SOSYOTROPİK-OTONOM KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN BİLGİ İFŞASINA ETKİSİNDE ETİK İŞ İKLİMİ ALGISININ ROLÜ

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı sağlık çalışanlarının sosyotropik-otonom kişilik özelliklerinin bilgi ifşası üzerine etkisinde etik iş iklimi algısının aracı rolünün incelenmesidir. Araştırmanın örneklemi 320 sağlık çalışanından oluşmaktadır. Yapılan analizlerden elde edilen sonuçlara göre sosyotropik-otonom kişilik özellikleri ile bilgi ifşası arasındaki ilişkinin anlamlı olmadığı ancak sosyotropik kişilik özelliklerinin alt boyutu olan onaylanmama kaygısı ile bilgi ifşası arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca etik iş iklimi algısının, sosyotropik-otonom kişilik özelliklerinin bilgi ifşası üzerindeki etkisinde aracılık rolünün olmadığı tespit edilmiştir.

THE ROLE OF ETHICAL WORK CLIMATE PERCEPTION IN THE EFFECT OF SOCIOTROPIC- AUTONOMOUS PERSONALITY CHARACTERISTICS ON WHISTLEBLOWING

The main purpose of this research is whether the perception of ethical work climate has a mediating role in the effect of sociotropic and autonomous personality characteristics of healthcare professionals on whistleblowing. The sample of the research consists of 320 health workers. According to the results obtained from the analyzes, it was determined that there was no significant relationship between sociotropic and autonomous personality traits and whistleblowing. However, some meaningful relationships wereobtained in terms of the sub- dimension of the sociotropic personality characteristic. According to these findings, it was determined that there is a significant relationship between anxiety of disapproval, which is a sub-dimension of sociotropic personality, and whistleblowing. In addition, when ethical work climate perception, which is a mediating variable, is included in the model, it was concluded that ethical work climate did not have a mediating role in the effect of sociotropic and autonomous personality traits on whistleblowing.

