Simple sequence repeat markers and physiological characterization of some local Tunisian barley accessions

13 yerel arpa türü ve Martin varyetesi arasındaki genetik çeşitlilik ve ilişki Basit Dizi Tekrar (SSR) markörleri ve fizyolojik özellikler kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. Moleküler çalışma 15 SSR primer kullanarak primer başına ortalama 2.6 tespit edilebilir bant oranı ile 43 bandın yaratıldığını göstermiştir. Çalışılan 14 arpa aksesyonu arasında bu bant- ların 39 tanesi (%83.9'u) polimorfik bantlardır. Aksesyonlar arasındaki genetik çeşitlilik ayrılığı toplamın %15'i ila %77.78.'i arasında değişmektedir. Önemli farklılıklar kuzey doğu türleri ve güneyliler arasında gözlenmiştir. Öte yandan Martin varyetesi kuzey doğulularla düşük farklılık göstermiştir. Grup analizi aksesyonlann çoğunluğunun coğrafi dağılımına uygun olarak gruplanabileceğini göstermiştir. Fizyolojik sonuçlar da coğrafik bilgiyi doğrula- maktadır. Fizyolojik ve moleküler verilerin Mantel testi ile analizinin düşük kolerasyon (r=0.276) göstermesine rağmen, her iki metot da incelenen aksesyonlar arasında yüksek derecede çeşitlilik göstermiştir. Bu bulgu gelecekte ıslah programlarında kullanılabilecek genetik çeşitlilik kaynağına işaret etmektedir.

Bazı yerel Tunus arpa aksesyonlarının SSR markörleriyle ve fizyolojik karakterizasyonu

The genetic variation and relationships among 13 local barleys and the variety Martin were evaluated using Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers and physiological traits. The molecular study showed that a total of 43 bands were generated by 15 SSR primers, with an average of 2.6 easily detectable bands per primer. Of these 43 fragments, only 39 (90.7%) were polymorphic among the 14 barleys studied. Within-accessions genetic variation dissimilarity ranged from 15% to 77.78% of the total. The important dissimilarities were observed between East-Northern accessions and Southern ones, whereas the variety Martin showed low dissimilarity with the East Northern ones. Cluster analysis indicated that most of the accessions could be clustered into groups, which basically coincided with their geograph- ical distribution. Also, physiological results indicated geographic information. Although comparison of physiologi- cal and molecular data using the Mantel test indicated a low correlation (r = 0.276), both methods showed a high degree of variation among analyzed accessions, indicating an important source of genetic diversity that can be used in future breeding programs.

