FARKLI PEYNİR ÇEŞİTLERİNİN YAŞAM DÖNGÜSÜ ANALİZİ

Nüfus artışı, teknolojik gelişmeler ve ormanların azalması, dünyada hem ekolojik hem sağlıkla ilgili olumsuz sonuçlara yol açmaktadır. Tarım-gıda sanayii tüm dünyadaki sera gazı emisyonlarının üçte birinden sorumludur. Bu nedenle, gıda ürünlerinin çevresel etkilerinin incelenerek üretimin daha sürdürülebilir hale getirilmesi oldukça önemlidir. Süt sektöründe hem dünya genelinde hem de ülkemizde peynir üretim hacminin oldukça fazla olması, süt endüstrisindeki sürdürülebilirliğin peynir üretimi üzerinden değerlendirilebilmesinin önemini vurgulamaktadır. Yaşam Döngüsü Analizi (YDA), ürünlerin ve süreçlerin çevresel etkilerini inceleyen, küresel olarak kabul edilen, ISO tarafından standartlaştırılmış bir yöntemdir. Bu derleme çalışmasında, dünyada üretilen farklı peynir çeşitlerinin çevresel etkilerinin YDA ile incelendiği çalışmalar detaylı olarak incelenmiştir. Çiğ süt üretimi, başta küresel ısınma potansiyeli olmak üzere pek çok çevresel etki kategorisinden sorumlu olarak ilk sırada yer alırken; arkasından enerji tüketiminin geldiğini ve ambalajlama, nakliye ve tüketici kullanımı gibi basamakların çoğunlukla minimum düzeyde katkısı olduğunu söylemek mümkündür. Ayrıca, peynir üretiminin çevresel etkilerinin azaltılması için çeşitli öneriler sunulmuştur.

LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS CHEESE TYPES

Overpopulation, technological developments and deforestation have ecological and health consequences for the world. The agro-food industry is responsible for one-third of the global greenhouse gas emissions. So, it is crucial to make this industry more sustainable by examining the environmental effects related to food products. The fact that cheese production volume is high in the dairy industry, emphasizes the importance of evaluating the sustainability of cheese production in the dairy industry. Life Cycle Analysis (LCA), a globally accepted and ISO standardized method, examines the environmental impact of products and processes. In this study, studies which evaluated the environmental effects of cheese production in the world by LCA were reviewed. This study reveals that raw milk production has the greatest impact in many impact categories and is followed next by energy consumption. Packaging, transportation and consumer use stages primarily affect the impact categories minimally. In addition, suggestions to reduce environmental impacts of cheese production have been presented