___

  • Ahmad, S. A., Yunos, M. R., Ahmad, R. A. R., & Sanusi, Z. M. (2014). Whistleblowing behaviour: The influence of ethical climates theory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 16, 445-450.
  • Aksoy, S., Erdil, O., & Ertürk, A. (2017). Ethical climate: Conceptual development, individual and organizational effects. Doğuş University Journal, 18 (2), 133-151.
  • Aydın, K. B. (2019). The validity, reliability and relationship of the autonomous- relational self scale with subjective well-being. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches (IJETSAR), 4(8), 46-64.
  • Babin, B. J., Boles, J. S., & Robin, D. P. (2000). Representing the perceived ethical work climate among marketing employees. Journal Of The Academy Of Marketing Science, 28(3), 345-358.
  • Bader, G. E. (1986). Understanding individual political behaviors in organizations: instrument development and validation. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), San Diego Üniversitesi, California-Amerika.
  • Bartuli, J., Djawadi, B. M., & Fahr, R. (2016). Business ethics in organizations: An experimental examination of whistleblowing and personality. IZA Discussion Paper, 10190, 1-42.
  • Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Harrison R.P., & Emery, J. (1983). Development of the sociotropy autonomy scale: A measure of personality factors in psychopathology. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Bjorkelo, B., Einarsen S., & Matthiesen, S. B. (2010). Predicting proactive behaviour at work: Exploring the role of personality as an antecedent of whistleblowing behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 371-394.
  • Brennan, N. M. (2012). Whistle-blowing. G. Ritzer ve J. Wiley (Eds), Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology Online, London: Sons Ltd.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Manual of data analysis for social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Can, H., Aşan, Ö., & Aydın, E. M. (2006). Organizational behavior. İstanbul: Arıkan Publications.
  • Chiu, R. K. (2003). Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: examining the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 65–74.
  • Cullen, J. B., Victor, B. & Stephens, C. (1989). An ethical weather report: Assessing the organization’s ethical climate. Organizational Dynamics, 18(2), 50-62.
  • Çetinel, M. H., (2018). The mediating role of organizational justice perception on the relationship between employee personality traits and whistleblowing tendencies. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla.
  • Çiftçi, B. (2017). The effect of social culture on whistleblowing in organizations in Turkey: An evaluation in the context of Hofstede's theory of cultural dimensions, International Journal of Academic Value Studies, 3(10), 147-166.
  • DeConnick, J. (2011). The effects of ethical climate on organizational identification, supervisory trust, and turnover among salespeople. Journal of Business Research, 64, 617-624.
  • Demirtaş, Ö. (2014). The effect of revealing negative situations in workplaces on ethical climate: The moderator role of mobbing perception. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Business Administration, 43(1), 136-156.
  • Demirtaş, Ö., & D. M. Biçkes, (2014). The effect of Machiavellianism on intention to disclose negative situations: A field study. Journal of Business, Power, Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 16(2), 98-112.
  • Eren, E. (2017). Organizational behavior and management psychology. İstanbul: Beta Publications.
  • Hersh, M. A. (2002). Whistleblowers -heroes or traitors?: Indivıdual and collectıve responsibility for ethical behavıour. Annual Reviews in Control, 26, 243-262.
  • Hwang, D. B. K., Staley, A. B., Tsai, Y., & Chui, C. L. (2013). A comparative study of the propensity of whistle-blowing empirical evidence from China, Taiwan and the United States. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 3 (2), 202-204.
  • Jubb, P. B. (1999). Whistleblowing: A restrictive definition and ınterpretation. Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 77–94.
  • Kabakçı, E. (2001). Sociotropic/autonomic personality traits, life events and depressive symptoms in university students. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 12(4), 273-282.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). Spss applied multivariate statistical techniques. Ankara: Asil Publications.
  • King III, G. (1999). The implications of an organization's structure on whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 315-326.
  • Kolts, R. L., Robinson, A. M., & Tracy, J. J. (2004). The relationship of sociotropy and autonomyto posttraumatic cognitions and PTSD symptomatology in trauma survivors. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(1), 53–63.
  • Luthans, F. (2010). Organizational behaviour an evidence based approach. New York: Mcgrow Hill.
  • Lynch, T. R., Robins, C. J., & Morse, J. Q. (2001). Couple functioning in depression: The roles of sociotropy and autonomy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 93–103.
  • Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle- blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1-16.
  • Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (2002). What makes whistle-blowers effective? Three field studies. Human Relations, 55 (4), 455–479.
  • Mulki, J. P., Jaramillo, J. F., & Locander, W. B. (2009). Critical role of leadership on ethical climate and salesperson behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 125- 141.
  • Özdemir, L. (2015). The relationship between sociotropic-autonomous personality traits and entrepreneurial tendencies of Kyrgyzstan-Turkey Manas University students. Journal of Management Sciences, 13(25), 115-139.
  • Özdil, M. (2017). Social integration in the context of collective and individual identities. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 3(28), 383-400.
  • Özgener, Ş., A. Tan., & S. Ulu, (2018). Problem reporting system in working life (Whistleblowing systems). A. Keser (Ed). Behavior at work (ss. 193-217). Kocaeli: Umuttepe Publications.
  • Park, H., Blenkinsopp, J., Öktem, M., K. & Ömürgönülşen, U. (2008). Cultural orientation and attitudes toward different forms of whistleblowing: A comparison of South Korea, Turkey and the U.K. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 929–939.
  • Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior. çev. İnci Erdem. Ankara: Nobel Publications.
  • Rothwell, G. R., & J. N. Baldwin, (2006). Ethical climates and contextual predictors of whistle-blowing. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26 (3), 216-244.
  • Sarıoğlu Uğur, S., & Özdemir, L. (2019). “Whistleblowing” for them, what about us?: A conceptual research and a suggestion. Academic Journal of Social Studies, 7(89), 71-79.
  • Sato, T. S. (2003). Sociotropy and autonomy: The nature of vulnerability. The Journal of Psychology, 137(5), 447-466.
  • Sato, T. S., & McCann, D. (2007). Sociotropy–autonomy and ınterpersonal problems. Depression And Anxiety, 24, 153–162.
  • Sayğan, S. & Bedük, A. (2013). An application on the relationship between whistleblowing and ethical climate. Journal of Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 28(1), 1-23.
  • Smith, E. E., Hoeksema, S. N., Fredrickson, B., & Loftus, G. R. (2014). Introduction to psychology, çev. Öznur Öncül & Deniz Ferhatoğlu, (2. Baskı). Ankara: Arkadaş Publications.
  • Şahin, N., Ulusoy, M., & Şahin, N. (2003). Exploring the sociotropy-autonomy dimensions in a sample of turkish psychiatric ınpatients. Journal Of Clinical Psychology, 59(10), 1055–1068.
  • Tan, P. M., & Ong, S. F. (2011). Comparative analysis of whistleblower protection legislation in England, USA and Malaysia. African Journal of Business Management, 5(27), 11246-11255.
  • Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951-990.
  • Türker, A. The effect of parents on child's personality development. http://www.bilted.com/bilgi/ana-babanin-cocugun-kisilik-gelisimine-etkisi, Date of access: 09.07.2020.
  • Vadera, A. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Caza, B. B. (2009). Making sense of whistle-blowing's antecedents: Learning from research on identity and ethics programs. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19 (4), 553-586.
  • Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climate. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101- 125.
  • Yeşil, S., Mavi, Y., & Ceyhan, S. (2017). Ethical climate perception and its effects on individual outcomes. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, 51, 19- 38.
  • Zakaria, M. (2015). Antecedent factors of whistleblowing in organizations. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 230–234.
  • Zamantılı Nayır, D. (2012). Corporate ethics and whistleblowing. İstanbul: Pozitif Publications.
Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-4289
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2010
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

