ULUSLARARASI HUKUK KOMİSYONU’NUN “ULUSLARARASI ÖRF VE ÂDET HUKUKUNUN BELİRLENMESİNE İLİŞKİN TASLAK SONUÇLAR” METNİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE ULUSLARARASI ÖRGÜTLERİN ULUSLARARASI ÖRF VE ÂDET HUKUKUNA ETKİSİ

Uluslararası örgütler uluslararası hukukun kişileridir. Bu uluslararası hukuk kişileri uluslararası örf ve âdet hukuku kuralları ile bağlıdır. Uluslararası örgütlerin uluslararası örf ve âdet hukuku kurallarının oluşturulmasına katkısı ise tartışmalıdır. Uluslararası Hukuk Komisyonu (ILC) tarafından 2018 yılında yayımlanan Uluslararası Örf ve Âdet Hukukunun Belirlenmesine İlişkin Taslak Sonuçlar belgesi bu tartışmalara önemli bir etkide bulunmuştur. ILC, uluslararası örgüt uygulamalarının bazı durumlarda uluslararası örf ve âdet hukuku kurallarının oluşumuna katkı sunabileceğini düzenlemiştir. Ancak opinio juris’in tespit edilmesi noktasında uluslararası örgütlere ilişkin bir hüküm yer almamaktadır. ILC, uluslararası örgütleri uluslararası örf ve âdet hukukunun oluşumuna sınırlı ve muğlak bir biçimde dâhil etmektedir. Bu makale uluslararası örgütlerin uluslararası örf ve âdet hukuku kurallarının oluşumuna etkisini doktrindeki gelişmeler ve ILC’nin konuya yaklaşımıyla birlikte incelemektedir. Uluslararası hukuki kişiliği çerçevesinde uluslararası örgütler uluslararası andlaşma akdedebilir; bunların uluslararası sorumluluğu söz konusudur ve bu örgütler çeşitli ayrıcalık ve bağışıklıklara sahiptir. Bu nedenle, uluslararası örgütlerin uluslararası örf ve âdet hukukuna da faaliyet alanlarına ilişkin hususlarda katkı sunabilmeleri gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Uluslararası örgütler, Örf ve Âdet Hukuku, Uluslararası Hukuki Kişilik, Uluslararası Hukuk Komisyonu

THE EFFECT OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ON CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE TEXT “DRAFT CONCLUSIONS ON IDENTIFICATION OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW” OF INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION

International organizations are persons of international law. These international legal persons are bound by the rules of customary international law. The contribution of international organizations to the formation of international customary law rules is controversial. Draft Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law published by the International Law Commission (ILC) in 2018, had a significant impact on these debates. The ILC has regulated that the practices of international organizations can contribute to the formation of international customary law in certain cases. However, there is no provision regarding international organizations at the point of determination of opinio juris. The ILC incorporated international organizations in the formation of international customary law in a limited and ambiguous way. This article examines the effect of international organizations on the formation of international customary law rules with the developments in the doctrine and the approach of the ILC to the subject. Within the framework of its international legal personality, international organizations can conclude international treaties, have international responsibilities and have various privileges and immunities. Therefore, international organizations should be able to contribute to international customary law, in matters related to their field of activity

Keywords:

Customary International Law, International Law Comission, International Organizations, International Legal Personality,

