Efficacies of formic, oxalic and lactic acids Against Varroa destructor in naturally infested honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies in Turkey

Bu çalışma, bal arılarının (Apis mellifera L.), Türkiye dahil olmak üzere tüm dünyada yaygın paraziti olan Varroa destructor’un kontrolünde kullanılan formik asit, okzalik asit ve laktik asidin, Türkiye’nin Marmara Bölgesi koşullarında etkinliğinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Deneme kolonileri homojen olarak her biri sekiz kovandan oluşan beş gruba ayrılmıştır. Gruplara formik, okzalik ve laktik asidin yanı sıra etkisi bilinen kimyasal ilaç olarak coumaphos (Perizin®) uygulanmış ve bir grup tedavi edilmeden kontrol olarak bırakılmıştır. Her koloni iki sonbahar - bir ilkbahar olmak üzere üç sezon tedavi edilmiştir. Asitlerin etkileri Henderson - Tilton formülüyle, asitler arası önem ise Tukey’in çoklu karşılaştırma testi ile belirlenmiştir. İlk sonbaharda en yüksek etki %93.7 ile okzalik asitte görülmüş, coumaphos %92.5, formik asit %84.7 ve laktik asit %54.3 etki göstermiştir. İlkbahar sezonunda coumaphos %65.6, formik asit %21.4, okzalik asit ve laktik asit %8.3; ikinci sonbahar sezonunda (üçüncü sezonda) ise coumaphos %96.9, formik asit %95.6, okzalik asit %93.3 ve laktik asit %87.7 etki göstermişlerdir. Denemeler sırasında ana arının yumurtlamasında bir azalma veya ergin arı ölümleri gözlenmemiştir.

Türkiye’de Varroa destructor ile doğal enfeste bal arısı (Apis mellifera L.) kolonilerinde formik, okzalik laktik ve asitlerin etkinliği

This study was performed to determine the efficacies of formic, oxalic and lactic acids in the control of the common ectoparasite Varroa destructor on naturally infested honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies in the Marmara region of Turkey. Experimental colonies were divided in to five homogeneous groups of eight hives each. Formic, oxalic and lactic acids and coumaphos (Perizin®, a chemical with known efficacy, for comparison) were each applied to one group, with the fifth group serving as the untreated control. Each colony was treated during three seasons, two autumn seasons and one spring. The efficacy of the acids was measured by the Henderson–Tilton formula, and the significance between the acids was determined via Tukey’s multiple comparison test. In the first autumn, the highest percentage of the efficacy were detected in oxalic acid (93.7%) followed by coumaphos (92.5%), formic acid (84.7%) and lactic acid (54.3%). In spring, the efficacy rate was 65.6% in coumaphos while these rates were 21.4% in formic acid and 8.3% in oxalic and lactic acid each one. On the other hand, in the second autumn, the efficacy rate was 96.9% in coumaphos, 95.6% in formic acid, 93.3% in oxalic acid and 87.7% in lactic acid, respectively. During the trials, we observed no reduction in the queen bees’ egg laying or in adult bee deaths due to the treatments.

