___

• Afshar, H. S., & Farahani, M. (2018). Inhibitors to EFL Teachers’ Reflective Teaching and EFL Learners’ Reflective Thinking and the Role of Teaching Experience and Academic Degree in Reflection Perception. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 19(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2017.1351353
• Annisavitri, R., Sa’dijah, C., Qohar, A., Sa’Diyah, M., & Anwar, L. (2020). Analysis of Mathematical Literacy Test as A Problem-Solving Ability Assessment of Junior High School Students. AIP Conference Proceedings 2215 - 060002, 060002-1-060002–060007. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000648
• Bishop, J. P. (2012). “She’s Always Been the Smart One. I’ve Always Been the Dumb One”: Identities in the Mathematics Classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34–74. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.1.0034
• Cavanagh, M. (2011). Active Learning in Higher Education. Social and Behaviour Science And, 12(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1469787410387724
• Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of The Relation of Reflective Thinking to The Educative Process (1st ed.). D.C. HEATH AND COMPANY.
• DiDonato, N. C. (2013). Effective Self- and Co-Regulation in Collaborative Learning Groups: An Analysis of How Students Regulate Problem Solving of Authentic Interdisciplinary Tasks. Instructional Science, 41, 25–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9206-9
• Dubinsky. (2002). Reflective Abstraction in Advanced Mathematical Thinking. In Mathematics Education Library (pp. 95–126). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_7
• Ghanizadeh, A. (2017). The Interplay Between Reflective Thinking, Critical Thinking, Self-Monitoring, and Academic Achievement in Higher Education. Higher Education, 74(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0031-y
• Handayani, U. F., Sa’Dijah, C., Sisworo, Sa’Diyah, M., & Anwar, L. (2020). Mathematical creative thinking skill of middle-ability students in solving contextual problems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215(April), 060007-1-060007–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000645
• Hanley, P., Slavin, R., & Elliott, L. (2015). Thinking, Doing, Talking Science: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary.
• Hidajat, F. A., Sa’dijah, C., Sudirman, & Susiswo. (2019). Exploration of Students ’ Arguments to Identify Perplexity from Reflective Process on Mathematical Problems. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12236a
• Hong, Y. C., & Choi, I. (2011). Three Dimensions of Reflective Thinking in Solving Design Problems: A Conceptual Model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 687–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9202-9
• Howlett, C., Ferreira, J.-A., & Blomfield, J. (2015). Teaching Sustainable Development in Higher Education: Building Critical, Reflective Thinkers Through an Interdisciplinary Approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(3), 305–321.
• Hsieh, P. H., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Effects of Reflective Thinking in the Process of Designing Software on Students’ Learning Performances. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 88–99.
• Huang, H.-M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S.-S. (2010). Investigating Learners’ Attitudes Toward Virtual Reality Learning Environments: Based on A Constructivist Approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171–1182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.014
• Ikram, M., Purwanto, Parta, I. N., & Susanto, H. (2020). Exploring the Potential Role of Reversible Reasoning: Cognitive Research on Inverse Function Problems in Mathematics. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 591–611. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.665836
• Kaune, C. (2006). Reflection and Metacognition in Mathematics Education - Tools for The Improvement of Teaching Quality. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(4), 350–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652795
• Kulkarni, V. B. (2017). Overview of Reasons of Lack of Motivation in the Students of Indian Engineering Education. 2017 International Conference on Transforming Engineering Education (ICTEE), 1–5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTEED.2017.8585628
• Mann, E. L., Chamberlin, S. A., & Graefe, A. K. (2017). The Prominence of Affect in Creativity: Expanding the Conception of Creativity in Mathematical Problem Solving. In Creativity and Giftedness. Advances in Mathematics Education (pp. 57–73). Springer.
• Oliver, M. (2011). Technological Determinism in Educational Technology Research: Some Alternative Ways of Thinking About the Relationship Between Learning and Technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 373–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x
• Önder, E. (2016). Causes of School Failure From Teacher and Student’S Perspective. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 7(2), 9–22.
• Parmin, Saregar, A., Deta, U. A., & El Islami, R. A. Z. (2020). Indonesian Science Teachers’ Views on Attitude, Knowledge, and Application of STEM. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.647070
• Pravesti, C. A., Wiyono, B., Moenindyah, D., & Triyono. (2020). Examining The Effects of Guidance and Counseling Services to The Self-Regulated Learning for College Students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.664548
• Pressley, M., Roehrig, A. D., Raphael, L., Dolezal, S., Bohn, C., Mohan, L., Wharton-McDonald, R., Bogner, K., & Hogan, K. (2003). Teaching Processes in Elementary and Secondary Education. In Handbook of Psychology (pp. 153–175). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0708
• Radovic, D., Black, L., Williams, J., & Salas, C. E. (2018). Towards Conceptual Coherence in the Research on Mathematics Learner Identity: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99, 21–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9819-2
• Ramasamy, R., & Puteh, M. (2018). Bar Model Method for Higher Order Thinking Skills Questions in Mathematics for Dual Language Program Pupils. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 1456–1462. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i9/4855
• Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining Reflection:Another look at John Dewey and Reflective thinking. Teachers College Record,104, 104(4), 842–866. https://surreyfp.wikispaces.com/file/view/defining+reflection-Rogers.pdf
• Sa’dijah, C., Sa’diyah, M., Sisworo, & Anwar, L. (2020). Students’ Mathematical Dispositions Towards Solving HOTS Problems Based on FI and FD Cognitive Style. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215(April), 060025-1-060025–060027. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000644
• Sammons, P., Gu, Q., Day, C., & Ko, J. (2011). Exploring the Impact of School Leadership on Pupil Outcomes: Results from a Study of Academically Improved and Effective Schools in England. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541111100134
• Sandt, S. van der. (2007). Research Framework on Mathematics Teacher Behaviour: Koehler and Grouws’ Framework Revisited. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 343–350.
• Sezer, R. (2008). Integration of Critical Thinking Skills into Elementary School Teacher Education Courses in Mathematics. Education, 128(3), 349–363.
• Stahlberg, N., Mosler, S., & Schlüter, M. (2016). Writing, Calculating and Peer Feedback in a Mathematically-oriented Course for Process Engineers: Raising Motivation and Initiating Processes of Thinking and Learning. Journal of Academic Writing, 6(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v6i1.285
• Stark, R., & Krause, U. M. (2009). Effects of reflection prompts on learning outcomes and learning behaviour in statistics education. Learning Environments Research, 12(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-009-9063-x
• Suharna, H. (2018). Teori Berpikir Reflektif dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika (1st ed.). DEEPUBLISH.
• Susandi, A. D., & Widyawati, S. (2017). Proses Berpikir dalam Memecahkan Masalah Logika Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent. 1(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.25217/jn.v1i1
• Titikusumawati, E., Sa’dijah, C., As’ari, A. R., & Susanto, H. (2013). The Effectiveness of The Integration of Open-Ended and Collaborative (OE-C) Learning Strategies in Reducing Gaps of Elementary School Students’ Creative Thinking Skills. Elementary Education Online, 19(1), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.
• Van Haneghan, J. P., & Baker, L. (1989). Cognitive Monitoring in Mathematics. In Cognitive Strategy Research (pp. 215–238). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8838-8_9
• Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Hidayanto, E., Sulandra, I. M., & Sa’dijah, C. (2020). Content and Pedagogical Knowledge of Prospective Teachers in Mathematics Learning: Commognitive Framework. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(March), 515–532. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.642131
• Zehavi, N., & Mann, G. (2005). Instrumented Techniques and Reflective Thinking in Analytic Geometry. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 2(22), 1551–3440.