NERMİN TAŞKALE, Özlem SERTEL BERK

4416

Eş Şiddetine Karşı Yöntemler Endeksi’nin (EŞYE) Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması

Mağduru olduğu kadar faili ve ilişkili çevreyi de olumsuz etkileyen kadına yönelik şiddetle başa çıkma konusunda farklı açıklamalar getirilmiştir. Bu açıklamalar, mağdurların pasif kurbanlar olduğuna dair açıklamalardan hayatta kalmak için aktif çaba harcayan bireyler olduğuna dair açıklamalara evrilmiştir. Eş Şiddetine Karşı Yöntemler Endeksi (EŞYE) bu güncel yaklaşımı benimseyen bir endekstir. Bu çalışmada EŞYE’nin Türkçeye uyarlaması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Doksan altı katılımcının verisinin incelendiği çalışmada EŞYE, Çatışmaların Çözümüne Yaklaşım Ölçeği (ÇÇYÖ), Stresle Başa Çıkma Tarzları Ölçeği (SBTÖ) ve İki Boyutlu Sosyal İstenirlik Ölçeği (SİÖ) kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonuçları EŞYE boyutlarının kullanılan yöntem sayısı sıralamasının yatıştırma, karşı koyma, gayriresmi bağlantılar, yasal yöntemler, resmi bağlantılar ve güvenlik planlaması; yararlılık sıralamasının ise resmi bağlantılar, yasal yöntemler, gayriresmi bağlantılar, güvenlik planlaması, yatıştırma ve karşı koyma biçiminde olduğunu göstermiştir. EŞYE boyutları ÇÇYÖ boyutlarıyla ilişkili, SBTÖ boyutlarıyla tümüyle ve SİÖ boyutlarıyla genel olarak ilişkisiz bulunmuştur. Yöntemlerin kullanılan yöntem sayısı ve ÇÇYÖ boyutlarıyla ilişkisine yönelik bulgular alan yazınla uyumludur. Türk kadınlarının toplumsal alandaki yöntemleri bireysel alandaki yöntemlere kıyasla daha yararlı bulduğu gözlenmiştir. Gelecek çalışmaların EŞYE boyutlarının başka başa çıkma ölçekleriyle nasıl ilişki göstereceğini incelemesi yararlı bilgiler sunacaktır. Endeksin akademik ve saha çalışmalarına ve müdahale programlarına katkı sağlaması umulmaktadır.

The Turkish validity and reliability study of Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index (IPVSI)

There are a variety of explanations regarding coping with violence against women which has negative effects on victims as well as perpetrators and related environment. These explanations have evolved from descriptions of women as passive victims in response to violence to descriptions of women as active individuals attempting to survive. The Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index (IPVSI) is an index that follows these contemporary descriptions. The Turkish Adaptation of the IPVSI was carried out in this study. The IPVSI, The Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS), the Ways of Coping Inventory (WOC) and the Two-dimensional Social Desirability Scale (SDS) were used in the study that analyzed data from 96 participants. Findings revealed that ordering of IPVSI dimensions as for frequency of use was placating, resistance, informal networks, legal, formal networks, and safety planning whereas as for helpfulness ratings were formal networks, legal, informal networks, safety planning, placating, and resistance. The IPVSI dimensions were related to the CTS subscales but not to any subscales of the WOC and most of the subscales of the SDS. Findings regarding the frequency of use and the CTS dimensions were parallel with the literature. It was observed that the Turkish women find public realm strategies more helpful compared to private realm strategies. Inquiry of the relationship of the IPVSI dimensions with other coping scales in future studies will present valuable information. We hope the index adds support to academic and field studies and interventions.
PDF

