Eğitim Örgütlerinde Dönüşümcü Liderlik ve Örgütsel Öğrenme Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Meta Analiz Çalışması

Bu çalışmanın amacı, eğitim ortamlarında dönüşümcü liderlik ve örgütsel öğrenme arasındaki ilişkiyi meta- analiz ile incelemektir. Ayrıca, bu ilişkide okul türü ve okul büyüklüğünün moderatör olup olmadığı araştırılmaktadır. Bu konuda, Akademik Google, YÖK (Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu), ProQuest ve ULAKBİM arama motorlarından 16 çalışmaya ulaşıldı. Öğrenen örgüt, öğrenci-öğretmen öğrenmesi, liderlik, liderlik stilleri, dönüşümsel liderlik vb. anahtar kelimelerle çalışmalar taranmıştır. Ulaşılan çalışmaların meta-analiz için gerekli ve yeterli özellikte olup olmadıklarından emin olmak için anahtar kelimelerle ulaşılan çalışmalar kontrol edilmiştir. Meta-analiz ile analiz yapmak için, yayın yanlılığı ve etki modeli açısından varsayımlar kontrol edilmiştir. Yayın yanlılığının olmadığı ve modelin rastgele etki modeli olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, dönüşümsel liderliğin örgütsel öğrenme üzerinde güçlü bir etkisi olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca, sadece okul türü değil aynı zamanda okul büyüklüğü de dönüşümsel liderlik ile eğitim kurumlarında öğrenme organizasyonu arasındaki ilişkide bir moderatör olduğu sonuçlanmıştır.

The Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Organizational Learning in Educational Organizations: A Meta-Analysis Study

This study aims to determine the relationship between transformational leadership and the learning organization feature of educational organizations through a meta-analysis. Also, it is investigated whether the relationship is a moderator in terms of school type and sample size. On this topic, 16 studies were available on the Scholar Google, YÖK (Higher Education Institution), ProQuest, and ULAKBIM search portals. The studies were scanned with such keywords as learner organization, student-teacher learning, leadership, leadership styles, transformational leadership, and so on. The studies were checked to make sure if they are necessary and sufficient features for meta-analysis. To analyze with meta-analysis, the assumptions were checked for publication bias and effect model. It was found out that there was no publication bias and the model was a random effect model. As a result, it can be said that transformational leadership has a strong impact on learning organization. Furthermore, not only school type but also sample size is a moderator in the relationship between transformational leadership and learning organization in educational organizations.