YABANCI EL SENDROMU MU ÇİFT YÖNLÜLÜK MÜ? START-UPLAR ÜZERİNE ÇOKLU ÖRNEK OLAY ÇALIŞMASI

Handan Deniz BÖYÜKASLAN, Belkıs ÖZKARA

TÜRKİYE’DE ÖRGÜTSEL DEĞİŞİM VE ÖRGÜT GELİŞTİRME ALANINDAKİ BİLİMSEL ÇALIŞMALARIN BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZİ

Züleyha SAYIN, Nihat ERDOĞMUŞ

START-UP ANLATILARININ ARGÜMANTASYON PERSPEKTİFİNDEN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: İTÜ BİG BANG START-UP CHALLENGE ÖRNEK OLAYI

Umut Sanem ÇİTÇİ, Safiye PETEKÇİ

AMİRİM BENİ HASTA EDEBİLİR Mİ? İSTİSMARCI YÖNETİMİN ÇALIŞANIN SAĞLIĞI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ

Ertan AKTÜRK, Orkun DEMİRBAĞ

GENELCİ Mİ, UZMAN MI? ÜST KADEME YÖNETİCİLERİN YÖNETSEL BECERİLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Pelin ERDEN ÇEVİK, Dursun BİNGÖL

SOSYAL ZEKÂNIN KARAR VERME STİLİNE OLAN ETKİSİNDE BİLİŞSEL ESNEKLİĞİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ

Almula Umay KARAMANLIOĞLU, H. Nejat BASIM

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK İLE KURUMSAL İTİBAR ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE YÖNETİM KURULU VE AİLE SAHİPLİĞİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ETKİSİ

Elif SİS ATABAY, Tuğba KAPLAN, Kader ŞAHİN

SOSYOTROPİK-OTONOM KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN BİLGİ İFŞASINA ETKİSİNDE ETİK İŞ İKLİMİ ALGISININ ROLÜ

Burcu BATGA, Lütfiye ÖZDEMİR

BİLİNÇLİ FARKINDALIĞIN BİLİŞSEL KAYIPLAR ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: ÖZNEL İYİ OLUŞUN ARACILIK ROLÜ

Hande ÜNÜVAR, Sema POLATCI, Hüseyin YILMAZ

THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS IN FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS: THE CASE OF TURKISH BUSINESS GROUPS

Tülay İLHAN NAS, Şengül DURAN