GEBELİKTE AKUT APANDİSİTİ BELİRLEMEDE MANYETİK REZONANS GÖRÜNTÜLEMENİN ROLÜ

Giriş: Çalışmanın amacı akut apandisit şüphesi olan gebe hastalarda manyetik rezonans görüntüleme(MRG)’nin tanı koymada etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 1 Ocak 2008 – 1 Ocak 2018 tarihleri arasında Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Acil Servisi’ne akut karın ağrısı ile başvuran ve akut apandisit şüphesi ile MRG görüntüleme yapılan, 18- 50 yaş arası gebe hastalar alındı. Hastalara ait veriler retrospektif olarak toplandı. Manyetik rezonans görüntülemenin gebelikte akut apandisit tanısal sensitivitesi, spesifitesi ve güvenilirliği analiz edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya toplam 33 hasta alındı. Preoperatif MRG yapılan olguların 6(%18)’sında akut apandisit, 1(%0.3)’inde ise sağ over torsiyonu saptandı. Preoperatif bu tanıların doğruluğu, intraoperatif bulgular ve patolojik incelemeler ile kanıtlandı. Diğer 26(%78) hastada MRG akut apandisit ya da başka bir abdominal cerrahi patoloji belirlemedi. Bu hastalardan birisinde klinik şüphe duyulması nedeniyle apendektomi yapıldı ancak patolojik bulgular akut apandisit olarak yorumlanmadı. Geriye kalan 25(%75.7) hasta opere edilmedi ve takipte hiçbirisinde cerrahi patoloji gelişmedi. Hastaların hiçbirinde MRG ilişkili maternal ya da fetal komplikasyon gelişmedi. Çalışmamızda MRG’nin gebelikte akut apandisiti saptamada sensitivite ve spesifitesi %100 olarak belirlendi. Sonuç: Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme, gebelik döneminde akut apandisit tanısını yüksek sensitivite ve spesifite ile koymayı sağlayan güvenlir bir yöntemdir.

THE ROLE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING TO DETERMINE ACUTE APPENDICITIS DURING PREGNANCY

Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) for acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Material and Method: The study included pregnant women aged between 18 and 50 years who were admitted to the Emergency Department of Dokuz Eylul University Medical Faculty between January 1, 2008 and January 1, 2018 with acute abdominal pain and suspected acute appendicitis and had MRI. Data were collected retrospectively. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and reliability of magnetic resonance imaging during pregnancy were analyzed. Results: A total of 33 patients were included in the study. Six (18%) acute appendicitis and 1(0.3%) right ovarian torsion were detected in preoperative MRI. The accuracy of these diagnoses was demonstrated by intraoperative findings and pathological examinations. In 26 (78%) other patients, MRI did not detect acute appendicitis or another abdominal surgical pathology. Appendectomy was performed in one of these patients because of clinical suspicion, and pathological findings were not interpreted as acute appendicitis. None of the remaining 25(75.7%) patients developed surgical abdominal pathology. None of the patients had maternal or fetal complications associated with MRI. In our study, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI in detecting acute appendicitis during pregnancy was 100%. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging is a safe method of detecting acute appendicitis during pregnancy with high sensitivity and specificity.

___

  • Jung SJ, Lee DK, Kim JH, Kong PS, Kim KH, Bae SW. Appendicitis during pregnancy: the clinical experience of a secondary hospital. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2012; 28(3): 152–9.
  • Shin I, Chung YE, An C, Lee HS, Kim H, Lim JS et al. Optimisation of the MR protocol İn pregnant women- with suspected acute appendicitis. Eur Radiol 2018; 28(2): 514-21.
  • Jung JY, Na JU, Han SK, Choi PJ, Lee JH, Shin DH. Differential diagnoses of magnetic Resonance imagin for suspected acute appendicitis in pregnant patients. World J Emerg Med 2018; 9(1): 26-32.
  • Kereshi B, Lee KS, Siewert B, Mortele KJ. Clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging İn the evaluation of pregnant females with suspected acute appendicitis. Abdom Radiol 2018;43(6):1446–55.
  • Konrad J, Grand D, Lourenco A. MRI: first-line imaging modality for pregnant patients With suspected appendicitis. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40(8): 3359–64.
  • Ditkofsky NG, Singh A. Challenges in magnetic resonance imaging for suspected acute appendicitis in pregnant patients. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2015; 44(4): 297–302.
  • Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Borgstede JP, Bradley WG Jr, Froelich JW et al. ACR Guidance document on MR safe practices:2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37(3): 501– 30.
  • Spalluto LB, Woodfield CA, DeBenedectis CM, Lazarus E. MR imaging evaluation of Abdominal pain during pregnancy: appendicitis and other nonobstetric causes. Radiographics 2012; 32(2): 317-34.
  • Franca Neto AH, Amorim MM, Nobrega BM. Acute appendicitis in pregnancy: literature review. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2015; 61(2): 170–7.
  • Unal A, Sayharman SE, Ozel L, Unal E, Aka N, Titiz I et al. Acute abdomen in pregnancy Requiring surgical management: a 20-case series. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 159(1): 87–90.
  • Augustin G, Majerovic M. Non-obstetrical acute abdomen during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 131(1): 4–12.
  • Brown MA, Birchard KR, Semelka RC. Magnetic resonance evaluation of pregnant Patients with acute abdominal pain. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 2005; 26(4): 206–11.
  • Beddy P, Keogan MT, Sala E, Griffin N. Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of acute abdominal pain in pregnancy. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 2010; 31(5): 433–41.
  • Burns M, Hague CJ, Vos P, Tiwari P, Wiseman SM. Utility of magnetic resonance ımaging for the diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy: a Canadian experience. Can Assoc Radiol J 2017; 68(4): 392-400.
  • Smith MP, Katz DS, Lalani T, Carucci LR, Cash BD, Kim DH et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. Right Lower Quadrant Pain– Suspected Appendicitis. Ultrasound Q 2015; 31(2): 85–91.
  • Lehnert BE, Gross JA, Linnau KF, Moshiri M. Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the Appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emerg Radiol 2012; 19(4): 293-9.
  • Theilen LH, Mellnick VM, Longman RE, Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Macones GA, et al. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected appendicitis in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(3): 345.e1-6.
  • Duke E, Kalb B, Arif-Tiwari H, Daye ZJ, Gilbertson-Dahdal D, Keim SM et al. A Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MRI for evaluation of Acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 206(3):508-17.
  • Burke LM, Bashir MR, Miller FH, Siegelman ES, Brown M, Alobaidy M et al. Magnetic Resonance imaging of acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a 5-year multi institutional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(5): 693.e 1-6.
  • McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Nanayakkara D, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Negative appendectomy rate: influence of CT scans. Am Surg 2005; 71(10): 803–8.
  • Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (upto 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys 1998; 74(4): 494-522.
  • Kanal E, Shellock FG, Talagala L. Safety considerations in MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 176(3): 593–606.
  • Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 2004; 232(3): 635–52.
  • Pedrosa I, Lafornara M, Pandharipande PV, Goldsmith JD, Rofsky NM. Pregnant Patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology 2009; 250(3):749–57.
  • Nelson DB, Stewart RD, Matulevicius SA, Morgan JL, Mcintire DD, Drazner M, et al The effects of maternal positionand habitus on maternal cardiovascular parameters as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance. Am J Perinatol 2015; 32(14): 1318–23.
İzmir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1305-5151
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: İzmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

