Safran (Crocus sativus L.)’da Bitki Gelişimi Üzerine Dışarıdan Uygulanan Bitki Gelişim Düzenleyicilerinin Etkisi

Dışsal uygulanabilen kimyasallar olan ve farklı etki sınıfları içinde bulunan bitki gelişim düzenleyicilerininher biri bitki büyüme ve gelişiminin farklı aşamaları üzerinde hayati ve önemli işlevlere sahiptir. Tıbbi ve aromatikbitkiler içinde en önemli ve değerli bitkilerden biri olan safran (Crocus sativus L.) Iridaceae familyasına ait olup,doğal olarak generatif yolla üretilmesi mümkün olmadığından bitki gelişimi aseksüel olarak her yıl meydanagelen yavru kormlardan sağlanmaktadır. Bu araştırmada dışsal olarak uygulanan paclobutrazol, indole-3-butyricacid, zeatin and picloram maddelerinin safran gelişimi üzerine etkileri çalışılmıştır. Bitki gelişimi için önemliparametreler olan korm ve toprak üstü aksamı ile ilişkili karakterlerle ilgili veriler toplanmıştır. Çalışmada kontrolparsellerinin yanında paclobutrazol, indole-3-butyric acid, zeatin ve picloram bitki dikiminden 45 gün sonra camserada toprağa uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen verilere göre picloram konsantrasyonları nodyum aktivasyonu, yapraksayısı ve korm gelişim özellikleri (korm sayısı, ağırlığı, çapı ve yavru korm verimi) için geciktirici bir rol oynarken,en yüksek bitki boyu (10 mg L-1 de 60.98 cm ve 5 mg L-1 de 57.37 cm) elde edilmiştir. 10 mg L-1 paclobutrazoluygulamalarında, diğer uygulamalara ve kontrole nazaran en iyi korm verimine (469 kg da-1) ulaşılmıştır. Zeatin3 mg L-1 konsantrasyonda en iyi nodyum aktivasyonu göstermiştir (2.81 aktif nodyum/korm). Sonuç olaraksafran gelişimi önemli derecede dışarıdan toprağa uygulanan bitki gelişim düzenleyicilerinden etkilenmekte olupuygulama metodu gelişimi hedeflenen bitki kısmı göz önüne alınarak geliştirilebilir

The Effect of Exogenously Applied Plant Growth Regulators on Plant Development of Saffron (Crocus sativus L.)

Plant growth regulators have important roles in plant growth and development. The externallyapplicable chemicals belong to different action classes and each one has a crucial and effective role at differentplant growing stages. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) is one of the most important and valuable medicinal and aromaticplant, belongs to Iridaceae family. Because of impossibility of generative propagation in nature, growing can bemaintened asexually with daughter corms occured each year. In this experiment, the effects of exogenously appliedpaclobutrazol, indole-3-butyric acid, zeatin and picloram on saffron developmental stages were studied. Data werefocused on aerial part and corm related characters which is important in developmental fndings in this plant. In thetreatments, paclobutrazol (10 or 20 mg L-1), indole-3-butyric acid (1 or 3 mg L-1), zeatin (1 or 3 mg L-1) and picloram(5 or 10 mg L-1) were applied alone besides control to saffron 45 days after planting to the soil under greenhousecondition. According to the data picloram concentrations have a retardant role in nodium activation, leaf numberand corm developmental characters (number, weight, diameter and yield of daughter corm) but cause the highestplant height (60.98 cm in 10 mg L-1 and 57.37 cm in 5 mg L-1). In 10 mg L-1 paclobutrazol treatments resulted as thebest corm production (469 kg da-1) than the other treatments and control. Zeatin at 3 mg L-1concentration was foundeffective on the best nodium activation (2.81 active nodes/corm). In conclusion, saffron development is affectedsignifcantly by externally applied plant growth regulators under soil condition and the application methods can beprogressed in studies on aimed parts of the plant.

