___

• contextual and reflexive in relation to the students. Therefore, practice in field experiences
• should not be seen as generalizable to other contexts, because they are “articulating and
• negotiating classroom and cultural knowledges” with the specific learners of their classroom, “in
• the initiation, development and practice of assessment to achieve the learning goals of students”
• (Willis, Adie, & Klenowski, 2013, p. 242).
• Anderson, D. L., Mathys, H., & Mills, A. (2014). Pre-service teachers’ assessment of 7th-grade students’ social studies learning. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 3(1).
• Apple, M. W. (1992). The text and cultural politics. Educational Researcher, 21(7), 4-11.
• Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham, UK: Open. University Press.
• Biesta, G. & Tedder, M. (2006). How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement. Working paper 5. Exeter, UK: The Learning Lives Project.
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice Makes Practice: A Critical Study of Learning to Teach (revised ed.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
• Campbell, C., & Evans, J. A. (2000). Investigation of preservice teachers' classroom assessment practices during student teaching. Journal of Educational Research, 93(6), 350-356.
• Clark, J. S. (2013). “Your credibility could be shot”: Preservice teachers’ thinking about nonfiction graphic novels, curriculum decision Making, and professional acceptance. The Social Studies, 104(1), 38-45.
• Clark, J. S., Brown, J. S., & Jandildinov, M. (2015). Enriching preservice teachers’ critical reflection through an international videoconference discussion. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1-20.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Cornbleth, C. (2001). Climates of Constraint/Restraint of Teachers and Teaching. In W. B. Stanley, Critical Issues in Social Studies Research for the 21st Century. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
• Danielewicz, J. (2001). Teaching selves: Identity, pedagogy, and teacher education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
• DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. (2010). Assessment literacy development: Identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17:4, 419- 438.
• Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.
• Foucault, M. (1986). The care of the self: The history of sexuality of sexuality (R. Hurley, Ed. & Trans.) New York: Vintage Books.
• Fuchs, S. (2001). Beyond agency. Sociological Theory, 19, 24–40.
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
• Grant, S. G., & Salinas, C. (2008). Assessment and accountability in social studies. In L. Levstik & C. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Heafner, T. (2004). Assessment as magnification of internal, parallel, and external reflection. Action in Teacher Education, 25(4), 14-19.
• Kenna, J. L., & Russell III, W. B. (2015). Secondary social studies teachers' time commitment when addressing the Common Core State Standards. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1).
• Kohn, A. (2013) The case against grades. In J. Bowers & P.L. Thomas (Eds.), de-Testing and de- Grading Schools: Authentic Alternatives to Accountability and Standardization (pp. 143- 153). New York: Peter Lang.
• Kurfman, D. G. (1991). Testing as context for social studies. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 210-221). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
• McGee, J., & Colby, S. (2014). Impact of an assessment course on teacher candidates’ assessment literacy. Action in Teacher Education, 36(5-6), 522-532.
• Merriam, S. B. (2008). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Mertler, C. A. (2003, October). Preservice versus in-service teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, OH.
• Mertler, C. A. (2004). Secondary teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? American Secondary Education, 33 (1).
• Mertler, C. A., & Campbell, C. (2005, April). Measuring teachers’ knowledge & application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the Assessment Literacy Inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
• Otero, V. K. (2006). Moving beyond the “Get it or don’t” conception of formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 247–255.
• Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment Literacy for Teachers: Faddish or Fundamental? Theory into Practice,48: 4-11.
• Popham, W. J. (2011). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A. and Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42: 191–214.
• Siegel, M., & Wissehr, C. (2011). Preparing for the plunge: Preservice teachers’ assessment literacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), 371-391.
• Sloan, K. (2006). Teacher identity and agency in school worlds: beyond the all good/all-bad discourse on accountability-explicit curriculum policies. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2).
• Stiggins, R. J. (2002, June). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-766.
• Volante, L., & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates’ assessment literacy: Implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education 30, (3): 749–70.
• Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. The Australian Educational Researcher, 1- 16.