Depictions on Wood: Acceptation and Internalization of Wood, which is an Intercultural Interaction Tool, as “A Valuable Object” (The Discovery of Wood is not Over Yet)

As it is accepted and internalized as a valuable material within intercultural interaction, wood, which is most well-known material for its naturality and versatility in the world since ancient times, and which provides solutions for a wide range of different applications, has been depicted in this article in the following 3 original depictions with distinctive compositions constructed with styles and structures as different as possible with a mentality foresight upon the basis of “The Discovery of Wood is not Over Yet”. The implications forming a basis for these depictions were internalized with professional/technical knowledge and in these depictions that were made with a woodlover approach; certain theoretical explanations to strengthen wood awareness and general depictions to introduce wood (considered as an exquisite natural material in intercultural interaction) were made.

DEPICTIONS ON WOOD: ACCEPTATION AND INTERNALIZATION OF WOOD, WHICH IS AN INTERCULTURAL INTERACTION TOOL, AS “A VALUABLE OBJECT” (THE DISCOVERY OF WOOD IS NOT OVER YET)

As it is accepted and internalized as a valuable material within intercultural interaction, wood, which is most well-known material for its naturality and versatility in the world since ancient times, and which provides solutions for a wide range of different applications, has been depicted in this article in the following 3 original depictions with distinctive compositions constructed with styles and structures as different as possible with a mentality foresight upon the basis of “The Discovery of Wood is not Over Yet”. The implications forming a basis for these depictions were internalized with professional/technical knowledge and in these depictions that were made with a woodlover approach; certain theoretical explanations to strengthen wood awareness and general depictions to introduce wood (considered as an exquisite natural material in intercultural interaction) were made.

___

  • [1]. Wittgenstein, L., (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Kegan Paul, London.
  • [2]. Tsoumis, G., (1991). Science and Technology of Wood: Structure, Properties, Utilisation. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
  • [3]. Mantel, K., (1964). History of the International Science of Forestry with Special Consideration of Central Europe; Literature, Training, and Research from the Earliest Beginnings to the Nineteenth Century. International Review of Forestry Research, 1, 1-37.
  • [4]. Schmucker, T. and Linnemann, G., (1951). Geschichte der Anatomie des Holzes. In “Handbuch der Mikroskopie in der Technik”, H. Freund, Ed., Umschau Verlag, Frankfurt, 1-78.
  • [5]. Schweingruber, F.H., (2007). Wood Structure and Environment. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • [6]. Tsoumis, G., (1968). Wood as Raw Material: Source, Structure, Chemical Composition, Growth, Degradation and Identification. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
  • [7]. Usta, I., (2017). Depictions on Wood: Acceptation and Internalization of Wood, which is an intercultural interaction tool, as “A Valuable Object” (Wood is a Symbol of Civilization). International Research Group on Wood Protection, IRG/WP 17-40776.
  • [8]. Sargut, A.S., (2010). Kültürler Arası Farklılaşma ve Yönetim. İmge Yayınları, Ankara.
  • [9]. Geels, F.W. and Schot, J., (2007). Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399-417.