___

  • Alagöz, M. (2004). Sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın paradigması. Selçuk Üniversitesi İİBF Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar, 4, 1-23.
  • Alves, E. C., Soares, B. B., Neto, J. A. de A., & Rodrigues, L. B. (2019). Strategies for reducing environmental impacts of organic mozzarella cheese production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 226–237.
  • Bava, L., Bacenetti, J., Gislon, G., Pellegrino, L., D’Incecco, P., Sandrucci, A., Zucali, M. (2018). Impact assessment of traditional food manufacturing: The case of Grana Padano cheese. Science of the Total Environment, 626, 1200–1209. Berlese, M., Corazzin, M., Bovolenta, S. (2019). Environmental sustainability assessment of buffalo mozzarella cheese production chain: A scenario analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238.
  • Berlin, J. (2002). Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of Swedish semi-hard cheese. International Dairy Journal, 12, 939–953.
  • Berlin, J., Sonesson, U., Tillman, A.M. (2008). Product Chain Actors’ Potential for Greening the Product Life Cycle: The Case of the Swedish Postfarm Milk Chain. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(1), 95-110.
  • Berton, M., Bovolenta, S., Corazzin, M., Gallo, L., Pinterits, S., Ramanzin, M., Ressi, W., Spigarelli, C., Zuliani, A., Sturaro, E. (2021). Environmental impacts of milk productionand processing in the Eastern Alps: A “cradle-to-dairy gate” LCA approcah. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 127056.
  • Biron, M. (2016). Material selection for thermoplastic parts. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 603-653.
  • Broekema, R., Kramer, G. (2014). LCA of Dutch semi-skimmed milk and semi-mature cheese. Blonk Consultants. The Netherlands.
  • Borghesi, G., Stefanini, R., Vignali, G. (2022) Life cycle assessment of packaged organic dairy product: A comparison of different methods for the environmental assessment of alternative scenarios. Journal of Food Engineering, 318, 110902.
  • Cabral, C. F. S., Veiga, L. B. E., Araujo, M. G., Souza, S. L. Q. (2020). Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of goat cheese production in Brazil: a path towards sustainability. Food Science and Technology, 129, 109550.
  • Canellada, F., Laca, A., Laca, A., Diaz, M. (2018). Environmental impact of cheese production: A case study of a small-scale factory in southern Europe and global overview of carbon footprint. Science of the Total Environment, 635, 167–177.
  • Celozzi, S., Mattiello, S., Battini, M., Bailo, G., Bava, L., Tamburini, A., Valsecchi, I., Zucali, M. (2020). Valutazione della sostenibilità ambientale della produzione di latte e formaggio caprino mediante approccio LCA. Large Animal Review, 26, 293-298.
  • Dairy Australia. (2015). Australia dairy industry in focus 2015. Southbank: Dairy Australia Limited.
  • Djekic, I., Miocinovic, J., Tomasevic, I., Smigic, N., Tomic, N. (2014). Environmental life-cycle assessment of various dairy products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 68, 64–72.
  • Doublet, G., Jungbluth, N., Stucki, M., Schori, S. (2013). Life cycle assessment of Romanian beef and dairy products. Sense Project Number 288974.
  • FAO, OECD. (2020). Dairy and dairy products. OECD-FAO AGRICULTURAL OUTLOOK 2020-2029.
  • Famiglietti, J., Guerci, M., Proserpio, C., Ravaglia, P., Motta, M. (2019). Development and testing of the Product Environmental Footprint Milk Tool: A comprehensive LCA tool for dairy products. Science of the Total Environment, 648, 1614–1626.
  • FAO. (2010). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Dairy Sector: A Life Cycle Assessment.
  • Finnegan, W., Goggins, J., Clifford, E., Zhan, X. (2017). Global warming potential associated with dairy products in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, 262–273.
  • Finnegan, W., Goggins, J., Zhan, X. (2018a). Assessing the environmental of the dairy processing industry in the Republic of Ireland.
  • Finnegan, W., Yan, M., Holden, N. M., Goggins, J. (2018b). A review of environmental life cycle assessment studies examining cheese production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23, 1773–1787.
  • Flysjö, A., Thrane, M., Hermansen, J. E. (2014). Method to assess the carbon footprint at product level in the dairy industry. International Dairy Journal, 34, 86–92.
  • Forleo, M. B., Palmieri, N., Salimei, E. (2018). The eco-efficiency of the dairy cheese chain: an Italian case study. Italian Jornal of Food Science, 30, 362–380.
  • Fornasari, L. (2013). Developing a model for the life cycle assessment of the Parmigiano, Reggiano cheese. Progress In Nutrition, 15, 184–193.
