Mehdi SALMANZADEH, Habib SHAHRYAR AGHDAM, Alireza LOTFI

Effect of in ovo feeding of butyric acid on hatchability, performance and small intestinal morphology of Turkey poults

Bu çalışmanın amacı in ovo bütirik asit beslemesinin hindilerde yumurtadan çıkma, performans ve ince barsak morfolojisi üzerine etkilerini araştırmaktır. Fertilize olmuş yumurtalara inkübasyonun 7. gününde 0.5 mL deiyonize su içerisinde çözdürülmüş 10, 20 veya 30 mg bütirik asit enjekte edildi. Yumurtadan çıkma, vücut ağırlık artışı (BWG), yem tüketimi ve yem konversiyon oranı (FCR) belirlendi. İnce barsak morfolojisini gösteren villus yüksekliği (VH), cript derinliği (CD) ve villus genişliği (VW) yumurtadan çıkma zamanında ve her bir yetiştirme periyodu sonunda ölçüldü. Çalışma bulguları kontrol grubu ile karşılaştırıldığında bütirik asit verilenlerde yumurtadan çıkma zamanında vücut ağırlıklarının anlamlı derecede büyük olduğunu gösterdi. Ancak in ovo besleme (IOF) kontrol grubu (enjeksiyon yapılmayan) ile karşılaştırıldığında daha düşük yumurtadan çıkmaya neden oldu (P

In ovo bütirik asit beslemesinin hindilerde yumurtadan çıkma, performans ve ince barsak morfolojisi üzerine etkileri

The aim of present study was to investigate efect of in ovo administration of butyric acid on hatchability, performance, and small intestinal morphology of turkey poults. Fertilized eggs were subjected to injections with butyric acid (10 mg, 20 mg and 30mg dissolved in 0.5 mL of deionized water) on the d 7 of incubation. Hatching traits, Body weight gain (BWG), feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were determined during experiment.Small intestinal morphology included villus height (VH), crypt depth (CD), and villus width (VW) were measured at hatch and the end of each rearing periods. Finally, the results of the present study indicate that the weight of newly-hatched poults was significantly greater when butyric acid were administrated, in comparison with control groups.But, in ovo feeding (IOF) caused lower hatchability than in control group (not-injection eggs) (P<0.01). Poults from IOF showed better weight gain and FCR (0-42 day of age), when compared to poults hatched from control (P<0.01). The IOFB significantly increased VH for duodenum, jejunum and ileum at both hatch and starter period. It was concluded that IOFB may afect VH of intestine at hatch and starter (post- hatch) period in turkeys. Also, IOFB can improve performances.