___

  • Aba, Y. A. ve Kulakaç, Ö. (2016). Çatışmaların Çözümüne Yaklaşım Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, 12(1), 33-43.
  • Abramson, L. Y., Seligman M. E. ve Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 49-74.
  • Akadlı-Ergöçmen, B., Yüksel-Kaptanoğlu, İ. ve Jansen, H. A. F. M. (2013). Intimate partner violence and the relation between help-seeking behavior and the severity and frequency of physical violence among women in Turkey. Violence Against Women, 19(9), 1151-1174.
  • Akın, A. (2010). İki Boyutlu Sosyal İstenirlik Ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik özelliklerinin araştırılması. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(3), 771-784.
  • Alhabib, S., Nur, U. ve Jones, R. (2010). Domestic violence against women: Systematic review of prevalence studies. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 369–382.
  • Altınay, A. G. ve Arat, Y. (2009). Violence against women in Turkey: A nationwide survey. İstanbul: Punto Baskı Çözümleri.
  • Anderson, K. M., Renner, L. M. ve Bloom, T. S. (2014). Rural women’s strategic responses to intimate partner violence. Health Care for Women International, 35, 423-441.
  • Bell, M. E., Perez, S., Goodman, L. A. ve Dutton, M. A. (2011). Battered women’s perceptions of civil and criminal court helpfulness: The role of court outcome and process. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 71-88.
  • Bhandari, S., Bullock, L. F., Anderson, K. M., Danis, F. S.ve Sharps, P. W. (2011). Pregnancy and intimate partner violence: How do rural, low-income women cope? Health Care Women International, 32(9), 833- 854.
  • Bhandari, S., Bullock, L. F. ve Sharps, P. W. (2013). Strategies pregnant rural women employ to deal with intimate partner violence. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 7, 143-154.
  • Bowker, L. H. (1983). Beating wife-beating. Lexington: D. C. Health.
  • Brabeck, K. M. ve Guzmán, M. R. (2008). Frequency and perceived effectiveness of strategies to survive abuse employed by battered Mexican-origin women. Violence Against Women, 14(11), 1274-1294.
  • Calton, J. M., Cattaneo, L. B. ve Gebhard, K. T. (2016). Barriers to help seeking for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer survivors of intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(5), 585-600.
  • Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359, 1331-1336.
  • Cannon, W. B. (1932). The wisdom of the body. New York: N. W. Worton.
  • Cattaneo, L. B., Bell, M. E., Goodman, L. A. ve Dutton, M. A. (2007). Intimate partner violence victims’ accuracy in assessing their risk of re-abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 429-440.
  • Cattaneo, L. B. ve Goodman, L. A. (2005). Risk factors for reabuse in intimate partner violence: A crossdisciplinary critical review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6(2), 141-175.
  • Chang, J. C., Dado, D., Ashton, S., Hawker, L., Cluss, P. A., Buranosky, R. ve Scholle, S. H. (2006). Understanding behavior change for women experiencing intimate partner violence: Mapping the ups and downs using the stages of change. Patient Education and Counseling, 62(3), 330-339.
  • Chang, J. C., Dado, D., Hawker, L., Cluss, P. A., Buranosky, R., Slagel, L., ... ve Scholle, S. H. (2010). Understanding turning points in intimate partner violence: factors and circumstances leading women victims toward change. Journal of Women's Health, 19(2), 251-259.
  • Cheng, C. (2001). Assessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings: A multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 814-833.
  • Choice, P. ve Lamke, L. K. (1997). A conceptual approach to understanding abused women's stay/leave decisions. Journal of Family Issues, 18(3), 290-314.
  • Cook, S. L. ve Goodman, L. A. (2006). Beyond frequency and severity: Development and validation of the brief coercion and conflict scales. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1050-1072.
  • Dahlberg, L. L. ve Krug, E. G. (2002). Violence - a global public health problem. E. G. Krug, L. L. Dahlberg, J. A. Mercy, A. B. Zwi, ve R. Lozano (Der.), World report on violence and health içinde (ss. 1-21). Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • Dichter, M. E., Cerulli, C. ve Bossarte, R. M. (2011). Intimate partner violence victimization among women veterans and associated health risks. Women’s Health Issues, 21(4S), S190-S194.
  • Dichter, M. E., Marcus, S. C., Wagner, C. ve Bonomi, A. E. (2014). Associations between psychological, physical, and sexual intimate partner violence and health outcomes among veteran VA patients. Social Work in Mental Health, 12, 411-428.
  • Dutton, M. A. ve Goodman, L. A. (2005). Coersion in intimate partner violence: Toward a new conceptualization. Sex Roles, 52(11/12), 743-756.
  • El-Khoury, M. Y., Dutton, M. A., Goodman, L. A., Engel, L., Belamaric, R. J. ve Murphy, M. (2004). Ethnic differences in battered women's formal help-seeking strategies: A focus on health, mental health, and spirituality. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 10(4), 383-393.
  • Ellsberg, M., Peña, R., Herrera, A., Liljestrand, J. ve Winkvist, A. (2000). Candies in hell: Women’s experiences of violence in Nicaragua. Social Science and Medicine, 51(11), 1595-1610.
  • Emura, T. ve Lin, Y. S. (2015). A comparison of normal approximation rules for attribute control charts. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 31(3), 411-418.
