___

• Akyüz, Y. (2001). Başlangıçtan 2001’e Türk eğitim tarihi [Turkish education history from the beginning to 2001]. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
• Altuntas, Ö. (2017, December 27). PISA direktörü Andreas Schleicher: Türkiye bilgiyi pratiğe geçirmeyi öğrenmeli [Turkey should learn to put knowledge into practice]. BBC Türkçe. Retrived from https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-42481321.
• Archibald, S., Coggshall, J. G., Croft, A., & Goe, L. (2011). High-Quality Professional Development for All Teachers: Effectively Allocating Resources. Research & Policy Brief. New York: New York Comprehensive Center and Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED520732.pdf
• Atanur Baskan, G., Aydin, A., & Madden, T. (2006). Turkiye’deki ogretmen yetistirme sistemine karsilastirmali bir bakis [A comparative view on the teacher training system in Turkey]. Journal of Cukurova University Institude of Social Sciences, 15 (1), 35-42.
• Aykaç, N., Kabaran, H., & Bilgin, H. (2014). Türkiye'de ve Bazı Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerindeki Öğretmen Yetiştirme Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılmalı Olarak İncelenmesi (Almanya, Finlandiya, Fransa, İngiltere ve Türkiye Örneği) [Comparative Analysis of Teacher Training Practices in Turkey and Some European Union Countries]. Electronic Turkish Studies, 9(3).
• Barber, M. and Mourshed, M. (2007). How The World's Best-Performing School Systems Come Out On Top. New York: McKinsey & Company.
• Buyukozturk, S., Cokluk, O. & Koklu, N. (2014). Sosyal bilimler icin istatistik [Statistics for social sciences] (14th. Edition). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Can, Ertug. (2015). Qualitative Obstacles in Turkish Education System and Suggestions. Anthropologist, 20 (1,2) 289-296.
• Çelikten, M. (2005). Öğretmenlik Mesleği ve Özellikleri [Teaching Profession and Characteristics]. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(19), 207-237.
• Ceylan, E., Özdoğan Özbal, E., Sever, M. & Boyacı, A. (2020). Türkiye’deki Öğretmen ve Okul Yöneticilerinin Görüşleri, Öğretim Koşulları: TALIS 2018 Öğretmen ve Okul Yöneticileri Yanıtları Analizi [Opinions of Teachers and School Administrators in Turkey, Teaching Conditions: Analysis of TALIS 2018 Teachers and School Administrators Responses]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları. Retrived from https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_09/10142823_TALIS_RAPORU-.pdf
• Cohen, D. K. ve Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294–343.
• Connolly, P. (2007) Quantitative Data Analysis in Education: A critical introduction using SPSS. Routledge, London.
• Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (Vol. 7). Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). A Concise İntroduction to Mixed Methods Research. SAGE publications.
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education policy analysis archives, 8, 1-19.
• Day, C. and Sachs, J. (2004). Professionalism, performativity, and empowerment: Discourses in the politics, policies, and purposes of continuing professional development. In International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers, Day, C and Sachs, J. (Eds.). Maidenhead: Open University Press (pp. 3-32).
• Demirel, Ö. (1999). Öğretme sanatı [Didactics]. Pegem Yayınları.
• DeMonte, J. (2013). High-quality professional development for teachers: Supporting teacher training and improving student learning. Centers for American Progress. Retrieved From https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/07/DeMonteLearning4Teachers-1.pdf
• Desimone, L. M. ve Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers' professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252-263.
• Education Information Network in the European Community (2009). The education system in Turkey. Eurydice Report. Retrived from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/Eurydice/ByCountryResults?countryCode=TR
• Education Information Network in the European Community (2018). Teaching Careers in Europe: Access, Continuity and Support. Eurydice Report. Retrived from https://www.avrupa.info.tr/sites/default/files/2019-08/Avrupa%27da%20%C3%96%C4%9Fretmenlik%20Kariyeri%20-%20Eri%C5%9Fim%2C%20Devaml%C4%B1l%C4%B1k%20ve%20Destek.pdf
• Eğitim Reformu Girişimi (2022, January 27). Arka Plan, Öğretmenlik Meslek Kanunu [Background, Teaching Profession Law]. ERG. Retrived from https://www.egitimreformugirisimi.org/arka-plan-ogretmenlik-meslek-kanunu/
• Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (2009). Decoding resistance to change. Harvard business review, 87(4), 99-103.
