Yansıtma Üzerine Yansıtma: İngilizceyi Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğreten Üniversite Okutmanlarının Yansıtmalı Öğretim Uygulamaları Üzerine Algıları

Öğretmenlerin yansıtmalı öğretim tecrübelerini incelemek, farklı yansıtmalı öğretim uygulamalarının sınıflarda nasıl işe yaradığına ışık tutmak için önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; üniversitede yabancı dili İngilizce olarak öğreten okutmanları farklı araçlar kullanarak yansıtmalı öğretim uygulamalarına katmak ve bu uygulamayla ilgili algılarını incelemektir. Bu amaçla, Türkiye’den sekiz İngilizce okutmanı bu çalışmaya katılmıştır. Bir eğitim sürecinden sonra, yansıtmalı öğretimin sistemli bir şekilde uygulanması için, sırasıyla yansıtmalı günlük, yansıtmalı video analizleri ve meslektaş ile görüşme yansıtmalı öğretim araçları olarak kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılar, bu yansıtmalı öğretim uygulamalarına katılmakla ilgili görüşlerini yazarak, bir algı anketine cevap vererek ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmelere katılarak yaşadıkları yansıtmalı öğretim tecrübesi üzerine yansıtmada bulunmuşlardır. “Sürekli Karşılaştırma Metodu” (Constant Comparison Method) kullanılarak yapılan nitel incelemeler, katılımcıların yansıtmalı öğretim uygulamalarının zaman ve çaba gerektirmesiyle ilgili bir kaç olumsuz görüş ortaya koymalarına rağmen, bu uygulamanın kendi öğretim uygulamaları üzerine bilinç kazanmak ve kendilerini değerlendirmelerini artırmak konusunda fayda sağladığını ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca; katılımcılar, yansıtmalı öğretimin öğretmen gelişimi için etkili bir metod olduğunu, ve bunun değişik yollarla ya da araçlarla uygulanabileceğini farkına varmışlardır. Sonuçlar, sistemli bir şekilde uygulandığında, yansıtmalı öğretim uygulamalarının mesleki gelişime katkıda bulunabileceğini de göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, farklı ortamlardaki öğretmenlere etkili yansıtmalı öğretim uygulamaları düzenlenmesi için ümit verici sonuçlar ortaya koymaktadır.

Reflection on Reflection: EFL University Instructors’ Perceptions on Reflective Practices

Exploring teachers’ reflective experiences is important to shed light on understanding how different reflective practices work in classroom settings. The aim of the study was to engage EFL university instructors in reflectivity through various tools and to investigate their related perceptions. To that end, eight EFL university instructors in a Turkish context participated in the study. For systematic implementation of reflective practices, different reflective tools; namely, reflective diaries, reflective video analysis, and reflective peer sessions were used following a training procedure. The participants reflected on their reflective practices by writing reflections, answering a perception questionnaire and participating in semi-structured interviews. Qualitative analysis using the Constant Comparison Method put forward that all participants benefited much from the study in terms of gaining awareness about their teaching practices and promoting self-evaluation albeit some negative perceptions related to time and effort required. The participants also realized that reflective practice is an effective method for teacher development, and it can be applied through different ways or tools. Findings assert that reflective teaching practices could contribute to professional empowerment when implemented in a systematic fashion. This study yields promising results for designing effective reflective practices for teachers in various contexts.

