David Denton, Cindy Sink

4850

Preserving the Social Studies as Core Curricula in an Era of Common Core Reform

Preserving the Social Studies as Core Curricula in an Era of Common Core Reform

Education reform over the last two decades has changed perceptions of core curricula. Although social studies has traditionally been part of the core, emphasis on standards-based teaching and learning, along with elaborate accountability schemes, is causing unbalanced treatment of subjects. While the research literature indicates teachers are spending less time on social studies, perceptions about the subject are more complicated. Some educators accept the value of social studies knowledge and skills, while others see it as an auxiliary subject for supporting test achievement. Integration is one way primary school teachers reconcile the need to focus on tested disciplines, while holding to traditional notions of the core curricula. Results from a case study involving primary teachers show integration as the preferred method for teaching social studies. However, participants also indicated they were unable to achieve effective integration due to time constraints, limited training, and inadequate curricular resources. The trajectory of standards-based reform suggests educators will continue to encounter obstacles that impede integration. Systematic improvements that preserve the place of social studies as part of the core curricula are unlikely. However, adoption of Common Core standards presents a practical opportunity for educators to reexamine the merits of integration.
Keywords:

integration; social studies; Common Core; core curricula; case study,

PDF

___

  • Badley, K. (2009). Resisting curriculum integration: Do good fences make good neighbors? Issues in Integrative Studies, 27, 113-117.
  • Bailey, G., Shaw, E. R., & Hollifield, D. (2006). The devaluation of social studies in the elementary grades. Journal of Social Studies Research, 30(2), 18-29.
  • Banks, J. (1993). Multicultural education: Development, dimensions, and challenges. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(1) 22-28.
  • Beane, J. A. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 616-622.
  • Berson, I. R., & Berson, M. J. (2013). Getting to the core: Using digital resources to enhance content-based literacy in the social studies. Social Education, 77(2), 102-106.
  • Bisland, B. M. (2012). The marginalization of social studies in the elementary grades: An overview. In W. B. Russell (Ed.). Contemporary social studies: An essential reader (pp. 173-191). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Bolinger, K., & Warren, W. J. (2007). Methods practiced in social studies instruction: A review of public school teachers’ strategies. International Journal of Social Education, 22(1), 68-84.
  • Center on Educational Policy. (2007). Choices, changes, challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cep-dc.org
  • Committee for Children. (2012). About committee for children. Retrieved from http://www.cfchildren.org/advocacy/about-us.aspx
  • Creswell, J., & Clark, V. (2007). Mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Czerniak, C. M., Weber, W. J., Sandmann, A., & Ahern, J. (1999). A literature review of science and mathematics integration. School Science and Mathematics, 99(8), 421-430.
  • Ellis, A. K. & Fouts, J. T. (2001). Interdisciplinary curriculum: The research base. Music Educators Journal, 87(5), 22-26.
  • Faulkner, S., & Cook, C. (2006). Testing vs. teaching: The perceived impact of assessment demands on middle level instructional practices. RMLE Online: Research in Middle Level Education, 29(7), 1-13.
  • Gibson, S. (2012). Why do we learn this stuff? Students’ views on the purpose of social studies. Canadian Social Studies, 45(1), 43-58.
  • Hand to Mind. (2013). WorldScapes. Retrieved from http://www.hand2mind.com/worldscapes/worldscapes.jsp
  • Hartzler, D. S. (2000). A meta-analysis of studies conducted on integrated curriculum programs and their effects on student achievement (Order No. 9967119). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A & I. (304624583). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.spu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/304624583?account id=2202
  • Haskell, R. E. (2000). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction and reasoning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Heafner, T. L., & Fitchett, P. G. (2012). National trends in elementary instruction: Exploring the role of social studies curricula. Social Studies, 103(2), 67-72.
  • Hinde, E. R. (2005). Revisiting curriculum integration: A fresh look at an old idea. Social Studies, 96(3), 105-111.
  • Holloway, J., & Chiodo, J. J. (2009). Social studies IS being taught in the elementary school: A contrarian view. Journal of Social Studies Research, 33(2), 235-261.
