___

• Airasian, P. W. & Walsh, M. E. (1997). Cautions for classroom constructivists. Education Digest, 62 (8), 62-69. Retrieved November 26, 1999 from EBSCOHOST database.
• Bonnstetter, R. J. (1998). A constructivist approach to science teacher preparation. A draft concept paper. Retrieved December 9, 1999, from http://tc.unl.edu./rbonstetter/constru.html
• Brooks, M., & Brooks, J. (1993). In search for understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
• Cochran, K.F., DeRuiter, J. A. & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272.
• Firestone, W. A. & Herriott, R. E. (1982). Prescriptions for effective elementary schools don’t fit secondary schools.Educational Leadership, 4(2), 51-53.
• Fisher, D., Taylor, P. & Fraser, B. (1996). Using a questionnaire to monitor social constructivist reform in university teaching. Retrieved June 17, 2001 from http://www.curtin/edu.au/learn /QualityReports /5.html
• Hassard, J. (1999). Students’ experience in constructivist learning environments: An inquiry into teems...a science teacher education program. Paper presented at the 6th Nordic Research Conference on Science Education. Joensuu, Finland.Retrieved December 9, 1999 from http://www.gsu.edu.webfs01/mst/mstjr/public_html/teemsfinland.html
• Hendry, G. D. (1996). Constructivism and educational practice. Australian Journal of Education, 40(1), 19-45.
• Herr, N .E. (1992). A comparative analysis of the perceived influence of advanced placement and honors programs upon science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(5), 521-532.
• Murphy, E. (2000). Strangers in a strange land: Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning French as a second or foreign language in on-line learning environment. Retrieved July 1, 2004 from http://www.nald.ca/fulltext/ stranger/cover.htm
• Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M. & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(4), 280-312.
• Raudenbush, S. W., Rowan, B. & Cheong, Y. F. (1993). Higher order instructional goals in secondary schools: Class, teacher and school influences. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 523-553.
• Richardson, V. (Ed.) (1997). Constructivist teacher education: Building a world of new understandings. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
• Skrinda, A. (2004) The challenge of language teaching: Shifts of paradigms. Retrieved July 1, 2004 from http://www.lhsse/atee/proceedings/Skrinda.RDC_8.doc
• Smerdon, B., Burkam, D. T. & Lee, V. E. (1999). Access to constructivist and didactic teaching: Who gets it? Where is it practiced? Teachers College Record, 101 (1), 5-34.
• Taylor, P. C. (1995). UCLES: A questionnaire for evaluating portfolio cultures in postgraduate teaching. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Teaching Learning Forum. Retrieved July 1, 2004, from http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/asu/pubs/tlf/ tlf95/taylo252.html
• Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31 (5), 357-442.
• Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Yüksek Ögretim Kurulu Baskanlıgı (1998). Egitim fakülteleri ögretmen yetistirme programlarının yeniden düzenlenmesi. Ankara: YÖK Yayınevi.
• Wilson, B. G. (Ed.). (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs:Educational Technology Pub. Inc.
• Wilson, B. G. (1997). Reflections on constructivism and instructional design. Retrieved November 21, 1999 from http://www.cudenver.edu/~bwilson/construct.html