  • Garcia, S. G., Castanheira, E. G., Dias, A. C., Arroja, L. (2013a). Environmental performance of a Portuguese mature cheese-making dairy mill. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 65–73.
  • Garcia, S. G., Hospido, A., Moreira, M. T. (2013b). Environmental life cycle assessment of a Galician cheese: San Simon da Costa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 253–262.
  • Gosalvitr, P., Cuellar-Franca, R., Smith, R., Azapagic, A. (2019). Energy demand and carbon footprint of cheddar cheese with energy recovery from cheese whey. Energy Procedia, 161, 10–16.
  • Gosalvitr, P., Cuellar-Franca, R. M., Smith, R., Azapagic, A. (2021). Integrating process modelling and sustainability assessment to improve the environmental and economic sustainability in the cheese industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 969-986.
  • Hospido, A., Moreira, M. T., Feijoo, G. (2003). Simplified life cycle assessment of Galician milk production. International Dairy Journal, 13, 783-796.
  • ISO. (2006a). ISO 14040: Environmental management––Life cycle assessment–– Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • ISO. (2006b). ISO 14044: Environmental management––Life cycle assessment, life cycle impact assessment. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • ISO. (2014). ISO 14046: Environmental Management – Water Footprint – Principles, Requirements and Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Kaypak, Ş. (2013). Ekolojik ayak izinden çevre barışına bakmak. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi, 6(1), 154-159.
  • Kim, D., Thoma, G., Nutter, D., Milani, F., Ulrich, R., Norris, G. (2013). Life cycle assessment of cheese and whey production in the USA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 1019–1035.
  • Kim, D., Thoma, G., Ulrich, R., Nutter, D., Milani, F. (2014). Life Cycle Assessment of Cheese Manufacturing in the United States. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector, 634-640.
  • Kumar, M., Choubey, V. K., Deepak, A., Gedam, V. V., Raut, R. D. (2021). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of dairy processing industry: A case study of North India. Trends In Food Science&Technology, 118, 207-229.
  • Kristensen, T., Soegaard, K., Eriksen, J., Mogensen, L. (2015). Carbon footprint of cheese produced on milk from Holstein and Jersey cows fed hay differing in herb content. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 229-237.
  • Laca, A., Gomez, N., Laca, A., Diaz, M. (2020). Overview on GHG emissions of raw milk production and a comparison of milk and cheese carbon footprints of two different systems from northern Spain. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27:1650-1666.
  • Lovarelli, D., Bava, L., Zucali, M., D’Imporzano, G., Adani, F., Tamburini, A. Sandrucci, A. (2019). Improvements to dairy farms for environmental sustainability in Grana Padano and Parmigiano Reggiano production systems. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 18:1, 1035-1048.
  • Middelaar, C. E. van, Berentsen, P. B. M., Dolman, M. A., Boer, I. J. M. de. (2011). Eco-efficiency in the production chain of Dutch semi-hard cheese. Livestock Science, 139, 91–99.
  • Milani, F. X., Nutter, D., Thoma, G. (2011). Invited review: Environmental impacts of dairy processing and products: A review. American Dairy Science Association, 94, 4243–4254.
  • Mittal, I., Gupta, R. K. (2015). Natural Resources Depletion and Economic Growth in Present Era. SOCH- Mastnath Journal of Science & Technology, 10:3.
  • Mondello, G., Salomone, R., Neri, E., Patrizi, N., Bastianoni, S., Lanuzza, F. (2018). Environmental hot-spots and improvement scenarios for Tuscan “Pecorino” cheese using life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 810–820.
  • Mottet A, de Haan C, Falcucci A, Tempio G, Opio C, Gerber P. (2017). Livestock: on our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Global Food Security, 14, 1-8.
  • Munir, M. T., Yu, W., Young, B. (2014). Can exergy be a useful tool for the dairy industry?. Proceedings of the 24th European symposium on computer aided chemical engineering, 24(33), 1129-1134.
  • Muthu, S. S. (2014). Assessing the environmental impact of textiles and the clothing supply chain. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Woodhead Publishing, 105-131.
  • Nigri, E. M., Barros, A. C. de, Rocha, S. D. F., Filho, E. R. (2014). Assessing environmental impacts using a comparative LCA of industrial and artisanal production processes: “Minas Cheese” case. Food Science and Technology, 34(3), 522–531.
  • Nunes, O. S., Gaspar, P. D., Nunes, J., Quinteiro, P., Dias, A.C., Godina, R. (2020). Life-Cycle Assessment of Dairy-Products- Case Study of Regional Cheese Produced in Portugal. Processes, 8, 1182.