___

  • Abbasi, E., & Zamani-Miandashti, N. (2013). The role of transformational leadership, organizational culture and organizational learning in improving the performance of Iranian agricultural faculties. Higher Education, 66(4), 505-519. *
  • Alsabbagh, M., & Khalil, A. H. A. (2016). The Impact of Leadership Styles on Organizational Learning (An Empirical Study on the Education Sector in Damascus City). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(5), 197-216. *
  • Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
  • Bass, B. M. (2000). The future of leadership in learning organizations. Journal of leadership studies, 7(3), 18-40.
  • Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
  • Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8(2), 207-218.
  • Bil, E. (2018). Ortaöğretim okullarının öğrenen örgüt, örgütsel güven ve iş doyumu düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. (Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Black, P., McCormick, R., James, M., & Pedder, D. (2006). Assessment for learning and learning how to learn: A theoretical enquiry. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 119-132.
  • Blazek, K. (2015). An inspiring leadership style – google ceo larry page. Retrieved from (https://www.truscore.com/360- feedback-resources/inspiring-leadership-style-google-ceo-larry-page/).
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. United States: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
  • Branch, G. F., Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2012). Estimating the effect of leaders on public sector productivity: The case of school principals (No. w17803). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
  • Bums, J. M. (1978) Leadership. New York: Harper & Row
  • Camps, J., & Rodríguez, H. (2011). Transformational leadership, learning, and employability: Effects on performance among faculty members. Personnel Review, 40(4), 423-442. *
  • Castiglione, J. (2006). Organizational learning and transformational leadership in the library environment. Library Management, 27(4/5), 289-299.
  • Cohen, L.; Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Falmer.
  • Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375-395.
  • Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Çelik, V. (2011). Eğitimsel liderlik. (5. Baskı), Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık,
  • Demirel, Ö. (2012). Eğitimde program geliştirme: Kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara : Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Dinham, S. (2005), Principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes, Journal of Educational Administration, 43, (4), 338-356.
  • Doğan, S. (2016). Çağdaş liderlik yaklaşımları: vizyoner liderlik-dönüşümcü liderlik-işlemci liderlik.(Ed.,Nezahat Güçlü; Ed. Yard., Serkan Koşar) Eğitim yönetiminde liderlik: Teori, araştırma ve uygulama içinde, ( s.97-141). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric" trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89-98.
  • Garcia-Morales, V. J., Lopezmartin, F., & Liamassanchez, R. (2006). Strategic factors and barriers for promoting educational organizational learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 478–502.
  • Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J., Stoel, R. D., & Krüger, M. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers' professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 406-427.
  • Graham, C. M., & Muyia Nafukho, F. (2007). Culture, organizational learning and selected employee background variables in small-size business enterprises. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(2), 127-144.
  • Hallinger, P. (2010). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement?. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654-678.
  • Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142. *
  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95-110.
  • Higgins, M., Ishimaru, A., Holcombe, R., & Fowler, A. (2012). Examining organizational learning in schools: The role of psychological safety, experimentation, and leadership that reinforces learning. Journal of Educational Change, 13(1), 67-94.
  • Higgins, M., Ishimaru, A., Holcombe, R., & Fowler, A. (2012). Examining organizational learning in schools: The role of psychological safety, experimentation, and leadership that reinforces learning. Journal of Educational Change, 13(1), 67-94.*
  • Hsiao, H. C., & Chang, J. C. (2011). The role of organizational learning in transformational leadership and organizational innovation. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 621. *
  • Huffman, J. (2003). The role of shared values and vision in creating professional learning communities. Nassp Bulletin, 87(637), 21-34.
  • Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
  • Keys Sr, M. R. (2010). The relationship between transformational leadership behaviors of middle school principals, the development of learning communities, and student achievement in rural middle schools in the Mississippi Delta. (Unpublished PhD), Union University, Jackson. *
  • Kış, A. ve Necdet K. (2010). The Characteristics of a Learning School in Information Age. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2): 797-802
  • Knutson, K. A., Miranda, A. O., & Washell, C. (2005). The connection between school culture and leadership social interest in learning organizations. Journal of Individual Psychology, 61(1). *
  • Kofman, F., & Senge, P. M. (1993). Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 5-23.
  • Korkmaz, M. (2008). Okul müdürlerinin liderlik stilleri ile öğrenen örgüt özellikleri arasındaki ilişki üzerine nicel bir araştırma. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 14(1), 75-98. *
  • Kurland, H., Peretz, H., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2010). Leadership style and organizational learning: The mediate effect of school vision. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(1), 7-30. *
  • Lam, Y. J. (2002). Defining the effects of transformational leadership on organisational learning: A cross-cultural comparison. School Leadership & Management, 22(4), 439-452. *
  • Leithwood, K., & Menzies, T. (1998). Forms and effects of school-based management: A review. Educational policy, 12(3), 325- 346.
  • Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Oxford University Press.
  • Lousã, E. P., & Mónico, L. D. S. M. (2018). How can leadership and organizational culture predict innovation in small, medium and large enterprises?, The Journal of Organizational Management Studies,1-15. Article ID 703891, DOI: 10.5171/2018.703891
  • Lu, Y. P. (2010). The relationship between leaders' behaviors & organizational learning actions (Doctoral dissertation), Marian University, Indianapolis. *
  • Miller, R. J., Goddard, R. D., Kim, M., Jacob, R., Goddard, Y., & Schroeder, P. (2016). Can professional development improve school leadership? Results from a randomized control trial assessing the impact of McREL’s balanced leadership program on principals in rural Michigan schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(4), 531-566.
  • Murphy, J. F., & Louis, K. S. (2018). Positive school leadership: Building capacity and strengthening relationships. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Nordin, N. (2011). The influence of emotional intelligence, leadership behaviour and organizational commitment on organizational readiness for change in higher learning institution. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 129-138. *
  • Özdemir, S., Karadağ, N., & Kilinç, A. Ç. (2013). Öğrenen örgütlerde liderlik: Okul müdürleri üzerine nitel bir araştırma. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 17-34.
  • Özden, Y. (2013). Eğitimde Yeni Değerler. 9. Baskı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Pedder, D., & MacBeath, J. (2008). Organisational learning approaches to school leadership and management: teachers' values and perceptions of practice. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(2), 207-224. *
  • Rijal, S. (2010). Leadership style and organizational culture in learning organization: a comparative study. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (Online), 14(5), 119-127.
  • Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.
  • Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values: The mediating effects of collective teacher efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 179-199. *
  • Ruiz Moreno, A., García Morales, V., & Lloréns Montes, F. J. (2005). Learning during the quality management process: antecedents and effects in service firms. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(8), 1001-1021.
  • Schulze, R. (2004). Meta-analysis-A comparison of approaches. MA: Hogrefe Publishing.
  • Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Doubleday.
  • Senge, P. (2011). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York, NY: Doubleday
  • Senge, P. M. (1993). Transforming the practice of management. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 4(1), 5-32.
  • Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn. New York, NY: Doubleday
  • Serrat, O. (2017). Building a learning organization. In Knowledge solutions (pp. 57-67). Singapore: Springer
  • Silins, H. C., Mulford, W. R., & Zarins, S. (2002). Organizational learning and school change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 613-642. *
  • Silins, H. Zarins, S., & Mulford, W. (2002) What characteristics and processes define a school as a learning organisation ? Is this a useful concept to apply to schools’ (online) International Education Journal, 3 (1), 24, 32
  • Stierlin, H. (2010). Sinnsuche im Wandel. Herausforderungen für die Psychotherapie. Eine persönliche Bilanz. Heidelberg (Carl- Auer).
  • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221-258.
  • Şimsek H.(2013). Transformational leadership in educational context: A fantasy of education scholars. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 51, 1-6.
  • Ünal, A. (2006). İlköğretim denetçilerinin öğrenen organizasyon açısından değerlendirilmesi (Doktora Tezi), Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya.
  • Üstün, A., & Menteşe, S. (2012). Teachers' Views on What Extent the Primary Schools Have the Characteristics of Learning Organizations and on Blocks. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 78-98.
  • Tekin, H. (2002). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. Ankara: Yargı Yayıncılık
  • Voulalas, Z. D., & Sharpe, F. G. (2005). Creating schools as learning communities: Obstacles and processes. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(2), 187-208.
  • Waters, T., Marzano, R., & McNulty, B. (2003). What 30 Years of Research Tells Us About the Effect of Leadership on Student Achievement. Denver, CO: Midcontinent Research for Education and Learning (McREL).
  • Yasir Ali, R., & Ameer, S. (2016). The Impact of Organizational Learning on Firm’s Perceived Financial Performance: Taking the Role of Leadership as Moderator. Düsseldorf:: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishers.
  • Yumuşak, S., & Yıldız, H. (2011). Eğitim örgütleri öğrenen organizasyon özellikleri göstermekte midir? Kamu ve özel ilköğretim okullarının Balıkesir ili örneğinde karşılaştırmalı bir analizi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 2(4), 159-177.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Başlangıç: 1986
  • Yayıncı: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dekanlığı
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Öğretimde Bilinçli Farkındalık Ölçeği Türkçe Uyarlama Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Ahmet GENÇ, Özgür DEMİRCİ SEYREK, Cüneyd AYDIN