PDF

___

AKANDE, Dapo: “International Organizations”, in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.), International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010.
AKSAR, Yusuf: Teoride ve Uygulamada Uluslararası Hukuk I, 4. Baskı, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara 2017.
AYBAY, Rona/ORAL Elif: Kamusal Uluslararası Hukuk, 1. Baskı, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul 2016.
BARKHOLDT, Janina: “The Contribution of International Organizations to the Formation, Interpretation and Identification of International Law: Questions Arising from the Work of the International Law Commission”, International Organizations Law Review, 2020, p.1-45.
BLOKKER, Niels: “International Organizations and Customary International Law: Is the International Law Commission Taking International Organizations Seriously?”, International Organizations Law Review, 14(1), 2017, p.1-12.
BOZKURT, Enver/POYRAZ Yasin/ERDAL Selcen: Devletler Hukuku, 10. Baskı, Legem Yayıncılık, Ankara 2018.
BRÖLMANN, Catherine: “Capturing the Juridical Will of International Organizations”, Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2019-09.
ÇAĞIRAN, Mehmet Emin: Uluslararası Örgütler, 4. Bası, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara 2019.
ÇELİK, Edip: Milletlerarası Hukuk, 3. Baskı, İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul 1975.
DAUGIRDAS, Kristina: “International Organizations and the Creation of Customary International Law”, European Journal of International Law, 31(1), 2020, p.201-233.
DEPLANO, Rossana: “Assessing the Role of Resolutions in the ILC Draft Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law”, International Organizations Law Review, 14, 2017, p.227-253.
EMİR, Nergiz: Uluslararası Hukukta Kişilik Kavramı ve Uluslararası Örgütlerin Hukuki Kişiliğinin Sonuçları, (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara 2020.
GOLDSMITH, Jack L./POSNER Eric A.: “A Theory of Customary International Law”, The University Chicago Law Review, 66(4), 1999, p.1113-1177.
GÜNDÜZ, Aslan: Milletlerarası Hukuk, 10. Baskı, Günel, Reşat Volkan (ed.), Savaş Yayınevi, İstanbul 2019.
IŞIKTAÇ, Yasemin: Hukukun Kaynağı Olarak Örf ve Âdet Hukuku, Kazancı Hukuk Yayınları, İstanbul 1992.
KAMMERHOFER, Jörg: “Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of Its Problems”, European Journal of International Law, 15(3), 2004, p.523-553.
KAYA, İbrahim: Uluslararası Hukukta Temel Belgeler, 4. Baskı, Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara 2020.
KENNEDY, David: “The Sources of International Law”, American University Journal of International Law, 2(1), 1987, p.1-96.
KESKİN, Sevda: “Uluslararası Örgütlerin Sorumluluğuna İlişkin Taslak Maddeler”, MHB, 36(2), 2016, s.163-188.
KLABBERS, Jan: An Introduction to International Organizations Law, 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.
LEPARD, Brian D.: Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York 2010.
MERAY, Seha L.: Devletler Hukukuna Giriş, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları, Ankara 1960.
MURPHY, Sean D.: “Identification of Customary International Law and Other Topics: The Sixty-Seventh Session of the International Law Commission”, American Journal of International Law, 109(4), 2015, p.822-844.
ODERMATT, Jed: “The Development of Customary International Law by International Organizations”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(2), 2017, p.491-511.
ÖKTEM, Emre: Uluslararası Teamül Hukuku, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul 2013.
PACHOLSKA, Magdalena: “New Kids on the Block: International Organizations as Customary Rules Creators”, International Community Law Review, 21, 2019, p.325-343.
PAZARCI, Hüseyin: Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri I. Kitap, 12. Baskı, Turhan Kitabevi Yayınları, Ankara 2014.
REÇBER, Kamuran: Uluslararası Hukuk, Dora Yayıncılık, Bursa 2014.
ROBERTS, Anthea Elizabeth: “Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation”, The American Journal of International Law, 95(4), 2001, p.757-791.
SCHERMERS, Henry G./BLOKKER Niels M.: International Institutional Law: Unity Within Diversity, 5th Edition, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden-Boston 2011.
SEYERSTED, Finn: “Objective International Personality of Intergovernmental Organizations: Do Their Capacities Really Depend upon the Conventions Establishing Them”, Nordisk Tidsskrift Int'l Ret, 34, 1964.
SHAW, Malcolm N.: Uluslararası Hukuk, TÜBA, Ankara 2018.
SUR, Melda: Uluslararası Hukukun Esasları, 14. Baskı, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul 2020.
TERZİOĞLU, Süleyman Sırrı/ÖZARSLAN, Bahadır Bumin: Uluslararası Örgütler Hukuku, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara 2016.
THIRLWAY, Hugh: “The Sources of International Law”, in Evans, Malcolm D. (ed.), International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2010.
TREVES, Tullio: “Customary International Law”, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012.
TÜTÜNCÜ, Ayşe Nur/ARIKOĞLU Enver/AKÜN Verda Neslihan/BAŞKARACAOĞLU Elif: Toluner Milletlerarası Hukuk (Giriş, Kaynaklar), Beta Yayınları, İstanbul 2017.
WHITE, Nigel D.: The Law of International Organizations, 2nd Edition, Manchester University Press, Manchester 2005.
WOOD, Michael: “International Organizations and Customary International Law”, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 48(3), 2015, p.609-620.
Analytical Guide to the Work of the International Law Commission: Identification of Customary International Law, https://legal.un.org/ilc/guide/1_13.shtml (Erişim Tarihi: 16.11.2020).
Draft Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations, https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_11_2011.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 27.11.2020).
Draft Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law with Commentaries, https://legal.un.org/docs/?path=../ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/1_13_2018.pdf&lang=EF (Erişim Tarihi: 17.11.2020).
Fifth Report on Identification of Customary International Law by Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, A/CN.4/717. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N18/043/79/PDF/N1804379.pdf?OpenElement (Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2020).
First Report on Formation and Evidence of Customary International Law, by Sir Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, Document A/CN.4/663, https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_663.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2020).
Fourth Report on Identification of Customary International Law by Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, A/CN.4/695. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N16/063/33/PDF/N1606333.pdf?OpenElement (Erişim Tarihi: 23.11.2020).
International Law Association London Conference (2000), https://www.law.umich.edu/facultyhome/drwcasebook/Documents/Documents/ILA%20Report%20on%20Formation%20of%20Customary%20International%20Law.pdf (ErişimTarihi: 17.11.2020).
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, 1. C.J. Reports 1996, p.226, s.254, 255. https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/95/095-19960708-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 03.12.2020).
North Sea Continental Shelf, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1969, p.3. https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/52/052-19690220-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 03.12.2020).
Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1949, p.174. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/4/004-19490411-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 16.11.2020).
Second Report on Identification of Customary International Law by Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, A/CN.4/672. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N14/407/74/PDF/N1440774.pdf?OpenElement (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2020).
Statute of the International Court of Justice, https://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/sicj/icj_statute_e.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 14.11.2020).
Summaries of the Work of the International Law Commission, https://legal.un.org/ilc/summaries/1_13.shtml (Erişim Tarihi: 17.11.2020).
Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law by Michael Wood, Special Rapporteur, A/CN.4/682. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/088/91/PDF/N1508891.pdf?OpenElement (Erişim Tarihi: 22.11.2020).