SERUM 25-HİDROKSİVİTAMİN D DÜZEYLERİNİN HEMOGLOBİNLE İLİŞKİSİ

Murat AKŞİT, Giray BOZKAYA, Sibel BİLGİLİ, Nuriye UZUNCAN

GEBELİKTE AKUT APANDİSİTİ BELİRLEMEDE MANYETİK REZONANS GÖRÜNTÜLEMENİN ROLÜ

TUFAN EGELİ, CİHAN AĞALAR, ZEKAİ SERHAN DERİCİ, Süleyman Özkan AKSOY, TAYFUN BİŞGİN, ALİ DURUBEY ÇEVLİK, MÜCAHİT ÖZBİLGİN, BAŞAK BAYRAM, Erkan ÇAĞLIYAN, IŞIL BAŞARA AKIN, CANAN ALTAY, MUSTAFA SEÇİL

BÖBREK NAKİLLİ HASTALARDA AKUT REJEKSİYON İLE AKUT DÖNEM SONRASI ÜRETERAL JET DİNAMİĞİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: PROSPEKTİF KOHORT ÇALIŞMA

Serdar ÇELİK, Arda YEŞİLOVA, Türker ACAR, Cenk ŞİMŞEK, Erhan TATAR, İBRAHİM HALİL BOZKURT, Yusuf Kadir TOPÇU, Ertuğrul ŞEFİK, İsmail BASMACI, İsmail Can TERCAN, Serkan YARIMOĞLU, BÜLENT GÜNLÜSOY, TANSU DEĞİRMENCİ, ADAM USLU

MULTİPLE MYELOMA HASTALARINDA ORTA DOZ SİKLOFOSFOMİD (2.5g /m2 Cy) İLE HEMATOPOETİK KÖK HÜCRE MOBİLİZASYONU SONUÇLARIMIZ

Zafer GÖKGÖZ, Ender SOYDAN, Ayla GÖKMEN, Osman İLHAN, Önder ARSLAN, Muhit ÖZCAN

ERİŞKİN İZOLE MONTEGGİA KIRIKLI ÇIKIKLARI CERRAHİ TEDAVİSİ VE FONKSİYONEL SONUÇLARI

Gürkan YILDIZ, Mesut TAHTA, Eyüp Çağatay ZENGİN, Cihan ASLAN

BAŞAĞRISI YAKINMASIYLA BAŞVURAN HASTALARDA KRANİAL TOMOGRAFİ İNCELEMELERİNİN RETROSPEKTİF DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Erdem ARSLAN, Zehra Hilal ADIBELLİ

VAZOPRESSÖR DESTEĞİ ALAN YOĞUN BAKIM HASTALARINDA RADİYAL ARTER KATETERİZASYONUNDA PALPASYON TEKNİĞİ İLE ULTRASON KULLANIMININ ETKİNLİĞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Ezgi Direnç KÜLÜNK, Zeki Tuncel TEKGÜL, Hüseyin ÖZKARAKAŞ, Halide Hande ŞAHİN KAYA

YOĞUN BAKIM ÜNİTESİNDE MEKANİK VENTİLASYON UYGULANAN HASTALARDA KLİNİK SEDASYON SKORLARI İLE BİSPEKTRAL İNDEKS ARASINDAKİ KORELASYONUN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Çiler ZİNCİRCİOĞLU, Aykut SARITAŞ, Meltem ÇAKMAK, Uğur UZUN, Işıl KÖSE GÜLDOĞAN, NİMET ŞENOĞLU

TANISAL KAROTİS ARTER ANJİYOGRAFİ VE KAROTİS STENTLEME RADYASYON PARAMETRELERİ AÇISINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLDİĞİNDE KORONER İŞLEMLERE KIYASLA GÜVENLİ MİDİR?

ÇAĞIN MUSTAFA ÜREYEN

ASSOCIATION OF SERUM 25-HYDROXYVITAMIN D LEVELS WITH HEMOGLOBIN

Sibel BİLGİLİ, Giray BOZKAYA, Nuriye UZUNCAN, Murat AKŞİT