Ayşe AYTEKİN, Güner ARKUN

9129

COMPARISON OF FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

COMPARISON OF FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Today, conscientious societies demand the food products to be healthy in terms of production processes and ingredients, while at the same time demanding access to all sorts of information regarding them. The companies respond to this call by certifying their products regarding food safety through various certifications. Since the purpose of this study is to compare the Food Safety Management Systems commonly applied in food production plants, the standards of the systems ISO 22000:2005, BRc version 7 and IFS version 6 are used as the main references of this study. A total of 13 topics thought to be critical regarding food safety are found to be fit for comparison. In addition, the issues of the transition of HAccP to ISO 22000 and the points at which the two standards differ have been dealt with and the enlightenment of the food sector on these issues is aimed in this study by emphasizing that the ISO 22000 and HAccP have to be thought as two different standards. As a result of the comparison of BRc, IFS and ISO 22000 systems, it is found that ISO 2200 treats topics in a more general manner, and not include many topics that are treated in BRc and IFS. These topics are: control and detection of foreign substances, customer complaints, product analysis and finally audit protocols. The issue of audits is the most significant among the issues that are not included. It is seen that BRc and IFSs have given a section about the scope and the application of audits and that BRc has given a more detailed treatment of the issue of audits than the IFS, marking the audit, the requirement of which will be applied, according to its way of procedure.
Keywords:

Food Safety, , ISO 22000, , HACCP, BRC, IFS,

PDF

___

  • [1] Giray veand Soysal, 2007. Türkiye’ de Gıda Güvenliği ve Mevzuatı, TSK Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni, 6(6), 485-490, İzmir
  • [2] Tayyar, M., 2010. Gıda Güvenliği Ders Kitabı, 22-36, İstanbul: Tc. Marmara Belediyeler Birliği Yayını
  • [3] Onurlubaş, E., 2015. ‘Tüketicilerin Gıda Güvenliği Konusunda Bilinç Düzeylerinin Ölçülmesi Tokat İli Örneği’, (Ph.D. thesis), Ankara.
  • [4] Başaran, B., 2016. ISO 22000 Gıda Güvenliği Yönetim Sistemi, Journal of Food Health Science, 2(1), 9-26, Rize.
  • [5] Koçak, N., 2007. ISO 22000: Gıda Güvenliği Yönetim Sistemleri Uygulama Sürecinde Temel Adımlar, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(4), 135-159.
  • [6] Belibağlı veand Dalgıç, 2006. Gıda Güvenliği ve Kalite Yönetim Sistemleri Entegrasyonu ISO 22000:2005 Gıda Güvenliği Yönetim Sistemi ve ISO 9000:2000 Kalite Yönetim Sistemi Uygulamaları, Türkiye 9. Gıda Kongresi, Bolu, 24-26 May 2006.
  • [7] TS EN ISO 22000, 2005. Gıda Güvenliği Yönetim Sistemleri, Gıda Zincirindeki Tüm Kuruluşlar İçin Şartlar, Türk Standardı, TSE, Ankara.
  • [8] BRc, 2015. Gıda Güvenliği Global Standardı, British Retail Consortium Version 7, Londra.
  • [9] IFS, 2014. Gıda Ürünlerinin Kalite ve Gıda Güvenliğini Denetleme Standardı, International Featured Standarts Versiyon 6, Almanya.
  • [10] Kırdar and Kurşun, 2008. ISO 22000 Gıda Güvenliği Yönetim Sistemi, Türkiye 10. Gıda Kongresi, Erzurum, 21-23 May 2008.
  • [11] Anonymous , 2005. http://www.-informdanismanlik.com /22000 . html (Date of Access: 05.04.2017).
  • [12]Anonymous,2008. http://www.gidabilimi.com/ index.php/tr/forum-146/7-iso- 22000/1872-haccpve- iso-22000-arasindaki-farklar-iso-22000-ingetirdigi- yenilikler (Date of Access: 05.04.2017).
  • [13] Anonymous, 2009 . h t t p : / / w w w . e g i t t i m . c o m / i n d e x . php?option=comcontent&view=article&id= 128:isohaccpfarki&catid=53:mutfaktahijyen &Itemid=44 (Date of Access: 05.04.2017).
  • [14] Anonymous, 2013. http://www.europlastiques. com/news/69-iso-22000-brc-and-ifs-thedifference. html#. WOH9vfnyipo (Date of Access: 05.04.2017).
International Journal of Food Engineering Research-Cover
  • ISSN: 2149-5777
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

COMPARISON OF FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Ayşe AYTEKİN, Güner ARKUN

AKKERMANSIA MUCINIPHILA; ,FUNCTIONAL AND PROBIOTIC PROPERTIES IN THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT

Murat DOĞAN, Merve ÖZTAĞ, Hilal DEMİRKESEN BIÇAK

PREPARETION OF SAFE FOODS IN HOSPITAL KITCHEN AND PATIENT NUTRITION

Merve ADIGÜZEL, Güner ARKUN

Nanotechnology and Smart Packaging in Food Packaging

Anıl KIZEN, Zeynep TACER CABA