  • Osojnik Crnivec, I. G., Marinsek-Logar, R. (2009). Identification of Environmental impact hotspots in traditional food production lines. Acta Argiculturae Slovenica, 94(1), 39–46.
  • Oulu, M. (2015). The unequal exchange of Dutch cheese and Kenyan roses: Introducing and testing an LCA-based methodology for estimating ecologically unequal exchange. Ecological Economics, 119, 372–383.
  • Palmieri, N., Forleo, M. B., Salimei, E. (2017). Environmental impacts of a dairy cheese chain including whey feeding: An Italian case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 881–889.
  • Pollaro, N., Santagata, R., Ulgiati, S. (2020). Sustainability evaluation of sheep and goat rearing in Southern Italy. A life cycle cost/benefit assessment. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 8(3), 229-241.
  • Reijnders, L., Soret, S. (2003). Quantification of the environmental impact of different dietary protein choices. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78 (suppl), 664S-8S.
  • Riva, A. D., Burek, J., Kim, D., Thoma, G., Cassandro, M., Marchi, M. D. (2017). Environmental life cycle assesment of Italian Mozzarella cheese: Hotspots and improvement opportunities. American Dairy Science Association, 100, 7933–7952.
  • Riva, A. D., Burek, J., Kim, D., Thoma, G., Cassandro, M., Marchi, M. D. (2018). The environmental analysis of asiago PDO cheese: a case study from farm gate-to-plant gate. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 17:1, 250-262.
  • Sanjuan, N., Ribal, J., Clemente, G., Fenollosa, M. L. (2011). Measuring and improving eco-efficiency using data envelopment analysis: A case study of Mahon-Menorca cheese. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15, 614–628.
  • Santos Jr., H. C. M., Maranduba, H. L., Neto, J. A. de A., Rodrigues, L. B. (2017). Life cycle assessment of cheese production process in a small-sized dairy industry in Brazil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 3470–3482.
  • Tarighaleslami, A. H., Ghannadzadeh, A., Atkins, M. J. (2020). Environmental life cycle assesment for a cheese production plant towards sustainable energy transition: Natural gas to biomass vs. natural gas to geothermal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122999.
  • Terin, M. (2014). Dünya Süt ve Süt Ürünleri Üretim, Tüketim, Fiyat ve Ticaretindeki Gelişmeler. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(3), 53-63.
  • Ulusal Süt Konseyi. (2021). Dünya ve Türkiye’de süt sektör istatistikleri: 2020 süt raporu.
  • Uysal, İ. G. (2021). İzmir tulum peyniri üretiminde Yaşam Döngüsü Analizi ile çevresel etkilerin sürdürülebilirlik kapsamında incelenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitiüsü, 87 s.
  • Üçtuğ, F. G., Atluğkoyun, A. İ., İnaltekin, M. (2019). Environmental life cycle assessment of yoghurt supply to consumer in Turkey. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 215, 1103–1111.
  • Üçtuğ, F. G. (2019). The environmental life cycle assessment of dairy products. Food Engineering Reviews, 11, 104–121.
  • Vagnoni, E., Franca, A., Porqueddu, C., Duce, P. (2017). Environmental profile of Sardinian sheep milk cheese supply chain: A comparison between two contrasting dairy systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 1078–1089.
  • Vargas, C. S., Perez, L. B., Ortiz, V. E. E., Garcia, C. G. M. (2021). Environmental impact of Oaxaca cheese production and wastewater from artisanal dairies under two scenarios in Aculco, State of Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 127586.
  • Verduna, T., Blanc, S., Merlino, V. M,, Cornale, P., Battaglini, L. M. (2020). Sustainability of Four Dairy Farming Scenarios in an Alpine Environment: The Case Study of Toma di Lanzo Cheese. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7:569167.
  • Verge, X. P. C., Maxime, D., Dyer, J. A., Desjardins, R. L., Arcand, Y., Vanderzaag, A. (2013). Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: Calculations and issues. American Dairy Science Association, 96, 6091–6104.
  • Villegas, H. A. A., Kraatz, S., Reinemann, D. J. (2012). Life cycle impact assessment and allocation methods development for cheese and whey processing. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 55(2), 613-627.
  • Westenhöfer, J. (2013). Energy density and cost of foods in Germany. Ernaehrungs Umschau International. 60(3):30–35.
  • Wiedmann, T., Minx, J. (2008). Chapter 1: A Definition of 'Carbon Footprint'. Ecological Economics Research Trends. Editör: Pertsova C. C., Hauppauge, NY, USA.: Nova Science Publishers.
Gıda-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-3070
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1976
  • Yayıncı: Prof. Dr. İbrahim ÇAKIR
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