___

  • Abdellaoui R, Cheik M'hamed H, Ben Naceur M, Bettaib- Kaab L and Ben Hmida J. Morpho-p.hysiological and molecular characterization of some Tunisian barley ecotypes. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 2: 261-268, 2007.
  • Arnon DI. Cooper enzymes in isolated chloroplastes. Plant Physiol. 24: 1-15, 1949.
  • Badr A, Müller K, Schâfer-Pregl R, El Rabey H, Effgen S, Ibrahim H H, Pozzi C, Rohde W and Salamini F. On the origin and domestication history of barley {Hordeum vulgare). Molecular Biology and Evolution. 17: 499- 510,2000.
  • Belghouthi A. Caracterisation morphologique et moleculaire de quelques genotypes d'orge. Memoire de recherche de mastere 'Specialite: Agriculture Integree'. Ecole Superieure d'Agriculture du Kef. Tunisie, 69 p, 2007.
  • Ben Hmida-Ben Salem W. Contribution des marqueurs microsatellites et RAPD pour 1'etudes dupolymorphisme chez l'orge. Diplomes d'etude approfondies de genetique et biologie moleculaires. Fac. Sci. Tunis, 80 p, 2000.
  • Bradford M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principal of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 72: 248-254, 1976.
  • Ceccarelli S, Grando S and Vanlour JAG. Undrestanding landraces: The Fertile Crescent: Barley provides lessons to plant Breeders, 1996.
  • Crochemore M L, Huyghe C, Ecalle C and Julier B. Structuration of alafalfa genetic diversity using agonimic and morphological characteristics. Relationship with RAPD markers. Agronomie. 18: 79-9, 1998.
  • Dreir W and Goring M. Der einfluss hoher salzkonzentrationen auf physiologische parameter von Maiswurzeln. Wiss. Z. Der H. U. Berlin, Nath Naturwiss R. 23: 641-644,1974.
  • Duarte JM, dos Santos JB and Cünha Melo L. Genetic divergence among common bean cultivars from different races based on RAPD markers. Genet Mol Biol. 3: 419- 426, 1999.
  • El Felah M, Chalbi N and et El Gazzah M. Analyse de 1'adaptation a l'aridite de quelques ressources genetiques locales d'orge (Hordeum vulgare L.) comparativement a des varietes ameliorees. « L'amelioration des plantes aux milieu arides ». Deuxiemes journees scientifiques du reseau « Biotechnologies vegetales », Tunis. 4- 9 Decembre 1989. Ed. John Libbey. Evrotext, 226 p, 197-209, 1991.
  • Grando S and McGee RJ. Utilization of barley landraces in a breeding program. In Biotic Stresses of Barley in Arid and Semi-Arid Environments, Big Sky, Montana.
  • Hamza S, Ben Hmida W, Rebai A and Harrabi M. SSR- based genetic diversity assessement among Tunisian Winter Barley and relation sheep with morphological traits. Euphytica. 135: 107-118, 2004.
  • Harlan JR. Tropical and subtropical grasses. In: M.W. Simmonds (ed.). Evolution of Crop Plants. Longman Group,London. 19:142-144, 1976.
  • Hou YC, Yan ZH, Wei YM and Zheng YL. Genetic diversity in barley from west china based on RAPD and ISSR analysis. Barley Genetic Newsletter. 35: 9-22, 2005.
  • Mantel NA. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27: 209- 220,1967 .
  • Mariç S, Bolariç S J, Martinâiç I P and Kozumplik V. Genetic diversity of hexaploid wheat cultivars estimated by RAPD markers, morphological traits and coefficients of parentage. Plant Breeding. 4: 366-369, 2004.
  • Monneveux P and Nemmar M. Contribution â 1'etude de la resistance a la secheresse chez le ble tendre (Triticum aestivum L) et chez le ble dur (Triticum durum) et leur developpement. Agronomie. 6: 583-590, 1986.
  • Morgante M, Hanafey M and Powel W. Microsatellites are prefentilly associeted with non repetitive DNA in plant genomes. Nature Genetic. 3: 194-200, 2002.
  • Nei M and Li WH. Mathematical models for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. ProcNatlAcadSc USA. 76: 5269-5273, 1979.
  • Nuel G, Baril CP and Robin S. Varietal distinctness assisted by molecular markers: a methodological approach. Acta Hort. 546,2000.
  • Pillen K, Binder A, Kreuzkam B, Ramsay L, Waugh R, Forster J and Leon J. Mapping new EMBL-derived barley microsatellites and their use in differentiating German barley cultivars. Theor Appel Genet. 101: 652- 660, 2000.
  • Rohlf F J. NTSYS-pc, numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.02 g. Exeter Software, Setauket, NY, 1993.
  • Roldân-Ruiz I, van Eeuwijk F A, Gilliland T J, Dubreuil P, Dillmann C,-Lallemand J,-De Loose M and Baril C P. A comparative study of molecular and morphological methods of describing relationships between perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties. Theor Appl Genet. 103: 1138-1150, 2001.
  • Russell JR, Fuller J D, Macaulay M, Hatz B G, Jahoor A, Powell W and Waugh R. Direct comparison of levels of genetic variation among barley accessions detected by RFLPs, AFLPs, SSRs and RAPDs. Theor Appl Genet. 95: 714-722, 1997.
  • Saghai-Maroof MA, Biyashev R M, Yang GP, Zhang Q and Allard RW. Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite R.W. DNA in barley: species diversity, chorojnosomal locations, and population dynamics. Proc Nalt Acad Sci USA. 91: 5466-5470, 1994.
  • Saker M, Nagchtigall M and Kuehne T. A comparative assessment of DNA fingerprinting by RAPD, SSR and AFLP in genetic analysis of some barley genotypes. Egypt J Genetics and Cytology. 34: 81- 97, 2005a.
  • Saker Mahmoud M, Youssef Sawsan S, Abdallah Naglaa A, Bashandy Hany S and El Sharkawy Ahmed M. Genetic analysis of some Egyptian rice genotypes using RAPD, SSR and AFLP. African Journal of Biotechnology. 9: 882-890,2005b.
  • Scholander P, Hammel H, Bradstxeet E and Hemmingsen E. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Sciences. 148: 339-346, 1965.
  • Smith JSC, Kresovich S, Hopkins MS, Mitchell SE, Dean RE, Woodman WL, Lee M and Porter K. Genetic diversity among elite sorghum inbred lines assessed with simple sequence repeats. Crop Sci. 40: 226-232, 2000.
  • Sneath PHA and Sokal RR. Numerical Taxonomy: the Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. 1973.
  • Spooner DM, McLean K, Ramsay G, Waugh and Bryan GJ. A single domestication for potato based on multilocus amplified fragment length polymorphism genotyping.PNAS. 4: 14694-14699, 2005.
  • Struss D and Plieske J. The use of microsatellite markers for detection genetic diversity in barley populations. Theor Appel Genet. 97: 308-315, 1998.
  • Troll W and Lindsley J. A photometric method for the determination of proline. J Biol Chem. 215: 655-660, 1955.
  • Vallejos CE. Enzyme activity staining. In: Tankesley, S D et Orton, T. J. Eds. Isoenzymes in plant genetic and breeding. Part A. Elseivers Sciences Publishers B. V. Amesterdam. The Netherlands: 469-516, 1983.
  • Webb DM and Knapp S J. DNA extraction from a previously recalcitrant plant genus. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 8: 180-185, 1990.