Kriz zamanlarında banka piyasa gücü ve riski

Amaç: Bu makale, Küresel Finansal Kriz 2007/2009 (GFC) döneminde banka piyasa gücünün risk üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktadır. Metodoloji: 2007-2016 yılları için 6090 özel ve borsada işlem gören ABD bankasından oluşan bir örneklem kullanılmaktadır ve ampirik analiz banka sabit etkileri içeren panel veri teknikleri kullanarak gerçekleştirilmektedir. Bulgular: Bulgular, krizin piyasa gücü düşük bankaların temerrüt riskini artırdığını göstermektedir. Ancak, yüksek piyasa gücüne sahip bankalar kriz sırasında istikrarlı kalır ve temerrüt riskleri daha düşüktür. Daha fazla piyasa gücüne sahip bankalar, kriz sırasında, esas olarak daha düşük kaldıraç riski ve ve daha düşük portföy riski yoluyla istikrarı sağlamaktadırlar. Bu bankalar kriz sırasında daha yüksek ve daha istikrarlı kazançlara sahip bir portföy sürdürmeyi başarmışlardır. Bu çalışma, bankacılıkta piyasa gücünün çok hayati olduğu ve kriz dönemlerinde rekabetin istikrar için daha zararlı olduğu görüşünü desteklemektedir. Özgünlük: Bu makale, kriz zamanlarında bankacılık sektörü için önemli çıkarımlar sunmaktadır. Bankacılıkta politika yapıcılar, kriz zamanları sırasında bankalar arasındaki rekabeti maksimize etmeye değil, banka pazar gücünü geliştirmeye odaklanabilir

Bank market power and risk during crises

Purpose: This paper investigates the influence of bank market power on risk during the Global Financial Crisis 2007/2009 (GFC). Methodology: We use a sample of 6,090 private and listed US banks for 2007-2016 and perform our estimations using panel data techniques, together with bank-fixed effects. Findings: The findings suggest that the crisis increases banks’ default risk for banks with lower market power. Meanwhile, higher market power helps banks to remain stable during turbulent times and have lower default risk. Banks with more market power achieve this stability mainly because of lower leverage risk and lower portfolio risk. They managed to maintain a portfolio with higher and more stable earnings during the crisis. This paper supports the view that market power in banking is very vital, and competition is more harmful to stability during crisis periods. Originality: This paper provides important implications for the banking industry during crisis times. Policymaking in banking may specifically focus on improving bank market power but not maximizing competition between banks during crises.

___

  • Allen, F. & Gale, D. (2000). Financial contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 1–33.
  • Barry, T., Lepetit, L., & Tarazi, A. (2011). Ownership structure and risk in publicly held and privately owned banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(5), 1327-1340.
  • Barth, J. R., Caprio, G., & Levine, R. (2013). Bank regulation and supervision in 180 countries from 1999 to 2011. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 5(2), 111-219.
  • Beck, T., De Jonghe, O., & Schepens, G. (2013). Bank competition and stability: Cross-country heterogeneity. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(2), 218-244.
  • Beltratti, A. & Stulz, R. M. (2012). The credit crisis around the globe: Why did some banks perform better? Journal of Financial Economics, 105(1), 1-17.
  • Berger, A. N., Klapper, L. F., & Turk-Ariss, R. (2009). Bank competition and financial stability. Journal of Financial Services Research, 35(2), 99-118.
  • Bhattacharya, S. & Thakor, A.V. (1993). Contemporary banking theory. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 3(1), 2-50.
  • Bofondi, M., & Gobbi, G. (2004). Bad Loans and Entry into Local Credit Markets (Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) No. 509). Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  • Bolt, W. & Tieman, A. F. (2004). Banking competition, risk and regulation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(4), 783–804.
  • Boot, A. W.A. & Greenbaum, S. (1993). Bank regulation, reputation and rents: theory and policy implications. In Mayer, C & Vives, X. (Eds.), Capital markets and financial intermediation (pp. 262-285). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boot, A. W., & Thakor, A. V. (2000). Can relationship banking survive competition?. The journal of Finance, 55(2), 679-713.
  • Boyd, J. H., & De Nicoló, G. (2005). The theory of bank risk taking and competition revisited. The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1329–1343.
  • Boyd, J.H., De Nicolo, G., & Jalal, A.M. (2006). Bank risk-taking and competition revisited: new theory and new evidence (Working Paper Series No. 06/297). International Monetary Fund.
  • Brownbridge, M., & Kirkpatrick, C. (1999). Financial sector regulation: The lessons of the Asian crisis. Development Policy Review, 17(3), 243-266.
  • Caminal, R., & Matutes, C. (2002). Market power and banking failures. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(9), 1341-1361.
  • Carletti, E. (2008). Competition and regulation in banking. In Boot, A.W.A., & Thakor, A.V. (Eds.), Handbook of Financial Intermediation (pp. 449–482). North Holland: Elsevier.
  • Claessens, S., & Laeven, L. (2004). What drives bank competition? Some international evidence. Journal of money, credit and banking, 563-583.
  • Cubillas, E., & Suárez, N. (2018). Bank market power and lending during the global financial crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 89, 1-22. Delis, M. D., Kokas, S., & Ongena, S. (2017). Bank market power and firm performance. Review of Finance, 21(1), 299-326.
  • Demsetz, R. S., Saidenberg, M. R., & Strahan, P. E. (1996). Banks with something to lose: The disciplinary role of franchise value. Economic Policy Review, 2(2), 1-14.
  • Fungáčová, Z., Solanko, L., & Weill, L. (2014). Does competition influence the bank lending channel in the euro area?. Journal of banking & Finance, 49, 356-366.
  • Gambacorta, L., & Marques-Ibanez, D. (2011). The bank lending channel: lessons from the crisis. Economic policy, 26(66), 135-182.
  • Hellmann, T. F., Murdock, K. C., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Liberalization, moral hazard in banking, and prudential regulation: Are capital requirements enough?. American economic review, 90(1), 147-165. Houston, J. F., Lin, C., Lin, P., & Ma, Y. (2010). Creditor rights, information sharing, and bank risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 96(3), 485–512.
  • Ivashina, V., & Scharfstein, D. (2010). Bank lending during the financial crisis of 2008. Journal of Financial economics, 97(3), 319-338.
  • Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. Keeley, M. C. (1990). Deposit insurance, risk, and market power in banking. The American economic review, 1183-1200.
  • Köhler, M. (2015). Which banks are more risky? The impact of business models on bank stability. Journal of Financial Stability, 16, 195-212.
  • Laeven, L. & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation, and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259–275.
  • Lepetit, L., Nys, E., Rous, P., & Tarazi, A. (2008). Bank income structure and risk: An empirical analysis of European banks. Journal of banking & finance, 32(8), 1452-1467.
  • Levy Yeyati, E. & Micco, A. (2007). Concentration and foreign penetration in Latin American banking sectors: Impact on competition and risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(6), 1633-1647.
  • Matutes, C. & Vives, X. (2000). Imperfect competition, risk-taking, and regulation in banking. European Economic Review, 44(1), 1–34.
  • Marquez, R. (2002). Competition, adverse selection, and information dispersion in the banking industry. The Review of Financial Studies, 15(3), 901-926.
  • Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1995). The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 407-443.
  • Schaeck, K., Cihak, M., & Wolfe, S. (2009). Are competitive banking systems more stable? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(4), 711-734.
  • Soedarmono, W., Machrouh, F., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Bank competition, crisis and risk taking: Evidence from emerging markets in Asia. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 23, 196-221.
  • Suarez, J. (1994). Closure rules, market power and risk-taking in a dynamic model of bank behavior (LSE Financial Markets Group Discussion Paper No. 196). London: London School of Economics.
  • Vives, X. (2016). Competition and stability in banking: The role of regulation and competition policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1303-5495
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2002
  • Yayıncı: İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