  • Flicker, S. M., Cerulli, C., Swogger, M. T. ve Talbot, N. L. (2012). Depressive and posttraumatic symptoms among women seeking protection orders against intimate partners: Relations to coping strategies and perceived responses to abuse disclosure. Violence Against Women, 18(4), 420-436.
  • Flynn, A. ve Graham, K. (2010). “Why did it happen?” A review and conceptual framework for research on perpetrators’ and victims’ explanations for intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 239-251.
  • Folkman, S. ve Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219-239.
  • Ford-Gilboe, M., Varcoe, C., Noh, M., Wuest, J., Hammerton, J., Alhalal, E. ve Burnett, C. (2015). Patterns and predictors of service use among women who have separated from an abusive partner. Journal of Family Violence, 30(4), 419-431.
  • Fox, K. (2018, 9 Mart). How US gun culture compares with the world in five charts. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/03/americas/us-gunstatistics/index.html, (Erişim tarihi: 19.05.2019).
  • Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A. F. M., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L. ve Watts, C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multicountry study on women's health and domestic violence. The Lancet, 368(3543), 1260-1269.
  • Gelles, R. J. (1974). The violent home. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  • Glanz, K. ve Schwartz, M. D. (2008). Stress, coping and health behavior. K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer ve K. Viswanath (Der.). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research and practice içinde. (ss: 211-236) 4. Baskı. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gondolf, E. W. ve Fisher, E. R. (1988). Battered women as survivors. An alternative to treating learned helplessness. Toronto: Lexington Books.
  • Goodman, L. A., Banyard, V., Woulfe, J., Ash, S. ve Mattern, G. (2016). Bringing a network-oriented approach to domestic violence services: A focus group exploration of promising practices. Violence Against Women, 22(1), 64-89.
  • Goodman, L. A., Smyth, K. F., Borges, A. M. ve Singer, R. (2009). When crises collide: How intimate partner violence and poverty intersect to shape women’s mental health and coping? Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(4), 306-329.
  • Goodman, L., Dutton, M. A., Vankos, N. ve Weinfurt, K. (2005). Women’s resources and use of strategies as risk and protective factors for reabuse over time. Violence Against Women, 11(3), 311-336.
  • Goodman, L., Dutton, M. A., Weinfurt, K. ve Cook, S. (2003). The Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index: Development and application. Violence Against Women, 9, 163-186.
  • Graham-Bermann, S. ve Perkins, S. (2010). Effects of early exposure and lifetime exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) on child adjustment. Violence and Victims, 25(4), 427–439.
  • Güleç Öyekçin D., Yetim D. ve Şahin E. M. (2012). Psychosocial factors affecting various types of intimate partner violence against women. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 23, 75-81.
  • İbiloğlu, A. O. (2012). Aile içi şiddet. Current Approaches in Psychiatry/Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 4(2), 204-222.
  • Jansen, H. A. F. M., Yüksel, İ. ve Çağatay, P. (2009). Kadına yönelik şiddetin yaygınlığı. T.C. Başbakanlık Kadının Statüsü Genel Müdürlüğü, Türkiye’de kadına yönelik aile içi şiddet içinde (s. 45-70). Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Kadının Statüsü Genel Müdürlüğü.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1(3), 180-186.
  • Klem, L. (2000). Structural equation modeling. Editörler: L. G. Grimm ve P. R. Yarnold, Reading and understanding multivariate statistics içinde (s. 227-260). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Kocot, T. ve Goodman, L. (2003). The roles of coping and social support in battered women’s mental health. Violence Against Women, 9(3), 323-346.
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Lazarus, R. S. ve Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer. Lewis, C. S., Griffing, S., Chu, M., Jospitre, T., Sage, R.
  • E., Madry, L. ve Primm, B. J. (2006). Coping and violence exposure as predictors of psychological functioning in domestic violence survivors. Violence Against Women, 12(4), 340-354.
  • Liang, B., Goodman, L., Tummala-Nara, P. ve Weintraub, S. (2005). A theoretical framework for understanding help-seeking process among survivors of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1/2), 71-84.
  • Lloyd, S., Farrell, G. ve Pease, K. (1994). Preventing repeated domestic violence: A demonstration project on Merseyside. Londra: Home Office Police Department.
  • Messing, J. T., Ward-Lasher, A., Thaller, J. ve BagwellGray, M.E. (2015). The state of intimate partner violence intervention: progress and continuing challenges. Social Work, 60(4), 305-313.
  • Mihalic, S. W. ve Elliott, D. (1997). A social learning theory model of marital violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12(1), 21-47.
  • Montalvo-Liendo, N. (2009). Cross-cultural factors in disclosure of intimate partner violence: An integrated review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(1), 20-34.
  • Myers, T. A. (2011). Goodbye, listwise deletion: Presenting Hot Deck Imputation as an easy and effective tool for handling missing data. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(4), 297-310.