___

  • Abednia, A., Hovassapian, A., Teimournezhad, S., & Ghanbari, N. (2013). Reflective journal writing: Exploring inservice EFL teachers’ perceptions. System, 41, 503-514.
  • A’Dhahab, S.M., & Region, D. (2009). EFL teachers’ perceptions and practices regarding reflective writing. In: Borg, S. (Ed.), Researching English language teaching and teacher development in Oman (pp. 1-15). Muscat: Ministry of Education, Oman.
  • Ahmad, I., Bin-Said, H., Zeb, A., Ur-Rehman, S., Ahmad, S., & Khan, W. (2013). How reflective practice improves teachers’ classroom teaching skills? Case of community based schools in District Chitral, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(1), 73-81.
  • Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35(2), 192-207.
  • Akbari, R., Behzadpoor, F. & Dadvand, B. (2010). Development of English language teaching reflection inventory. System, 38(2), 211-227.
  • Al Mahmud, A. (2013). Constructivism and reflectivism as the Logical Counterparts in TESOL: Learning theory versus teaching methodology. TEFLIN Journal,24(2), 237-257.
  • Baecher, L., Birch, G., Trotman, W., & Ainy, S. (2011). Collaborative video inquiry in MA Tesol coursework “Working together to improve ourselves”. ELTED Journal, 14, 1-7.
  • Blank, A. (2009). Reflection and professional practice. In A.Atwal and M.Jones (Ed.), Preparing for professional practice in health and social care (pp.41-50). Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Britton, L.R., & Anderson, K.A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilised concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 306-314.
  • Chant, R.H., Heafner, T.L., & Bennett, K.R. (2004).Connecting personal theorizing and action research in preservice teacher development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(3), 25-42.
  • Chirema, K. D. (2007). The use of reflective journals in the promotion of reflection and learning in post-registration nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 27(3), 192–202.
  • Choy, C.S., & Oo, P.S. (2012). Reflective thinking and teaching practices: A precursor for incorporating critical thinking into the classroom? International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 167-182.
  • Cirocki, A., Tennekoon, S., & Calvo, A.P. (2014). Research and reflective practice in the ESL classroom: Voices from Sri Lanka. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 24-44.
  • Cohen-Sayag, E., & Fischl, D. (2012). Reflective writing in pre-service teachers’ teaching: What does it promote? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(10), 20-35.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Publishing.
  • Daniels, E., Pirayoff, R., & Bessant, S. (2013). Using peer observation and collaboration to improve teaching practices. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 268-274.
  • Dantas-Whitney, M. (2002). Critical reflection in the second language classroom through audiotaped journals, System 30 (4), 543-555.
  • Day, R.R. (2013). Peer observation and reflection in the ELT practicum. Journal of Language and Literature Education, 2(8), 1-8.
  • Dewey, J. (1910). How to think. Boston:Heath. Dymond, S. K., & Bentz, J. L. (2006). Using digital videos to enhance teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29(2), 98-112.
  • Eröz-Tuga, B. (2013). Reflective feedback sessions using video recordings. ELT Journal, 67(2), 175-183.
  • Ferraro, J.M. (2000). Reflective practice and professional development. ERIC Digest,No: ED449120.
  • Farrell, T. (2008). Reflective practice in the professional development of teachers of adult English language learners. CAELA Network Brief. Center for Adult English Language Acquisition.
  • Farrell, T. (2013). Critical incident analysis through narrative reflective practice: A case study. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 79-89.
  • Fatemipour, H. (2013). The efficiency of the tools used for reflective teaching in ESL contexts. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1398-1403.
  • Garber, C. (2014). Doorways and walls: Peer coaching as a means to change instructional practice. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 8. [Available online at: http://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/8/], Retrieved on October 22, 2015.
  • Genç, Z. (2010). Teacher autonomy through reflective journals among teachers of English as a foreign language in Turkey. Teacher Development, 14(3), 397-409.
  • Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York:Aldine De Gruyter.
  • Gözüyeşil, E., & Aslandağ-Soylu, B. (2014). How reflective are EFL instructors in Turkey? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 23-27.
  • Gün, B. (2011). Quality self-reflection through reflection training. ELT Journal, 65(2), 126-135.
  • Halim, L., Buang, N.A., &Meerah, T.S.M. (2010).Guiding student teachers to be reflective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 544-550.
  • Harun, Md., & Al-Amin, S. (2013). Continuous teacher development through reflective teaching and action research. Bangladesh Research Publications Journal, 8(1), 69-78.
  • Hole, S. & McEntee, G.H. (1999). Reflection is at the heart of practice. Educational Leadership, 56(8), 34-37.
  • Jasper, M. (2003). Beginning reflective practice. UK: Nelson Thornes.
  • Kaur, S., & Kaur, S. (2010). Pathways to reflective learning and teacher development: Insights from teacher trainees’ diaries. Malaysian Journal of Education, 35(1), 47-57.
  • Khan, B., Begum, S. (2012). Portfolio: A professional development and learning tool for teachers. International Journal of Social Science and Education, 2(2), 363-377.
  • Korumaz, M., & Karakaş, A. (2014). An investigation of English language instructors’ attitudes towards reflective teaching. Pegem Journal of Education & Instruction, 4(1), 27-46.
  • Kumari, S.N.V. (2014). Constructivist approach to teacher education: An integrative model for reflective teaching. IManager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 31-40.
  • Lakshmi, S.B. (2014). Reflective practice through journal writing and peer observation: A case study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education,15(4), 189-204.
  • Lee, I. (2007). Preparing pre-service English teachers for reflective practice. ELT Journal, 61(4), 321- 329.
  • Leong, P., Joseph, S.R.H., & Boulay, R. (2010). Applying constant comparative and discourse analyses to virtual worlds research. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 3(1), 3-26.
  • Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA:Sage
  • Lowe, G.M., Prout, P., & Murcia, K. (2013). I see, I think I wonder: An evaluation of journaling as a critical reflective practice tool for aiding teachers in challenging or confronting contexts. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(6), 1-16.
  • Maarof, N. (2007). Telling his or her story through reflective Journals. International Education Journal, 8(1), 205- 220.
  • Mahmoodi-Shahrebabaki, M., & Kondlaji, A.R. (2015). Investigating the associations between english language teachers’ reflectiveness and teaching experience. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 3(1), 256-272.
  • Mann, S., & Walsh, S. (2013). RP or ‘RIP’: A critical perspective on reflective practice. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2), 289-312.
  • Norrish, J., & Pachler, N. (2003). Preparing language teachers – but how? The role of ‘theory’ in enabling reflection. The Teacher Trainer, 17(1), 12-18.
  • Odabaşı-Çimer, S., & Paliç, G. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of reflection. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 3(1), 52-60.
  • Picci, P., & Calvani, A.,& Bonaiuti, G. (2012). The use of digital video annotation in teacher training: the teachers’ perspectives. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 600-613.
  • Prince, T., Snowden, E., & Matthews, B. (2010). Utilising peer coaching as a tool to improve student-teacher confidence and support the development of classroom practice. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 1(1), 45-51.
  • Pultorak, Edward G. (1993). Facilitating reflective thought in novice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 288-295.
  • Razaeyan, M. &Nikoopour, J. (2013).The relationship between reflectivity of foreign language teachers with Iranian students’ achievement. Journal of Language Sciences & Linguistics, 1(1), 9-20.
  • Richards, J.C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rudd, R. D. (2007). Defining critical thinking. Techniques, 82(7), 46-49.
  • Santagata, R., & Angelici, G. (2010). Studying the impact of the lesson analysis framework on preservice teachers’ abilities to reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 339-349.
  • Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2010). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. Zdm, 43(1), 133-145.
  • Savaş, P. (2012). Use of digital video recording in the preparation stage of pre-service foreign language teachers’ micro teachings. International Journal of New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 3(3), 107-116.
  • Sayın, B.A. (2013). Promoting teacher self-assessment through video-recording (with a questionnaire study on Turkish university students). Journal of Education, 2(1), 41-45.
  • Schön, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Sezer, R. (2008). Integration of critical thinking skills into elementary school teacher education courses in mathematics. Education, 128(3), 349-362.
  • Silvia, B., Valerio, D., & Lorenza, G., (2013). The reflective journal: A tool for enhancing experience-based learning in nursing students in clinical practice. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 3(3), 102-106.
  • Soisangwarn, A., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Promoting the reflective teacher through peer coaching to improve teaching skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2504 – 2511.
  • Tawney, W. J. & Gast, L.D. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus: Merrill.
  • Tripp, T.R., & Rich, P.J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 728-739.
  • Vidmar, D. J. (2006). Reflective peer coaching: Crafting collaborative self-assessment in teaching. Research Strategies, 20(3), 135-148.
  • Woodman R. J., & Parappilly, M. B. (2013). The effectiveness of peer review of teaching when performed between early-career academics. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 12(1), 1-14.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 1986
  • Yayıncı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dekanlığı
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Öğretmenlerin Liderlik Davranışları ile Öğrenen Özerkliğini Destekleme Davranışları Arasındaki İlişki