PDF

___

1. Halevy O, GeyraA, Barak M, Uni Z, SklanD: Early posthatch starvation decreases satellite cell proliferation and skeletal muscle growth in chicks. J Nutr, 130, 858-864, 2000.
2. Halevy O, Nadel Y, Barak M, Rozenbolm I, Sklan K: Early posthatch feeding stimulates satellite cell proliferation and skeletal muscle growth in turkey poults. J Nutr, 133, 1376-1382, 2003.
3. Uni Z, Ferket PR, Tako E, Kedar O: In ovo feeding improves energy status of late-term chicken embryos. Poult Sci, 84, 764-770, 2005.
4. Ohta Y, Kidd MT: Optimum site for amino acid injection in broiler breeder eggs. Poult Sci, 80, 1425-1429, 2001.
5. Ohta Y, Kidd MT, Ishibashi T: Embryo growth and amino acid concentration profiles of broiler breeder eggs, embryos, and chicks after administration of amino acids. Poult Sci, 80, 1430-1436, 2001.
6. Uni Z, Ferket PR: Enhancement of development of oviparous species by feeding. U.S. Patent no. 6. 592. 878.2003.
7. Foye OT, Uni Z, Ferket RP: Efect of in ovo feeding egg white protein, beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, carbohydrates on glycogen status and neonatal growth of turkeys. Poult Sci, 85, 1185-1192, 2006.
8. Bellairs R, Osmond M: The Atlas of Chick Development. Elsevier, New York, 2005.
9. Foye OT, Ferket PR, Uni Z: The efects of feeding arginine, ß-hydroxy-ß- methyl-butyrate and protein on jejunal digestive and absorotive activity in embryonic and neonatal turkey poults. Poult Sci, 5, 309-317, 2007.
10. Zhai W, Neuman SL, Latour MA, Hester PY: The efect of injection of L-carnitine on hatchability of White Leghorns. Poult Sci, 87, 569-572, 2008.
11. Chen W, Wang R, Wan HF, Xiong XL, Peng P, Peng J: Infuence of injection of glutamine and carbohydrates on digestive organs and pectoralis muscle mass in the duck. Br Poult Sci, 50, 436-442, 2009.
12. Zhai W, Rowe DE, Peebles ED: Efect of commercial injection of carbohydrates on broiler embryogenesis. Poult Sci, 90, 1295-1301, 2011.
13. Keralapurath MM, Corzo A, Pulkanti R, Zhai W, Peebles ED: Efects of injection of L-carnitine on hatchability and subsequent broiler performance and slaughter yield. Poult Sci, 89, 1497-1501, 2010.
14. Friedman A, Bar-Shira E: Efect of nutrition on development of immune competence in chickens gut associated lymphoid system. In, Proc. 15th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Balatonfured-Hungary, pp.234-242, 2005.
15. Dierick NA, Decuypere JA, Molly K, VanBeek E, Vanderbeke E: The combined use of triacylglycerols containing medium-chain fatty acids and exogenous lipolytic enzymes as an alternative for nutritional antibiotics in piglet nutrition. Livest Prod Sci, 75, 129-142, 2002.
16. Leeson S, NamkungH, Antongiovanni M, Lee EH: Efect of butyric acid on the performance and carcass yield of broiler chickens. Poult Sci, 84, 1416-1422, 2005.
17. Van Immerseel F, Methner U, Rychlik I, Nagy B, Velge P, Martin G, Foster N, Ducatelle R, Barrow PA: Vaccination and early protection against non-host-specific Salmonella serotypes in poultry: Exploitation of innate immunity and microbial metabolic activity. Epidemiol Infect, 133, 959-978, 2005.
18. Pryde SE, Duncan SH, Hold GL, Stewart CS, Flint HJ: The microbiology of butyrate formation in thehuman colon. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 217, 133-139,2002.
19. Pouraziz S, AghdamShahryar H, Chekani-Azar S: Efects of dietary saccharomyces cerevisiae and butyric acid glycerides on performance and serum lipid level of broiler chickens. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 19 (5): 903-907, 2013. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2013.9074
20. Smith MW: Symposium on the digestive tract in nutritional adaptation . Proc Nutr Soc, 52, 293-300,1993.
21. Uni Z: Functional development of the small intestine indomestic birds: Cellular and molecular aspects. Poult Avian Biol Rev, 10, 167-179, 1999.
22. Marshman E, Booth C, Potten CS: The intestinal epithelial stem cell. Bioessays, 24, 91-98, 2002.
