Detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae by Real-Time PCRs and Mycoplasma gallisepticum-antibody Detection by an ELISA in Chicken Breeder Flocks

Bu çalışmada, Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) ve Mycoplasma synoviae (MS)'nın solunum sistemine ait semptomlara sahip damızlık tavuk kümeslerindeki yaygınlığını tespit etmek amaçlandı. Toplam 77 kümes (2153 trakeal svab ve kan örneği)'in toplanan tüm örnekleri MG gerçek zamanlı PCR (MG-rPCR) ve MG-ELISA ile, 32 kümes ise MS-rPCR ile test edildi. Çalışmanın birinci bölümünü kapsayan ilk 28 kümeste MG-antikorları yüksek bulundu ve belirgin klinik semptomlar gösteren bu tavukların örnekleri MG-rPCR1 ile negatif sonuç verdi. Bu nedenle, bu PCR'da kullanılan MG-lipoprotein geni-spesifik primerler (MG-rPCR1), MS tespitinde kullanılan MS-16S rRNA primerlerine (MS-rPCR) benzer olarak, MG-16S rRNA primerleri (MG-rPCR2) ile değiştirildi ve çalışmaya bu primerler ile devam edildi. MG-ELISA ile %100 pozitif olan ilk 28 kümesin tümü MG-rPCR1 ile negatif iken, çalışmanın 2. bölümünde %87.8 MG seropozitif olarak saptanan diğer 49 kümes MG-rPCR2ile %42.9 pozitif bulundu. Ayrıca, bu ilk 28 kümesten seçilen 5 adetinde MS-rPCR negatif iken, daha sonraki 49 kümesten seçilen 27'si MSrPCR ile %7.4 pozitif olarak tespit edildi. Genel olarak, toplam 77 kümeste uygulanan 432 MG-rPCR1-2'den 81'i (%18.7) ve bu kümeslerden 32 adetinde yapılan 187 MS-rPCR'ın 13'ü (%6.9) pozitif bulundu. ELISA sonuçları ise serolojik testlerden önemli oranda yanlış-pozitif sonuçlar alınabileceğini ve tek bir test sistemine güvenilmemesi gerektiğini işaret etti. Bu çalışma ile, aynı zamanda, Mycoplasma-enfekte kümeslerin laboratuvarlarda doğrulanabilmesi için doğru primerler seçildiğinde rPCR'ın güvenli bir metot olduğu, damızlık tavuk kümeslerinde MG ve MS prevalansının özellikle kış mevsiminde oldukça yüksek olduğu ortaya kondu

Damızlık Tavuk Kümeslerinde Mycoplasma gallisepticumve Mycoplasma synoviae'nin Gerçek Zamanlı PCR'lar ile ve Mycoplasma gallisepticum Antikorlarının ELISA ile Tespiti

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) and Mycoplasma synoviae (MS) in breeder flocks showing respiratory symptoms. A total of 77 flocks (2153 tracheal swabs and blood samples) were sampled and all were tested by MG real time PCR (MG-rPCR) and MG-ELISA, and 32 flocks were tested by MS real time PCR (MS-rPCR). In the first part of this study covering 28 flocks, all samples from chickens with marked clinical symptoms and high MG-antibody levels gave negative results with MG-rPCR1. Therefore, the MG-lipoprotein gene-specific primers (MG-rPCR) of this PCR were replaced with MG-16S rRNA primers (MG-rPCR2), as were the MS16S rRNA primers (MS-rPCR), thus the study was pursued accordingly. All of the first 28 flocks, which were 100% positive by MG-ELISA, were MG-rPCR1 negative, whereas in the second part of the study, other 49 flocks, which were 87.8% MG seropositive, were found 42.9% positive by MG-rPCR2. In addition, 5 selected flocks from the first 28 were negative, whereas 7.4% of the 27 selected flocks from the second 49 were positive by MS-rPCR. Overall, 81 out of 432 MG-rPCR1-2 (18.7%) performed from 77 flocks, and 13 out of 187 MS-rPCRs (6.9%) in 32 flocks were determined as positive. ELISA results indicated that there could be significantly high false-positives in serological tests, thus results should not be relied upon one test system. Also, this study revealed that, for the confirmation of Mycoplasma-infected flocks in laboratories, rPCR is a reliable method as long as suitable primers are selected, and that MG and MS prevalence is considerably high in winter season