Bilimin Doğasına Yönelik Görüşlerde Öğrenci Özelliklerinin Rolü

Ebru EBREN KUYUMCU, Semra SUNGUR

Türkiye’de Tek Ebeveynli “Geniş” Ailelerde Yaşayan Çocukların Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rollerine İlişkin Tutumlarının İncelenmesi

Esma EROĞLU, Yaşare AKTAŞ ARNAS, Seval ÖRDEK İNCEOĞLU

Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Konu Odaklı Dünya Görüşlerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Ölçme Aracı Geliştirme

Pelin ERTEKİN, Gamze AKKAYA, Mustafa Serdar KÖKSAL

Öğretim Elemanlarının Çevreye Karşı Tutumları: Bir Q Metot Çalışması

Eda ERDAŞ KARTAL, Günkut MESCİ

Hayat Bilgisi Dersi Öğretim Programında Yer Alan Duyuşsal Alan Kazanımlarının Taksonomik Açıdan İncelenmesi

Esra MUTLU, Büşra Betül ALTUNBAŞ, Simge KAMBUR

Öğrenme Güçlüğüne Sahip ve İşitme Engelli Öğrencilerin Açı Kavrayışları

Dilşad GÜVEN AKDENİZ, Nejla GÜREFE, Ahmet ARIKAN

Özel Yetenekli Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Eğitiminde FeTeMM Yaklaşımına Dayalı Bir Öğretim Tasarımının Öğretim Sürecine Etkileri

Leyla AYVERDİ, Serap ÖZ AYDIN

Eğitim Örgütlerinde Dönüşümcü Liderlik ve Örgütsel Öğrenme Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Meta Analiz Çalışması

Fatma KÖYBAŞI ŞEMİN

Sanat Temelli Bir Araştırma Yöntemi: Yaşayan Sorgulama Olarak A/r/tograf

Nurhayat GÜNEŞ, Şeniz AKSOY, Vedat ÖZSOY