Effect of pressurized carbon dioxide on the quality criteria of ayran

Bu çalışmada basınçlı karbondioksit gazı enjeksiyonunun Ayran'ın kimyasal, mikrobiyolojik ve duyusal kalite kriterleri üzerine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Üretilen Ayran, şişelere doldurulduktan sonra dört gruba ayrılmış ve her bir gruba pilot bir enjeksiyon sistemi yardımıyla 1 dakika sureyle sırasıyla 0 (control), 0,5 (A5), 1.0 (A10) ve 1,5 (A15) MPa basınç altında CO2 gazı enjekte edilmiştir. Ayran örnekleri daha sonra +5°C de 7 gün süreyle depolanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar basınçlı CO2 ilavesinin Ayranların genel bileşimleri üzerinde bir etkisi olmadığı; ancak, A5 ve A10 nolu örneklerinin serum ayrılmasının kontrol ve A15 nolu örneklerle kıyaslandığında serum ayrılmasını azalttığını göstermiştir. Artan CO2 konsantrasyonu depolama sonunda Streptococcus thermophilus'un sayısını önemli derecede azalttıığı (P < 0.05), Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus sayısını ise değişmediği gözlenmiştir. Duyusal özellikler açısından, CO2 ilave edilmiş Ayran örnekleri kontrole nazaran daha düşük puanlar almıştır (P

Basınçlı karbondioksit uygulamasının ayranın kalite kriterleri üzerine etkisi

The effect of pressurized carbon dioxide (CO2) on the chemical, microbiological and sensory properties of Ayran was investigated. Bulk Ayran was filled into bottles, injected prior to capping with pressurized CO2 by a pilot injection system at 0.5 (A5), 1.0 (A10) and 1.5 (A15) MPa for one min, respectively, and kept at 5°C for seven days. Results indicated that the CO2 concentration had no significant effect on the gross composition; however, serum separation was less in A5 and A10 on day 7 than in control and A15 (P < 0,05). The number of Streptococcus thermophilus decreased significantly with increasing CO2 concentrations at the end of the storage (P

