The aim of this study was to investigate the J48 mediated decision tree algorithm from the principal component analysis - PCA, which is more complex, one of the statistical algorithms of diabetic metabolic disorders of Wistar albino rats’ biochemical values and magnetic field application. Wistar Albino rats were examined under 4 diffrent groups including the control group. When the results were examined, it was observed that PCA increased the success rate of classification from 96.25% to 97.50% when used with J48 decision tree algorithm. Thus, the PCA-supported J48 algorithm demonstrated that Wistar albino rats could be successfully used on the data obtained from more complex diabetic metabolic values.
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Wistar albino türü sıçanların diyabetik biyokimyasal değerleri ve Manyetik Alan Uygulamasıyla kasılma değerleriyle daha karmaşık hale getirilen veri setinin, istatistiksel algoritmalarından biri olan temel bileşen analiz -PCA ile etkili karar ağacı makinesi öğrenme algoritması-J48 aracılığı ortaya konulmasıdır. Wistar Albino türü sıçanlarkontrol grubu da dahil olmak üzere 4 farklı grup altında incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar incelendiğinde, PCA’nın karar ağacı makinesi öğrenme algoritması J48 ile birlikte kullanıldığında sınıflndırmadaki başarı oranı %96.25’den %97.50’e arttırdığı gözlenmiştir. Böylece, PCA ile desteklenen J48 algoritmasının, Wistar albino türü sıçanlarının daha karmaşık hale getirilmiş diyabetik metobolik değerlerinden elde edilen veriler üzerinde başarılı bir şekilde kullanılabileceğini ortaya koymuştur.
___
1. Expert Committee on the D, Classification of Diabetes M: Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 26 (Suppl. 1): S5-S20, 2003. DOI: 10.2337/ diacare.26.2007.s5
2. Schneider H, Shaw J, Zimmet P: Guidelines for the detection of diabetes mellitus--diagnostic criteria and rationale for screening. Clin Biochem Rev, 24 (3): 77-80, 2003.
3. Alberti KGMM, Zimmet PZ: Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med, 15 (7): 539-553, 1998. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096 9136(199807)15:7<539::AIDDIA668>3.0.CO;2-S
4. Emerging Risk Factors Colloboration, Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Ingelsson E, Lawlor DA, Selvin E, Stampfer M, Stehouwer CD, Lewington S, Pennells L, Thompson A, Sattar N, White IR, Ray KK, Danesh J: Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative metaanalysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet, 375 (9733): 2215-2222, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9
5. Bourne RR, Stevens GA, White RA, Smith JL, Flaxman SR, Price H, Jonas JB, Keeff J, Leasher J, Naidoo K, Pesudovs K, Resnikof S, Taylor HR: Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health, 1 (6): E339-E349, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/S2214- 109X(13)70113-X
6. Saran R, Li Y, Robinson B, Ayanian J, Balkrishnan R, Bragg-Gresham J, Chen JT, Cope E, Gipson D, He K, Herman W, Heung M, Hirth RA, Jacobsen SS, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kovesdy CP, Leichtman AB, Lu Y, Molnar MZ, Morgenstern H, Nallamothu B, O’Hare AM, Pisoni R, Plattner B, Port FK, Rao P, Rhee CM, Schaubel DE, Selewski DT, Shahinian V, Sim JJ, Song P, Streja E, Kurella Tamura M, Tentori F, Eggers PW, Agodoa LY, Abbott KC: US renal data system 2014 annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis, 66 (Suppl. 1): Svii, 2015. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.001
7. Pelit A, Ozaykan B, Tuli A, Demirkazik A, Emre M, Gunay I: The effcts of magnetic field on the biomechanics parameters of soleus and extensor digitorum longus muscles in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 10 (4): 294-298, 2008. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2007.0280
8. Keynes RD, Keynes RD, Aidley DJ: Nerve and Muscle. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
9. Bulman A: Electromagnetic Fields (300 Hz to 300 GHz) Environmental Health Criteria, No: 137. Occupational Environ Med, 51 (10): 720-720, 1994. DOI: 10.1136/oem.51.10.720-a
10. Bassett CAL: Beneficial effects of electromagnetic fields. J Cell Biochem, 51 (4): 387-393, 1993.
11. McLeod KJ, Rubin CT: The effct of low-frequency electrical fields on osteogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg, 74 (6): 920-929, 1992.
12. Sisken BF, Kanje M, Lundborg G, Herbst E, Kurtz W: Stimulation of rat sciatic nerve regeneration with pulsed electromagnetic fields. Brain Res, 485 (2): 309-316, 1989.