___

  • 1. Cakmak I, Aydin L, Gülegen E, Wells H: Varroa (Varroa destructor) and tracheal mite (Acarapis woodi) incidence in the Republic of Turkey. J Apic Res, 42, 57-60, 2003.
  • 2. Zhang ZQ: Notes on Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) parasitic on honeybees in New Zealand. Sys Appl Acarol, 5, 9-14, 2000.
  • 3. Yang X, Cox-Foster DL: Impact of an ectoparasite on the immunity and pathology of an invertebrate: Evidence for host immunosuppression and viral amplification. PNAS, 102, 7470- 7475, 2005.
  • 4. Gregorc A, Planinc I: Dynamics of falling Varroa mites in honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies following oxalic acid treatments. Acta Vet Brno, 73, 385-391, 2004.
  • 5. Tutkun E, Inci A: Balarılarında Zarar Yapan Arı Akarı (Varroa jacobsoni Oudemans)’nın Tanınması, Yayılışı, Biyolojisi ve Mücadelesi. Türkiye Kalkınma Vakfı Entegre Arıcılık Projesi Yayın No. 1, Yenigün Matbaası, Ankara, 1985.
  • 6. Warrit N, Hagen TAR, Smith DR, Cakmak I: A survey of Varroa destructor strains on Apis mellifera in Turkey. J Apic Res, 43, 190-191, 2004.
  • 7. Aydin L, Gülegen E, Cakmak I, Girisgin AO: The occurrence of Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman, 2000 on Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) in Turkey. Tr J Vet Anim Sci, 31 (3): 189- 191, 2007.
  • 8. Kumova U: The controlling methods of Varroa. In, Aydın L, Cakmak I, Günes N (Eds): 2nd Marmara Beekeeping Congress, Announcement Book. pp. 83-131, Uludag Univ. Press, Bursa- Turkey, 2003 (in Turkish).
  • 9. Wallner K: The use of varroacides and their influence on the quality of bee products. Am Bee J, 135, 817-821, 1995.
  • 10. Gregorc A, Planinc I: Acaricidal effect of oxalic acid in honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies. Apidologie, 32, 333-340, 2001.
  • 11. Anonymus: Turkish State Meteorological Service: Meteorological Data in Northwestern Turkey 1995-2005. http:// www.meteor.gov.tr/2008/tahmin/tahmin-iller.aspx?m=BURSA, Accessed: 10th January, 2008.
  • 12. Shimanuki H, Knox DA: Diagnosis of honeybee diseases. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 690, 2000.
  • 13. Schur A, Tornier I, Brasse D, Mühlen W, Von Der Ohe W, Wallner K, Wehling M: Honey bee brood ring-test in 2002: Method for the assessment of side effects of plant protection products on the honey bee brood under semi-field conditions. Bull Insectol, 56, 91-96, 2003.
  • 14. Henderson CF, Tilton EW: Tests with acaricides against the brown wheat mite. J Econ Entomol, 48, 157-161, 1955.
  • 15. SPSS® for Windows: Rel. 15.0.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc, 2006.
  • 16. Ergün G, Aktaş S: ANOVA modellerinde kareler toplamı yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 15 (3): 481-484, 2009
  • 17. Lodesani M, Costa C: Limits of chemotherapy in beekeeping: Development of resistance and the problem of residues. Bee World, 86, 102-109, 2005.
  • 18. Calderone NW, Nasr ME: Evaluation of a formic acid formulation for the fall control of Varroa jacobsoni (Acari: Varroidae) in colonies of the honey bee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in a temperate climate. J Econ Entomol, 92, 526-533, 1993.
  • 19. Charriere JD, Imdorf A, Bachofen B: Five formic acid dispensers for long term treatments in comparison. Swiss Bee Research Centre. Dairy Research Station, Liebefeld, Switzerland. http://www.alp.admin.ch/themen/00502/00515/00517/index. html?lang=en, Accessed: 26th February, 2006.
  • 20. Greatti M, Iob M, Barbattini R, D’agaro M: Effectiveness of spring treatment with lactic acid and formic acid against Varroa jacobsoni Oud. Apic Mod, 83, 49-58, 1992.
  • 21. Charriere JD, Imdorf A: Oxalic acid treatment by trickling against Varroa destructor recommendations for use in central Europe and under temperate climate conditions. Bee World, 83, 51-60, 2002.
  • 22. Kraus B, Berg S: Effect of a lactic acid treatment during winter in temperate climate upon Varroa jacobsoni Oud, and the bee (Apis mellifera) colony. Exp Appl Acarol, 18, 459-468, 1994.
  • 23. De Ruijter A, Van Den Eijnde J: Field experiment to determine the effects of Perizin on Varroa mites and on development of treated colonies. Vet Med Rev, 2, 158-163, 1986.
  • 24. Kumova U: The investigation on the effects of some chemicals used to control Varroa jacobsoni in Turkey. Tr J Vet Anim Sci, 25, 597-602, 2001.
  • 25. De Grandi-Hoffman G, Curry R: Simulated population dynamics of Varroa mites in honey bee colonies: Part II - What the Varroapop model reveals. Am Bee J, 145, 629-632, 2005.
  • 26. Colin ME: Alternative control of the varroosis. In, Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes, Seminar on the Varroosis in the Mediterranean Region, Granada, Spain, 22-23 September, 1996. Vol. 21. pp. 87-98 CIHEAM-IAMZ, Zaragoza, 1997.
  • 27. Kaftanoglu O, Bicici M, Yeninar H, Toker S, Güler A: The effects of formic acid on Varroa jacobsoni and chalk brood (Ascosphaera apis) disease in honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies. Tr J Vet Anim Sci, 16, 415-425, 1992.
  • 28. Yücel B: The effects of using different organic acids for against Varroa (Varroa jacobsoni Q.) treatment on colony performances of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). J Anim Prod, 46 (2): 33-39, 2005 (in Turkish).
Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-6045
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniv. Veteriner Fak.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Tarsal plate: protective structure peculiar to buzzard’s (Buteo buteo) palpebra inferioris

MURAT ERDEM GÜLTİKEN, BURCU ONUK, MEHMET ÖNDER KARAYİĞİT, DİNÇER YILDIZ

Determination of ibuprofen in rabbit plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography

Bilal YILMAZ, Ali AŞÇI, Saziye Sezin PALABIYIK

Comparison of two different media for In vitro production of dog embryos

MİTHAT EVECEN, ÜMÜT CİRİT, KAMBER DEMİR, Elif KARAMAN, GÜL BAKIRER ÖZTÜRK, Asiye İzem HAMZAOĞLU, SEMA BİRLER, SERHAT PABUCCUOĞLU

Use of GnRH agonist (Desloreline) in combination with $PGF_{2\alpha}$ on the termination of pregnancy in bitches

Örsan GÜNGÖR, MEHMET KAYA, KUTLAY GÜRBULAK, HASAN ORAL, SEMRA KAYA, CİHAN KAÇAR

A survey on animal welfare attitudes of veterinary surgeries, veterinary students, animal owners and society in Turkey

SERDAR İZMİRLİ, AŞKIN YAŞAR

Efficacies of formic, oxalic and lactic acids Against Varroa destructor in naturally infested honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies in Turkey

AHMET ONUR GİRİŞGİN, LEVENT AYDIN

Vejetasyonun farklı dönemlerinde biçilen Macar fiği buğday karışımının besin madde kompozisyonu, rumende yıkılım özellikleri, in vitro sindirilebilirlik ve rölatif yem değerinin belirlenmesi

İhsan AKSOY, HÜSEYİN NURSOY

Genetic parameters and correlations for lactation milk yields according to lactation numbers in jersey cows

ADNAN ÜNALAN, SONER ÇANKAYA

Antifungal Effects of Lactobacillus spp. bacteria on candida yeast

ERGİN KARİPTAŞ, Şener TULUMOĞLU, BELGİN ERDEM

Bir Gazella gazella’da (Hatay Dağ ceylanı) ultrasonografi ile gebelik tanısı

Yaşar ERGÜN, GÖKHAN DOĞRUER, Mustafa Kemal SARIBAY