___

  • 1. Tan S, Erturk YE. 2001. Situation on milk and dairy products in Turkey. Gıda 2000, 17: 17-27.
  • 2. State Institute of Statistics. 2005. Manufacturing Industry (Quarterly)-Employment, Payments, Production and Tendencies. State Institute of Statistics, Prime Ministry, Ankara.
  • 3. Emerson R, Dwyer JT. 2000. Is furit juice a 'no-no' in children diets? Nutr. Rev., 58: 180-183
  • 4. Zandstra EH, Stubenitsky, De Graaf G, Mela DJ. 2002. Effects of learned flavour cues on short-term regulation of food intake in a realistic setting. Physiol. Behav., 75: 83-90
  • 5. Mckinley MC. 2005. The nutrition and health benefits of yoghurt. Int. J. Dairy Technol., 58:1-12.
  • 6. Driessen FM, Kingma F, Stadhouders J. 1982. Evidence that Lactobacillus bulgaricus in yogurt is stimulated carbon dioxide produced by Streptecoccus thermophilus. Neth. Milk Dairy J., 36:134-144.
  • 7. Tinson W, Broome MC, Hillier AJ, Jago GR. 1982. Metabolism of Streptecoccus thermophilus. II. Production of CO2 and NH3 from urea. Aust.J. Dairy Technol., 37:14-16.
  • 8. Gueimonde M, Alonso L, Delgado L, Bada-Gancedo JC, Reyes-Gavilan CG. 2003. Quality of plain yoghurt made from refrigerated and CO2-treated milk. Food Res. Int., 36: 43-48.
  • 9. Calvo MM, Montilla A, Cobos A. 1999. Lactic acid production and rheological properties of yoghurt made from milk acidified with carbon dioxide. J. Sci. Food Agr., 79:1208-1212.
  • 10. Karagül-Yüceer Y, Coggins PC, Wilson JC, White CHJ. 1999. Carbonated yogurt: sensory properties and consumer acceptance. J. Dairy Sci., 82:1394-1398.
  • 11. Karagül-Yüceer Y, Wilson JC, White CHJ. 2001. Formulations and processing of yogurt affect the microbiology quality of carbonated yoghurt. J. Dairy Sci., 84: 543-550.
  • 12. Vinderola CG, Gueimonde M, Delgado T, Reinheimer JAG, De Los Reyes-Gavilan CG. 2000. Characteristics of carbonated fermented milk and survival of probiotic bacteria. Int. Dairy J., 10: 213-220.
  • 13. Ogden LV. 1997. Process to produce carbonated semi-solid or solid food and the product thereof. Brigham Young Univ. Provö, UT, assignee. US. Pat. No. 5,624,700.
  • 14. Hotchkiss JH, Werner BG, Lee EYC. 2006. Addition of carbon dioxide to dairy products to improve quality: a comprehensive review. Compr. Rev. in Food Sci. Food Safety, 5:158-168.
  • 15. Deps-Louka E, Louka N, Abraham G, Chabot V, Allaf K. 1999. Effect of compressed carbon dioxide on microbial cell viability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65: 626-631.
  • 16. Van Hekken DL, Rajkowski KT, Tomasula PM, Tunick MH, Holsinger VH. 2000. Effect of carbon dioxide under high pressure on the survival of cheese starter cultures. J. Food Protect., 63: 758-762.
  • 17. Turkish Food Codex 2001. Fermented Milk Regulations. No. 2001 /21, Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs, Ankara.
  • 18. Tamime AY, Robinson RK. 2001. Yoghurt Science and Technology. CRC Press, NewYork, NY, USA.
  • 19. Richardson GH. 1993. Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products (16th edition). American Public Health Association, Washinton, DC, USA.
  • 20. Lees GJ, Jago GR. 1969. Methods for the estimation of acetaldehyde in cultured dairy products. Aust. J. Dairy Technol., 24: 181-185.
  • 21. Setinsholt K, Calbert HE. 1960. A rapid colorimetric method for determination of lactic acid in milk and milk products. Milchwissenschaft, 15: 7-10.
  • 22. Atarrier M, Gürsel A, Tamucay B, Gencer N, Yildirim G, Odabasi S, Karademir E, Şenel E, Kirdar S. 1999. [A study on the utilization of pectin in manufacture of long-life ayran]. Gida, 24:119-126.
  • 23. Caputri Jr A, Ueda M, Walter P, Brown T. 1970. Titrimetric determination of carbon dioxide in wine. Am. J. Enol.Viticulture, 21:140-144.
  • 24. Bracquart, P. 1981. An agar medium for the differential enumeration of Streptecoccus thermophilus and Lactobacilus bulgaricus in yogurt. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 51: 303-305.
  • 25. Bodyfelt FW, Tobias J, Trout GM. 1988. The Sensory Evaluation of Dairy Products. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York,NY, USA.
  • 26. Beshkova D, Simova E, Frengova G, Simov 2. 1998. Production of flavour compounds by yoghurt starter cultures. J.Indust. Microbiol. Biotehchnol., 20:180-186.
  • 27. Zhang Z., Goff HD. 2004. Protein distribution at air interfaces in dairy foams and ice cream as affected by casein dissociation and emulsifiers. Int. Dairy J., 14: 647-657.
  • 28. Daniels JA, Krishnamurthy R, Rizvi SS. 1985. A review of effects of carbon dioxide on microbial growth and food quality. J. Food Protect., 48: 532-537.
  • 29. Lin H.-M, Yang Z, Chen LF. 1992. An improved method for distruption of microbial cells with pressurized carbon dioxide. Biotechnol. Prog., 8:165-166.
  • 30. Van Aardt M, Duncan SE, Bourne D, Marcy JE, Long TE, Hackney CR, Helsey, C. 2001. Flavor threshold for acetaldehyde in milk, chocolate milk, and spring water using solid phase microextraction gas chromatography for quantification. J. Agr.Food Chem., 49:1377-1381.
  • 31. Wei Cl, Balaban MO, Fernando SY, Peplow AJ. 1991. Bacterial effect of high CO2 treatment on foods spiked with Listeria or Salmonella. J. Food Protect, 54:189-193.
  • 32. Ott A, Hugi A, Baumgartner M, Chaintreau A. 2000. Sensory investigation of yogurt flavour perception: mutual influence of volatiles and acidity. J. Agr. Food Chem., 48: 441-445.