watkins ve E. Harmon-Jones, (Ed.), Handbook of cognition and emotion içinde (365- 379). New York: The Guilford Press.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
Browne, M. W. ve Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258.
Butler, E. A., Hollenstein, T., Shoham, V. ve Rohrbaugh, M. J. (2014). A dynamic state-space analysis of interpersonal emotion regulation in couples who smoke. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(7), 907-927.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı istatistik, araştırma deseni spss uygulamaları ve yorum (22. Baskı). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Diamantopoulos, A. ve Siguaw, J.A. (2000). Introducing LISREL. London: Sage Publications.
Ehring, T. ve Ehlers, A. (2014). Does rumination mediate the relationship between emotion regulation ability and posttraumatic stress disorder?. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5(1), 1-7.
Ehring, T. ve Watkins, E. R. (2008). Repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic process. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 1(3), 192-205. Erkorkmaz, Ü., Etikan, İ., Demir, O., Özdamar, K. ve
Sanisoğlu, S. Y. (2013). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve uyum indeksleri. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(1), 210-223.
Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. London-Thousand Oaks- New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE. Fişiloğlu, H. ve Demir, A. (2000). Applicability of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for measurement of marital quality with Turkish couples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 214.
Friesen, A. P., Devonport, T. J., Sellars, C. N. ve Lane, A. M. (2013). A narrative account of decision-making and interpersonal emotion regulation using a socialfunctional approach to emotions. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(2), 203-214.
Gaensbauer, T. J. (1982). Regulation of emotional expression in infants from two contrasting caretaking environments. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 21(2), 163-170.
Gottman, J. M. ve Notarius, C. I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 927-947.
Gökdağ, C., Sorias, O., Kıran, S., ve Ger, S. (2019). Kişilerarası Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması ve Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi. Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 30(1), 57-66.
Gratz, K. L. ve Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41- 54.
Gravetter, F. ve Wallnau, L. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (8. Baskı). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224-237.
Gross, J. J. (2013). Emotion regulation: taking stock and moving forward. Emotion, 13(3), 359-365.
Gross, J. J. ve John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348-362.
Gross, J. J. ve Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation içinde (3–24). New York: The Guilford Press.
Henry, J. D. ve Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227-239.
Hofmann, S. G. (2014). Interpersonal emotion regulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38(5), 483-492.
Hofmann, S. G., Carpenter, J. K. ve Curtiss, J. (2016). Interpersonal emotion regulation questionnaire (IERQ): Scale development and psychometric characteristics. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40(3), 341-356.
Horn, A. B. ve Maercker, A. (2016). Intra-and interpersonal emotion regulation and adjustment symptoms in couples: The role of co-brooding and co-reappraisal. BMC Psychology, 4 (51), 1-11.
Hu, L.T. ve Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55.
Hutcheson, G. ve Sofroniou, N. (1999). The Multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kazdin, A. E. (Ed.). (2000). Encyclopedia of psychology, Vol. 3. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. Keltner, D. ve Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 505-521.
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Publications.
Koç, M. S., Aka, B. T., Doğruyol, B., Curtiss, J., Carpenter, J. K. ve Hofmann, S. G. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the interpersonal emotion regulation questionnaire (IERQ). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 41(2), 294-303.
Levenson, R. W. ve Gottman, J. M. (1983). Marital interaction: physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 587-597.
Lovibond, P. F. (1998). Long-term stability of depression, anxiety and stress syndromes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 520-526.
Lovibond, P. F. ve Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335-343.
MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W. ve Sugawara, H., M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-49.
Mahmoud, J. S. R., Staten, R. T., Hall, L. A. ve Lennie, T. A. (2012). The relationship among young adult college students’ depression, anxiety, stress, demographics, life satisfaction, and coping styles. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 33(3), 149-156.
Malkoç, A., Gördesli, M. A., Arslan, R., Çekici, F. ve Sünbül, Z. A. (2018). Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Scale (IERS): Adaptation and psychometric properties in a Turkish Sample. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(4), 754-762.
Marcoulides, G. A. ve Drezner, Z. (2001). Specification searches in structural equation modeling with a genetic algorithm. G. A. Marcoulides ve R. E. Schumacker (Ed.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling içinde (247-268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associatiates.
Marroquín, B. (2011). Interpersonal emotion regulation as a mechanism of social support in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(8), 1276-1290.
Miles, J. ve Shevlin, M. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 85-90.
Myers, T. A. (2011). Goodbye, listwise deletion: Presenting Hot Deck Imputation as an easy and effective tool for handling missing data. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(4), 297-310.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E. ve Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 400-424.
Pallant, J. (2001). SPPS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Parkinson, B. (1996). Emotions are social. British Journal of Psychology, 87(4), 663-683.
Parrott, W. G. (2001). Implications of dysfunctional emotions for understanding how emotions function. Review of General Psychology, 5(3), 180-186.
Sarıçam, H. (2018). The psychometric properties of Turkish version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) in health control and clinical samples. Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research, 7, 19-30.
Sarısoy-Aksüt, G. ve Gençöz, T. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ) in Turkish samples. Current Psychology, 1-10.
Saruhan, V., Başman, M., ve Ekşi, H. (2019) Kişilerarası Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 1090-1101.
Schodt, K. B. (2019). Social anxiety and emotion regulation processes in romantic relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
Seçer, İ. (2015). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci (1. Baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Sev, İ. G. (2012). Türkiye Türkçesinde gibi edatıyla kurulan benzetmeli anlatımlar. Electronic Turkish Studies, 7(4), 499-512.
Smith C. A. ve Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research içinde (609-637). New York: Guilford.
Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 15 -28.
Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2‐3), 25-52.
Trochim, W. M. ve Donnelly, J. P. (2006). The research methods knowledge base (3. Baskı). Cincinnati, OH:Atomic Dog.
Yurtsever, G. (2008). Negotiators' profit predicted by cognitive reappraisal, suppression of emotions, misrepresentation of information, and tolerance of ambiguity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106(2), 590-608.
Zaki, J. ve Williams, W. C. (2013). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion, 13(5), 803 -81.