İNTRASİTOPLAZMİK SPERM İNJEKSİYONU YAPILAN HASTALARDA DONDURMA ÇÖZME SİKLUSLARINDA 5. GÜN VE 6. GÜN EMBRİYO TRANSFER SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Giriş: Bu çalışmanın amacı intrasitoplazmik sperm enjeksiyonu yapılan hastalarda dondurma çözme sikluslarında 5. gün ve 6. gün embriyo transfer sonuçlarının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2017-2019 yılları arasında İzmir Medikalpark Hastanesi Tüp Bebek Ünitesi’nde yapılan dondurma çözme siklusları arasında 5.(Grup 1) ve 6. gün (Grup 2) embriyo transferi yapılan hastaların dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Çalışmaya 40 yaş altında olan ve tek embriyo transferi yapılan kadın olgular dahil edildi. İki grubun klinik özellikleri, gebelik ve klinik gebelik sonuçları karşılaştırıldı. İstatistiksel analizde ortalamaları karşılaştımada t-test ve oranları karşılaştırmada ki-kare testleri kullanıldı. p

COMPARISON OF 5th DAY VERSUS 6th DAY FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER RESULTS IN INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION PATIENTS

Introduction: The aim of this study is to compare the 5th day and 6th day frozen thawed blastocyst transfer results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Material and Methods: We evaluated the results of the patients who underwent frozen thawed blastocyst transfer on 5th day and 6th day after intracytoplasmic sperm injection in Izmir Economy University Medicalpark Hospital In Vitro Fertilization Unit between 2017 and 2019 retrospectively. Patients under 40 years of age and patients with single embryo transfer were included. Clinical characteristics of the patients, pregnancy rates and also clinical pregnancy rates were compared between the two groups. In statistical analysis, t-test was used to compare means and chi-square tests were used to compare rates. p

___

  • 1. D K Gardner , W B Schoolcraft. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1999; 11(3): 307-11.
  • 2. Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 7: CD002118.
  • 3. Sullivan EA, Wang YA, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Illingworth P, McBain J et al. Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study. Hum Reprod 2012; 27(12): 3609–15.
  • 4. Maheshwari A, Griffiths S, Bhattacharya S. Global variations in the uptake of single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(1):107–20.
  • 5. Barrenetxea G, Lopez de Larruzea A, Ganzabal T, Jimenez R, Carbonero K, Mandiola M. Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertil Steril 2005; 83(1): 49–53.
  • 6. Utsunomiya T, Ito H, Nagaki M, Sato J. A prospective, randomized study: day 3 versus hatching blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod 2004; 19(7): 1598–603.
  • 7. Shapiro B, Daneshmand S, Garner F, Aguirre M, Ross R. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril 2008; 89(1): 20–6.
  • 8. Van Voorhis BJ, Dokras A. Delayed blastocyst transfer: is the window shutting? Fertil Steril 2008; 89(1): 31–2.
  • 9. Marek D, Langley M, Gardner DK, Confer N, Doody KM, Doody KJ. Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril 1999; 72(6): 1035-40.
  • 10. Kovalevsky G, Carney SM, Morrison LS, Boylan CF, Neithardt AB, Feinberg RF. Should embryos developing to blastocysts on day 7 be cryopreserved and trans-ferred: an analysis of pregnancy and implantation rates. Fertil Steril 2013; 100(4): 1008–12.
  • 11. Behr B, Gebhardt J, Lyon J, Milki A. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril 2002; 77(4): 697–9.
  • 12. Hiraoka K, Hiraoka K, Miyazaki M, Fukunaga E, Horiuchi T, Kusuda T et al. Perinatal outcomes following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified at day 5, 6 and 7. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod 2009; 6: 4.
  • 13. Levens E, Whitcomb B, Hennessy S, James A, Yauger B, Larsen F. Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2008; 90(6): 2138–43.
  • 14. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000; 73(6): 1155–8.
  • 15. Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 7: CD002118.
  • 16. Sullivan EA, Wang YA, Hayward I, Chambers GM, Illingworth P, McBain J, et al. Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study. Hum Reprod 2012; 27(12): 3609–15.
  • 17. Mukaida T, Oka C, Goto T, Takahashi K. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoels using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Repord 2006; 21(12): 3246–52.
  • 18. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11(3): 300–8.
  • 19. Sunkara SK, Siozos A, Bolton VN, Khalaf Y, Braude PR, El-Toukhy T. The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2010; 25(8): 1906-15.
  • 20. Ferreux L, Bourdon M, Sallem A, Santulli P, Barraud-Lange V, Le Foll N et al. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6. Hum Reprod. 2018 Mar 1;33(3):390-8.
  • 21. Tannus S, Cohen Y, Henderson S, Al Ma'mari N, Shavit T, Son WY et al. Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?. Hum Reprod 2019; 34(1): 44-51.
  • 22. M Irani, N Zaninovic , C Canon , C O'Neill , V Gunnala , Q Zhan et al. A rationale for biopsying embryos reaching the morula stage on Day 6 in women undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Hum Reprod 2018; 33(5): 935- 41.
İzmir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1305-5151
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: İzmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