  • Houser, N. O. (1995). Social studies on the back burner: Views from the field. Theory and Research in Social Education, 23(2), 147-168.
  • Interact. (2013). Storypath. Retrieved from http://www.teachstorypath.com
  • Kenna, J. L., & Russell, W. B. (2015). Secondary social studies teachers’ time commitment when addressing the Common Core State Standards. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 26-48.
  • Kinniburgh, L. H., & Byrd, K. (2008). Ten black dots and September 11: Integrating social studies and mathematics through children’s literature. Social Studies, 99(1), 33-36.
  • Leming, J. S., Ellington, L., & Schug, M. (2006). The state of social studies: A national random survey of elementary and middle school social studies teachers. Social Education, 70(5), 322-327.
  • Lintner, T. (2006). Social studies (still) on the back burner: Perceptions and practices of K-5 social studies instruction. Journal of Social Studies Research, 30(1), 3-8.
  • Lucey, T. A., & Laney, J. D. (2009). This land was made for you and me: Teaching for economic justice in upper elementary and middle school grades. Social Studies, 100(6), 260-272.
  • MacPhee, D. A., & Whitecotton, E. J. (2011). Bringing the “social” back to social studies: Literacy strategies as tools for understanding history. Social Studies, 102(6), 263-267.
  • Maloy, R. W., Poirier, M., Smith, H. K., & Edwards, S. A. (2010). The making of a history standards wiki: “Covering”, “uncovering”, and “discovering” curriculum frameworks using a highly interactive technology. History Teacher, 44(1), 68-81.
  • McGuire, M. E. (2007). What happened to social studies?: The disappearing curriculum. Phi Delta Kappan, 88, 620-624.
  • National Council for the Social Studies. (2008). Curriculum standards for social studies. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org
  • National Council for the Social Studies. (n.d.). About National Council for the Social Studies. Retrieved from http://www.socialstudies.org/about
  • Parker, W. C. (2005). Social studies in elementary education. (12th ed.). Columbus, OH. Pearson.
  • Pederson, P. V. (2007). What is measured is treasured: The impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on nonassessed subjects. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 80, 287-291.
  • Schug, M. C., & Cross. B. (1998). The dark side of curriculum integration in social studies. The Social Studies, 89(2), 54-56.
  • Singletary, T., & Miller, R. (2009). Instant integration: Just add water. Science Teacher, 76(2), 54-60.
  • Thomas, E. (2007). Thoughtful planning fosters learning transfer. Adult Learner, 18(3-4), 4-8.
  • Tyler, R. W. (2004). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. In D. J. Flinders, & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), Curriculum studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 51-59). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • VanFossen, P. J. (2005). Reading and math take so much time…: An overview of social studies instruction in Indiana. Theory and Research in Social Education, 33(3), 376-403.
  • Vars, G. F. (1991). Integrated curriculum in historical perspective. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 14-15.
  • Vars, G. F. (1997). In J. L. Irvin (Ed.), What current research says to the middle level practitioner (pp. 179-186). Waterville, OH: National Middle School Association.
  • Vogler, K. E. (2011). Back on the backburner? Impact of reducing state-mandated social studies testing on elementary teachers’ instruction. Journal of Social Studies Research, 35(2), 163-190.
  • Winstead, L. (2011). The impact of NCLB and accountability on social studies: Teacher experiences and perceptions about teaching social studies. The Social Studies, 102, 221- 227.
  • Wraga, W. G. (1993). The interdisciplinary imperative for citizenship education. Theory & Research in Social Education. 21(3), 201-231.
Journal of Social Studies Education Research-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 2010
  • Yayıncı: Bülent TARMAN
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Determining Methods Used By Prospective Teachers Of Social Studies In Teaching About Historical Topics

Ali YILMAZ, Ayşegül KIRTEL

Opinions of Social Studies Teachers Regarding the 4+4+4 Educational System

Filiz ZAYİMOĞLU ÖZTÜRK

“My assessment didn’t seem real”: The Influence of Field Experiences on Preservice Teachers’ Agency and Assessment Literacy

J. Spencer CLARK

Pay It Forward: Teacher Candidates’ Use of Historical Artifacts to Invigorate K-12 History Instruction

Scott WARİNG, Cheryl TORREZ, George LİPSCOMB

Preservice Social Studies Teachers' Perspectives and Understandings of Teaching in the Twenty-First Century Classroom: A Meta-Ethnography

Rory Tannebaum

Preserving the Social Studies as Core Curricula in an Era of Common Core Reform

David Denton, Cindy Sink