  • Naçar, M., Baykan, Z., Poyrazoğlu, S. ve Çatinkaya, F. (2009). Kayseri ilinde iki sağlık ocağı bölgesinde kadına yönelik aile içi şiddet. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 8(2), 131-138.
  • Petersen, R., Moracco, K. E., Goldstein, K. M. ve Clark, K. A. (2005). Moving beyond disclosure: women's perspectives on barriers and motivators to seeking assistance for intimate partner violence. Women & Health, 40(3), 63-76.
  • Popescu, M. (2010). Childhood victimization and its impact on coping behaviors for victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 575- 585.
  • Popescu, M. L., Drumm, R., Dewan, S. ve Rusu, C. (2010). Childhood victimization and its impact on coping behaviors for victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 575-582.
  • Powell, P. ve Smith, M. (2011). Domestic violence: An overview. (FactSheet-11-76). http:/www.unce.unr.edu/ publications/files/cy/2011/fs 1176.pdf, (Erişim tarihi: 29.08.2017).
  • Reviere, S. L., Farber, E. W., Twomey, H., Okun, A., Jackson, E., Zanville, H. ve Kaslow, N. J. (2007). Intimate partner violence and suicidality in low-income African American women: A multimethod assessment of coping factors. Violence Against Women, 13(11), 1113-1129.
  • Riddell, T., Ford-Gilboe, M. ve Leipert, B. (2009). Strategies used by women to stop, avoid, or escape from intimate partner violence. Health Care for Women International, 30, 134-159.
  • Salazar, M., Högberg, U., Valladares, E. ve Öhman, A. (2012). The supportive process for ending intimate partner violence after pregnancy: The experience of Nicaraguan women. Violence Against Women, 18(11), 1257-1278.
  • Sanchez, D. T., Crocker, J., & Boike, K. R. (2005). Doing gender in the bedroom: Investing in gender norms and the sexual experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1445-1455.
  • Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. New York: McGrawHill.
  • Shea, M. ve Yeh, C. J. (2008). Asian American students’ cultural values, stigma, and relational self-construal: Correlates of attitudes toward professional help seeking. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 30(2), 157- 172.
  • Shen, A. C. T. (2011). Cultural barriers to help-seeking among Taiwanese female victims of dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(7) 1343-1365.
  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
  • Straus, M. A. (1995). Manual for the Conflict Tactics Scales. Durham, NH: Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire.
  • Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., McCoy, S. ve Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283-316.
  • Swan, S. C. ve Sullivan, T. P. (2009). The resource utilization of women who use violence in intimate relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(6), 940- 958.
  • Şahin, N. H. ve Durak, A. (1995). Stresle Başa Çıkma Tarzları Ölçeği: Üniversite öğrencileri için uyarlanması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 10(34), 56-73.
  • Taşkale, N. (2019a). Şiddet mağduriyeti ve sağlık sonuçları arasındaki ilişkide kullanılan başa çıkma yöntemlerinin biçimlendirici rolü. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Taşkale, N. (2019b, Temmuz). Suitability of behaviorist perspectives to study coping with intimate partner violence. Sözlü sunum, The 16th European Congress of Psychology (ECP), Moskova, Rusya.
  • Taşkale, N. ve Soygüt, G. (2016). Kadın sığınma evlerinde kalan şiddet mağduru kadınlar: Demografik ve sosyoekonomik bir ı̇nceleme. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 19(Özel Sayı), 3-11.
  • Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159-177.
  • Walker, L. E. (1978). Battered women and learned helplessness. Victimology, 2, 525–534.
  • Witte, S. S., Batsukh, A. ve Chang, M. (2010). Sexual risk behaviors, alcohol abuse, and intimate partner violence among sex workers in Mongolia: Implications for HIV prevention intervention development. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 38(2), 89-103.
  • World Health Organization. (2018). World health statistics. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  • Wright, C. V. ve Johnson, D. M. (2009). Correlates for legal help-seeking: Contextual factors for battered women in shelter. Violence and Victims, 24(6), 771- 785.
  • Zakar, R. (2012). Intimate partner violence against women and its implications for women’s health in Pakistan. Hamburg: Disserta Verlag.
  • Zanville, H. A. (2006). The relationship between risk and coping among survivors of intimate partner violence. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Goerge Mason University, ABD.
Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2602-4438
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2017
  • Yayıncı: Klinik Psikoloji Araştırmaları Derneği
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Klinik sosyal psikolojiye doğru

Hacer HARLAK

Eş Şiddetine Karşı Yöntemler Endeksi’nin (EŞYE) Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması

NERMİN TAŞKALE, Özlem SERTEL BERK

Türkiye’de Psikoloji etiği öğretimi: Bir uygulama çalışmasının etik davranış, ahlaki değerler ve etik kuralları benimseme açısından değerlendirilmesi

Yeşim KORKUT, Ayşenur AKTAŞ

Fonksiyonel somatik sendromlar ve DSM-5: Zihin beden yaklaşımı açısından bir değerlendirme

Burak DURUK, Özlem SERTEL BERK

Obsesif kompulsif bozukluk belirtileri, tiksinme duyarlılığı ve zihinsel kirlenmenin cinsel doyumla ilişkisi

Buruç YILMAZ, Başak BAHTİYAR