Aytunga OĞUZ, Yahya ALTINKURT, Kürşad YILMAZ

Kemanda Detaşe Yay Tekniği İçin Öğrenme-Öğretme Modeli Geliştirilmesi

Gülşah SEVER

Öğretmenlerin Tükenmişliğini Etkileyen Faktörler: Cinsiyetin ve Medeni Durumun Etkisine Yönelik Bir Meta-Analiz Çalışması

Nazım ÇOĞALTAY, Engin Karadağ, Suat ANAR

Yansıtma Üzerine Yansıtma: İngilizceyi Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğreten Üniversite Okutmanlarının Yansıtmalı Öğretim Uygulamaları Üzerine Algıları

Safiye İpek KURU GÖNEN, Özlem FAKAZLI

Cinsel Sağlık Eğitimi Programının 9. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Cinsel Sağlık Bilgi Düzeyleri ve Tutumlarına Etkisi

Diğdem MÜGE SİYEZ, Erol ESEN

Görme Yetersizliğinden Etkilenmiş Öğrencilerde Matematikte Çarpma İşlem Akıcılığını Arttırmada Kendini İzleme Tekniğinin Etkililiği

Mehmet Salih KÜÇÜKÖZYİĞİT, Selda ÖZDEMİR

8. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Matematik Odaklı Akademik Risk Alma Davranışlarının Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Ebru BOZPOLAT, Hacer KOÇ

Sınıf Öğretmen Adaylarının Meslek Tercih Algıları: Değişimin Boylamsal Çözümlemesi

Hülya ÇERMİK, Abdurrahman ŞAHİN, Birsen DOĞAN

PISA 2012 Matematik Başarısını Etkileyen Faktörlerin Hiyerarşik Doğrusal Model Kullanılarak İncelenmesi

Eren Halil ÖZBERK, Kübra ATALAY KABASAKAL, Nagihan BOZTUNÇ ÖZTÜRK

Öğretmenlerin Öğrenciye Yönelik Metaforlarının Belirlenmesine İlişkin Nitel Bir Araştırma

Didem KOŞAR, Serkan KOŞAR, Emre ER, Ferudun SEZGİN