İmalat İşletmelerinin Sürdürülebilir Süreç İnovasyon Performansının Ölçümü için Ölçek Geliştirme

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, imalat işletmelerinin sürdürülebilir süreç inovasyon performanslarının ölçülebilmesi için bir ölçek geliştirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Yöntem: Literatür tabanlı oluşturulan 17 maddelik ölçüm modeli üzerinde, web tabanlı anket yöntemi ile imalat işletmelerinden elde edilen toplamda 291 geçerli veri kullanılarak, açıklayıcı faktör analizi ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular: Analizler sonucunda, imalat işletmelerinin sürdürülebilir süreç inovasyon performansının ölçülmesinde kullanılacak 15 maddeden oluşan bir ölçüm modeli ortaya çıkmıştır. Sonuç ve Öneriler: Elde edilen 15 maddelik ölçek, sürdürülebilir süreç inovasyon performansını ölçmek isteyen imalat işletmelerinin ve bu alanda araştırma yapacak olan araştırmacıların kullanımına sunulmuştur. Özgün Değer: Literatürde daha önce imalat işletmelerinde sürdürülebilir süreç inovasyon performansını ölçmek için yapılmış bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması bulunmamaktadır. Bu çalışma ile bu alandaki boşluk doldurulmaya çalışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Sürdürülebilir Süreç İnovasyonu, Ölçek Geliştirme, Ölçüm Modeli, AFA, DFA

Scale Development for Measurement of Sustainable Process Innovation Performance of Manufacturing Enterprises

Purpose: In this study, it is aimed a scale development to measure sustainable process innovation performances of manufacturing enterprises. Methodology: In the 17-item measurement model created based on the literature, explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted by using a total of 291 valid data obtained from the manufacturing enterprises via a web-based survey. Findings: As a result of the analyses, a measurement model consisting of 15 items has emerged to use in measuring sustainable process innovation performance of manufacturing enterprises. Practical Implications: The 15-item measurement scale obtained was introduced to use of manufacturing enterprises which want to measure sustainable process innovation performance and investigators who will conduct research in this field. Originality: In the literature, there has not been any scale development study previously to measure sustainable process innovation performance of manufacturing enterprises. Hence, it is tried to fill the gap in this area via this study.

Keywords:

Sustainable Process Innovation, Scale Development, Measurement Model, EFA, CFA,

PDF

___

Ar, I.M. (2012), “The impact of green product innovation on firm performance and competitive capability: the moderating role of managerial environmental concern”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 854-864.
Arundel, A., René Kemp (2009), “Measuring eco-innovation”, Maastricht, The Netherlands: UNI-MERIT Research Memorandum.
Basso, L.F.C., David Ferreira Lopes Santos, Herbert Kimura, Ana Carolina Simões Braga (2013), “Eco-Innovation in Brazil. The Creation of an Index”, The Business & Management Review, 4(1), 2-17.
Cai, W., Guangpei Li (2018), “The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Evidence from China”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 110-118.
Calik, E., Fazleena Badurdeen (2016), “A measurement scale to evaluate sustainable innovation performance in manufacturing organizations”, Procedia CIRP, 40, 449-454.
Calik, E., Fethi Calisir (2019), “The mediating effect of the innovation process on the relationships among innovation components: an empirical study on Turkish companies”, International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 19(1), 72-88.
Chen, Y.-S., Shyh-Bao Lai, Chao-Tung Wen (2006), “The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan”, Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339.
Chen, Y.-S. (2008), “The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image: Green Core Competence”, Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531-543.
Cheng, C.C., Eric Shiu (2012), “Validation of a proposed instrument for measuring eco-innovation: An implementation perspective”, Technovation, 32(6), 329–344.
Delmas, M.A., Sanja Pekovic (2018), “Corporate Sustainable Innovation and Employee Behavior”, Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1071–1088.
De Marchi, V. (2012), “Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms”, Research Policy, 41(3), 614–623. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002
De Medeiros, J.F., Jose Luis Duarte Ribeiro, Marcelo Nogueira Cortimiglia (2014), “Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: a systematic literature review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 76–86. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.035
García-Granero, E.M., Laura Piedra-Muñoz, Emilio Galdeano-Gómez (2018), “Eco-innovation measurement: A review of firm performance indicators”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 304-317.
Gaskin, J. (2012), Validity master, Stats Tools Package. http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com. (Erişim:22.10.2019).
Hair, Joseph, William Black, Barry Babin, Rolph Anderson (2014), Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed., New Jersey: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
Ketata, I., Wolfgang Sofka, Christoph Grimpe (2015), “The role of internal capabilities and firms’ environment for sustainable innovation: evidence for Germany”, R&D Management, 45(1), 60–75.
Klewitz, J., Erik Hansen, (2014), “Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017
Kline, Rex (2016), Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th ed.,New York: The Guilford Press.
Leal-Rodríguez, A.L., Antonio Ariza-Montes, Emilio Morales-Fernández, Gema Albort-Morant (2018), “Green innovation, indeed a cornerstone in linking market requests and business performance. Evidence from the Spanish automotive components industry”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 129, 185-193.
Liao, Z. (2016), “Temporal cognition, environmental innovation, and the competitive advantage of enterprises”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1045-1053.
Lopez-Valeiras, E., Jacobo Gomez-Conde, David Naranjo-Gil (2015), “Sustainable Innovation, Management Accounting and Control Systems, and International Performance”, Sustainability, 7(3), 3479–3492.
Ma, Y., Guisheng Hou, Baogui Xin (2017), “Green Process Innovation and Innovation Benefit: The Mediating Effect of Firm Image”, Sustainability, 9, 1778.
OECD ve Eurostat (2005), Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd Edition, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Paris: OECD.
Raykov, Tenko ve George Marcoulides (2008), An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis, New York: Routledge.
Schiederig, T., Frank Tietze, Cornelius Herstatt (2011), “What is green Innovation? A quantitative literature review”, Working Paper, No. 63, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Hamburg: Institute for Technology and Innovation Management (TIM).
Singh, M.P., Arpita Chakraborty, Mousumi Roy (2016), “The link among innovation drivers, green innovation and business performance: empirical evidence from a developing economy”, World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 12(4), 316-334.
Tumelero, C., Roberto Sbragia, Steve Evans (2019), “Cooperation in R & D and eco-innovations: The role in companies’ socioeconomic performance”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 1138–1149.
Varadarajan, R. (2017), “Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 14-36.
Worthington, R.L., Tiffany Whittaker (2006), “Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices”, The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838.
Wu, G.-C. (2017), “Effects of Socially Responsible Supplier Development and Sustainability-Oriented Innovation on Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence from SMEs”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), 661–675.
Zhang, Y., Jun Sun, Zhaojun Yang, Shurong Li (2018), “Organizational Learning and Green Innovation: Does Environmental Proactivity Matter?”, Sustainability, 10(10), 3737.