ÇOCUK DESTEK MERKEZLERİNDE KALAN ERGENLERDE PSİKOLOJİK İYİLİK VE ALGILANAN SOSYAL DESTEK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Psikolojik iyilik, kişinin psikolojik olarak herhangi bir sorun (anksiyete, depresyon, vb.) yaşamamasıdır. Algılanan sosyal destek, kişinin sosyal çevresinden (aile, arkadaş, akraba, vb.) almakta olduğu desteği öznel olarak değerlendirme düzeyidir. Bu çalışmada korunma altında bulunan ve çocuk destek merkezlerinde kalmakta olan 14-20 yaş arasındaki ergenlerin algıladıkları sosyal destek ve psikolojik iyilikleri arasındaki ilişki araştırılmıştır. Çocukların kuruluşta kalma süreleri, izinsiz ayrılma sıklıkları ve süreleri de incelenen değişkenler arasındadır. Araştırma, algılanan sosyal destek arttıkça psikolojik iyiliğin de artacağını öngörmüştür. Ayrıca kuruluşta kalış sürelerinin algıladıkları sosyal destekle ilişkili olacağını, izinsiz ayrılma sıklık ve süresinin de bu değişkenlerle ilişkili olabileceğini değerlendirmiştir. Araştırmaya kuruluşta kalmakta olan 78 ergen katılmıştır. Değerlendirme amacıyla Genel Sağlık Anketi ve Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek ölçeği kullanılmıştır. 

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AND PERCEIVED SOCIAL SUPPORT OF ADOLESCENTS LIVING IN CHILD SUPPORT CENTERS

Psychological well-being is the absence of any psychological distress (anxiety, depression, etc.). Perceived social support is the level of the subjective evaluation of one’s amount of support from their social environment (family, friends, relatives, etc.). This study is to determine the relationship between perceived social support and psychological well-being of teenagers under protection (14-20 years of age) who stays at child support centers. Living duration, frequency and duration of absence without leave behavior are also included variables. The study predicted that perceived social support and psychological well-being are positively related. Thus, duration of their stay at the center was expected to be related with the perceived social support. Frequency and duration of their absence without leave behavior were also expected to be related with the variables. Seventy-eight teenagers participated to the study. General Health Questionnaire and Multdimensional Perceived Social Support Scale were used. 

___

  • Adamczyk, K., ve Segrin, C. (2015). Perceived social support and mental health among single vs. partnered Polish young adults. Current Psychology, 34, 82-96.
  • Arenas, M. D., Alvarez-Ude, F., Reig-Ferrer, A., Zito, J. P., Gil, M. T., Carretón, M. A., Albiach, B., Moledus, A. (2007). Emotional distress and health-related quality of life in patients on hemodialysis: the clinical value of COOP-WONCA charts. Journal of Nephrology, 20(3), 304-310.
  • Bilgiç, R., ve Yılmaz, N. (2013). The correlates of psychological health among the Turkish unemployed: Psychological burden of financial help during unemployment. International Journal of Psychology, 48(5), 1000-1008.
  • Byrne, M., Plunkett, P. K., McGee, H., Murray, A., ve Bury, G. (2003). Frequent attenders to an emergency department: a study of primary health care use, medical profile, and psychosocial characteristics. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 41, 309-318.
  • Chou, K. L. (2000). Assessing Chinese adolescents’ social support: the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Personality and individual differences, 28, 299-307.
  • Çebi, E. (2009). University students’ attitudes toward seeking psychological help: Effects of perceived social support, psychological distress, prior help-seeking experience and gender. Thesis submitted to the graduate school of Middle East Technical University.
  • Eker, D., Arkar, H., ve Yaldız, H. (2001). Çok boyutlu algılanan sosyal destek ölçeğinin gözden geçirilmiş formunun faktör yapısı, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 12(1), 17-25.
  • Eker, D, ve Arkar, H. (1995). Perceived social support: psychometric properties of the MSPSS in normal and pathological groups in a developing country. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiology, 30, 121-126.
  • Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N ve ark. (1997) The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychological Medicine, 27, 191-97.
  • Goldberg, D.P., Hillier, V.F. (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9(1), 139-145.
  • Glozah, F. N., (2013). Effects of academic stress and perceived social support on the psychological wellbeing of adolescents in Ghana. Open Journal of Medical PSychology, 2, 143-150.
  • Karim, N., Ali, A., ve Deuri, (2015). A comparative study of care burden and social support among caregivers of persons with schizophrenia and epilepsy. Open Journal of Psychiatryve Allied Sciences, 6, 132-137.
  • Kılıç, C. (1996). Genel Sağlık Anketi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 7, 3-11.
  • Lakey, B., ve Cohen, S. (2000). Social support theory and measurement. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, ve B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.) Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (29-52).
  • Matsuda, T., Tsuda, A., Kim, E., ve Deng, K. (2014). Association between perceived social support and subjective well-being among Japane-se, Chinese, and Korean college students. Psychology, 5, 491-499.
  • Ryaff, C. D. (1995). Psychoılogical well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4 (4), 99-104.
  • Selçuk Tosun, A., ve Akça, G. (2014). Konya kent merkezinde sosyoekonomik özellikleri farklı olan bölgelerde yaşayan bireylerin sosyal destek ve ruhsal sağlık durumlarını etkileyen faktörler. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 17, 4.
  • Shahdadi, H., Monsouri, A., Nasiri, A. A., ve Bandani, E. (2017). An assess-ment of the relaitonship between social support and mental health of students of Zabol University of Medical Science in 2017. World Family Medicine / Middle East Journal of FAmily MEdicine, 15 (10).
  • Tam, C. L., Foo, Y. C., ve Lee, T. H. (2011). The association between perceived social support, socio-economic status and mental health in young Malaysian adults. East Asian Arch Psychiatry, 21(2), 73-78.
  • Tahmasbipour, N., ve Taheri, A. (2012). A survey on the relation between social support and mental health in students Shahid Rajaee Uni-versity. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Scinences, 47, 5-9.
  • Tschann, J. M., Flores, E., Pasch, L. A., Marin B. V. (2005). Emotional distress, alcohol use, and peer voilence among Mexican-American and Eu-ropean-American adolescent. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(1), 11-18.
  • Oginska-Bulik, N. (2005). The role of personal and social resources in preventing advers health outcomes in employess of uniformed professions. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environ-mental Health, 18(3), 233-240.
  • Ono, M., ve Honda, S. (2017). Association between social support and child abuse potential among Japanese mothers. Children and youth services review, 73, 88-92.
  • Williams, P. (2005). What is social support? A grounded theory of social interaction in the context of the new family. Thesis for Department of public health, University of Adelaide.
  • Winefield, H. R., Gill, T. K., Taylor, A. W., Pilkington, R. M. (2012). Psychological well-being and psychological distress: is it necessary to measure both? Theory, Research and Practice, 2:3.
  • Yıldırım, N., Karaca, A., Cangur, S., Açıkgöz, F., ve Akkuş, D. (2017). The relationship between educational stress, stress coping, self-esteem, social support, and health status among nursing students in Turkey: A structural equation modeling approach. Nurse education today, 48, 33-39.
  • Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G. ve Farley, G. K. (1988) The Multi-dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30-41.