Dioik F. carica L.’da Sikonyumların Yapısal ve Mevsimsel Farklılıkları
Bu araştırma, diok Ficus carica’nın sikonyumları üzerine yapılan ilk detaylı ve kantitatif çalışmanın bir parçasıdır. İncir ağaçlarının fenolojisini ve cinsel özelliklerini araştırmak için sikonyumlar toplandı. Asenkron sikonyum oluşumu popülasyon düzeyinde gözlendi. Sikonyumların yılda üç kez meydana geldikleri görüldü: ilkbaharda (aralık-mart), yaz aylarında (temmuz-eylül) ve sonbaharda (eylül-kasım). Sikonyumun yapısı oldukça farklı bir oluşum sergiler; ostiolü çevreleyen pul benzeri brakteler, reseptakulm ve çiçeklerden oluşur. Erkek çiçekler, sikonyumun iç yüzeyinde bulunan doku üzerinde oluşurlar. Sikonyumlar ilkbahar, yaz ve sonbahar dönemlerinde incelendiğinde ilkbahar ve yaz aylarında gal ve dişi çiçeklerin morfolojik farklılıklar gösterdiği oysa ki erkek çiçeklerde hiçbir farklılığın olmadığı açıktır. Sonuç olarak F. carica’da sikonyumlar hayatta kalmak için değişiklikler oluşturmuşlardır. Bu çalışmada sikonyumların oluşumu ve gelişim zamanları araştırılmış ve birbiriyle karşılaştırılmıştır.
Structural and Seasonal Differences of Syconia in Dioecious F. carica L.
This research is part of the first quantitative, detailed study on the syconia in dioecious Ficus carica. Syconia were collected to research thephenology and sexual speciality of fig trees. Asynchronous syconium production was observed at a population level. They occurred threetimes yearly: in spring (December to March), in summer (July to September) and in autumn season (september to November). Syconiumstructure chart out quite differently; a syconium cosists of a receptacle, scale-like bracts surrounding the ostiole and flowers. Male, gall orfemale flowers bear into syconium, which are located on the inside surface of the syconium. We have been investigated the syconium inspring, summer and autumn periods. The morphological differences of gall and female flowers in spring and summer are obvious whereasthe male flowers do not show any differences. F. carica found out variation in the fruits (syconium) to his survival. In this paper, time offormation and development of syconium have been investigated and compared.
___
- [1] Monselise, S.P., Figue, Fr., Feige, Ger., Fico, It., Higo, Sp., &
Julian, C.C. (2018). Handbook of Fruit Set and Development.
Chapter Fig, Pages 14.
- [2] Datwyler, S.L., & Weiblen, G.D. (2004). On the origin of the
fig: phylogenetic relationships of Moraceae from ndhF sequences.
Am J Bot, 91, 767–777.
- [3] Corner, E.J.H. (1962). The classification of Moraceae. Gard.
Bull. Straits Settle – ment, 19, 187-252.
- [4] Janzen, D.H. (1979a). How to be a Fig. Annual Review of
Ecology and Systematics, 10, 13-51.
- [5] Ji, L., Zhe, W., Li, C., Tinglin, Z., Qinwei, G., Jian X., Li, J.,
Qunfeng, L., Sanwen, H., & Zhengguo, L. (2014). Transcriptome
comparison of global distinctive features between pollination
and parthenocarpic fruit set reveals transcriptional
phytohormone cross-talk in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).
Plant Cell Physiol, 55(7), 1325.
- [6] FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
(2006). FAOSTAT agricultural data.
- [7] Berg, C.C. (2003). Flora Malesiana precursor for the treatment
of Moraceaea 1: The main subdivision of Ficus: the subgenera.
Blumea, 48, 167-178.
- [8] Aytürk, Ö. (2016). Comparison of Female, Gall and Male
Flower Development with Microscopic and Molecular Tecniques
in Dioecious Ficus carica L. PhD, Marmara University,
Istanbul, Turkey.
- [9] Flaishman, M.A., Rodov, V., & Stover, E. (2008). The fig: botany,
horticulture, and breeding. Horticultural Rev-Westport
Then N Y., 34, 113.
- [10] Stover, E., Aradhya, M., Ferguson, L., & Crisosto, C.H.
(2007). The fig: overview of an ancient fruit. Hortscience, 42,
1083–1087.
- [11] Ramirez, W. (1977). A new classification of ficus. Annals of
the missouri botanical garden, 64, 296-310.
- [12] Rosianski, Y., Freiman, Z.E., Cochavi, S.M., Yablovitz, Z.,
Kerem, Z. & Flaishman, M.A. (2016). Advanced analysis
of developmental and ripening characteristics of pollinated
common-type fig (Ficus carica L.). Sci Hortic, 198, 98–106.
- [13] Freiman, Z.E., Rosianskey, Y., Dasmohapatra, R., Kamara,
I., & Flaishman, M.A. (2015). The ambiguous ripening nature
of the fig (Ficus carica L.) fruit : a gene expression study
of potential ripening regulators and ethylene-related genes. J
Exp Bot, 66, 3309–3324.
- [14] Yu, D.W. (2001). Parasites of mutualisms. Biological Journal
of the Linnean Society, 72, 529–546.
- [15] Herre, E.A. (1999). In Laws Govering Species Interactions?
Encouragement and Caution from Figs and their Associates.
(Keller L ed) pp,209–237, Princeton University Press.
- [16] Ware, A.B., & Compton, S.G. (1994). Responses of fig wasps
to host plant volatile cues. Journal of Chemical. Ecology, 20,
785-802.
- [17] Bronstein, J.L. (1988a). Mutualism, antagonism, and the
fig-pollinator interaction. Ecology, 69, 1298-1302.
- [18] McKey, D. (1989). Population biology of figs: Applieations
for conservation. Experientia 45, Birkh/iuser Verlag, CH-
4010 Basel/Switzerland.
- [19] Bronstein, J.L. (1988b). Predators of fig wasps. Biotropica,
20, 215-219.
- [20] Verkerke, W. (1989). Structure and function of the fig. Experientia
(Basel), 45, 612-622.
- [21] Sutton, T.L., DeGabriel, J.L., Riegler, M., & Cook, J.M.
(2017). Local coexistence and genetic isolation of three pollinator
species on thesame fig tree species. Heredity, 118, 486–
490.
- [22] Shuker, D.M., & Simmons, L.W. (2014). The Evolution of Insect
Mating Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
- [23] Wang, B., Geng, X.Z., Ma, L.B., Cook, J.M., & Wang, R.W.
(2014). A trophic cascade induced by predatory ants in a fig–
fig wasp mutualism. Journal of Animal Ecology, 83, 1149–
1157.
- [24] Galil, J., & Eisikovitch, D. (1974). Further studies on pollination
ecology in Ficus sycomorus L. Pocket filling and emptying
by ceratosolen arabicus magr. New phytologist, 73, 515-
528.
- [25] Janzen, D.H. (1979b). How many babies do figs pay for babies?.
Biotropica, 11, 48-50.
- [26] Patel, A., & McKey, D. (1998). Sexual specialization in two
tropical dioecious figs. Oecologia, 115, 391–400.
- [27] Kjellberg, L.F., Gouyon, P.H., Ibrahim, M., Raymond, M.,
& Valdeyron, G. (1987). “The Stability of the Symbiosis
between Dioecious Figs and Their Pollinators: A Study of Ficus
carica L and Blastophaga psenes”. Evolution, 41(4), 693–
704.
- [28] Cox, P.A. (1981). Niche partitioning between sexes of dioecious
plants. Am. Nat., 117, 295-307.