İNSAN SAĞLIĞI İÇİN RİSK FAKTÖRLERİ OLARAK İÇME SULARINDA ALÜMİNYUM VE FLOR

Fatma Özsel ARAÇ, Ozan ALDEMİR

LAURİK ASİT OLEOJELLERİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ VE KARAKTERİZE EDİLMESİ

Eda KESKİN USLU, Emin YILMAZ

TÜKETİCİLERİN KANATLI ETİ TÜKETİM ALIŞKANLIKLARINI VE ALGISINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN VE KANATLI HAYVAN YETİŞTİRME SÜREÇLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Güliz HASKARACA, Yusuf ARSLAN, Zehra AYHAN

ET VE ET ÜRÜNLERİNDE POLİSİKLİK AROMATİK HİDROKARBONLARIN OLUŞUM MEKANİZMALARI VE AZALTICI YAKLAŞIMLAR

Betül KARSLIOĞLU

FARKLI PEYNİR ÇEŞİTLERİNİN YAŞAM DÖNGÜSÜ ANALİZİ

İpek Gülçin UYSAL, Neslihan ÇOLAK GÜNEŞ, Nurcan KOCA

RASFF BİLDİRİMLERİNİN ANALİZİ: 2021 YILI GIDA VE GIDA İLE TEMAS EDEN MADDE VERİLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Nil IRMAK, Kübra YILMAZ, Derya DENİZ ŞİRİNYILDIZ, Aslı YORULMAZ

KARABUĞDAY NİŞASTASI-MİRİSTİK ASİT KOMPLEKS OLUŞUMU: REAKSİYON SICAKLIĞI VE MİRİSTİK ASİT KONSANTRASYONUNUN SİNDİRİLEBİLİRLİK ÖZELLİKLERİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Betül OSKAYBAS, Ayşe ÖZBEY, Levent Yurdaer AYDEMİR, Kevser KAHRAMAN

ÇEŞİTLİ ET VE ET OLMAYAN BİLEŞENLERLE FORMÜLE EDİLEN ENDÜSTRİYEL KEMİK SULARININ KARAKTERİZASYONU

Muge URGU OZTURK, Burcu ÖZTÜRK KERİMOĞLU

FARKLI KONSANTRASYONLARDA SİYAH SARIMSAK KULLANILARAK ÜRETİLEN PASTIRMA ÇEMEN MACUNUNUN FİZİKOKİMYASAL, ANTİOKSİDAN, TEKSTÜREL VE DUYUSAL ÖZELLİKLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Emre TURAN, Atilla ŞİMŞEK

KURKUMİN TABANLI BİYOPOLİMER FİLMLERİN GÖRÜNÜR IŞIK ALTINDA GELİŞTİRİLMESİ

İdil KİT, Leyla Nesrin KAHYAOĞLU