• Furst, S. A., & Cable, D. M. (2008). Employee resistance to organizational change: managerial influence tactics and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied psychology, 93(2), 453.
• Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 10(2), 486.
• Göker, S. D. & Gündüz, Y. (2017). Dünya Ölçeğinde Öğretmenlerin Saygınlık Statüsü ve Özlük Hakları [Reputation Status and Personal Rights of Teachers at the World Scale]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 46(213), 177-196.
• Gürbüz, M. Ç. & Altun, M. (2019). PISA uygulamalarının tanıtımı [Introduction of PISA applications]. In S. Çepni (Ed.), PISA ve TIMSS mantığını ve sorularını anlama. (2nd ed., pp. 1-16). Pegem Akademi.
• Hardy, I. (2012). The politics of teacher professional development: Policy, research, and practice. Routledge.
• Hussey, D. E. (1997). How to Manage Organisational Change [Kurumsal Değişimi Başarmak], (trans. Tülay Savaşer). Rota Yayınları
• İlğan, A. (2014). Okul müdürünün öğretimsel denetim davranışları ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [The validity and reliability study of the school principal's instructional supervision behavior scale]. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 1-23.
• İlğan, A. (2021). Öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi üzerine kavramsal bir çerçeve ve Türk eğitim sistemi için çıkarımlar [A conceptual framework on the professional development of teachers and implications for the Turkish education system]. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 35(1), 256-280.
• Jensen, B., & Farmer, J. (2013). School Turnaround in Shanghai: The Empowered-Management Program Approach to Improving School Performance. Center for American Progress. Retrieved from https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ShanghaiReport-INTRO.pdf
• Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. Nobel Yayınları.
• Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221-240.
• Ministry of National Education (2019). PISA 2018 Turkey Preliminary Report. Training Analysis and Evaluation Reports Series No:10. Ankara: MEB Yayınları. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (in Turkish). Retrieved from https://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_12/03105347_PISA_2018_Turkiye_On_Raporu.pdf
• Ministry of National Education (2006). Teacher Training Systems of Countries. Ankara: MEB Yayınları. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (in Turkish). Retrieved from https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/StPrg/Ogretmenlik_Meslegi_Genel_Yeterlikleri.pdf
• Neyişçi, N. , Turabik, T. , Gün, F. & Kısa, N. (2020). Öğretmen Adaylarının Perspektifinden Türk Eğitim Sisteminin Sorunları ve Olası Çözüm Önerileri [Problems of Turkish Education System and Possible Solutions from the Perspective of Pre-Service Teachers]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 28 (6) , 2257-2270 . DOI: 10.24106/kefdergi.833516
• O'Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 19 https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
• OECD (2019), PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): As lifelong learners, teachers, and school leaders. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi:10.1787/1d0bc92a-en.
• Özkan, U. B. (2019). Matematik ve fen başarısının belirleyicisi olarak öğretmenlerin eğitim düzeyi [Education level of teachers as a determinant of mathematics and science achievement]. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(6), 29-43.
• Pallant, J. (2017) SPSS Survival Manual [SPSS Kullanma Kılavuzu], (trans. Sibel Balcı & Berat Ahi), Anı Yayıncılık.
• Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284.
• Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of management review, 25(4), 783-794.
• RESMI GAZETE (2022). Teaching Profession Law (No: 31750). Resmi Gazete, (in Turkish). Retrieved from https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2022/02/20220214-1.htm
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: A conception of teacher knowledge. American Educator, 10(1). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ333816
• Usak, M. (2009). Preservice Science and Technology Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge on Cell Topics. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(4), 2033-2046.
• Varkey Foundation. (2018). Teacher Status Index. London. Retrived from https://www.varkeyfoundation.org/media/4867/gts-index-13-11-2018.pdf