___

  • Feberwee A, Mekkes DD, Wit JJ, Hartman EG, Pijpers A: Comparison of culture, PCR and different serologic tests for detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae infections. Avian Dis, 49, 260-268,
  • Kleven SH: Control of avian Mycoplasma infections in commercial poultry. Avian Dis, 52, 367-374, 2008.
  • Ley DH: Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection. In, Saif YM (Ed): Diseases of Poultry. Ames, 8th ed., 807-834, Iowa State University Pres, Iowa, 2008.
  • Raviv Z, Kleven SH: The development of diagnostic Real-Time TaqMan PCRs for the four pathogenic avian mycoplasmas. Avian Dis, 53, 103- , 2009. DOI: 10.1637/8600.1
  • Kahya S, Temelli S, Eyigor A, Carli KT: Real-Time PCR culture and serology for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in chicken breeder flocks. Vet Microbiol, 144, 319-324, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j. vetmic.2010.01.012
  • Yoder HW: A historical account of the diagnosis and characterization of strains of Mycoplasma gallisepticum of low virulence. Avian Dis, 30, 518, 1986.
  • Buim MR, Mettifogo E, Timenetsky J, Kleven S, Ferreira AJP: Epidemiological survey on Mycoplasma gallisepticum and M. synoviae by multiplex PCR in commercial poultry. Pesq Vet Bras, 29, 552-556, 2009. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-736X2009000700009
  • Carli KT, Eyigor A: Real-Time polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in chicken trachea. Avian Dis, 47, 712-717, DOI: 10.1637/6041
  • Jarquin R, Schultz J, Hanning I, Ricke SC: Development of a real time polymerase chain reaction assay for the simultaneous detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae under industry conditions. Avian Dis, 53, 73-77, 2009. DOI: 10.1637/8596.1
  • Lauerman LH, Hoerr FJ, Sharpton AR, Shah SM, Santen VL: Development and application of a polymerase chain reaction assay for Mycoplasma synoviae. Avian Dis, 37, 829-834, 1993.
  • Zain ZM, Bradbury JM: The influence of type of swab and laboratory method on the recovery of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae in broth medium. Avian Pathol, 24, 707-716, 1995. DOI: 1080/03079459508419109
  • Lauerman LH: Mycoplasma PCR assays. In, Lauerman LH (Ed): Nucleic Acid Amplification Assays for Diagnosis of Animal Diseases. 51, Published by American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, USA, 1998.
  • Garcia M, Ikuta N, Levisohn S, Kleven SH: Evaluation and comparison of various PCR methods for detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in chickens. Avian Dis, 49, 125-132, 2005.
  • Hess M, Neubauer C, Hackl R: Interlaboratory comparison of ability to detect nucleic acid of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae by polymerase chain reaction. Avian Pathol, 36, 127-133, 2007. DOI: 10.1080/03079450701203082
  • Harasawa R, Pitcher DG, Ramirez AS, Bradbury JM: A putative trans- posase gene in the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region of Mycoplasma imitans. J Microbiol, 150, 1023-1029, 2004. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.26629-0
  • Abdul-Wahab OMS, Ross G, Bradbury JM: Pathogenicity and cytoadherence of Mycoplasma imitans in chicken and duck embryo organ cultures. Infect Immun, 64, 563-568, 1996.
  • Cengiz S, Babacan O, Dinc G, Akan M: Tavuklarda Mycoplasma gallisepticum enfeksiyonunun polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu (PCR) ile teşhisi. J Etlik Vet Microbiol, 22, 45-48, 2011.
  • Dakman A, Gunaydın E, Turkyılmaz MA, Gülec M, Coşar M, Ozdemir U: Damızlık tavuk işletmelerinde tespit edilen mikoplazma enfeksiyonları. J Etlik Vet Microbiol, 20, 27-34, 2009.
  • Tuzcu M, Özmen M, Karakoç SR, Tuzcu N, Yoldas A: Diagnosis of mycoplasmosis in chicks by pathological and real-time PCR methods. Eurasian J Vet Sci, 28, 82-86, 2012.
  • Aras Z, Sayın Z: Molecular epidemiology of Mycoplasma synoviae infection in commercial layers. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 20, 93-97, 2014. DOI: 10.9775/kvfd.2013.9488
  • Feberwee A, Vries TS, Landman WJM: Seroprevelance of Mycoplasma synoviae in Dutch commercial poultry farms. Avian Pathol, , 629-633, 2008. DOI: 10.1080/03079450802484987
  • Thu NV, Thuy LT, Phuong PT: Investigation of avian Mycoplasma infection in Vietnam by molecular tools. Proceedings of International Research on food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development. 8- 10 October, Gottingen, 250, 2003.
  • Kahya S, Coven F, Temelli S, Eyigor A, Carli KT: Presence of IS/1494/06 genotype-related Infectious Bronchitis Virus in breeder and broiler flocks in Turkey. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 60, 27-31, 2013.
  • Hossain KMM, Ali MY, Haque M: Seroprevalence of Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in chicken in the greater rajshahi district of Bangladesh. Bangl J Med, 5, 9-14, 2007. DOI: 10.3329/bjvm.v5i1.1302
  • Sikder AJ, Islam MA, Rahman MM, Rahman MB: Seroprevalence of Salmonella and Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in the six model breeder poultry farms at patuakhali strict in Bangladesh. Int J Poult Sci, , 905-910, 2005.
  • Sun Y, Lin L, Chen Z, Wu L, Xiong ZL, Li XM: Serology study of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in broiler chickens in Chong Qing. J Anim Vet Adv, 13, 5-8, 2014. DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2014.5.8
Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-6045
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniv. Veteriner Fak.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Forensic Findings on Acute Mortality of Piglets after Ingestion of Aflatoxin