___

  • Amiri ME, 2008. Impact of animal manures and chemical fertilizers on yield components of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). American-Eurasian J. Agric&Environ. Sci., 4(3): 274-279.
  • Ault JR, Siqueira SS, 2008. Morphogenetic response of Lilium michiganense to four auxin-type plant growth regulators in vitro. HortScience, 43(6): 1922-1924.
  • Aytekin A, Acıkgoz AO, 2008. Hormone and microorganism treatments in the cultivation of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) plants. Molecules, 13: 1135-1146.
  • Bhagyalakshmi N, 1999. Factors influencing direct shoot regeneration from ovary explants of saffron. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 58: 205-211.
  • Cavusoglu A, Sulusoglu M, Erkal S, 2013. Plant regeneration and corm formation of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in vitro. Research Journal of Biotechnology, 8(12): 128-133.
  • Colins GB, Vian WE, Phillips GC, 1978. Use of 4-Amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid as an auxin source in plant tissue cultures. Crop Science, 18(2): 286-288.
  • Çavuşoğlu A, Sülüşoğlu M, 2012. Saffron corm and habitus growth under nitrogen fertilized field condition. Tıbbi ve Aromatik Bitkiler Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, Tokat, Türkiye. 156-161.
  • Devi K, Sharma M, Singh M, Ahuja PS, 2011. In vitro cormlet production and growth evaluation under greenhouse conditions in saffron (Crocus sativus L.)- A commercially important crop. Eng. Life Sci., 11(2): 189-194.
  • Devi K, Sharma M, Ahuja PS, 2014. Direct somatic embryogenesis with high frequency plantlet regeneration and succssive cormlet production in saffron (Crocus sativus L.). South African Journal of Botany. 93: 207-216.
  • Francescangeli N, 2009. Paclobutrazol and cytokinin to produce iris (Iris x hollandica Tub.) in pots. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 69 (4): 509-515.
  • IARC, 1991. Picloram. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to human, Lyon-France. 53: 481-493. Khan MA, Naseer S, Nagoo S, Nehvi FA, 2011. Behavior of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) corms for daughter corm production. Journal of Phytology. 3 (7): 47-49.
  • Krug BA, Whipker BE, McCall I, 2007. Caladium growth control with flurprimidol, paclobutrazol, and uniconazole. HortTechnology,17(3): 368-370.
  • Nagaraju V, Bhowmik G, Parthasarathy VA, 2002. Effect of paclobutrazol and sucrose on in vitro cormel formation in gladiolus. Acta Bot. Croat., 61(1): 27-33.
  • Negbi M, Dagan B, Dror A, Basker D, 1989. Growth, flowering, vegetative reproduction and dormancy in the saffron crocus (Crocus sativus L.). Isr. J. Bot., 38:95-113.
  • Plessner O, Ziv M, Negbi M, 1990. In vitro corm production in the saffron crocus (Crocus sativus L.). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 20: 89-94.
  • Renau-Morata, B, Moya L, Nebauer SG, Segui-Simarro JM, Para-Vega V, Gomez MD, Molina RV, 2013. The use of corms produced under storage at low temperatures as a source of explants for the in vitro propagation of saffron reduces contamination levels and increases multiplication rates. Ind. Crop Prod., 46: 97-104.
  • Ríos JL, Recio MC, Giner RM, Máňez S, 1996. An update review of saffron and its active constituents. Phytother. Res., 10: 189-193.
  • Sampathu SR, Shivshankar S, Lewis YS, 1984. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) cultivation, processing, chemistry and standardization. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 20(2): 123-157.
  • Sharma KD, Rathour R, Sharma R, Goel S, Sharma TR, Singh BM, 2008. In vitro cormlet development in Crocus sativus. Biol. Plantarum, 52(4): 709-712.
  • Steinitz B, Cohen A, Goldberg Z, Kochba M, 1991. Precocious gladiolus corm formation in liquid shake cultures. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 26: 63-70.
  • Turhan H, Kahriman F, Egesel CO, Gul MK, 2007. The effects of different growing media on flowering and corm formation of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). African Journal of Biotechnology, 6(20): 2328-2332.
  • WHO, 2009. The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification, Stuttgard-Germany, 39-46.
  • Yaacob JS, Yussof AIM, Taha RM, Mohajer S, 2012. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from bulb, leaf and root explants of African blue lily (Agapanthus praecox ssp. minimus). Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6(19): 1462-1470.
  • Zeybek E, Önde S, Kaya Z, 2012. Improved in vitro micropropagation method with adventitious corms and roots for endangered saffron. Central Eur. J. Biol., 7(1): 138-145.
  • Zuyasna S, Hafsah S, Fajri R, Syahputra MO, Ramadhan G, 2012. The effect of picloram concentrations and explants types on the induction of somatic embryo on North Aceh Cocoa genotype. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference Syiah Kuala University & The 8th IMT-GT Uninet Biosciences Conference Banda Aceh., 2(1): 395-398.