___

• Amin, S., Utaya, S., Bachri, S., & Susilo, S. (2020). Effect of problem-based learning on critical thinking skills and environmental attitude. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(June), 743–755.
• Bofferding, L., & Enzinger, N. W. (2017). Subtraction involving negative numbers: Connecting to whole number reasoning. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 14(1), 241–262.
• Borgen, K. (2006). From mathematics learner to mathematics teacher: Preservice teachers’ growth of understanding of teaching and learning mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia: BC.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research, 243.
• Debrenti, E. (2015). Visual Representations In Mathematics Teaching: An Experiment With Students. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(1), 21–26.
• Diana, N., Suryadi, D., & Dahlan, J. A. (2020). Analysis of students ’ mathematical connection abilities in solving problem of circle material : transposition study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(June), 829–842.
• Fatimah, A. T., & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Mathematical understanding and reasoning of vocational school students in agriculture-based mathematical tasks. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 701–712. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.702884
• Greer, B. (2012). Inversion in mathematical thinking and learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(3), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9317-2
• Gülkılık, H., Uğurlu, H. H., & Yürük, N. (2015). Examining students’ mathematical understanding of geometric transformations using the pirie-kieren model. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 15(6), 1531–1548. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.6.0056
• Huberman, M. B. M. & A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 28.
• Indrawatiningsih, N., Purwanto, As’ari, A. R., & Sa’dijah, C. (2020). Mathematical Argumentation Ability: Error Analysis in Solving Mathematical Arguments. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(5), 711–721. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.654460
• Kieren, T. E. (1989). A Recursive Theory of Mathematical Understanding. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3.
• Kieren, T. E., Pirie, S. E. B., & Gordon Calvert, L. (1999). Growing minds, growing mathematical understanding: Mathematical understanding, abstraction and interaction. In L.
• Burton (Ed.), Learning mathematics. From hierarchies to networks. London: Falmer Press.
• Martin, L. C. (2008). Folding back and the dynamical growth of mathematical understanding: Elaborating the Pirie-Kieren Theory. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(1), 64–85.
• Martin, L. C., LaCroix, L., & Fownes, L. (2005). Folding Back and the Growth of Mathematical Understanding in Workplace Training. ALM International Journal, 1(1), 19–35.
• Martin, L. C., & Towers, J. (2016a). Folding back, thickening and mathematical met-befores. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 89–97.
• Martin, L. C., & Towers, J. (2016b). Folding back and growing mathematical understanding: a longitudinal study of learning. International Jounal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(4), 281–294.
• Orhun, N. (2013). Assessing conceptual understanding in mathematics: Using derivative function to solve connected problems. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.03120
• Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 405–435.
• Rahmad, B. A., Ipung, Y., Abdur, R. A., Sisworo, & Dwi, R. (2016). Mathematical representation by students in building relational understanding on concepts of area and perimeter of rectangle. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(21), 2002–2008. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2813
• Ramadhani, R., Huda, S., & Umam, R. (2019). Problem-Based Learning , Its Usability and Critical View as Educational Learning Tools. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 6(3), 219–231.
• Skemp, R. R. (2006). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(2), 88–95.
• Skemp, R. R. (2013). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 26(3), 9–15.
• Syazali, M., Listiani, B., & Farid, F. (2019). Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Guided Discovery Learning (GDL) Effects of Mathematical Reasoning Capability: Analysis for Gifted Students. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 6(3), 209–216.
• Towers, J. (2004). Teachers’ interventions and the growth of students’ mathematical understanding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia: BC.
• Weber, K. (2002). The role of instrumental and relational understanding in proofs about group isomorphisms. Proceedings from the 2nd International Conference for the Teaching of Mathematics, (1711553), 1–9.
• Wright, V. (2014). Frequencies as proportions: using a teaching model based on Pirie and Kieren model of mathematical understanding. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 101–128.