Nenad STOJANAC, Ognjen STEVANCEVIC, Bozidar SAVIC, Ivana DAVIDOV, R. Marko CINCOVIC, Aleksandar POTKONJAK, Jovan SPASOJEVIC

An Athrax Outbreak in Wild Felidae Kept in a Local Zoo

RAHŞAN YILMAZ, NİHAT YUMUŞAK

Detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma synoviae by Real-Time PCRs and Mycoplasma gallisepticum-antibody Detection by an ELISA in Chicken Breeder Flocks

SERPİL KAHYA DEMİRBİLEK, Özge YILMAZ, Ayşegül EYİGÖR, SERAN TEMELLİ, K. Tayfun ÇARLI

Effects of Sperm from Different Bulls on Developmental Competence, Blastosist Quality and Cell Number of Bovine Embryos In Vitro

UĞUR ŞEN

Alt Solunum Sistemi Hastalığına Sahip Taylarda Bronkoalveolar Lavaj Sıvısının Bakteriolojik ve Sitolojik Değerlendirilmesi

Sevim KASAP, HÜBAN GÖÇMEN, Serkan ÇATIK, Kaan ÖNAT, Mihriban ÜLGEN, Cengiz ÇETİN, Engin KENNERMAN

The Effect of Egg Shell Thickness on Some Hatching Traits of Broiler Breeders

UMUT SAMİ YAMAK, MUSA SARICA, MEHMET AKİF BOZ, HASAN ÖNDER

Chewing Lice (Phthiraptera: Amblycera, Ischnocera) on Several Species of Wild Birds around the Lake Van Basin, Van, Eastern Turkey

Yaşar GÖZ, BİLAL DİK, ÖZLEM ORUNÇ KILINÇ, ALİ BİLGİN YILMAZ, LOĞMAN ASLAN

Türkiye'de Lumpy Skin Disease Virus Enfeksiyonunun Klinik Bulgular ve PCR Yöntemi İle Saptanması

METİN GÜRÇAY, Ahmet SAİT, Ayşe PARMAKSIZ, AYŞE KILIÇ

İneklerde Bir Biyosidal Dezenfektanın İntrauterin Kullanımı Üzerine Histopatolojik Bir Değerlendirme

ARMAĞAN ÇOLAK, MUSTAFA ÖZKARACA, Serdar ALTUN, Selim ÇOMAKLI

Effect of Maclura pomifera Extract on Cisplatin-Induced Damages in Reproductive System of Male Rats

EMRAH HİCAZİ AKSU, Orhan AKMAN, MUSTAFA ÖZKARACA, Ali Doğan ÖMÜR, ÖMER UÇAR