TESİS YERİ SEÇİMİNDE KRİTERLERİN ÖNEM AĞIRLIKLARININ BULANIK FUCOM YÖNTEMİYLE BELİRLENMESİ

Bilge Nur PEKER, Ali GÖRENER

KURUMSAL İTİBAR ALGISININ ÖRGÜTSEL ÇEKİCİLİK VE ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME ÜZERİNE ETKİSİNİN YEME İÇME SEKTÖRÜNDE İNCELENMESİ

Tuğba ŞEN DEMİRCİ, Akın MARŞAP

ONLİNE VE YÜZ YÜZE PSİKOLOJİK DANIŞMAYA İLİŞKİN TUTUM İLE ÇEVRİMİÇİ MAHREMİYET KAYGISI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Firdevs ÖZTÜRK, Damla ZÜMBÜL, Figen AKÇA

AİLE ŞİRKETLERİNDE DEVİR PLANLAMASI SÜRECİ VE LİDERİN ÖRGÜTSEL BAĞLILIĞI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Aylin GÖZEN, Melis ATABEY KIRAN

PANDEMİ DÖNEMİ BORSA ETKİNLİĞİ ve BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZİ

Canan DAĞIDIR ÇAKAN, Esengül ÖZDEMİR ALTINIŞIK

Otantik Bir Uzaktan Öğrenme Ortamının Öğrenmeye Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Yeşim BOZKURT, Zekeriya Fatih İNEÇ

DİJİTAL YAYINCILIK VE İZLEME PRATİKLERİ: “GAİN” ÜZERİNE BİR ANALİZ

Sibel KARADUMAN, Nagihan ÜNLÜ KARATAŞ

Türkiye ve Doğu Asya Ülkeleri İmalat Sanayi Sektörlerinin Teknoloji Yoğunluğuna Göre İthal Girdi Oranlarının Girdi-Çıktı Tabloları İle Analizi

Nurullah KAHVECİOĞLU, Nurullah GÜR

ÖRGÜTSEL ÇATIŞMALARIN YÖNETİMİNE YÖNELİK BİR ARAÇ OLARAK ARABULUCULUK

Fahrettin KORKMAZ, Emre KIYAK, Püren AKÇAY

TÜKETİCİ DAVRANIŞ MODELLERİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE KAYIP MÜŞTERİLERİN TERK ETME NEDENLERİ VE GERİ DÖNME NİYETLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ÖLÇEK ÇALIŞMASI

Mustafa ŞEHİRLİ, Cahit ERDOĞAN