13. Sisken BF, Walker J, Orgel M: Prospects on clinical applications of electrical stimulation for nerve regeneration. J Cell Biochem, 51 (4): 404- 409, 1993.
14. Canedo-Dorantes L, Soenksen LR, Garcia-Sanchez C, Trejo-Nunez D, Perez-Chavez F, Guerrero A, Cardona-Vicario M, Garcia-Lara C, Colli-Magana D, Serrano-Luna G, Angeles Chimal JS, Cabrera G: Efficacy and safety evaluation of systemic extremely low frequency magnetic fields used in the healing of diabetic foot ulcers--phase II data. Arch Med Res, 46 (6): 470-478, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2015.07.002
15. Del Seppia C, Ghione S, Luschi P, Ossenkopp KP, Choleris E, Kavaliers M: Pain perception and electromagnetic fields. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 31 (4): 619-642, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.01.003
16. Markov MS: Magnetic field therapy: A review. Electromagn Biol Med, 26 (1): 1-23, 2007. DOI: 10.1080/15368370600925342
17. Pilla AA: Mechanisms and therapeutic applications of time-varying and static magnetic filds. In, Barnes FS, Greenebaum B (Eds): Biological and Medical Aspects of Electromagnetic Fields. 3rd ed., Taylor and Francis, 2007.
18. Gordon GA: Designed electromagnetic pulsed therapy: Clinical applications. J Cell Physiol, 212 (3): 579-582, 2007. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.21025
19. Mert T, Gunay I, Ocal I: Neurobiological effcts of pulsed magnetic field on diabetes-induced neuropathy. Bioelectromagnetics, 31 (1): 39-47, 2010. DOI: 10.1002/bem.20524
20. Worachartcheewan A, Schaduangrat N, Prachayasittikul V, Nantasenamat C: Data mining for the identification of metabolic syndrome status. EXCLI J, 17, 72-88, 2018. DOI: 10.17179/excli2017-911
21. Zou Q, Qu K, Luo Y, Yin D, Ju Y, Tang H: Predicting diabetes mellitus with machine learning techniques. Front Genet, 9:515, 2018. DOI: 10.3389/ fgene.2018.00515
22. Kaya IE, Pehlivanli AC, Sekizkardes EG, Ibrikci T: PCA based clustering for brain tumor segmentation of T1w MRI images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 140, 19-28, 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.11.011
23. Magana-Mora A, Bajic VB: OmniGA: Optimized omnivariate decision trees for generalizable classification models. Sci Rep, 7:3898, 2017. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04281-9
24. Wu X, Kumar V, Quinlan JR, Ghosh J, Yang Q, Motoda H, McLachlan GJ, Ng A, Liu B, Yu PS, Zhou Z-H, Steinbach M, Hand DJ, Steinberg D: Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowl Inf Syst, 14 (1): 1-37, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s10115-007-0114-2
25. Albright AL, Gregg EW: Preventing type 2 diabetes in communities across the U.S.: The National diabetes prevention program. Am J Prev Med, 44, S346-S351, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.12.009
26. Lee MS, Song KD, Yang HJ, Solis CD, Kim SH, Lee WK: Development of a type II diabetic mellitus animal model using Micropig (R). Lab Anim Res, 28 (3): 205-208, 2012. DOI: 10.5625/lar.2012.28.3.205
27. Tay YC, Wang Y, Kairaitis L, Rangan GK, Zhang C, Harris DC: Can murine diabetic nephropathy be separated from superimposed acute renal failure? Kidney Int, 68 (1): 391-398, 2005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523- 1755.2005.00405.x
28. Sheweita SA, Mashaly S, Newairy AA, Abdou HM, Eweda SM: Changes in Oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme activities in streptozotocininduced diabetes mellitus in rats: Role of Alhagi maurorum Extracts. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2016:5264064, 2016. DOI: 10.1155/2016/5264064
29. Kavakiotis I, Tsave O, Salifoglou A, Maglaveras N, Vlahavas I, Chouvarda I: Machine Learning and data mining methods in diabetes research. Comput Struct Biotechnol J, 15, 104-116, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j. csbj.2016.12.005
30. Ludwig JA, Reynolds JA: Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methods and Computing. Wiley, 1988.
31. Paliy O, Shankar V: Application of multivariate statistical techniques in microbial ecology. Mol Ecol, 25 (5): 1032-1057, 2016. DOI: 10.1111/ mec.13536
32. Wu H, Yang S, Huang Z, He J, Wang X: Type 2 diabetes mellitus prediction model based on data mining. IMU, 10, 100-107, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.imu.2017.12.006