PERİTONEAL KARSİNOMATOZİS HASTALARININ PREOPERATİF EVRELENDİRİLMESİNDE BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİNİN ETKİNLİĞİ

Funda BARLIK OBUZ, Baran Umut VARDAR, Cihan AGALAR, A.Emre CANDA, Selman SOKMEN

KİLİTLİ İNTRAMEDÜLLER ÇİVİ İLE TEDAVİ EDİLEN 75 YAŞ ÜSTÜ FEMUR CİSİM KIRIKLI HASTALARIN KLİNİK SONUÇLARI

Onur SÜER, Sertaç SARUHAN, Melikşah UZAKGİDER, Kamil YAMAK, Recep EYCEYURT, Cemil KAYALI

PARKİNSON HASTALARINDA BİR NON-MOTOR SEMPTOM OLARAK KOGNİTİF DİSFONKSİYON

İpek İNCİ, Özge YILMAZ KÜSBECİ, Burçin DURMUŞ

SERUM D VİTAMİN DÜZEYİ İLE LİPİDLERİN İLİŞKİSİ

Mehmet ÇALAN, Tevfik DEMİR, Merve YILMAZ, Özgür MELETLİ

İNTRASİTOPLAZMİK SPERM İNJEKSİYONU YAPILAN HASTALARDA DONDURMA ÇÖZME SİKLUSLARINDA 5. GÜN VE 6. GÜN EMBRİYO TRANSFER SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Volkan KARATAŞLI, Burcu TAMER, Volkan EMİRDAR, Gülin OKAY, Funda GÖDE, Ahmet Zeki IŞIK, İbrahim PALA, Selda Bahar DOĞAN

SPİNAL EPENDİMOMLARIN KLİNİK VE CERRAHİ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Emrah AKÇAY, Hüseyin Berk BENEK

HASTANE DIŞI KARDİYAK ARREST İLE ACİL SERVİSE BAŞVURAN HASTALARDA MORTALİTE VE MORBİDİTENİN KAN GAZI PARAMETRELERİYLE BELİRLENMESİ

Umut PAYZA, Omay SORGUN, Adnan YAMANOĞLU

AĞIR GÖZ SENDROMLU BİR OLGUNUN KLİNİK ÖZELLİKLERİ VE TEDAVİSİ

Reis AVŞAR, Fatih GÜMÜŞ, Bora YÜKSEL, Tuncay KÜSBECİ

COVID-19 PANDEMİSİ GENEL CERRAHİ YOĞUN BAKIM ÜNİTESİ’NDEKİ NASOKOMİAL ENFEKSİYON ETKENLERİNİ DEĞİŞTİRDİ Mİ?

Levent UĞURLU, Cengiz AYDIN, Korhan TUNCER, Cem KARAALİ, Hüseyin ESİN, Şükran KÖSE, Mustafa EMİROĞLU, Ayberk DURSUN

NADİR GÖRÜLEN MEME TÜMÖRLERİNİN RETROSPEKTİF ANALİZİ

Semra SALİMOĞLU, Sümeyye EKMEKÇİ, Tayfun KAYA, Batuhan EYDURAN