23. Salmanzadeh M: Evaluation of dietary butyric acid supplementation on small intestinal morphology, performance and carcass traits of Japanese quails. Revue Méd Vét, 164, 481-485, 2013.
24. NRC: Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9 th ed., Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC, 1994.
25. Girdhar SR, Barta JR, Santoyo FA, Smith TK: Dietary putrescine (1, 4-diaminobutane) infuences recovery of turkey poults challenged with a mixed coccidial infection. J Nutr, 136, 2319-2324, 2006.
26. Geyra A, Uni Z, Sklan D: Enterocyte dynamics and mucosal development in the posthatch chick. Poult Sci, 80, 776-782, 2001.
27. SAS Institute: SAS Users Guide: Statistics. 8 th ed., SASInst. Inc., Cary, NC, 2000.
28. Tako E, Ferket PR, Uni Z: Efects of feeding of carbohydrates and beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate on the development of chicken intestine. Poult Sci, 83, 2023-2028, 2004.
29. Ipek A, Sahan U, Yilmaz B: The efect of ascorbic acid and glucose injection in broiler breeder eggs on hatchability and chick weight. Arch Gefugelk, 63, 132-135, 2004.
30. Heiblum R, ArnonE, ChazanG, RobinzonB, Gvaryahu G, Snapir N: Glucocorticoid administration during incubation: Embryo mortality and post-hatch growth in chickens. Poult Sci, 80, 1357-1363, 2001.
31. Kocamis H, Kirkpatric-Keller DC, Klandorf H, Killefer J: Administration of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-i alters postnatal growth and development of the broiler chicken. Poult Sci, 77, 1913-1919, 1998.
32. Kocamis H, Yeni YN, Kirkpatric-Keller DC, Killefer J: Postnatal growth of broilers in response to administration of chicken growth hormone. Poult Sci, 78, 1219-1226, 1999.
33. Lamosova D, Macajova M, Zeman, M, Moze D, Ova JE: Efect of leptin administration on the development of Japanese quail. Physiol Res, 52, 201-209, 2003.
34. Lotfi A, Aghdam Shahryar H, Kaiya H: Efect of in ovo ghrelin administration on hatching results and post-hatching performance of broiler chickens. Livest Sci, 154, 158-164, 2013.
35. Leitao RA, Lrandro NSM, Café MB, Stringhini JH, Pedroso AA, Chaves LS: Inoculation of glucose of broiler breeders/eggs: Incubation parameters and initial performance. Ciencia Anim Brasileira, 9, 847-855, 2008.
36. Adriana AP, Leandro SC, Karina L, De AML, Nadja SML, Matcos BC, Jose HS: Nutrient inoculation in eggs from heavy breeders. Rev Bras Zootecn , 5, 2018-2026, 2006.
37. Iji PA, Saki A, Tivey DR: Body and intestinal growth of broiler chicks on a commercial starter diet. 1. Intestinal weight and mucosal development. Br Poult Sci, 42, 505-513, 2001.
38. Antongiovanni M, Buccioni A, Petacchi F, Leeson S, Minieri S, Martini A, Cecchi R: Butyric acid glycerides in the diet of broiler chickens: Efects on gut histology and carcass composition. Italian J Anim Sci, 6, 19-25, 2007.
39. Isolauri E, Salminen S, Ouwehand AC: Probiotics. Best Pract Res Clin Gastr, 18, 299-313, 2004.
40. Josefiak D, Rutkowski A, Martin SA: Carbohydrate fermentation in the avian ceca: A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 113, 1-15, 2004.
41. Uni Z, Ferket PR: Methods for early nutrition and their potential. Worlds Poult Sci J, 60, 101-111, 2004.
42. Tako E, Ferket PR, Uni Z: Changes in chicken intestinal zinc exporter RNA expression and small intestinal functionality following intra-amniotic zincmethionineadministration. J Nutr Biochem , 16, 339-346, 2005.
43. Smirnov A, Tako E, Ferket PR, Uni Z: Mucin gene expression and mucin content in the chicken intestinal goblet cells are afected by feeding of carbohydrates. Poult Sci, 85, 669-673, 2006.
44. Zhonghong H, Yuming G: Effect of dietary sodium butyrate supplementation on the intestinal morphological structure, absorptive functions and gut fora in chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 132, 240-249, 2007.
45. Salmanzadeh M, Ebrahimnezhad Y, Aghdam Shahryar H: Efects of in ovo administration of L-carnitine on hatchability, subsequent performance, carcass traits and blood cholesterol of turkey poults. Revue Méd Vét, 163, 448-453, 2012.